Which Ti Bike to get?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Which Ti Bike to get?
Hello,
I am considering getting into a Ti Road Bike at the moment. It would be my first Titanium bike. So I currently have two options in front of me....
1. A Litespeed Classic with Sachs/Mavic parts components.
or a
2. Lemond Arrivee with mostly Ultegra and Ksyrium wheels
Price is not a determinant cause they are both around a 1K.
Any opinions suggestions?
I am considering getting into a Ti Road Bike at the moment. It would be my first Titanium bike. So I currently have two options in front of me....
1. A Litespeed Classic with Sachs/Mavic parts components.
or a
2. Lemond Arrivee with mostly Ultegra and Ksyrium wheels
Price is not a determinant cause they are both around a 1K.
Any opinions suggestions?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Both nice bikes - IIRC the LeMond has a slightly slacker seat tube angle and longer top tube if that's what you're looking for. The LeMond is probably also a little rarer, but, given that I don't know who built it (pretty sure LeMond didn't), I would tend toward the Litespeed - when it comes to titanium, weld quality is key, so I would go with the manufacturer that has built a stack of Ti frames, and that would be Litespeed (unless Litespeed actually built the LeMond - they built Ti frames for a lot of other manufacturers). How old are these bikes? When I saw "Sachs/Mavic" on the Litespeed, my first thought was "ancient!" but that may not be the case.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Both nice bikes - IIRC the LeMond has a slightly slacker seat tube angle and longer top tube if that's what you're looking for. The LeMond is probably also a little rarer, but, given that I don't know who built it (pretty sure LeMond didn't), I would tend toward the Litespeed - when it comes to titanium, weld quality is key, so I would go with the manufacturer that has built a stack of Ti frames, and that would be Litespeed (unless Litespeed actually built the LeMond - they built Ti frames for a lot of other manufacturers). How old are these bikes? When I saw "Sachs/Mavic" on the Litespeed, my first thought was "ancient!" but that may not be the case.
The Litespeed I believe is a Litespeed Classic from circa 2000, but the color scheme (all yellow with Ti showing on the end of the Seat stays, and the whole chain stay) i cannot find anywhere. But I have seen that particular fork on other models (yellow and black Look), but who knows if it is original or has been changed out. I believe its original cause it matches perfectly. The bike actually has Mavic on the top tube and Mavic on the chainstay. I cant find this particular color scheme anywhere online
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
The yellow/black color of the Look fork was the standard color - I had that exact fork (and color) on a bare Ti Litespeed in the late '90s - I guess it was supposed to go with the big yellow downtube decals. The Litespeed factory paint job left most of the seat- and chain stays bare Ti, but I don't think yellow was a factory color for the Classic, so it sounds like your paint job was aftermarket. But if I was painting my current LS, that's how I'd do it - the bare stays look good. This site has links to original LS catalogs from that era - a fun read if you're a Litespeed fan. Might be able to help you pin down the exact year if you're interested. The 2000's are probably the last of the truly Lynskey-built Litespeeds and IMO they were also the prettiest Litespeeds - for that year they added nice touches like the "L" cutouts on the dropouts and engraved BB shells, and they hadn't yet got into all that "geometrically-enhanced tubing" malarkey and integrated headsets. My 2000 Vortex has some subtly ovalized TT and DT tubing, but otherwise traditional round, and had a proper Chris King headset.
I've seen various stories (all unsubstantiated) about the genesis of Lemond Ti frames. One says that Clark-Kent in CO built the early Lemond Ti's, then production moved to Litespeed and finally (by at least 2002) on to the Trek main factory in WI. By that reckoning, your Lemond is Trek-built. However, I also saw somewhere that higher-end models (Tete de Course and Victoire) were made at Trek using butted 3/2.5, while the Arrivee was built from straight-gauge tubing overseas. I've seen Reynolds and Sandvik tubing mentioned. I'm sure the truth is out there somewhere.
If size isn't as issue and the components are decent (and you can't beat the Ultegra on the Lemond, don't know about the Sachs stuff), I'd go with the Litespeed, simply because you know what you're getting
I've seen various stories (all unsubstantiated) about the genesis of Lemond Ti frames. One says that Clark-Kent in CO built the early Lemond Ti's, then production moved to Litespeed and finally (by at least 2002) on to the Trek main factory in WI. By that reckoning, your Lemond is Trek-built. However, I also saw somewhere that higher-end models (Tete de Course and Victoire) were made at Trek using butted 3/2.5, while the Arrivee was built from straight-gauge tubing overseas. I've seen Reynolds and Sandvik tubing mentioned. I'm sure the truth is out there somewhere.
