Long vs short training rides for double century
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Long vs short training rides for double century
I'm aiming for a double century ride (~315km) in early January - a route of my own devising, with one 1000m climb and a few other undulating sections. Normally, in preparation I'd head out on lots of 100-150km rides, both for training and because I enjoy them. (My previous longest day ride was 220km, but back in 2014. I think I'm ok with the psychology and logistics parts of the ride, I'm just trying to get back into that kind of shape from a kind of moderate fitness base.).
However. My city is currently in lockdown, with a vague rule about "not exercising outside your neighborhood". So to do more than about 40km at a time basically means loops, which I find a bit dull if they're back to back.
So my question is: what is the difference in outcome between say:
1) Monday: 2x40km loops back to back (80km), Tuesday rest
2) Monday: 40km loop, Tuesday: 40km loop
That is: is it better or worse for that second loop to be straight after the first one, or when starting fresh?
I am currently also doing a bit of interval training, although since I'm a bit new to it, I'm probably not doing it "right". (Basically, riding up a hill as hard as I can, which takes around 2 minutes, ~4 times in a row.)
(I'm lucky to have quite a bit of flexibility in my schedule, and can ride during business hours. Less lucky to live in a big, locked down city with a lot of people on bike paths etc, and police waiting to question you about being too far from home...)
However. My city is currently in lockdown, with a vague rule about "not exercising outside your neighborhood". So to do more than about 40km at a time basically means loops, which I find a bit dull if they're back to back.
So my question is: what is the difference in outcome between say:
1) Monday: 2x40km loops back to back (80km), Tuesday rest
2) Monday: 40km loop, Tuesday: 40km loop
That is: is it better or worse for that second loop to be straight after the first one, or when starting fresh?
I am currently also doing a bit of interval training, although since I'm a bit new to it, I'm probably not doing it "right". (Basically, riding up a hill as hard as I can, which takes around 2 minutes, ~4 times in a row.)
(I'm lucky to have quite a bit of flexibility in my schedule, and can ride during business hours. Less lucky to live in a big, locked down city with a lot of people on bike paths etc, and police waiting to question you about being too far from home...)
#2
Senior Member
I did some loops back in March and April when the advice was to avoid shops and cafes, it wasn't too bad. I ended up doing cloverleaf-style rides instead of the same loop out-and-back, but if you've only one good loop you can reverse it for a bit of variety. I would rather do a 80km ride for the endurance benefits of the longer ride rather than back-to-back 40km days. The 40km rides would be good to do for some rides at higher intensity though, so there's room for both.
#3
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times
in
2,497 Posts
I don't think you need to be distance training just yet. Whatever keeps you fresh. Hopefully the lockdown will work and by october you'll be able to do longer rides without danger of official sanction
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
I'm aiming for a double century ride (~315km) in early January - a route of my own devising, with one 1000m climb and a few other undulating sections. Normally, in preparation I'd head out on lots of 100-150km rides, both for training and because I enjoy them. (My previous longest day ride was 220km, but back in 2014. I think I'm ok with the psychology and logistics parts of the ride, I'm just trying to get back into that kind of shape from a kind of moderate fitness base.).
However. My city is currently in lockdown, with a vague rule about "not exercising outside your neighborhood". So to do more than about 40km at a time basically means loops, which I find a bit dull if they're back to back.
So my question is: what is the difference in outcome between say:
1) Monday: 2x40km loops back to back (80km), Tuesday rest
2) Monday: 40km loop, Tuesday: 40km loop
However. My city is currently in lockdown, with a vague rule about "not exercising outside your neighborhood". So to do more than about 40km at a time basically means loops, which I find a bit dull if they're back to back.
So my question is: what is the difference in outcome between say:
1) Monday: 2x40km loops back to back (80km), Tuesday rest
2) Monday: 40km loop, Tuesday: 40km loop
Stress is proportional to the square of exertion in terms of both accumulating fitness and spending it.
At 30% lower effort you can go twice as long.
I am currently also doing a bit of interval training, although since I'm a bit new to it, I'm probably not doing it "right". (Basically, riding up a hill as hard as I can, which takes around 2 minutes, ~4 times in a row.)
Stop when you can't exceed your anaerobic threshold because you're accumulating fatigue without doing much to improve fitness.
