New to Di2 - Question
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,740
Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
554 Posts
If you weren't aware of it already, you can setup semi-synchro shifting so that it shifts the rear and the front at the same time to lessen the gear difference. I have my hood buttons programmed for this purpose; left one shifts the FD to the small ring and the rear ring to the next smaller cog. Right hood is the reverse.
I only use the small ring for climbing. Once that is over, I switch back to the big ring and use the rear cogs as needed. The only time I ever wanted a small ring/small cog combo was when my Di2 battery died and went into limp mode and I was 15 miles from home.
I only use the small ring for climbing. Once that is over, I switch back to the big ring and use the rear cogs as needed. The only time I ever wanted a small ring/small cog combo was when my Di2 battery died and went into limp mode and I was 15 miles from home.
#27
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,968
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 521 Times
in
358 Posts
Shift 3 with a long press
Back in 2014, my 6850 came with the default "shift all cogs" with a long press. That's never useful.
My setting is "shift 3 cogs with a long press" of a rear shifter button. That's holding the button for 1/2 second or longer.
At the base of a hill: hold both bottom buttons to get the small chainring and 3 smaller cogs. Nice, no thinking required, and no auto chainring shifting.
Over the crest of the hill: hold both top buttons, to get the big ring and 3 larger cogs.
That works great with my 11-32. I think there's a "shift 2 cogs" setting also.
I ride lots of small rolling terrain, so this is used quite often. I can decide which climbs are small enough to just power over on the big ring cross chained, or if shifting the front is better.
Back in 2014, my 6850 came with the default "shift all cogs" with a long press. That's never useful.
My setting is "shift 3 cogs with a long press" of a rear shifter button. That's holding the button for 1/2 second or longer.
At the base of a hill: hold both bottom buttons to get the small chainring and 3 smaller cogs. Nice, no thinking required, and no auto chainring shifting.
Over the crest of the hill: hold both top buttons, to get the big ring and 3 larger cogs.
That works great with my 11-32. I think there's a "shift 2 cogs" setting also.
I ride lots of small rolling terrain, so this is used quite often. I can decide which climbs are small enough to just power over on the big ring cross chained, or if shifting the front is better.
Likes For rm -rf:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
That automated “shift 3 cogs” sounds great. I need to get me some Di2 one day.
#29
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,111
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6262 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,350 Posts
^ This doesn't make sense to me. When you size a chain for a mechanical groupset in which the rider can shift into "small-small" the RD deals with that just fine. It's a very bad gear combination for sure, but it shouldn't create excess slack in the chain.
Proper chain management for cassette cogs of various tooth counts is why rear derailleur cages come in different lengths.
Proper chain management for cassette cogs of various tooth counts is why rear derailleur cages come in different lengths.
A limit due to cross chaining is what would make no sense. Why would cross chaining in the small/smalls be any worse for a cassette with a larger rear cog such as my current 11-30 than it would be for those cassettes with smaller large cogs like the 11-26 which is allowed to go into the two smallest cogs?
Perhaps it's my use of the term slack. But that's how I describe less tension. And in those gear combos when the chain is at greater angle between the front and back, less tension on the bottom run of the chain can result in poor shifting performance.
Last edited by Iride01; 01-05-24 at 08:54 AM.
Likes For Iride01:
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,540
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3253 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times
in
1,521 Posts
Dang, OP just asked if it could be done. He didn't need all the "you're a stupid SOB for even thinking that way" responses. He's probably going back to his mechanical group.
#31
-------
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9657 Post(s)
Liked 6,366 Times
in
3,506 Posts
Yep, post 3 was the winner and provided him with all the information he sought.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,725
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 1,680 Times
in
789 Posts
I have my Di2 set to a semi-automatic mode. I control the shifts front and rear, but when changing from the big to small chainring or small to big chainring the RD will shift 2 gears up or down automatically so I don't feel that big jump in gears. It's pretty seamless, and eliminates the temptation of cross-chaining just because I'm otherwise too lazy to make a FD change and compensate with two RD changes.
#33
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,111
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6262 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Don't think that because people have differing opinions that they don't have respect for the other.
#34
Junior Member
Why doesn't it make sense? It's what the Total Capacity limit is for the RD. However in the case of Di2, they are fudging that by allowing you to run bigger rear cogs by not letting you use the smaller cogs.
A limit due to cross chaining is what would make no sense. Why would cross chaining in the small/smalls be any worse for a cassette with a larger rear cog such as my current 11-30 than it would be for those cassettes with smaller large cogs like the 11-26 which is allowed to go into the two smallest cogs?
Perhaps it's my use of the term slack. But that's how I describe less tension. And in those gear combos when the chain is at greater angle between the front and back, less tension on the bottom run of the chain can result in poor shifting performance.
A limit due to cross chaining is what would make no sense. Why would cross chaining in the small/smalls be any worse for a cassette with a larger rear cog such as my current 11-30 than it would be for those cassettes with smaller large cogs like the 11-26 which is allowed to go into the two smallest cogs?
Perhaps it's my use of the term slack. But that's how I describe less tension. And in those gear combos when the chain is at greater angle between the front and back, less tension on the bottom run of the chain can result in poor shifting performance.
Gear Position Control
So what is Gear Position Control, exactly? Basically, it is Shimano’s way to prevent cross chaining when in the small ring. They do this for two reasons:- Prevent a chain line that would lower the chain tension too much
- To accommodate modern disc bikes with shorter chain stays that don’t work well with extreme cross chaining
Likes For Turnin_Wrenches:
#35
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,111
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6262 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,350 Posts
The prevention of cross-chaining is exactly why those two gears are restricted when in the small ring...
