Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1984 Trek 400 Mystery & restoration potential

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1984 Trek 400 Mystery & restoration potential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-20, 03:01 PM
  #1  
dselected
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1984 Trek 400 Mystery & restoration potential

A dear friend has been given a vintage Trek bike and we're trying to identify its provenance and whether it would be a good bike to restore for him (family rides in the CA Bay Area). (To be clear I'm NOT looking for valuation or sale potential)

[EDIT, it appears I can't post photos yet as a new user, which makes this harder. Maybe someone can suggest a way around that?]

With great help from Skip's vintage-trek site I think we've identified this bike as a Japanese-made 1984 Trek 400 (serial # 402304XXX, stamped on lower seat tube). There are still some mysteries though and I would appreciate any community input on:
  1. The bike does not seem to be modified or previously restored, but I'm a novice so hard to be sure. It was single owner.
  2. The tires seems thicker than a road bike, and yet not as thick as the MTB tires I'm used to. Is this what MTB tires were like in 1984?
  3. The shifter location does not seem to correspond to any of the 1980s road bikes from Trek.
  4. The handlebars are like a comfort/hybrid bike and yet I can't find reference to that kind of bike anywhere in the old Trek catalogs. Might this be a one-off or non authorized?
I'm interested in restoring this bike, but don't want to proceed if it's not worth it. I'm new to restoration and would treat this as a learning project. There seems to be a really classy bike under the rust and dirt!

Thanks!
dselected is offline  
Old 08-10-20, 03:28 PM
  #2  
madpogue 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2362 Post(s)
Liked 1,747 Times in 1,191 Posts
Pics - https://www.bikeforums.net/g/album/18786894

A single straight-on (not from a standing position) shot of the bike, right-side-up, from the drive side, would be helpful.

Handlebar and shifters are not original. Very common "geezer pleaser" mod. Not enough photo detail, but the brake levers are probably upright-compatible replacements as well. Easy swap back. Stem appears to be original.

Tubing is likely Tange Magnalloy, double-butted. As others have said here, BITD, Trek's "entry level" was anything but.

I have an '84 420, and a question for you -- which side of the seat tube is the serial number on? That is, which side of the bike is it visible from?
madpogue is offline  
Old 08-10-20, 03:32 PM
  #3  
dselected
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks @madpogue. I will work on getting the clearer photo from my friend.

The serial is on the side of the front crank/gear/chain.
dselected is offline  
Old 08-10-20, 03:41 PM
  #4  
madpogue 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2362 Post(s)
Liked 1,747 Times in 1,191 Posts
Originally Posted by dselected
The serial is on the side of the front crank/gear/chain.
Thanks for the intel, mine is the same way. They didn't exactly make it easy to read, did they?

Oh - tires - original tires were 27 x 1 1/8". Yours look like 27 x 1 1/4", in keeping with the "geezer pleaser" mods. Should be marked on the sidewall somewhere.
madpogue is offline  
Old 08-10-20, 03:47 PM
  #5  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 837 Post(s)
Liked 1,080 Times in 521 Posts
As was stated, the drop bars and down tube shifters were swapped out for upright bars and stem shifters. The tires aren't typically the type you'd find on this bike. Otherwise yes definitely worth the refurbish. Trek didn't do low end bikes back then. Their entry level models were equivalent to other companies mid range. 70's and 80's treks have a cult following and for good reason.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 08-10-20, 04:22 PM
  #6  
dselected
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks @polymorphself

So to understand correctly: This bike would originally have drop bars and the shifters I can find in the vintage-trek 1984 catalog?
dselected is offline  
Old 08-10-20, 06:01 PM
  #7  
thinktubes 
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,376 Times in 891 Posts
I've owned a number of Trek 400s from that era and they are great riders. Stable and comfortable. Well worth the effort.
thinktubes is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.