Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

which size (I'm between sizes)

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

which size (I'm between sizes)

Old 09-19-20, 07:55 AM
  #1  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
which size (I'm between sizes)

Hello everyone,

I'm considering a BMC Roadmachine ONE

I am 184 cm / 6 feet
My inseam is 90cm / 34 inches
and my arm is 71 cm / 28 inches
I made the chart below comparing 56 to 58
Difference in size (to me) appears minimal
But I realize a cm can also affect fit.
Opinions?
Thank you

hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-19-20, 10:04 AM
  #2  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Just pick one and be happy. If you are in the overlap they'll both be good. What you might want to look at are whether crank lengths, handlebar width and any other component changes that might matter more to you.

The smaller frame will give you a more livelier ride. Some like that and others don't.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 07:13 AM
  #3  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,213

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 443 Posts
Rather than an inseam measurement, measure your actual saddle height to pick the best stack height to produce your desired saddle to bar drop, without a lot of spacers or a high rise stem. There's a big difference between a properly measured cycling inseam and a pants inseam. I never know which might be used.

With a 73cm saddle height, I look for a stack height in the 520-530 range to produce a maximum saddle to bar drop of 10cm. Changing from a -17 stem to a -6 will raise the bars by about 2cm.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 12:24 PM
  #4  
sfrider 
Asleep at the bars
 
sfrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 135 Posts
The front of the bars around the hoods or in the drops are already behind the front wheel contact area and well behind the front axle, and you probably don't want to ride that bike with an excessively short stem since that would bring it back even further. I'd go with the next size down. I test rode the RM02 in 56 and it felt a bit big for me at 6'0. I ended up buying a Cervelo C3 in 54, but liked the RM02 and it would have been my second choice, also in 54. It's easier to add a little reach, especially to an endurance steering geometry, than it is to try to remove it. But I was also in the market for a bike to spend all day on, which is a little different from something spent an hour or two on - for the latter it almost doesn't matter, at least to me.
__________________
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop

sfrider is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 12:51 PM
  #5  
RiceAWay
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times in 81 Posts
Originally Posted by hedonist222
Hello everyone,

I'm considering a BMC Roadmachine ONE

I am 184 cm / 6 feet
My inseam is 90cm / 34 inches
and my arm is 71 cm / 28 inches
I made the chart below comparing 56 to 58
Difference in size (to me) appears minimal
But I realize a cm can also affect fit.
Opinions?
Thank you

I really don't know what gives you the idea that you are "between sizes." I am 6'4" and with a 34" inseam. My bikes are:
1: A 60 cm Trek Emonda,
2. A 60 cm Trek Madone
3. A 58 cm Colnago CLX3.0
4. A 58 cm Lemond Zurich
5. A 64 cm Backroads Touring bike.

Now if you are a professional racer, it is pretty important that you have exactly the correct size that would center you perfectly over the center of mass of the bike. The precise measurements is very important because these guys literally live on their bikes so changing the position on the bike can cause them muscle damage. So this is so critical that they now use digital readout measuring tools for everything from the seat height to the damn tilt of the saddle.

But this doesn't apply to people who put in less than 5 or 10,000 miles per year. Saddle height is important only insofar that if you are off more than a couple of percent you get knee pain. If the reach is incorrect you get shoulder, arm and hand pains. None of this is serious and you just play around with it until it is correct. Even crank arm length from 170-175 mm is not important in any way other than saddle height since this is measure from crank BDC to to saddle surface.

If you intend on being a pro racer by all means get a custom measurement and follow them to the letter. Otherwise there are very few measurements that make much difference in anything other than your comfort. Saddle position is adjustable, stems are changeable. Handlebar width is changeable. Old steel frames I used to ride a 62 cm
RiceAWay is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 01:35 PM
  #6  
Racing Dan
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,224
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 316 Times in 214 Posts
If you are in between sizes you should most likely find an other model. Compromising one ore more measurements just isnt wort it in a market with hundreds of models to choose from.
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 03:38 PM
  #7  
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,623

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 549 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times in 365 Posts
All other things being equal, the smaller one will leave more room in the shed for another bike.
znomit is offline  
Likes For znomit:
Old 09-20-20, 04:51 PM
  #8  
masi61
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,673

