efficiency of "pulling up" or "pedaling circles" (paging RacerEx)
#5
Making a kilometer blurry
I did a test on a 17% grade. 18-22% less power with running shoes vs. clipless pedals/shoes/cleats.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Look 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I watched the video. My conclusion: If you ride your bike on a tread mill in a laboratory, flat pedals are as good as clipless.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I heard a test existed with same everything (pedals, clips, shoes) at tempo power and compares a the power 1o'clock to 5o'clock position of a stomper vs. a spinner and the entire pedal circle. Anyone seen that?
I recall ...
They found it didn't make much difference - almost like the crank arm argument. Or...there really is no better pedal stroke.
Mountain bikers distributed power more evenly through the circle.
Pros put a larger % of the power in the 1-5 o'clock than rec.
I recall ...
They found it didn't make much difference - almost like the crank arm argument. Or...there really is no better pedal stroke.
Mountain bikers distributed power more evenly through the circle.
Pros put a larger % of the power in the 1-5 o'clock than rec.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
^ I read something similar. I think I found it on Steve Hogg's Site one day. If I recall, he discourages one-legged drills.
edit (not the same study, but some good discussion in the comments):
PEDALLING TECHNIQUE ? Which is best? » Bike Fit » Feet » Steve Hogg's Bike Fitting Website
edit (not the same study, but some good discussion in the comments):
PEDALLING TECHNIQUE ? Which is best? » Bike Fit » Feet » Steve Hogg's Bike Fitting Website
#9
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I imagine for a real test one would need to ride each platform (pun unavoidable) to and equal level of familiarity and comfort.
Anyway, clipless provides for nice bike control, confidence, and safety. I don't think we all prefer it in a mass hallucination/placebo.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Before this becomes one of those 5 pages of posts over what I didn't say (I know you tend to read my posts) I wanted to clarify.
-A cyclists needs good shoes and cleats. It is an aerobic sport, but one where power can be multiple times higher than tempo in sprints or climbs. Cleats are needed.
But, at least for the RR so much time is spent enduring and trying not to get fatigued and most aerobic systems are not taxed other than those annoying attacks. I think the low power tempo stroke should be looked at. My hunch is the square / less round strok may be better.
Early 80s I worked on this trainer attachment called the spin coach (working for Inventor for Inventors - not under any brand at the time) - basically a place to put your other foot so you could do one legged intervals. It was very effective improving spin. Everyone was selling spin then. As the guy building it I got good at spinning (200+). But, I really don't think it made me more powerful.
-A cyclists needs good shoes and cleats. It is an aerobic sport, but one where power can be multiple times higher than tempo in sprints or climbs. Cleats are needed.
But, at least for the RR so much time is spent enduring and trying not to get fatigued and most aerobic systems are not taxed other than those annoying attacks. I think the low power tempo stroke should be looked at. My hunch is the square / less round strok may be better.
Early 80s I worked on this trainer attachment called the spin coach (working for Inventor for Inventors - not under any brand at the time) - basically a place to put your other foot so you could do one legged intervals. It was very effective improving spin. Everyone was selling spin then. As the guy building it I got good at spinning (200+). But, I really don't think it made me more powerful.
Last edited by Doge; 10-31-14 at 05:11 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 557
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^ Looks like a good old Racer Mate Turbo Trainer. I still call my fluid trainer a wind trainer, does that make me old?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 6,313
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
250 Posts
I heard a test existed with same everything (pedals, clips, shoes) at tempo power and compares a the power 1o'clock to 5o'clock position of a stomper vs. a spinner and the entire pedal circle. Anyone seen that?
I recall ...
They found it didn't make much difference - almost like the crank arm argument. Or...there really is no better pedal stroke.
Mountain bikers distributed power more evenly through the circle.
Pros put a larger % of the power in the 1-5 o'clock than rec.
I recall ...
They found it didn't make much difference - almost like the crank arm argument. Or...there really is no better pedal stroke.
Mountain bikers distributed power more evenly through the circle.
Pros put a larger % of the power in the 1-5 o'clock than rec.
#16
Senior Member
So, making 300W takes the body about the same amount of effort as making 300W...
Would be useful to also see max power level available with each technique over some period of time.
Would be useful to also see max power level available with each technique over some period of time.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 2,470
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker, Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, Dahon Mu P 24 , Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Rodriguez Tandem, Wheeler MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rivendell Bicycles long ago published an article with a similar conclusion called the Shoe's Ruse The Shoes Ruse
I found it an interesting read, and consistent with my experiences. YMMV
I found it an interesting read, and consistent with my experiences. YMMV
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
That was a good read. Sometimes when my cleats got loose I'd also have auto adjustment forefoot/midfoot for those hills and spinning.