Likes For Drew Eckhardt:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Stephen Seiler opined 7-10 minute intervals as hard as possible were most efficient at lifting VO2max and power at lactate threshold.
Stop when you can't exceed your anaerobic threshold because you're accumulating fatigue without doing much to improve fitness.[/QUOTE]
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
Which then made me realise that the needs of elite athletes and myself are pretty different.
Studies have found benefits from polarized training down to four hours a week.
E.g. https://www.peakendurancesport.com/e...onal-athletes/ although it may be a bit contrived.
"For example, one study looked at cyclists who completed two blocks of 6-week endurance training periods with similar total training volumes but with differing intensity distributions(1):
Polarized, averaging 6.4 hours per week spending 80%, 0% and 20% of training time in low, moderate and high intensity zones respectively;
A much more middle of the road (threshold training) block, averaging 7.5 hours per week spending 57%, 43% and 0% of training time in low, moderate and high intensity zones respectively.
Although both training periods produced fitness gains, the polarized training regime resulted in a 5% extra gain in peak power output, a 48% extra gain in high-intensity exercise capacity and a 7% extra gain in power output at lactate threshold"
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
E.g. https://www.peakendurancesport.com/e...onal-athletes/ although it may be a bit contrived.
"For example, one study looked at cyclists who completed two blocks of 6-week endurance training periods with similar total training volumes but with differing intensity distributions(1):
Polarized, averaging 6.4 hours per week spending 80%, 0% and 20% of training time in low, moderate and high intensity zones respectively;
A much more middle of the road (threshold training) block, averaging 7.5 hours per week spending 57%, 43% and 0% of training time in low, moderate and high intensity zones respectively.
Although both training periods produced fitness gains, the polarized training regime resulted in a 5% extra gain in peak power output, a 48% extra gain in high-intensity exercise capacity and a 7% extra gain in power output at lactate threshold"
"For example, one study looked at cyclists who completed two blocks of 6-week endurance training periods with similar total training volumes but with differing intensity distributions(1):
Polarized, averaging 6.4 hours per week spending 80%, 0% and 20% of training time in low, moderate and high intensity zones respectively;
A much more middle of the road (threshold training) block, averaging 7.5 hours per week spending 57%, 43% and 0% of training time in low, moderate and high intensity zones respectively.
Although both training periods produced fitness gains, the polarized training regime resulted in a 5% extra gain in peak power output, a 48% extra gain in high-intensity exercise capacity and a 7% extra gain in power output at lactate threshold"
> In terms of training prescription then, it is likely that many recreational athletes may not need to adopt a polarized approach to maximise performance – although including some zone-3 sessions is still likely to produce benefits.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
One of the other motivations is to improve my fitness enough that I can keep up with some of my friends for joint training rides when they become possible as well. I have one friend who is still commuting to work, 18km each way 5 days a week. Eep.
#9
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times
in
2,497 Posts
Getting in shape is fine, but you don't really need distance to do that. I feel like the occasional 100-200km ride is helpful, but also that's what I'm training for anyway.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,655
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 609 Times
in
458 Posts
Drew Eckhardt great advice. I watched a GCN segment on Mark Beaumont and what he did to cycle around the world. He had the same bit of advice, shorter more intense rides. There was also a forum member who rode the dirty kanza with nothing more then short intense rides under his belt, but he also made use of a power meter and heart rate monitor.
#11
mosquito rancher
Here's a long article discussing polarized training. The author does give recommendations for how to do it, but also seems kind of negative about the idea--his criticisms seem to be that novices can get big gains from it, but can get big gains from anything, and pros can get big gains from it, but only because they put in such massive volumes of low-intensity work.
__________________
Adam Rice
Adam Rice
#12
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times
in
2,497 Posts
I was surprised at how much gain I got last year from a series of 100km rides. But I only did that for a few weeks before a 600km ride. That's why I was saying that could wait until deeper into late spring.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,009
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times
in
34 Posts
(My previous longest day ride was 220km, but back in 2014. I think I'm ok with the psychology and logistics parts of the ride, I'm just trying to get back into that kind of shape from a kind of moderate fitness base.).
Most of long-distance riding technique is about selecting the correct starting pace and knowing how and when you may alter that pace as conditions on the ride present themselves.
Having a good base of saddle time is usually more important than calculating specific training sessions.
Good luck.