Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Long legs short arms

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Long legs short arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-20, 06:20 PM
  #1  
xinlitik
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Long legs short arms

Hi all-
I ride an old Technium trilite pro 59 cm which has an old non-standard seat post size that I can't find a replacement for. Unfortunately I can't quite get my seat high enough and I keep straining by quad tendons. So I decided it might be a nice time to upgrade and was wondering about sizing, cause I'm a long leg short arm guy... Appreciate any advice.

I measured myself for various online calculators: inseam is 89 cm barefoot, height 184 cm, arm 68 cm, trunk 65 cm, forearm 35.5 cm, lower leg 58 cm, thigh 62 cm, sternal notch 151.5 cm. Fairly consistently they recommend a seat tube in the 59 cm range, but effective top tube of around 560mm. For one of the bikes I'm looking at, the le champ from bikesdirect (https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...i-disc-geo.gif), this would give me two totally different sizes - e.g. a 59 cm would address my legs but the top tube would be a bit long according to these calculators, a 53 cm would address my arms but not my legs...


(BTW measurements on my old bike are 59 cm seat tube, ~570-572 top tube)

What do you think?
xinlitik is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 07:08 PM
  #2  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,536

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times in 1,384 Posts
Go with the effective top tube measurement and look for an endurance type bike which will have a slightly longer head tube. Looks to me like the 56 would do it - ETT only ~1cm longer than perfect, easy to make up in the stem.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 05-05-20, 07:27 PM
  #3  
Marylander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Frederick County, MD
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times in 70 Posts
You can look up a fair few models on this site and compare their geometries, you can even upload geometry charts yourself: https://bikeinsights.com/home

For example, here are a couple models in my size, including another motobecane that I uploaded the geometry chart for:
https://bikeinsights.com/compare?geo...315c00144448d3

I'm in the same boat as you with long legs and short arms (and torso). The endurance and all road/gravel categories tend to have what is now called "relaxed" geometry, with tall stacks and short reaches (which are fair new to me terms as a returning rider after more than 20 years off). What this translates to for me is "regular" geometry.

I happened to have also had a technium tri-lite (no extra monikers, mine was the gray one with yellow and turquoise accents, if memory serves) that I bought new in the late 80s and was screwed up when a car pulled out in front of me and I went over the hood.
Marylander is offline  
Old 05-06-20, 09:20 AM
  #4  
xinlitik
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Go with the effective top tube measurement and look for an endurance type bike which will have a slightly longer head tube. Looks to me like the 56 would do it - ETT only ~1cm longer than perfect, easy to make up in the stem.
Thanks - so is it generally easier to crank up the seat for long legs than it is to shorten the reach with say a shorter stem?

Originally Posted by Marylander
You can look up a fair few models on this site and compare their geometries, you can even upload geometry charts yourself: https://bikeinsights.com/home

For example, here are a couple models in my size, including another motobecane that I uploaded the geometry chart for:
https://bikeinsights.com/compare?geo...315c00144448d3

I'm in the same boat as you with long legs and short arms (and torso). The endurance and all road/gravel categories tend to have what is now called "relaxed" geometry, with tall stacks and short reaches (which are fair new to me terms as a returning rider after more than 20 years off). What this translates to for me is "regular" geometry.

I happened to have also had a technium tri-lite (no extra monikers, mine was the gray one with yellow and turquoise accents, if memory serves) that I bought new in the late 80s and was screwed up when a car pulled out in front of me and I went over the hood.
Thanks for that link - really helpful. Nice to play around with the numbers. Too bad about your technium, they are cool bikes!
xinlitik is offline  
Old 05-06-20, 10:36 AM
  #5  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,536

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times in 1,384 Posts
Originally Posted by xinlitik
Thanks - so is it generally easier to crank up the seat for long legs than it is to shorten the reach with say a shorter stem?<snip>!
Bikes are sized proportionally for the average human, so shorter seat tube, top tube, and head tube. So a 53 is just too small for you, more drop than you'll probably like to get that shorter TT. The 59 is too long for you, so you'll have to use a very short stem, might not feel quite right. Thus I though the 56 would be a good compromise: a good bit of seat post showing, fine, a slightly shorter stem than usual, fine, a bit more drop than usual, also fine. See if you can order the stem uncut. All that said, there might be a more suitable frame out there somewhere.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 05-10-20, 06:29 PM
  #6  
tangerineowl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 938

Bikes: Curve Grovel v2 ti

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 75 Posts
https://99spokes.com/compare?bikes=f...6c-carbon-2020

One of those would fit you pretty well. There are other models priced cheaper. Carbon bikes.

You may need to switch out the seatpost for a longer one, depending on your saddle height / max. seatpost length for frame size spec.

That BikesDirect frame proportions does not suit you (too low at the front).

You can still find new horizontal top tube road bikes out there, but they're not that common these days, and I've never seen a 59/56cm in an off-the-shelf frame.

The bikes I listed will still have a decent enough seat tube length to fit your saddle height.
Those frames are short reach with tall stack.

Fuji frame will have the higher tech.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edit:- You're in luck if you'd like to build up a frame and have the cash. See post #4450 :- https://forums.thepaceline.net/showt...32021&page=297 (Jeff Lyon blue frame).

Last edited by tangerineowl; 05-11-20 at 05:04 PM. Reason: txt
tangerineowl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.