Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Correct tyre pressure?

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Correct tyre pressure?

Old 04-30-20, 12:38 PM
  #26  
bran1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 53

Bikes: 2020 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
That sounds right to me for 25s. The rear will generally be at higher risk of pinch flats, so you don't want to underinflate it. If your frame can fit 28s, that would be much better.
Which one sounds right - the 91/114 psi or the 51/51psi?

I'm not sure if my frame accommodates 28s. So far I am loving the "zippiness" of the 25's compared to the 2.25" on my 29'er. haha.
bran1986 is offline  
Old 04-30-20, 12:46 PM
  #27  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,626

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Originally Posted by bran1986
Which one sounds right - the 91 and 114 or the 51?

I'm not sure if my frame accommodates 28s. So far I am loving the "zippiness" of the 25's compared to the 2.25" on my 29'er. haha.
Both. Since there is less weight on the front of most bikes, it makes sense to use less air in front. So I got 91 psi front and 114 psi rear for your numbers, as well.

That said, if you can avoid hitting potholes and other bumps with your full weight in the saddle, you might be able to get away with less pressure. This stuff isn't right or wrong.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 04-30-20, 12:51 PM
  #28  
bran1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 53

Bikes: 2020 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Both. Since there is less weight on the front of most bikes, it makes sense to use less air in front. So I got 91 psi front and 114 psi rear for your numbers, as well.

That said, if you can avoid hitting potholes and other bumps with your full weight in the saddle, you might be able to get away with less pressure. This stuff isn't right or wrong.
Any idea what the max PSI is on a typical 25 tire? I'd check but I'm at work right now. I guess it's just surprising that 114 doesn't exceed the max PSI.
bran1986 is offline  
Old 04-30-20, 01:21 PM
  #29  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,626

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Originally Posted by bran1986
Any idea what the max PSI is on a typical 25 tire? I'd check but I'm at work right now. I guess it's just surprising that 114 doesn't exceed the max PSI.
Depends on the model, but mine have been between 115 psi and 130 psi or so. There's some wiggle room around those specs, too.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 04-30-20, 01:27 PM
  #30  
bikeaddiction1
Full Member
 
bikeaddiction1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 345

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 50 Posts
Originally Posted by Rides4Beer
Full system weight for me on my gravel bike with 40mm tires is prob 10-15lbs less than you, I run 45-50psi on the road, and 30-40psi on gravel depending on conditions. That's tubeless tho, maybe lil extra pressure if you're running tubes. The goal is to find the right pressure for you that feels comfortable and stable, while not low enough to allow for pinch flats (if you're running tubes). Start at maybe 60psi and work your way down and find what works for you.
I weigh about the same as the OP and this is about what I run on 40mm Clements (now Donnelly). I am running tubeless.
bikeaddiction1 is offline  
Old 04-30-20, 01:55 PM
  #31  
bran1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 53

Bikes: 2020 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Depends on the model, but mine have been between 115 psi and 130 psi or so. There's some wiggle room around those specs, too.
Appreciate all of the help! Just got a road bike so this info is very helpful.
bran1986 is offline  
Old 05-01-20, 06:45 AM
  #32  
Moe Zhoost
Half way there
 
Moe Zhoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,955

Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times in 526 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
With 40mm tires I would probably be 50-ish.
That's what I run on my 40mm tires. My loaded down weight is similar to yours. I don't run tubeless.
Moe Zhoost is offline  
Old 05-01-20, 10:16 AM
  #33  
Nyah
QR-disc must die!!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703

Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 199 Times in 147 Posts
I wanted to to see what optimal pressure for 35mm tires are, but the calculator doesn't offer that tire width. I find it odd that it jumps from 32mm to 37mm, when none of the other tires differ more than 4mm in width from the previous one.
Nyah is offline  
Old 05-01-20, 12:14 PM
  #34  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,209

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by Nyah
I wanted to to see what optimal pressure for 35mm tires are, but the calculator doesn't offer that tire width. I find it odd that it jumps from 32mm to 37mm, when none of the other tires differ more than 4mm in width from the previous one.
Just take the average of 32mm and 37mm Close enough.