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1158 Post(s)
Liked 439 Times in 312 Posts
The 58 has a taller headtube (206mm compared to 181 mm) and a 1cm longer top tube. Do you like to get a little lower and have no neck or back issues? If yes, the 56 might be a bit quicker. If you need the extra headtube height for comfort then the 58 might make riding the drops a bit more comfort oriented for you. In that case you would also need to consider what stem length or handlebar drop you want.
masi61 is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 07:25 PM
  #9  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
56
Dean V is offline  
Old 09-20-20, 09:16 PM
  #10  
Hapsmo911
Senior Member
 
Hapsmo911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 18 Posts
can make a smaller bike bigger cant make a bigger bike smaller
Hapsmo911 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:10 AM
  #11  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
Just pick one and be happy. If you are in the overlap they'll both be good. What you might want to look at are whether crank lengths, handlebar width and any other component changes that might matter more to you.

The smaller frame will give you a more livelier ride. Some like that and others don't.
Thank you and thats why I picked 56 over 58.
It, naturally, felt more nimble.

Thank you for your input.
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:11 AM
  #12  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Rather than an inseam measurement, measure your actual saddle height to pick the best stack height to produce your desired saddle to bar drop, without a lot of spacers or a high rise stem. There's a big difference between a properly measured cycling inseam and a pants inseam. I never know which might be used.

With a 73cm saddle height, I look for a stack height in the 520-530 range to produce a maximum saddle to bar drop of 10cm. Changing from a -17 stem to a -6 will raise the bars by about 2cm.
I used a measured inseam in my OP.

Thank you for your contribution.
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:14 AM
  #13  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by sfrider
The front of the bars around the hoods or in the drops are already behind the front wheel contact area and well behind the front axle, and you probably don't want to ride that bike with an excessively short stem since that would bring it back even further. I'd go with the next size down. I test rode the RM02 in 56 and it felt a bit big for me at 6'0. I ended up buying a Cervelo C3 in 54, but liked the RM02 and it would have been my second choice, also in 54. It's easier to add a little reach, especially to an endurance steering geometry, than it is to try to remove it. But I was also in the market for a bike to spend all day on, which is a little different from something spent an hour or two on - for the latter it almost doesn't matter, at least to me.
If you're 6'0 and prefer a 54 - don't you (we) end up in a fetal/prawn position?

Assuming proportionate legs/torso/arms.
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:15 AM
  #14  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by RiceAWay
I really don't know what gives you the idea that you are "between sizes." I am 6'4" and with a 34" inseam. My bikes are:
1: A 60 cm Trek Emonda,
2. A 60 cm Trek Madone
3. A 58 cm Colnago CLX3.0
4. A 58 cm Lemond Zurich
5. A 64 cm Backroads Touring bike.

Now if you are a professional racer, it is pretty important that you have exactly the correct size that would center you perfectly over the center of mass of the bike. The precise measurements is very important because these guys literally live on their bikes so changing the position on the bike can cause them muscle damage. So this is so critical that they now use digital readout measuring tools for everything from the seat height to the damn tilt of the saddle.

But this doesn't apply to people who put in less than 5 or 10,000 miles per year. Saddle height is important only insofar that if you are off more than a couple of percent you get knee pain. If the reach is incorrect you get shoulder, arm and hand pains. None of this is serious and you just play around with it until it is correct. Even crank arm length from 170-175 mm is not important in any way other than saddle height since this is measure from crank BDC to to saddle surface.

If you intend on being a pro racer by all means get a custom measurement and follow them to the letter. Otherwise there are very few measurements that make much difference in anything other than your comfort. Saddle position is adjustable, stems are changeable. Handlebar width is changeable. Old steel frames I used to ride a 62 cm
The chart I posted is directly from BMC on the Roadmachine.
You can see that there is overlap between 56 and 58 - in rider height.
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:16 AM
  #15  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
All other things being equal, the smaller one will leave more room in the shed for another bike.
heh heh heh

good one
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:18 AM
  #16  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by masi61
The 58 has a taller headtube (206mm compared to 181 mm) and a 1cm longer top tube. Do you like to get a little lower and have no neck or back issues? If yes, the 56 might be a bit quicker. If you need the extra headtube height for comfort then the 58 might make riding the drops a bit more comfort oriented for you. In that case you would also need to consider what stem length or handlebar drop you want.
I don't have a very flexible neck. Meaning, the more stretched I am over the top tube (tank in a motorcycle), the harder it is for me to flex/pivot my neck upwards.

