which size (I'm between sizes)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
which size (I'm between sizes)
Hello everyone,
I'm considering a BMC Roadmachine ONE
I am 184 cm / 6 feet
My inseam is 90cm / 34 inches
and my arm is 71 cm / 28 inches
I made the chart below comparing 56 to 58
Difference in size (to me) appears minimal
But I realize a cm can also affect fit.
Opinions?
Thank you
I'm considering a BMC Roadmachine ONE
I am 184 cm / 6 feet
My inseam is 90cm / 34 inches
and my arm is 71 cm / 28 inches
I made the chart below comparing 56 to 58
Difference in size (to me) appears minimal
But I realize a cm can also affect fit.
Opinions?
Thank you
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Just pick one and be happy. If you are in the overlap they'll both be good. What you might want to look at are whether crank lengths, handlebar width and any other component changes that might matter more to you.
The smaller frame will give you a more livelier ride. Some like that and others don't.
The smaller frame will give you a more livelier ride. Some like that and others don't.
#3
Senior Member
Rather than an inseam measurement, measure your actual saddle height to pick the best stack height to produce your desired saddle to bar drop, without a lot of spacers or a high rise stem. There's a big difference between a properly measured cycling inseam and a pants inseam. I never know which might be used.
With a 73cm saddle height, I look for a stack height in the 520-530 range to produce a maximum saddle to bar drop of 10cm. Changing from a -17 stem to a -6 will raise the bars by about 2cm.
With a 73cm saddle height, I look for a stack height in the 520-530 range to produce a maximum saddle to bar drop of 10cm. Changing from a -17 stem to a -6 will raise the bars by about 2cm.
#4
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
The front of the bars around the hoods or in the drops are already behind the front wheel contact area and well behind the front axle, and you probably don't want to ride that bike with an excessively short stem since that would bring it back even further. I'd go with the next size down. I test rode the RM02 in 56 and it felt a bit big for me at 6'0. I ended up buying a Cervelo C3 in 54, but liked the RM02 and it would have been my second choice, also in 54. It's easier to add a little reach, especially to an endurance steering geometry, than it is to try to remove it. But I was also in the market for a bike to spend all day on, which is a little different from something spent an hour or two on - for the latter it almost doesn't matter, at least to me.
__________________
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
#5
Full Member
Hello everyone,
I'm considering a BMC Roadmachine ONE
I am 184 cm / 6 feet
My inseam is 90cm / 34 inches
and my arm is 71 cm / 28 inches
I made the chart below comparing 56 to 58
Difference in size (to me) appears minimal
But I realize a cm can also affect fit.
Opinions?
Thank you
I'm considering a BMC Roadmachine ONE
I am 184 cm / 6 feet
My inseam is 90cm / 34 inches
and my arm is 71 cm / 28 inches
I made the chart below comparing 56 to 58
Difference in size (to me) appears minimal
But I realize a cm can also affect fit.
Opinions?
Thank you
1: A 60 cm Trek Emonda,
2. A 60 cm Trek Madone
3. A 58 cm Colnago CLX3.0
4. A 58 cm Lemond Zurich
5. A 64 cm Backroads Touring bike.
Now if you are a professional racer, it is pretty important that you have exactly the correct size that would center you perfectly over the center of mass of the bike. The precise measurements is very important because these guys literally live on their bikes so changing the position on the bike can cause them muscle damage. So this is so critical that they now use digital readout measuring tools for everything from the seat height to the damn tilt of the saddle.
But this doesn't apply to people who put in less than 5 or 10,000 miles per year. Saddle height is important only insofar that if you are off more than a couple of percent you get knee pain. If the reach is incorrect you get shoulder, arm and hand pains. None of this is serious and you just play around with it until it is correct. Even crank arm length from 170-175 mm is not important in any way other than saddle height since this is measure from crank BDC to to saddle surface.
If you intend on being a pro racer by all means get a custom measurement and follow them to the letter. Otherwise there are very few measurements that make much difference in anything other than your comfort. Saddle position is adjustable, stems are changeable. Handlebar width is changeable. Old steel frames I used to ride a 62 cm
#6
Senior Member
If you are in between sizes you should most likely find an other model. Compromising one ore more measurements just isnt wort it in a market with hundreds of models to choose from.
#7
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,623
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 549 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
365 Posts
All other things being equal, the smaller one will leave more room in the shed for another bike.