The reason that it has the sizes it does is that it is based on a study that used those sizes of tires.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-02-20, 12:29 AM
  #35  
Oso Polar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 311

Bikes: Trek 3500, Jamis Renegade Escapade

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 43 Posts
One more calculator with more options to play with: https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form?__h...a-c25cf17e117f
Oso Polar is offline  
Old 05-02-20, 05:06 PM
  #36  
Litespud
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by Oso Polar
One more calculator with more options to play with: https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form?__h...a-c25cf17e117f
this works out pretty much where I am. I’m ~200# bike + rider, tires nominal 25s, actual 24s, fast group pace on OK roads, F/R weight 48/52 the calculator gave me 99F/102R. I usually run 100 F&R. I think the assumed weight distribution is a little off - given that I wear out rear tires at ~2x the rate of front tires, I imagine my F/R is likely closer to 40F/60R
Litespud is offline  
Old 05-02-20, 05:32 PM
  #37  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Don't get too obsessed with numbers....As long as you're not getting pinch flats then your tire pressure is correct.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 05-03-20, 05:30 PM
  #38  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,863

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1853 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times in 502 Posts
Originally Posted by nematers
So I have been reading through these forums, googling, etc, but still not 100% sure how to get this right. How do I get the definitive answer?

Details below.

My weight (fully dressed plus a backpack with some snacks and personal items) approx.: 85-90Kg / 187-198 Lb
Bike weight approx.: 13Kg / 29 Lb
Bike type: Hybrid
Tyres: 700x40c
If you want to find the go-to chart, Google "Frank Berto bicycle tire pressure chart." Using your numbers I get someting like 47 front 53 rear. It's not exact because they don't have a line for a 40 mm tire, but they do have a 37. In any case, some very sharp folks like Jobst Brandt usually just bumped it up to the sidewall max value. I've been comfortable with about 95 psi in 22 mm tubulars for road riding, for several decades. I adjust for comfort and to have enough pressure to prevent bumps from cracking my rims when I forget to unload over them. Same for when I use 42 mm Hetres or 31 mm Strada Bianca. There is no magic failure when the pressure is a few # too low or too high, but you may feel it in your butt or the heels of your hands. When I use the Berto values I feel it is too soft. Jan Heine writes that while that is true, it is not actually slower. I dunno, ultimately I like pedaling to have a balance between zip and cush.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 05-04-20, 10:12 AM
  #39  
nematers
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks everyone for your input. Some valuable feedback there. Will definitely do some trial and error to get my optimal setup, but should be able to start with a good starting point at least. Cheers all.
nematers is offline  
Old 05-04-20, 11:28 AM
  #40  
VinnieS
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Correct Tire pressure

Every comment on this thread has been much higher pressure than I run. I weigh 165 lbs. Riding gravel on WTB Riddler 700x45mm, tubeless. I run 28 psi front and 34 psi rear. I have not noticed significant increase with rolling resistance on pavement compared with higher pressure and tracks better on gravel. I will drop several psi front and back if course is gnarly. I also have a "gravel" tandem. Co-Motion Java. Combined weight is over 300 lbs. I run about the same pressure on 700x50mm tires (also tubeless), may increase pressure a couple psi if mostly paved course. Once read a comment that if running tubeless, you shouldn't exceed the minimum pressure listed for the tire.
VinnieS is offline  
Old 05-04-20, 06:56 PM
  #41  
gmgtennis
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VinnieS
Every comment on this thread has been much higher pressure than I run. I weigh 165 lbs. Riding gravel on WTB Riddler 700x45mm, tubeless. I run 28 psi front and 34 psi rear. I have not noticed significant increase with rolling resistance on pavement compared with higher pressure and tracks better on gravel. I will drop several psi front and back if course is gnarly. I also have a "gravel" tandem. Co-Motion Java. Combined weight is over 300 lbs. I run about the same pressure on 700x50mm tires (also tubeless), may increase pressure a couple psi if mostly paved course. Once read a comment that if running tubeless, you shouldn't exceed the minimum pressure listed for the tire.
Interesting as that's almost the same pressure I run when using 44mm compass tyres, set up tubeless, on mostly road surfaces, F/28 R/30 lbs, and I find the ride quality considerably better across the board, as far as comfort is concerned the difference between dropping to 30 lbs from 50 lbs is night and day (so comfortable), cornering grip on dry roads is similar (no worse) and as a bonus considerably better in wet conditions.

