Endurance Drop Bar Width and Shoulder Width
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 231
Bikes: S-Works Venge Dura-Ace DI2, KTM Strada 4000, Fuji Norcom Straight 1.3 (TT), Fuji Track Elite, BMC Trackmachine TR02
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Endurance Drop Bar Width and Shoulder Width
I think I'm going to "drop" my Scattos and go with the 3T Aeronova Team bars for endurance events.
What's the current reasoning on bar width relative to shoulder width? I'm fairly broad shouldered -- approx. 47cm - -and wondering if I should go with 40cm or 42cm.
My Scattos are 37cm and feel normal to me, but then again that's all I have ever used since I started racing on the track. Now when I jump on my road bike, they feel unstable and too wide (I suppose that's an indication of how much time I spend training on my track bike vs. road bikes). The Velodrome Shop's page on this suggests 42cm based on my shoulder width, but since 37cm already feels fine to me, I am thinking of 40cm. Thoughts?
What's the current reasoning on bar width relative to shoulder width? I'm fairly broad shouldered -- approx. 47cm - -and wondering if I should go with 40cm or 42cm.
My Scattos are 37cm and feel normal to me, but then again that's all I have ever used since I started racing on the track. Now when I jump on my road bike, they feel unstable and too wide (I suppose that's an indication of how much time I spend training on my track bike vs. road bikes). The Velodrome Shop's page on this suggests 42cm based on my shoulder width, but since 37cm already feels fine to me, I am thinking of 40cm. Thoughts?
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 231
Bikes: S-Works Venge Dura-Ace DI2, KTM Strada 4000, Fuji Norcom Straight 1.3 (TT), Fuji Track Elite, BMC Trackmachine TR02
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
K-
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,569
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times
in
429 Posts
I believe the general rule of thumb for road bikes was that your bars should be as wide as your shoulders. The idea being that your arms would move straight out to be on the hoods or drops. Given your measurements, you would need a 46 bar. (I've never seen a 48). Of course, that is not the most aerodynamic set up.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 231
Bikes: S-Works Venge Dura-Ace DI2, KTM Strada 4000, Fuji Norcom Straight 1.3 (TT), Fuji Track Elite, BMC Trackmachine TR02
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I believe the general rule of thumb for road bikes was that your bars should be as wide as your shoulders. The idea being that your arms would move straight out to be on the hoods or drops. Given your measurements, you would need a 46 bar. (I've never seen a 48). Of course, that is not the most aerodynamic set up.
I found this page interesting. https://www.velodrome.shop/barsize
I am just wondering where they get the recommendation of 42cm for my shoulder width, or the rest of the recommendations for that matter. I assume that at some point, similar to a time trial bike, an overly narrow arm position can constrict the chest and oxygen intake, despite increased aerodynamics. On a time trial bike, there is also an issue of stability. However, on my track bike, 37cm does not seem to constrict my chest nor reduce stability. If anything I feel more stable, because a wider bar is essentially like using a longer lever, where you can produce greater movement of the steer tube with less movement from the end of the bars (I think this is standard mechanics, right?) -- hence I consider this a good basis for going with a 40cm endurance bar, but this is an inference based on limited information and experience.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 631
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
However, on my track bike, 37cm does not seem to constrict my chest nor reduce stability. If anything I feel more stable, because a wider bar is essentially like using a longer lever, where you can produce greater movement of the steer tube with less movement from the end of the bars (I think this is standard mechanics, right?)
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 231
Bikes: S-Works Venge Dura-Ace DI2, KTM Strada 4000, Fuji Norcom Straight 1.3 (TT), Fuji Track Elite, BMC Trackmachine TR02
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Ahhh, makes sense. So, when I use my road bike on my rollers, it feels more unstable and twitchy. I assume that is just because I have adapted to using my track bike on the rollers.
#8
Senior Member
Am I alone in thinking that the old chestnut "narrow bars restrict breathing" is no longer applicable? It seems that track positions have gotten much longer, putting hands well in front, so that your arms are in no way beside you, and cannot really be restricting your breathing. Right? Wrong?
#9
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
There is only about a 1 inch sweet spot where a bike is nicely mated with rollers.
To see if they are the same or different, simply use a tape measure and measure horizontally from front wheel axle to rear wheel axle.
When setting up rollers for a bike, the sweet spot is to have the axle of the front roller barrel either directly under or 1cm in front of the axle of the bicycle's front wheel. Use a plumb or at least a nut tied to a string as a plumb.
When the rollers are set up properly for the bike, handling is easy
#10
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Am I alone in thinking that the old chestnut "narrow bars restrict breathing" is no longer applicable? It seems that track positions have gotten much longer, putting hands well in front, so that your arms are in no way beside you, and cannot really be restricting your breathing. Right? Wrong?
I forgot who it was, but one regular called the narrow bar trend about to happen about 1 year before it hit. (S)He had seen narrow bars on the British bikes working for them.
#11
Senior Member
Yeah, I mean I've sen a few enduros riding 33's at elite level too, so this isn't just a sprinter thing. NOBODY has 33cm shoulders., and I would guess that a world level points race is a fairly intense deal aerobically.