Likes For znomit:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,673
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1158 Post(s)
Liked 439 Times
in
312 Posts
The 58 has a taller headtube (206mm compared to 181 mm) and a 1cm longer top tube. Do you like to get a little lower and have no neck or back issues? If yes, the 56 might be a bit quicker. If you need the extra headtube height for comfort then the 58 might make riding the drops a bit more comfort oriented for you. In that case you would also need to consider what stem length or handlebar drop you want.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Just pick one and be happy. If you are in the overlap they'll both be good. What you might want to look at are whether crank lengths, handlebar width and any other component changes that might matter more to you.
The smaller frame will give you a more livelier ride. Some like that and others don't.
The smaller frame will give you a more livelier ride. Some like that and others don't.
It, naturally, felt more nimble.
Thank you for your input.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Rather than an inseam measurement, measure your actual saddle height to pick the best stack height to produce your desired saddle to bar drop, without a lot of spacers or a high rise stem. There's a big difference between a properly measured cycling inseam and a pants inseam. I never know which might be used.
With a 73cm saddle height, I look for a stack height in the 520-530 range to produce a maximum saddle to bar drop of 10cm. Changing from a -17 stem to a -6 will raise the bars by about 2cm.
With a 73cm saddle height, I look for a stack height in the 520-530 range to produce a maximum saddle to bar drop of 10cm. Changing from a -17 stem to a -6 will raise the bars by about 2cm.
Thank you for your contribution.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The front of the bars around the hoods or in the drops are already behind the front wheel contact area and well behind the front axle, and you probably don't want to ride that bike with an excessively short stem since that would bring it back even further. I'd go with the next size down. I test rode the RM02 in 56 and it felt a bit big for me at 6'0. I ended up buying a Cervelo C3 in 54, but liked the RM02 and it would have been my second choice, also in 54. It's easier to add a little reach, especially to an endurance steering geometry, than it is to try to remove it. But I was also in the market for a bike to spend all day on, which is a little different from something spent an hour or two on - for the latter it almost doesn't matter, at least to me.
Assuming proportionate legs/torso/arms.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I really don't know what gives you the idea that you are "between sizes." I am 6'4" and with a 34" inseam. My bikes are:
1: A 60 cm Trek Emonda,
2. A 60 cm Trek Madone
3. A 58 cm Colnago CLX3.0
4. A 58 cm Lemond Zurich
5. A 64 cm Backroads Touring bike.
Now if you are a professional racer, it is pretty important that you have exactly the correct size that would center you perfectly over the center of mass of the bike. The precise measurements is very important because these guys literally live on their bikes so changing the position on the bike can cause them muscle damage. So this is so critical that they now use digital readout measuring tools for everything from the seat height to the damn tilt of the saddle.
But this doesn't apply to people who put in less than 5 or 10,000 miles per year. Saddle height is important only insofar that if you are off more than a couple of percent you get knee pain. If the reach is incorrect you get shoulder, arm and hand pains. None of this is serious and you just play around with it until it is correct. Even crank arm length from 170-175 mm is not important in any way other than saddle height since this is measure from crank BDC to to saddle surface.
If you intend on being a pro racer by all means get a custom measurement and follow them to the letter. Otherwise there are very few measurements that make much difference in anything other than your comfort. Saddle position is adjustable, stems are changeable. Handlebar width is changeable. Old steel frames I used to ride a 62 cm
1: A 60 cm Trek Emonda,
2. A 60 cm Trek Madone
3. A 58 cm Colnago CLX3.0
4. A 58 cm Lemond Zurich
5. A 64 cm Backroads Touring bike.
Now if you are a professional racer, it is pretty important that you have exactly the correct size that would center you perfectly over the center of mass of the bike. The precise measurements is very important because these guys literally live on their bikes so changing the position on the bike can cause them muscle damage. So this is so critical that they now use digital readout measuring tools for everything from the seat height to the damn tilt of the saddle.
But this doesn't apply to people who put in less than 5 or 10,000 miles per year. Saddle height is important only insofar that if you are off more than a couple of percent you get knee pain. If the reach is incorrect you get shoulder, arm and hand pains. None of this is serious and you just play around with it until it is correct. Even crank arm length from 170-175 mm is not important in any way other than saddle height since this is measure from crank BDC to to saddle surface.