Gear Position Control
So what is Gear Position Control, exactly? Basically, it is Shimano’s way to prevent cross chaining when in the small ring. They do this for two reasons:- Prevent a chain line that would lower the chain tension too much
- To accommodate modern disc bikes with shorter chain stays that don’t work well with extreme cross chaining
The less tension on the chain which is what I've been saying is the reason in the first bullet point.
So it seems we actually agree but just don't realize it because we don't see cross-chaining in the same way.
I haven't been into the newer version of e-tube project. I still use the old version prior to the version that had some issues back in 2020. There wasn't a Gear Position Control Enable/Disable option. However you could, as I have said, simply change the rear cassette size to be 11-26 or maybe it was 11-27 and it would happily shift to those two lower cogs on my 8000 series 11 speed Di2 even though the cassette was actually 11-30 or even a lower cog (more teeth).
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,044
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1284 Post(s)
Liked 1,405 Times
in
714 Posts
As an aside, i find it interesting that on 12 speed di2, the default out of the box behavior prevents cross chaining little-little on dura ace but NOT on ultegra! They’re so similar otherwise…
#37
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,111
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6262 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,350 Posts
When the total capacity is exceeded, that's where the chain will chain tension will start to diminish all other things about the bike being equal. So that's going happen sooner on a bike with a DuraAce 12 speed RD than it is a Ultegra RD as the range from small to big cog on the rear increases.
#38
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,101
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2261 Post(s)
Liked 3,481 Times
in
1,827 Posts
I mentioned this to my friend who set this up, he said this is the default of the system to prevent cross-chaining, and to over-ride this you need a computer setup which he does NOT have.
I suppose I can get used to not having my 11t and 12t when in the small ring, but it kinda rubs me the wrong way that I can't use these gears occasionally on an-as needed basis.
The whole electric shifting thing is still mostly a black box to me, but I expect there is some good knowlege here. Suggestions?? Easy Fix? Suck it up, buttercup???
If you have a mac, you can run this in a virtual enviroment, but it might be easier to borrow someone's PC.
I "solved" the problem by not doing any firmware updates, because, like you, the idea annoyed me. I've had this for almost 10 years, and was only recently bitten by a bad shift. I was in the smallest cog and the large chainring, and dropped to the small chainring first, and backpedaled or something stupid, and stuff jammed up. I'm sure it isnt the first time I shifted like that, but it is the first time I got bit.
I should note that I am exceeding the capacity of the rear derailleur with a 30T front.
So, if you do go back, be careful of cross-chaining. I always wondered why it let you go into big-big without issue. I guess that is less of a problem.
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1253 Post(s)
Liked 1,337 Times
in
683 Posts
If you have the charging brick, you can do it from a computer. If you have a PC, install the etube software and attach your usb cable and plug in the bike.
If you have a mac, you can run this in a virtual enviroment, but it might be easier to borrow someone's PC.
I "solved" the problem by not doing any firmware updates, because, like you, the idea annoyed me. I've had this for almost 10 years, and was only recently bitten by a bad shift. I was in the smallest cog and the large chainring, and dropped to the small chainring first, and backpedaled or something stupid, and stuff jammed up. I'm sure it isnt the first time I shifted like that, but it is the first time I got bit.
I should note that I am exceeding the capacity of the rear derailleur with a 30T front.
So, if you do go back, be careful of cross-chaining. I always wondered why it let you go into big-big without issue. I guess that is less of a problem.
If you have a mac, you can run this in a virtual enviroment, but it might be easier to borrow someone's PC.
I "solved" the problem by not doing any firmware updates, because, like you, the idea annoyed me. I've had this for almost 10 years, and was only recently bitten by a bad shift. I was in the smallest cog and the large chainring, and dropped to the small chainring first, and backpedaled or something stupid, and stuff jammed up. I'm sure it isnt the first time I shifted like that, but it is the first time I got bit.
I should note that I am exceeding the capacity of the rear derailleur with a 30T front.
So, if you do go back, be careful of cross-chaining. I always wondered why it let you go into big-big without issue. I guess that is less of a problem.
The issue with small/small on a short chain stay bike with a compact, when on the small chainring the chain will rub on the larger chainring.
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,044
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1284 Post(s)
Liked 1,405 Times
in
714 Posts
Total capacity on the Ultegra RD-R8150 is 39 teeth and the DuraAce RD-R9250 is 37 teeth.
When the total capacity is exceeded, that's where the chain will chain tension will start to diminish all other things about the bike being equal. So that's going happen sooner on a bike with a DuraAce 12 speed RD than it is a Ultegra RD as the range from small to big cog on the rear increases.
When the total capacity is exceeded, that's where the chain will chain tension will start to diminish all other things about the bike being equal. So that's going happen sooner on a bike with a DuraAce 12 speed RD than it is a Ultegra RD as the range from small to big cog on the rear increases.
__________________
#41
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
It allows running a 2t longer chain since the maximum slack (at small-small) that the rear cage has to pick up is reduced. This in turn allows use of a 32t or even 34t in the rear; I think for most of us this is a good trade-off... Before allowing the smallest cogs on the small ring, make sure your chain length and rear cassette will work with the rear cage.
__________________
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
#42
Di2 fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times
in
45 Posts
As far as I know - and I should definitely update the GPC page linked above - one of the main reasons for restricting small x small is because on some bikes, and with certain chain rings, you risk getting the chain caught on the big ring's shift ramps (when cross chaining small x small).
Likes For TerryDi2C:
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,129
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1006 Post(s)
Liked 588 Times
in
442 Posts
But we like to discuss and argue on anything and everything. Welcome to our current society. That's the whole point of a forum, right?
#44
Should Be More Popular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,121
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22662 Post(s)
Liked 8,987 Times
in
4,184 Posts
I have also come to love this place because, despite personalities, there is a wealth of knowledge/information/experience.
Carry on.