If size isn't as issue and the components are decent (and you can't beat the Ultegra on the Lemond, don't know about the Sachs stuff), I'd go with the Litespeed, simply because you know what you're getting
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I really doubt its a custom paint job cause its just waaaay to on point. I wish i could post a pic, but the forum wont let me yet.
Im really torn between the two.
The litespeed has got that old school nostalgic built to last look and feel. But the Lemond is almost mint and has the better components.
Im really torn between the two.
The litespeed has got that old school nostalgic built to last look and feel. But the Lemond is almost mint and has the better components.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
What do you mean by "on point" re a paint job?
How do they fit? Either one would be a good frame (my Litespeed bias notwithstanding), the Lemond would be a good choice either way. Especially if you're not planning on any significant upgrading any time soon, then the quality of the components have to factor in, and as I said, you can't go wrong with Ultegra.
How do they fit? Either one would be a good frame (my Litespeed bias notwithstanding), the Lemond would be a good choice either way. Especially if you're not planning on any significant upgrading any time soon, then the quality of the components have to factor in, and as I said, you can't go wrong with Ultegra.
Last edited by Litespud; 06-10-20 at 04:53 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
They are both 57cm top tube, but I havent got a chance to ride them yet. Thats next....
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I dont know, it looks way too "factory". It would be an amazing aftermarket paint job is all im saying.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 423
Bikes: 2016 Cervelo R3 & 1999 Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 138 Times
in
79 Posts
Here's a picture of the Classic from the 1999 catalog. Yep, I still have it from when I bought my Tuscany new. Looks like for that year yellow wasn't a factory option.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Yeah I looked through all the catalogs as well, and not only does it not have that color scheme, but none of the catalogs in any of the years have an option for a Sachs drivetrain. So im at a loss. Sort of leaning towards the Lemond at this point. I dont want to spend anything on upgrades in the immediate future.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times
in
674 Posts
Not to be negative as both are great looking bikes which would be fun to ride I would approach the carbon forks with some caution. They are 20 years old and you are not aware of any potential damage from previous impacts.
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 262
Bikes: Trek Madone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times
in
54 Posts
I have had Litespeed in the past.....forget the model, but it was a great bike. I prefer carbon in the overall scheme of things. Don’t know much about the Lemond model but Litespeed is a safe bet.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Yeah I looked through all the catalogs as well, and not only does it not have that color scheme, but none of the catalogs in any of the years have an option for a Sachs drivetrain. So im at a loss. Sort of leaning towards the Lemond at this point. I dont want to spend anything on upgrades in the immediate future.
Last edited by Litespud; 06-12-20 at 09:29 AM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
This is a very good point - at the very least, go over the fork very carefully. At any sign of abuse or damage - cracks, deep scratches etc, strongly consider budgeting for a replacement. I replaced my original CF fork at 13 years because the bike had been involved in a "roof-mounted garage door incident". The bike, attached to the roof rack through the fork, hit the door frame and managed to pull the rack half-off the car. Although the fork looked OK, and suffered no exterior damage, I was concerned that it had been exposed to significant forces for which it hadn't been designed, so I retired it (and, like I said, 13 years old....it owed me nothing). I found an identical NOS replacement on line for a relative bargain (it was NOS, still in the packaging, but >10 years old, after all). The original fork may have been fine, but for peace of mind it was worth it to me to replace it.
Last edited by Litespud; 06-12-20 at 09:33 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
OK so now I have a the LiteSpeed classic vs a newer Litespeed Ultimate. The ultimate has the 6/4 tubing and more aggressive geometry? Opinions? The Ultimate has Campy Record 10 speed drive train and Ksyrium wheels. Its 1200 compared to the 1k for the classic, but is it worth it? Also looks in better condition.
#17
Full Member
Hello,
I am considering getting into a Ti Road Bike at the moment. It would be my first Titanium bike. So I currently have two options in front of me....
1. A Litespeed Classic with Sachs/Mavic parts components.
or a
2. Lemond Arrivee with mostly Ultegra and Ksyrium wheels
Price is not a determinant cause they are both around a 1K.
Any opinions suggestions?
I am considering getting into a Ti Road Bike at the moment. It would be my first Titanium bike. So I currently have two options in front of me....
1. A Litespeed Classic with Sachs/Mavic parts components.
or a
2. Lemond Arrivee with mostly Ultegra and Ksyrium wheels
Price is not a determinant cause they are both around a 1K.
Any opinions suggestions?
That being said, since you would be buying used bikes Litespeed is a far better choice. Or a Lynskey. These people have been in the business long enough to know the material better than other people.
