Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

MTB drop conversion bottom bracket & crankset woes

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

MTB drop conversion bottom bracket & crankset woes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-20, 10:38 AM
  #1  
janthenat
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
janthenat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 66

Bikes: 1995 GT Tequesta, 20?? Miele Toscana 300

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 15 Posts
MTB drop conversion bottom bracket & crankset woes

So, i have this converted mtb... https://www.bikeforums.net/20949423-post153.html

I built it up with a BB386evo BSA bottom bracket and FSA Gossamer Pro ABS 386evo crankset. This setup was very tight at the chainstays for the crank arms and chainrings. VERY tight with only a couple mm clearance, so close that my cadence sensor magnet which sticks to the backside of the left pedal spindle was too thick, and gunk from the 36t chainring was building up on the chainstay. I had to put a spacer on each side to allow that little bit of clearance, and now the bb bearings are shot, at least on the non-drive side, grinding and crunching.

For now I'll throw on a square taper bb and cheapo crankset so I can finish the season. But, I might be interested in a more modern solution to provide appropriate crank arm and chainring clearance.

Any suggestions? I'm open to just about anything, and I'm not tied to any particular bb standard as long as it will work on my BSA frame. Thanks!
janthenat is offline  
Old 09-07-20, 12:34 PM
  #2  
dsbrantjr
Senior Member
 
dsbrantjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times in 723 Posts
I never saw any reason to get away from square taper BBs in the first place. "More modern" does not always mean "better", often it means "cheaper for the manufacturer".
dsbrantjr is offline  
Likes For dsbrantjr:
Old 09-07-20, 12:45 PM
  #3  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,489
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1083 Post(s)
Liked 686 Times in 440 Posts
The correct chainline for that bike is 47.5 - 50.0 mm. A Shimano UN55 square taper is an excellent choice and you can get whatever size you need to get your chainline correct. You need to choose your crankset first and then buy the BB that gives you the right chainline for that crankset. I like Sugino XD600 cranksets for my vintage MTBs. You might have to go one size larger BB from what was the original length.

Despite "newer" systems, square taper is still my preferred crankset.

Last edited by Jeff Neese; 09-07-20 at 12:48 PM.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Likes For Jeff Neese:
Old 09-07-20, 02:39 PM
  #4  
janthenat
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
janthenat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 66

Bikes: 1995 GT Tequesta, 20?? Miele Toscana 300

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 15 Posts
As it happens I have a new Shimano un55 bb hanging around. Before i converted this bike it had the original Shimano 21 series cartridge bb... which worked problem free for 20+ years. Yea, maybe square taper is not such a bad idea. ;^)
janthenat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.