Jan Heine proved that tyre pressure generally has no bearing on rolling resistance, when tested with the rider on the bike in normal riding conditions. Since dropping my tyre pressure considerably across the board on all my tyre/wheel combinations, I have not looked back, and I am definitely not slower, IMO faster due to the extra comfort!

Here are other tyres I use, and the pressures I run in them on road surfaces mostly (all set up tubeless).
Schwalbe Pro One 25mm, F/44 R/46 lbs.
Schwalbe Pro One 28mm, F/41 R/43 lbs.
Panaracer Gravel King Slick 32mm, F/37 R/39 lbs.
Compass Switchback Hill 650b 48mm, F/26 R/28 lbs.
Schwalbe G-One Speed 650b 60mm, F/18 R20 lbs.

The way I generally gage tyre pressure for a given tyre/wheel combination is to continually drop pressure until the tyre starts to squirm slightly when cornering, and then add a few lbs until this sensation stops, and that's how I set the tyre pressure for all my setups, again as I mentioned earlier this is similar to what Jan Heine suggests and he has done extensive quality testing with the rider on the bike and also on different surfaces to back up his theories, and just to make it more interesting which might open up a can of worms, I feel equally as fast on my 60mm tyres as I do on my 25mm tyres (no proof), the only time I seem slower is on really steep climbs out of the saddle, and sprinting out of the saddle to catch catch someone in front of me in a race (I guess due to the extra weight), I have had no problem keeping up on flat roads at A grade race speeds on a converted MTB bike frame with drop bars added, at speeds ranging generally from 40-50 klm, and at times even topping at 60-65 klm with a tailwind, and a lot more comfortable and stable as a bonus!

For anyone sceptical I suggest try it first, be open minded, and then make up your mind, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised with your findings!

Last edited by gmgtennis; 05-05-20 at 12:06 AM.
gmgtennis is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 06:14 AM
  #42  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
You didn't say what tire you're talking about - they're all different. The PSI range is printed right on the side of the tire, so start there. It has nothing to do with your weight and everything to do with the tires themselves.

Generally, higher pressure gives you less rolling resistance while lower pressure gives you a cushier ride and better grip on some surfaces. Just experiment within the range printed on the side of the tire and you'll be fine.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 08:02 AM
  #43  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,209

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
You didn't say what tire you're talking about - they're all different. The PSI range is printed right on the side of the tire, so start there. It has nothing to do with your weight and everything to do with the tires themselves.
Wut?

It abso-freaking-lutely has to do with your weight.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 08:43 AM
  #44  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Wut?

It abso-freaking-lutely has to do with your weight.
No, it has to do with the specifications for that tire. They don't sell different versions of the same tire, depending on the weight of the rider. And there's no scenario where a rider's weight would override the manufacturer's specifications, printed right there on the side.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Likes For Jeff Neese:
Old 05-05-20, 08:50 AM
  #45  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,209

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
No, it has to do with the specifications for that tire. They don't sell different versions of the same tire, depending on the weight of the rider. And there's no scenario where a rider's weight would override the manufacturer's specifications, printed right there on the side.
Optimum pressure is primarily determined (in equal parts) by the tire volume and rider weight. (casing construction and personal tastes also play a role but far behind the first two factors). Without knowing either of these, one is shooting in the dark.

