Cogitating on cassettes
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 86
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced Pro 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Cogitating on cassettes
Got the call a little earlier, my new Giant Defy will be ready for pick up this evening.
So now I'm thinking about cassettes, the Defy comes with an compact crank and a 11-34 (11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-27-30-34) cassette.
That's gonna be a little different than the standard crank and 12-25 that I'm used to.
I don't see the 30 & 34 cogs getting much use.
I switched from 11-28 to 12-25 because I didn't often use the 11 or 28 cogs, and I really liked the 16 cog. Though I occasionally miss the 11 cog on a steep decent, I prefer the 25 cog over the 28 when the road tips up.
I'm not really asking a question, merely cogitating whether I'll stick with this cassette or pop on a 12-25, maybe even a set of mid-compact cranks.
I guess I'll have to log a few hundred kms to see how I like the ratios.
Cheers,
David
So now I'm thinking about cassettes, the Defy comes with an compact crank and a 11-34 (11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-27-30-34) cassette.
That's gonna be a little different than the standard crank and 12-25 that I'm used to.
I don't see the 30 & 34 cogs getting much use.
I switched from 11-28 to 12-25 because I didn't often use the 11 or 28 cogs, and I really liked the 16 cog. Though I occasionally miss the 11 cog on a steep decent, I prefer the 25 cog over the 28 when the road tips up.
I'm not really asking a question, merely cogitating whether I'll stick with this cassette or pop on a 12-25, maybe even a set of mid-compact cranks.
I guess I'll have to log a few hundred kms to see how I like the ratios.
Cheers,
David
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
A 12-25t cassette,with a compact crankset, is a great setup for flat to rolling terrain. A strong rider can also enjoy the setup in the mountains if they have a good high cadence spin.
#3
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,567
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3683 Post(s)
Liked 5,448 Times
in
2,769 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 86
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced Pro 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I got a quick ride in this evening after picking up the bike, the 11-32 has got to go, it's useless. I went from 10/10 useful cogs on my SuperSix EVO to to 5/11 useful cogs on the Defy.
And the worst thing was that there's no good transition point when switching from the big ring to the little ring.
On the EVO I most often rode in the middle 4 cogs on the flats, engaging the outer cogs when the road tipped up or down. And the 15 & 16 cogs were great transition points between the chain rings.
On the Defy I spent the ride on 5 cogs on the high end, never going lower than the 23 cog, on rolling terrain, one steep climb of > 10%, lots of 5-6%.
Hmmm, do I want to go 12-25 or 11-28 with the compact. I'll have to check the ratios before making a decision.
Cheers,
David
And the worst thing was that there's no good transition point when switching from the big ring to the little ring.
On the EVO I most often rode in the middle 4 cogs on the flats, engaging the outer cogs when the road tipped up or down. And the 15 & 16 cogs were great transition points between the chain rings.
On the Defy I spent the ride on 5 cogs on the high end, never going lower than the 23 cog, on rolling terrain, one steep climb of > 10%, lots of 5-6%.
Hmmm, do I want to go 12-25 or 11-28 with the compact. I'll have to check the ratios before making a decision.
Cheers,
David
#6
Senior Member
I'm have this dilemma as well. I have a compact crank but a 11-32 cassette (11-12-13-14-16-18-20-22-25-28-32). I never ever use the 32, and I really miss the 15 cog. But which should I go with? 11-25, 11-28, 12-25, or 11-30?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
I got a quick ride in this evening after picking up the bike, the 11-32 has got to go, it's useless. I went from 10/10 useful cogs on my SuperSix EVO to to 5/11 useful cogs on the Defy.
And the worst thing was that there's no good transition point when switching from the big ring to the little ring.
On the EVO I most often rode in the middle 4 cogs on the flats, engaging the outer cogs when the road tipped up or down. And the 15 & 16 cogs were great transition points between the chain rings.
On the Defy I spent the ride on 5 cogs on the high end, never going lower than the 23 cog, on rolling terrain, one steep climb of > 10%, lots of 5-6%.
Hmmm, do I want to go 12-25 or 11-28 with the compact. I'll have to check the ratios before making a decision.
Cheers,
David
And the worst thing was that there's no good transition point when switching from the big ring to the little ring.
On the EVO I most often rode in the middle 4 cogs on the flats, engaging the outer cogs when the road tipped up or down. And the 15 & 16 cogs were great transition points between the chain rings.
On the Defy I spent the ride on 5 cogs on the high end, never going lower than the 23 cog, on rolling terrain, one steep climb of > 10%, lots of 5-6%.
Hmmm, do I want to go 12-25 or 11-28 with the compact. I'll have to check the ratios before making a decision.
Cheers,
David
#8
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I have an 11-34T and an 11-36T cassette. Soften TFU.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 86
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced Pro 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hmmm. It is a heavier bike that’s usually only ridden while laden with panniers.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
I ride a 12-27 10 speed. If/when I go to 11-speed I would add, in order, a 30, 18. And, ummm, that's it. Maybe a 32 as a real bailout gear. I have no interest in an 11.