Shimano (or their VP is) is saying their platform DA pedals result in 5 more Watts than the others with smaller platforms. I'll be placing my order shortly.
Shimano (or their VP is) is saying their platform DA pedals result in 5 more Watts than the others with smaller platforms. I'll be placing my order shortly.
#19
ride lots be safe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Mmm I dunno bout that... I usually ride mtb with flats and sneakers and I do a helluva lot more technical stuff than on the road bike and have no problems with control, confidence, safety.
Ask any bmx'er or trials rider or downhiller if they prefer cleats or flats.
In fact there's a strong counter-argument that cleats are less safe - ask any cleated newbie who's fallen over due to failure to unclip.
WRT "mass hallucination/placebo" ... there are plenty of those already well documented in real life so it's hardly a convincing argument if you're suggesting that's a reason that people prefer cleats. We all know newbies who buy their first road bikes, get sold all the gear including cleats/pedals, and are barely even capable of operating a beach cruiser, much less a racing bike. But they'll happily repeat what the guy at the LBS told them about "efficiency" and "safety"
Adding also a sample size of 1: I've ridden 60 mile gravel grinders on my 29er with sneakers and flats and stayed with the leaders group the whole way. So it's definitely not accurate to say that flats are so much less efficient as to render a competitive rider non-competitive. That must also mean then that flats are pretty darn close to cleats in terms of real-world demands of a road race situation.
#20
These Guys Eat Oreos
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The other tidbit of the study was that after 2 weeks of cycling for 20 minutes a day pro athletes in other sports had better sprint power than pro cyclists. Of course, other pro athletes don't have to ride 80 miles a day to train and cannibalize their legs, but the point was you don't need to train an efficient pedal stroke.
#21
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
Mmm I dunno bout that... I usually ride mtb with flats and sneakers and I do a helluva lot more technical stuff than on the road bike and have no problems with control, confidence, safety.
Ask any bmx'er or trials rider or downhiller if they prefer cleats or flats.
In fact there's a strong counter-argument that cleats are less safe - ask any cleated newbie who's fallen over due to failure to unclip.
WRT "mass hallucination/placebo" ... there are plenty of those already well documented in real life so it's hardly a convincing argument if you're suggesting that's a reason that people prefer cleats. We all know newbies who buy their first road bikes, get sold all the gear including cleats/pedals, and are barely even capable of operating a beach cruiser, much less a racing bike. But they'll happily repeat what the guy at the LBS told them about "efficiency" and "safety"
Adding also a sample size of 1: I've ridden 60 mile gravel grinders on my 29er with sneakers and flats and stayed with the leaders group the whole way. So it's definitely not accurate to say that flats are so much less efficient as to render a competitive rider non-competitive. That must also mean then that flats are pretty darn close to cleats in terms of real-world demands of a road race situation.
Ask any bmx'er or trials rider or downhiller if they prefer cleats or flats.
In fact there's a strong counter-argument that cleats are less safe - ask any cleated newbie who's fallen over due to failure to unclip.
WRT "mass hallucination/placebo" ... there are plenty of those already well documented in real life so it's hardly a convincing argument if you're suggesting that's a reason that people prefer cleats. We all know newbies who buy their first road bikes, get sold all the gear including cleats/pedals, and are barely even capable of operating a beach cruiser, much less a racing bike. But they'll happily repeat what the guy at the LBS told them about "efficiency" and "safety"
Adding also a sample size of 1: I've ridden 60 mile gravel grinders on my 29er with sneakers and flats and stayed with the leaders group the whole way. So it's definitely not accurate to say that flats are so much less efficient as to render a competitive rider non-competitive. That must also mean then that flats are pretty darn close to cleats in terms of real-world demands of a road race situation.
#24
ride lots be safe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#25
Elite Fred
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945
Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
19 Posts
A few years ago I had to ride a 10 mile or so TT in sneakers because I forgot to take my cycling shoes.
I ended up taking off the TT bars because I couldn't ride the bike with them and not having shoes clipped in. It was too unstable that way.
So I rode Merckx style in sneakers without toe clips.
It sucked, but it wasn't that much slower than I would have expected otherwise.
I ended up taking off the TT bars because I couldn't ride the bike with them and not having shoes clipped in. It was too unstable that way.
So I rode Merckx style in sneakers without toe clips.
It sucked, but it wasn't that much slower than I would have expected otherwise.