And being a Campy rider from the time of downtube shifting I advise Shimano. Shimano engineers are engineers. Campy engineers are artists and there is always a damned brush stroke in the wrong place. I could never get my Campy 10 speed to shift perfectly for more than 2 weeks before you'd have to fiddle with the adjustments. Usually with Shimano you set and forget. SRAM is not something I would recommend. And the Chinese groups are why they refer to things as "Cheap Chinese Garbage". They are still learning groupsets and I'm sure that they'll catch up. But don't get even near that stuff now.
By ALL means be aware that Titanium bikes are flexible. I owned a couple of Colnago Ti frames. One of them was that awful Bititan. The other a more normal bike that was good until it fractured at a weld.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Greg Lemond bikes are absolutely fantastic. Whatever the hell he learned with three Tour de France wins REALLY shows through. Now I'm not familiar with his titanium bike but I have the last version of the Zurich with Reynolds 853 tubing and it weighs the same as my Colnago carbon fiber CLX 3.0 and it doesn't lift the front wheel when you're pushing hard on a steep climb. The steering is absolutely perfect. There is no wobble at the bottom of a steep descent when you go from descent to flat ground.
That being said, since you would be buying used bikes Litespeed is a far better choice. Or a Lynskey. These people have been in the business long enough to know the material better than other people.
And being a Campy rider from the time of downtube shifting I advise Shimano. Shimano engineers are engineers. Campy engineers are artists and there is always a damned brush stroke in the wrong place. I could never get my Campy 10 speed to shift perfectly for more than 2 weeks before you'd have to fiddle with the adjustments. Usually with Shimano you set and forget. SRAM is not something I would recommend. And the Chinese groups are why they refer to things as "Cheap Chinese Garbage". They are still learning groupsets and I'm sure that they'll catch up. But don't get even near that stuff now.
By ALL means be aware that Titanium bikes are flexible. I owned a couple of Colnago Ti frames. One of them was that awful Bititan. The other a more normal bike that was good until it fractured at a weld.
That being said, since you would be buying used bikes Litespeed is a far better choice. Or a Lynskey. These people have been in the business long enough to know the material better than other people.
And being a Campy rider from the time of downtube shifting I advise Shimano. Shimano engineers are engineers. Campy engineers are artists and there is always a damned brush stroke in the wrong place. I could never get my Campy 10 speed to shift perfectly for more than 2 weeks before you'd have to fiddle with the adjustments. Usually with Shimano you set and forget. SRAM is not something I would recommend. And the Chinese groups are why they refer to things as "Cheap Chinese Garbage". They are still learning groupsets and I'm sure that they'll catch up. But don't get even near that stuff now.
By ALL means be aware that Titanium bikes are flexible. I owned a couple of Colnago Ti frames. One of them was that awful Bititan. The other a more normal bike that was good until it fractured at a weld.
To the OP, don’t be afraid of Campagnolo - it’s awesome. As for Classic vs Ultimate, it really depends what you want to do with it - they’re different frames for different purposes - if I was heading out for a 50-miler or a century, the Classic without question. The inherent flex of a round-tubed 3/2.5 frame and the comparatively relaxed geometry make for a long-distance cruiser par excellence. However, if I’m blasting around a crit or going out for a fast 25, the Ultimate might be a better bet. It’s stiff and relatively twitchy, with steeper angles and shorter wheelbase - maybe not the ideal ride for a long day in the saddle. AFAIK it has a big 6/4 down tube for stiffness and shaped 3/2.5 everywhere else - more high-tech than the Classic, which makes it a more expensive bike, but not necessarily a better bike - just built for a different purpose - you need to decide what you want out of your bike
Last edited by Litespud; 06-14-20 at 06:53 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So I finally got it. I settled on the Litespeed Classic firstly because it fit the best, it was the most budget friendly, and i believe it was the most unique. I ll post pics soon.
Likes For oleg232000:
#20
Junior Member
Maybe we can petition the people who run this site to give us our own Ti section that we can hang out in and swap stories. Post photos and above all enjoy.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
congrats on your choice - a great frame that’ll literally last you a lifetime if you look after it. Looking forward to pics
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The forum wont let me post pics lol
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thar she blows
Likes For oleg232000:
#25
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
It's yellow because it's a neutral support bike? Woah. That's really interesting.
If you feel like throwing more money at it, I'd recommend getting an innicycle headset, getting a modern groupset and bars and riding it till everything falls apart.
Or just ride it like it is for a bit till you feel like doing the above. May not be the worst idea to replace the fork as others have said, but it should be okay if a thorough examination with the bike apart makes it check out.
Congrats!
If you feel like throwing more money at it, I'd recommend getting an innicycle headset, getting a modern groupset and bars and riding it till everything falls apart.
Or just ride it like it is for a bit till you feel like doing the above. May not be the worst idea to replace the fork as others have said, but it should be okay if a thorough examination with the bike apart makes it check out.
Congrats!