#11
Senior Member
If you miss the 11t on your 12-25 then get a 11-25, unless you will then miss the 18t.
Bicycle Gear Calculator
Bicycle Gear Calculator
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,673
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times
in
472 Posts
To the OP, I'm surprised you didn't opt for the mid compact if coming from a standard crank? If you're like me in the flat lands, the (11,12) cogs and (27+)cogs are completely uneeded. I spend 80% of my time in the middle of the cassette.
I watched how I rode, crunched some gear inch theory, and am going to have a 50/39 and 13-23 8 speed on my older ride
I have thought that the 46/36 cyclocross crank would go very nice with a 12-25 for me. Keep in mind for me I can do 54 miles in any direction and have around 1,000ft of climb total
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 86
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced Pro 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I’ve got a Jake The Snake that I use a couple times a year for rides when I need to carry saddle bags. It’s got a compact crank and an 11-28, and the ratios on that bike don’t inspire grief. I’ll have to pull it out of storage this weekend and refresh my memory.
Hmmm. It is a heavier bike that’s usually only ridden while laden with panniers.
Hmmm. It is a heavier bike that’s usually only ridden while laden with panniers.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 103
Bikes: Nashbar CR5 Ultegra, Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I made a 12-28 that fits my needs. I took my original 11-28 and bought a 12-25. Then I combined the two finishing with a 12,13,14,15,16,17,19,21,23,25,28.
For me, the gaps work fine and I really like having the 16.
I use this on a 50-34.
For me, the gaps work fine and I really like having the 16.
I use this on a 50-34.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I have bought about 30 cassettes in the last 5 years for immediate family and more for others. I cogitate too.
I'll pontificate.
Brand and models shift differently even if the same ratios. And I *think* certain materials are better. My fav cassettes for weight are alloy (several brands). They do not shift the best. I ordered a carbon fibre cassette and never got it but so far alloy, alloy different plating, Ti, Steel in many platting and coating. They are different.
I don't like 11T.
I prefer a big big vs a small small. So for anything a 53X14 is preferred over a 45X12 ~ same gear. The smaller mean more chain tension = more frame compression = more flex. Modern frames are real stiff and this is likely a left over tandem flex phobia. My stoker and I turned up about 3,000W in a sprint and in the 90s the 57TX11T would break. WE used a 12T. My kid races, I buy 12 and 13T as the low. Nothing he needs an 11 for with a 52T front. Enter MTB and cx and there are other clearance reasons for smaller front. He has 11T. This is a road sub-forum. If you have a 52T, you don't need an 11T. If you are cross chaining onto that, never-mind. For rec riding, and some non-road racing I think the 1X is a good option. I can see an 11T there, maybe. I'd build from a 12T or 13T min. I use a 14T but that is because I have a pile of left over junior stuff, I use now.
On the big cog, and ratios that is tough. If you live in alpine regions there are some ratios that focus on big and small and have very little mid. Recon has a 11-29 and a 12-28 with few in the middle. the intent is small ring up, big ring down. Or 1X up and down.
I have a 11X36 (or is it 40) on the cx bike on a 1X. For road - I like a "normal" 12-28. Maybe a 32.
I'm riding this old junior 14-17 now.
MASI Extralite rearSmall.jpg
I'll pontificate.
Brand and models shift differently even if the same ratios. And I *think* certain materials are better. My fav cassettes for weight are alloy (several brands). They do not shift the best. I ordered a carbon fibre cassette and never got it but so far alloy, alloy different plating, Ti, Steel in many platting and coating. They are different.
I don't like 11T.
I prefer a big big vs a small small. So for anything a 53X14 is preferred over a 45X12 ~ same gear. The smaller mean more chain tension = more frame compression = more flex. Modern frames are real stiff and this is likely a left over tandem flex phobia. My stoker and I turned up about 3,000W in a sprint and in the 90s the 57TX11T would break. WE used a 12T. My kid races, I buy 12 and 13T as the low. Nothing he needs an 11 for with a 52T front. Enter MTB and cx and there are other clearance reasons for smaller front. He has 11T. This is a road sub-forum. If you have a 52T, you don't need an 11T. If you are cross chaining onto that, never-mind. For rec riding, and some non-road racing I think the 1X is a good option. I can see an 11T there, maybe. I'd build from a 12T or 13T min. I use a 14T but that is because I have a pile of left over junior stuff, I use now.
On the big cog, and ratios that is tough. If you live in alpine regions there are some ratios that focus on big and small and have very little mid. Recon has a 11-29 and a 12-28 with few in the middle. the intent is small ring up, big ring down. Or 1X up and down.
I have a 11X36 (or is it 40) on the cx bike on a 1X. For road - I like a "normal" 12-28. Maybe a 32.
I'm riding this old junior 14-17 now.
MASI Extralite rearSmall.jpg
Last edited by Doge; 03-29-18 at 12:00 PM.
#23
Senior Member
#25
Senior Member
Just curious how you ended up with pretty much all different drive components than what your used to? I am worried that it won't fit your riding style as it is not one but two steps away from standard gearing with that massive rear cassette. Sounds like you might want to swap the whole lineup unless you end up liking it.