#12
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I can't recall if they won World Cups, Worlds, or the Olympics using those bars. They won something big using them.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
My shoulders are 48cm wide and I use 37cm bars for enduro and 40 or 42cm bars on the road depending on application (racing, training, CX).
I have never felt restricted in any way.
I have never felt restricted in any way.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 631
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Jon Dibben won the '16 WC points race on 33cm Alpinas. Also notice that he rides with his wrists rolled in, which would exaggerate any 'breathing constriction'.
#17
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I honestly think that the 33cm Alpinas are the best all around bar available now in terms of fitting, usefulness, and value.
Fitting because it's not super short and shallow. So, you can use it with moderately tall head tubes and don't need 140 or 150mm stems.
Usefulness in that all manner of riders can and have used them with success.
Value in that they are like half the cost of Scattos for all of the above.
No, they don't have an aero profile on the tops, but, it may not matter.
Fitting because it's not super short and shallow. So, you can use it with moderately tall head tubes and don't need 140 or 150mm stems.
Usefulness in that all manner of riders can and have used them with success.
Value in that they are like half the cost of Scattos for all of the above.
No, they don't have an aero profile on the tops, but, it may not matter.
#19
Senior Member
Man some of you people must be HUGE! I'm a BIG unit at 6'5" and my shoulders only run at 44cm! I presume that everyone is measuring correctly and to the shoulder bone, not the outside of your shoulders (skin)? Wider bars are a comfort factor. On the track that doesn't matter, even for "long" races. That is unless you're just a club rider out there and having fun.
At higher levels, at the speeds that are being ridden, aero trumps comfort EVERY time and in that case, wider bars will handicap you (unless you never intend on riding at the front )
At higher levels, at the speeds that are being ridden, aero trumps comfort EVERY time and in that case, wider bars will handicap you (unless you never intend on riding at the front )
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Man some of you people must be HUGE! I'm a BIG unit at 6'5" and my shoulders only run at 44cm! I presume that everyone is measuring correctly and to the shoulder bone, not the outside of your shoulders (skin)? Wider bars are a comfort factor. On the track that doesn't matter, even for "long" races. That is unless you're just a club rider out there and having fun.
At higher levels, at the speeds that are being ridden, aero trumps comfort EVERY time and in that case, wider bars will handicap you (unless you never intend on riding at the front )
At higher levels, at the speeds that are being ridden, aero trumps comfort EVERY time and in that case, wider bars will handicap you (unless you never intend on riding at the front )
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
That doesn't address my question, however. My question is what's the current reasoning on bar width relative to shoulder width? I've already researched the benefits or reasons why some track racers would choose a more road-like endurance bar over a sprint bar, and I have worked that out already on my own. So, to rephrase, are there any rules of thumb regarding bar width, in light of ergonomics, mechanics, etc? I'm looking for some facts and data here.
K-
K-
Also as you've seen people's definitions of shoulder width changes depending on where they measure, I'm about 43-4cm from AC joints and ride very narrow 40cm bars on the road that measure 36.5cm at the hoods and track bars that are 34cm.
I remember reading about the actual width of the shoulder ball in the joint doesn't vary that much between people but its protrusions from that and bone structure around it that make up the majority of variance in people, and that width generally falls between 37.5 and 39cm for that majority of the population +-1SD. It's something I'd like to look into with some of the medical people at uni and delve into a little more.
TLR- imo almost everyone rides bars too wide for them on the road and it's generally trackies that don't.
Am I alone in thinking that the old chestnut "narrow bars restrict breathing" is no longer applicable? It seems that track positions have gotten much longer, putting hands well in front, so that your arms are in no way beside you, and cannot really be restricting your breathing. Right? Wrong?
I honestly think that the 33cm Alpinas are the best all around bar available now in terms of fitting, usefulness, and value.
Fitting because it's not super short and shallow. So, you can use it with moderately tall head tubes and don't need 140 or 150mm stems.
Usefulness in that all manner of riders can and have used them with success.
Value in that they are like half the cost of Scattos for all of the above.
No, they don't have an aero profile on the tops, but, it may not matter.
Fitting because it's not super short and shallow. So, you can use it with moderately tall head tubes and don't need 140 or 150mm stems.
Usefulness in that all manner of riders can and have used them with success.
Value in that they are like half the cost of Scattos for all of the above.
No, they don't have an aero profile on the tops, but, it may not matter.
#22
Senior Member
I honestly think that the 33cm Alpinas are the best all around bar available now in terms of fitting, usefulness, and value.
Fitting because it's not super short and shallow. So, you can use it with moderately tall head tubes and don't need 140 or 150mm stems.
Usefulness in that all manner of riders can and have used them with success.
Value in that they are like half the cost of Scattos for all of the above.
No, they don't have an aero profile on the tops, but, it may not matter.
Fitting because it's not super short and shallow. So, you can use it with moderately tall head tubes and don't need 140 or 150mm stems.
Usefulness in that all manner of riders can and have used them with success.
Value in that they are like half the cost of Scattos for all of the above.
No, they don't have an aero profile on the tops, but, it may not matter.
Thanks a lot @carleton