This is why I went with the 56. I was less draped across the top tube.

Thank you for your input.
hedonist222 is offline  
Likes For hedonist222:
Old 09-21-20, 04:18 AM
  #17  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Hapsmo911
can make a smaller bike bigger cant make a bigger bike smaller
Very briefly, how so?

Thank you.
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:23 AM
  #18  
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,623

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 549 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times in 365 Posts
Originally Posted by hedonist222
Very briefly, how so?
You can put on a longer stem and raise the seat to make a smaller frame accomodate a larger rider.
znomit is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 04:26 AM
  #19  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
You can put on a longer stem and raise the seat to make a smaller frame accomodate a larger rider.
and I imagine the reverse is not so compatible (shorter stem and lowered seat on a larger bike), why?
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 06:55 AM
  #20  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,213

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 443 Posts
The reach difference between the two frames is a trivial 4mm, but the stack difference is 24mm. The smaller frame can be matched to the larger one with spacers and/or more stem angle. That's why it's important to start with saddle height and know how much saddle to bar drop you want. If you're sure that the minimum stack on the larger frame is OK, then choose it, but be aware of lowering limitations.

In my case, I have a 527mm stack and it works with only the 15mm headset top, no spacers and a -17 stem. Once the steerer is cut for no spacers, only stem angle can be used to raise the bars. If I ever need more bar height, I'll just go back to a -6 or -8 stem.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 07:15 AM
  #21  
Zaskar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 781
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 479 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 156 Posts
I fit on 60s and 58s and have moved to 58s with longer stems/posts. The 58s just feel better. That's hard to quantify but, in the end, what mattered for me.

As a bonus - if you sell your old bikes, there's a MUCH bigger market for the smaller frames, e.g. 54, 56
Zaskar is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 07:22 AM
  #22  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
The reach difference between the two frames is a trivial 4mm, but the stack difference is 24mm. The smaller frame can be matched to the larger one with spacers and/or more stem angle. That's why it's important to start with saddle height and know how much saddle to bar drop you want. If you're sure that the minimum stack on the larger frame is OK, then choose it, but be aware of lowering limitations.

In my case, I have a 527mm stack and it works with only the 15mm headset top, no spacers and a -17 stem. Once the steerer is cut for no spacers, only stem angle can be used to raise the bars. If I ever need more bar height, I'll just go back to a -6 or -8 stem.
If the 58 stack is 24mm more (higher), wouldn't that mean a more comfortable ride?
Since my torso is more upright? And tube top length is only 4mm more?
hedonist222 is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 07:50 AM
  #23  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,213

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 443 Posts
A taller stack height does not produce a more comfortable ride. It does change the lowest possible bar height. I'm comfortable with my 10cm saddle to bar drop, but if you only want less, then plan your setup accordingly. There are riders who only have a 2cm drop, but that requires a tall head tube, maybe 20mm of spacer and a high rise stem.
DaveSSS is offline  
Likes For DaveSSS:
Old 09-21-20, 09:02 AM
  #24  
drewtk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 31 Posts
Do you have a current road bike? If so, and you're comfortable with its fit, I would take measurements from that and compare it to the bikes you're considering. Even better if you can compare measurements in person to the actual bike.

Even better if there is a fitter you can consult. Bike fit isn't straight forward, and it's worth spending some time and money with a fitter to confirm you're getting the right size.
drewtk is offline  
Old 09-21-20, 11:34 AM
  #25  
hedonist222
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hedonist222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: abu dhabi, dubai - UAE
Posts: 58

Bikes: BMC Roadmachine ONE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by drewtk
Do you have a current road bike? If so, and you're comfortable with its fit, I would take measurements from that and compare it to the bikes you're considering. Even better if you can compare measurements in person to the actual bike.

Even better if there is a fitter you can consult. Bike fit isn't straight forward, and it's worth spending some time and money with a fitter to confirm you're getting the right size.
Alas , no current road bike.
Most fitters here want to size me for slow-selling stock in the brand they carry.

I've settled on a 56 Roadmachine
Rode out today

Phenomenal
hedonist222 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.