Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Spokes - how do I calculate length and which pattern?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Spokes - how do I calculate length and which pattern?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-10, 11:12 PM
  #1  
Sander Saares
Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Spokes - how do I calculate length and which pattern?

I am in the process of getting a new rear wheel. The rim and hub have been ordered but I am a bit stuck at spokes - I am not sure how to calculate the required length. I am also unsure of the differences between different lacing patterns.

First of all, here are the hub and rim I have ordered (48-hole models):
https://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/Ha...ub/5360042432/
https://www.bike-mailorder.de/shop/Si...ch::20270.html

I plan on ordering DT Alpine III spokes to match these parts but what length do I need? Does it depend on the lacing pattern?

I am not sure what lacing pattern to use. Are there any objective differences between them? I once read a study on the internet with lots of numbers and graphs but I did not understand any of it

In any case, please recommend me a spoke lacing pattern and tell me how to determine what length spokes I need. Can the length be determined based on the info available on the web about these components? Or do I need to measure them when they arrive?

I stuck some numbers into the DT Swiss spoke calculator on the web but it wanted some figures which I did not have (I believe it wanted rim inner diameter - can this be determined somehow? I did not see any such number on the shop website where I got the rim; there is an "Aero profile length", though - is this useful?).

I have recently discovered that spokes are far more expensive than I figured for small pieces of metal, so I would rather not buy the wrong size Unfortunately, local shops only have straight-gauge spokes available, so I need to order online and can't leave it to the shop that will actually build up the wheel.
Sander Saares is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 01:52 AM
  #2  
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Hub

d=58mm
cleft = 35mm
cright = 19mm

Rim

Guessing that D=590mm You really need to look up the ERD...measuring yourself is better.

3 Cross Lacing


https://www.mrrabbit.net/wheelsbyflemingapplications.php

Grab the spreadsheet.

Find the closet matching rear hub - try Chosen A4082 in 58mm

Plug in at the top 24 holes, 3 cross and plug in the ERD below for diameter.


...or try using SpokeCalc.

But you really need to get the ERD for the actual rim - else you are going off a cliff.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 10:33 AM
  #3  
Sander Saares
Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Many thanks!

This website seems to say ERD is 590mm: https://www.halorims.com/halo/product...hp?id=RMHA7W2B
The spoke counts seen there are lower but the wheel is still the same size, right? Or is there some possibility that number is not applicable in my case?
Sander Saares is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 10:37 AM
  #4  
BCRider
Senior Member
 
BCRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The 'Wack, BC, Canada
Posts: 5,559

Bikes: Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 38 Posts
I believe that with a 48 spoke build that a 4x pattern becomes a good option along with the 3x. If this is for a heavy duty tandem wheel then at least at the rear you want the crossing pattern that gives the spokes an angle that is the closest to tangental to the hub's spoke circle as you can get.

On the spoke length calculators watch what it asks for. Some ask for spoke count for one side only (so 24 in this case) while others ask for total spoke count and do the single side math for you in the program. In other words READ THE INSTRUCTIONS
BCRider is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 12:55 PM
  #5  
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Sander Saares
Many thanks!

This website seems to say ERD is 590mm: https://www.halorims.com/halo/product...hp?id=RMHA7W2B
The spoke counts seen there are lower but the wheel is still the same size, right? Or is there some possibility that number is not applicable in my case?

Yep....that's it. 590mm

3 cross...or 4 cross as BCRider suggested...I'm more partial to 4X for 48 hole wheels. In my spreadsheet that would mean plugging in 24, 4 and 590.

Round down drive side to nearest mm before ordering.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 07-23-10, 10:19 AM
  #6  
Sander Saares
Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks! However, I am running into a strange difference between two spoke calculators.

Using the table you provided, I enter the data (24, 4, 590) and go to the closest matching hubs (d=58 and offsets 35 and 19,5). I get results 282.79 and 281.30.

However, putting the same data into the DT Swiss calculator, I get 270.8 and 268.3. This is a rather large difference. Am I using this calculator wrong or what is going on? Here is what I enter into the DT Swiss calculator:
ERD=590mm
Pitch circle diameter = 58 mm
Flange distance = 35mm/19mm
Diameter of spoke hole = 2,8 (I have no idea but the preset rims all seemed to have values like that)
Spokes: Alpine III
No of spokes = 48
Intersections = 4
Nipple = messing 2.0, 12mm

The result is a difference of about 12-14mm. Rather big. Is there really that much inaccuracy in calculators or did I do something wrong?

Edit: spocalc.xls seems to agree with your spreadsheet 282.4 and 280.9.
Just in case, please confirm that I am not doing something wrong here

Why would the DT Swiss site be so much off? Did I just mess up the numbers or is that site inaccurate/"special"?

Edit 2: it seems that the closest length of Alpine III spokes that are available to me are 284 mm - is the 3-4 mm extra length too much or is this amount generally insignificant?

Last edited by Sander Saares; 07-23-10 at 10:35 AM.
Sander Saares is offline  
Old 07-23-10, 07:16 PM
  #7  
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Probably need to read DT's instructions again...or maybe it is broken. Lot's of folks were using until a little while ago - something about hub and rim selections getting removed or something.

=8-)

284 mm will be too long...282mm and 281mm are the max you want to use...282mm and 280mm should work as well. Use 12mm nipples...

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Old 07-24-10, 05:22 AM
  #8  
Sander Saares
Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Alright, thanks for the clarification.

Hmm... I'll ask DT Swiss why the 280-282 mm range is not available in any online shop I can see. Maybe they do not even manufacture them in this size? Let's hope they do. Assuming they do not, what other type of spoke would you recommend? Does anyone else make triple-butted spokes?

By the way, do you have a link to a diagram which cleanly shows how the 4X lacing pattern should be done? I figure I should try to lay out the spokes the right way and just leave tensioning & truing to the LBS when I get the components. I do not have much faith in the local LBSes - nobody here has even seen a 48-spoke wheel, so I fear they might have no idea what this 4X thing is...
Sander Saares is offline  
Old 09-06-10, 06:31 AM
  #9  
Sander Saares
Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks again for all your help! The parts arrived in August and fit perfectly. I laced it up myself. The third set of spokes took three tries to get right but it still went better than I expected. The LBS tensioned it and I now have a proper rear wheel
Sander Saares is offline  
Old 09-06-10, 10:56 AM
  #10  
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Domromer
Bicycle Mechanics
3
04-30-18 09:14 PM
aaronmichael
Bicycle Mechanics
15
03-17-16 10:41 PM
ak08820
Bicycle Mechanics
4
03-13-13 11:33 AM
evilcryalotmore
Bicycle Mechanics
3
03-07-12 09:46 AM
tgypoi
Bicycle Mechanics
13
07-12-11 12:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.