Max tire pressure simply tells you whether a given tire can be run at that pressure. If it can't, you need a different (most likely larger) tire. So in that sense, they DO make versions for heavier riders if a model comes in different sizes.

Perhaps we are saying the same thing or I am completely misunderstanding what you are saying.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 09:00 AM
  #46  
bobwysiwyg
Senior Member
 
bobwysiwyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344

Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 189 Posts
Originally Posted by Oso Polar
One more calculator with more options to play with: https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form?__h...a-c25cf17e117f
For what it's worth, hadn't seen this calculator before, but ran the numbers for my gravel bike.. darn close to what I've arrived at via experiments. Dead on rear, I run a couple of lbs. less in the front.
bobwysiwyg is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 09:09 AM
  #47  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Optimum pressure is primarily determined (in equal parts) by the tire volume and rider weight. (casing construction and personal tastes also play a role but far behind the first two factors). Without knowing either of these, one is shooting in the dark.

Max tire pressure simply tells you whether a given tire can be run at that pressure. If it can't, you need a different (most likely larger) tire. So in that sense, they DO make versions for heavier riders if a model comes in different sizes.

Perhaps we are saying the same thing or I am completely misunderstanding what you are saying.
Maybe we are. My point is illustrated with this example:

My wife's bike has Kenda Small Block 8s, which are rated for 50-85 PSI. My bike has Maxxis Ikons, rated 30-65 PSI. So when we are going to spend the day on smooth hardpack and want to roll fast, I fill her tires up to 85 PSI, and mine to 65 PSI. Body weight is not a factor - we use what's on the tire.

When we want to ride rougher or looser terrain, we reduce hers to about 55 and mine down to about 40, and that gives us each the best results with the tires we're each riding. Still within the manufacturers specifications, but different because they are different tires.

That's why asking what the best tire pressure is, without knowing exactly what tire we're talking about, is pointless. It depends on the tire.
Jeff Neese is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 09:32 AM
  #48  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,881

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4783 Post(s)
Liked 3,905 Times in 2,539 Posts
Originally Posted by bran1986
So the 176 psi suggestion would actually be 88 psi per wheel?

This is what I'm getting when I input data per wheel:

I don't like that at all! Runs counter to the age old advice to new racers. And yes, we laugh because we now know that some of that advice wasn't the fastest. But ... the huge but ... the race veterans and longtime coaches knew that staying upright; not crashing was key to good training and fitness and hence the ability to produce real speed when needed.

A 190 pound rider slamming into a pothole with all his weight on the front wheel (see my post last page) and only 73 psi in a skinny 25c tire? That's not going to end well. In fact, that might cause conditioning issues months later. Being at 85% of one's best because of a bad crash two months ago is a loss of 15% power. Real. 10% more rolling resistance in the front tire because you had nearly the same pressure up front as the back - well, rolling resistance is rarely more that about 20% of one's total resistance. The front is say half the total rolling resistance. So 1/2 X 20% X 10% increase for the additional pressure = 1% change in the total resistance, Yes, measurable but compared to a crash from loss of control because the front tire blew out or the rim collapsed, peanuts.

Those pretty charts are going to get people hurt. We hit potholes, If we ride long enough, we hit them without doing the proper un-weighting of the wheels and we may hit one one day while braking hard. Front tire pressure could make a very real difference. (If you do choose to ride the low front tire pressures, wear a helmet and shave your legs. Both make the ER experience a lot better and speed recovery.

Ben
79pmooney is online now  
Old 05-05-20, 11:52 AM
  #49  
phughes
Senior Member
 
phughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,089
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,287 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Neese
Maybe we are. My point is illustrated with this example:

My wife's bike has Kenda Small Block 8s, which are rated for 50-85 PSI. My bike has Maxxis Ikons, rated 30-65 PSI. So when we are going to spend the day on smooth hardpack and want to roll fast, I fill her tires up to 85 PSI, and mine to 65 PSI. Body weight is not a factor - we use what's on the tire.

