1984 Trek 400 Mystery & restoration potential
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1984 Trek 400 Mystery & restoration potential
A dear friend has been given a vintage Trek bike and we're trying to identify its provenance and whether it would be a good bike to restore for him (family rides in the CA Bay Area). (To be clear I'm NOT looking for valuation or sale potential)
[EDIT, it appears I can't post photos yet as a new user, which makes this harder. Maybe someone can suggest a way around that?]
With great help from Skip's vintage-trek site I think we've identified this bike as a Japanese-made 1984 Trek 400 (serial # 402304XXX, stamped on lower seat tube). There are still some mysteries though and I would appreciate any community input on:
Thanks!
[EDIT, it appears I can't post photos yet as a new user, which makes this harder. Maybe someone can suggest a way around that?]
With great help from Skip's vintage-trek site I think we've identified this bike as a Japanese-made 1984 Trek 400 (serial # 402304XXX, stamped on lower seat tube). There are still some mysteries though and I would appreciate any community input on:
- The bike does not seem to be modified or previously restored, but I'm a novice so hard to be sure. It was single owner.
- The tires seems thicker than a road bike, and yet not as thick as the MTB tires I'm used to. Is this what MTB tires were like in 1984?
- The shifter location does not seem to correspond to any of the 1980s road bikes from Trek.
- The handlebars are like a comfort/hybrid bike and yet I can't find reference to that kind of bike anywhere in the old Trek catalogs. Might this be a one-off or non authorized?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2362 Post(s)
Liked 1,747 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Pics - https://www.bikeforums.net/g/album/18786894
A single straight-on (not from a standing position) shot of the bike, right-side-up, from the drive side, would be helpful.
Handlebar and shifters are not original. Very common "geezer pleaser" mod. Not enough photo detail, but the brake levers are probably upright-compatible replacements as well. Easy swap back. Stem appears to be original.
Tubing is likely Tange Magnalloy, double-butted. As others have said here, BITD, Trek's "entry level" was anything but.
I have an '84 420, and a question for you -- which side of the seat tube is the serial number on? That is, which side of the bike is it visible from?
A single straight-on (not from a standing position) shot of the bike, right-side-up, from the drive side, would be helpful.
Handlebar and shifters are not original. Very common "geezer pleaser" mod. Not enough photo detail, but the brake levers are probably upright-compatible replacements as well. Easy swap back. Stem appears to be original.
Tubing is likely Tange Magnalloy, double-butted. As others have said here, BITD, Trek's "entry level" was anything but.
I have an '84 420, and a question for you -- which side of the seat tube is the serial number on? That is, which side of the bike is it visible from?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2362 Post(s)
Liked 1,747 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Thanks for the intel, mine is the same way. They didn't exactly make it easy to read, did they?
Oh - tires - original tires were 27 x 1 1/8". Yours look like 27 x 1 1/4", in keeping with the "geezer pleaser" mods. Should be marked on the sidewall somewhere.
Oh - tires - original tires were 27 x 1 1/8". Yours look like 27 x 1 1/4", in keeping with the "geezer pleaser" mods. Should be marked on the sidewall somewhere.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 837 Post(s)
Liked 1,080 Times
in
521 Posts
As was stated, the drop bars and down tube shifters were swapped out for upright bars and stem shifters. The tires aren't typically the type you'd find on this bike. Otherwise yes definitely worth the refurbish. Trek didn't do low end bikes back then. Their entry level models were equivalent to other companies mid range. 70's and 80's treks have a cult following and for good reason.
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks @polymorphself
So to understand correctly: This bike would originally have drop bars and the shifters I can find in the vintage-trek 1984 catalog?
So to understand correctly: This bike would originally have drop bars and the shifters I can find in the vintage-trek 1984 catalog?
#7
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,376 Times
in
891 Posts
I've owned a number of Trek 400s from that era and they are great riders. Stable and comfortable. Well worth the effort.