If you intend on being a pro racer by all means get a custom measurement and follow them to the letter. Otherwise there are very few measurements that make much difference in anything other than your comfort. Saddle position is adjustable, stems are changeable. Handlebar width is changeable. Old steel frames I used to ride a 62 cm
You can see that there is overlap between 56 and 58 - in rider height.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The 58 has a taller headtube (206mm compared to 181 mm) and a 1cm longer top tube. Do you like to get a little lower and have no neck or back issues? If yes, the 56 might be a bit quicker. If you need the extra headtube height for comfort then the 58 might make riding the drops a bit more comfort oriented for you. In that case you would also need to consider what stem length or handlebar drop you want.
This is why I went with the 56. I was less draped across the top tube.
Thank you for your input.
Likes For hedonist222:
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#20
Senior Member
The reach difference between the two frames is a trivial 4mm, but the stack difference is 24mm. The smaller frame can be matched to the larger one with spacers and/or more stem angle. That's why it's important to start with saddle height and know how much saddle to bar drop you want. If you're sure that the minimum stack on the larger frame is OK, then choose it, but be aware of lowering limitations.
In my case, I have a 527mm stack and it works with only the 15mm headset top, no spacers and a -17 stem. Once the steerer is cut for no spacers, only stem angle can be used to raise the bars. If I ever need more bar height, I'll just go back to a -6 or -8 stem.
In my case, I have a 527mm stack and it works with only the 15mm headset top, no spacers and a -17 stem. Once the steerer is cut for no spacers, only stem angle can be used to raise the bars. If I ever need more bar height, I'll just go back to a -6 or -8 stem.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 781
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 479 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
156 Posts
I fit on 60s and 58s and have moved to 58s with longer stems/posts. The 58s just feel better. That's hard to quantify but, in the end, what mattered for me.
As a bonus - if you sell your old bikes, there's a MUCH bigger market for the smaller frames, e.g. 54, 56
As a bonus - if you sell your old bikes, there's a MUCH bigger market for the smaller frames, e.g. 54, 56
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The reach difference between the two frames is a trivial 4mm, but the stack difference is 24mm. The smaller frame can be matched to the larger one with spacers and/or more stem angle. That's why it's important to start with saddle height and know how much saddle to bar drop you want. If you're sure that the minimum stack on the larger frame is OK, then choose it, but be aware of lowering limitations.
In my case, I have a 527mm stack and it works with only the 15mm headset top, no spacers and a -17 stem. Once the steerer is cut for no spacers, only stem angle can be used to raise the bars. If I ever need more bar height, I'll just go back to a -6 or -8 stem.
In my case, I have a 527mm stack and it works with only the 15mm headset top, no spacers and a -17 stem. Once the steerer is cut for no spacers, only stem angle can be used to raise the bars. If I ever need more bar height, I'll just go back to a -6 or -8 stem.
Since my torso is more upright? And tube top length is only 4mm more?
#23
Senior Member
A taller stack height does not produce a more comfortable ride. It does change the lowest possible bar height. I'm comfortable with my 10cm saddle to bar drop, but if you only want less, then plan your setup accordingly. There are riders who only have a 2cm drop, but that requires a tall head tube, maybe 20mm of spacer and a high rise stem.
Likes For DaveSSS:
#24
Senior Member
Do you have a current road bike? If so, and you're comfortable with its fit, I would take measurements from that and compare it to the bikes you're considering. Even better if you can compare measurements in person to the actual bike.
Even better if there is a fitter you can consult. Bike fit isn't straight forward, and it's worth spending some time and money with a fitter to confirm you're getting the right size.
Even better if there is a fitter you can consult. Bike fit isn't straight forward, and it's worth spending some time and money with a fitter to confirm you're getting the right size.
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Do you have a current road bike? If so, and you're comfortable with its fit, I would take measurements from that and compare it to the bikes you're considering. Even better if you can compare measurements in person to the actual bike.
Even better if there is a fitter you can consult. Bike fit isn't straight forward, and it's worth spending some time and money with a fitter to confirm you're getting the right size.
Even better if there is a fitter you can consult. Bike fit isn't straight forward, and it's worth spending some time and money with a fitter to confirm you're getting the right size.
Most fitters here want to size me for slow-selling stock in the brand they carry.
I've settled on a 56 Roadmachine
Rode out today
Phenomenal