When we want to ride rougher or looser terrain, we reduce hers to about 55 and mine down to about 40, and that gives us each the best results with the tires we're each riding. Still within the manufacturers specifications, but different because they are different tires.

That's why asking what the best tire pressure is, without knowing exactly what tire we're talking about, is pointless. It depends on the tire.
Nope, it depends on the weight on the tire. Yes, you can fill the tire to the max, but that is not the way it works optimally. The tire is designed to be able to support weight, using air, how much weight it can handle is dependent upon how much air is in the tire. The tire does not need 85psi to hold up lower weights, and handle the way it is designed to handle. Filling the tire to the max, with a low bike/rider weight, you have a smaller contact patch, which will affect traction for braking and cornering. T the same time, the tire will be hard, and not compliant, it will not be able to conform to small bumps, causing the tire to bounce and lose traction more easily. You most likely will never notice, if you are riding recreationally. On a perfectly smooth road, you probably won't notice any issues, but overall, using a lower psi, one determined by the weight of the rider and bike combined, will give you a better ride, and better efficiency.

It is like a car. The tire is designed to carry a max load at the max pressure the tire is rated for, but most cars use a lower pressure for each tire than the max psi the tire is rated for. As an extreme example, the old VW bugs, the ones with the engine on the back, used tires with a max inflation pressure of 35 psi, but, the VW Bug's pressure recommendation in the front, was 16 psi. There was very little weight on in the front of the Bug, so VW recommended 16 psi. That gave you the proper contact patch, the best handling, and best wear for the tire. If you used more, it rode like a buckboard, slid in cornering, the front would easily lock up during braking, and the tires wore in the center of the tread.

Tire inflation has everything to do with the weight the tire has to carry. The inflation range stamped on the tires is simply the minimum psi and maximum psi the tire is designed to be used with, depending on the weight the tire has to support.
phughes is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 11:57 AM
  #50  
Jeff Neese
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times in 438 Posts
Originally Posted by phughes
Nope, it depends on the weight on the tire. Yes, you can fill the tire to the max, but that is not the way it works optimally. The tire is designed to be able to support weight, using air, how much weight it can handle is dependent upon how much air is in the tire. The tire does not need 85psi to hold up lower weights, and handle the way it is designed to handle. Filling the tire to the max, with a low bike/rider weight, you have a smaller contact patch, which will affect traction for braking and cornering. T the same time, the tire will be hard, and not compliant, it will not be able to conform to small bumps, causing the tire to bounce and lose traction more easily. You most likely will never notice, if you are riding recreationally. On a perfectly smooth road, you probably won't notice any issues, but overall, using a lower psi, one determined by the weight of the rider and bike combined, will give you a better ride, and better efficiency.

It is like a car. The tire is designed to carry a max load at the max pressure the tire is rated for, but most cars use a lower pressure for each tire than the max psi the tire is rated for. As an extreme example, the old VW bugs, the ones with the engine on the back, used tires with a max inflation pressure of 35 psi, but, the VW Bug's pressure recommendation in the front, was 16 psi. There was very little weight on in the front of the Bug, so VW recommended 16 psi. That gave you the proper contact patch, the best handling, and best wear for the tire. If you used more, it rode like a buckboard, slid in cornering, the front would easily lock up during braking, and the tires wore in the center of the tread.

Tire inflation has everything to do with the weight the tire has to carry. The inflation range stamped on the tires is simply the minimum psi and maximum psi the tire is designed to be used with, depending on the weight the tire has to support.
And when you put different tires on that old VW bug, everything changes. It is literally impossible to know (or "calculate") the optimum pressure for a tire, without knowing exactly what tire you're talking about. That shouldn't be hard to understand.

When talking about bicycle tires, 45 PSI in one tire may handle and perform completely different than 45 PSI in a different tire. That shouldn't be hard to understand either.

Last edited by Jeff Neese; 05-05-20 at 12:05 PM.
Jeff Neese is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.