Converted from hybrid to road.
#26
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Wow. And I see you have a 63cm frame, that sounds right for 6'5". The steerer tube is quite short.
Easiest fix for you will be a large angle stem in the positive orientation. Many good stems are available in the 17 to 20 degree range.
Easiest fix for you will be a large angle stem in the positive orientation. Many good stems are available in the 17 to 20 degree range.
#27
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow, I'm glad I checked in here this morning. My wife and I have been test riding a lot of hybrids for the past couple of months. In the process we've come to realize that this is a great activity and we will eventually want to put in some good distances on our bikes. Since we don't have unlimited space to store several changes of bike we are now looking at road bikes as our first choice. We are looking at so called 'vintage' bikes at some shops in the area and have seem some that are in great condition. The problem with them for us is the placement of the gear shift. We've gotten accustomed to the shifters being on the handlebar and hope there are road bikes that incorporate that type of setup. I tried using shifters on a downtube and found it way out of my comfort zone. Does anyone have a suggestion about how to handle this? Any feedback is appreciated.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yep. I had the same idea. Its a 120mm (+/- 10deg) stem angled down a the moment. I'm gonna start by flipping it over...though I reckon I'll end up going to a 100mm stem.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 463
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
With regards the other comments about speed between hybrid and road bikes...I took the new supersix on its maiden voyage yesterday - an 80km loop of the bay that I've been doing for the last month on the Hybrid. The result: 2:44 vs. 3:23 the previous week on the hybrid. An average speed of 29.2km/h vs. 23.6km/h...I reckon that's more than a placebo effect. The SuperSix is carbon and weighs a bit over 5kg less than the hybrid. Thinner tyres too...dunno if that helps or not (Iv'e read conflicting posts on that one).
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Can't speak to other brands - I am using a Shimano 105 setup on a Specialized Roubaix Comp Compact.
Works great. I had shifters on the handlebar with my Trek 7.3 FX that I bought roughly a month prior to buying the Roubaix. The Trek has triple chainring and 8 speeds. The double chainring and 10 speed on the Compact work better for me. A lot better.
You and your wife will easily get used to whatever shifter you have on a road bike.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, California
Posts: 160
Bikes: 2011 Look 566 Ultegra, 2010 Specialized Sirrus Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The problem with them for us is the placement of the gear shift. We've gotten accustomed to the shifters being on the handlebar and hope there are road bikes that incorporate that type of setup. I tried using shifters on a downtube and found it way out of my comfort zone. Does anyone have a suggestion about how to handle this? Any feedback is appreciated.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I think I see Talldog's point. You were 19% faster on the hybrid by time and 23.7% faster by average speed.
Those are tremendous increases. I am also now wondering what else was different about the ride besides the bike..
- your effort; casual vs. going really hard (say 70% effort compared to 90%)
- any stops included in one trip and not the other?
- different method of recording time and speed?
- hybrid not optimized for speed-- fat knobby tires, panniers, rear rack, fenders, etc
Etc. I am not disagreeing with your basic premise that the road bike was significantly faster. I'm just joining Talldog in being surprised at how much better.
Those are tremendous increases. I am also now wondering what else was different about the ride besides the bike..
- your effort; casual vs. going really hard (say 70% effort compared to 90%)
- any stops included in one trip and not the other?
- different method of recording time and speed?
- hybrid not optimized for speed-- fat knobby tires, panniers, rear rack, fenders, etc
Etc. I am not disagreeing with your basic premise that the road bike was significantly faster. I'm just joining Talldog in being surprised at how much better.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 463
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I see Talldog's point. You were 19% faster on the hybrid by time and 23.7% faster by average speed.
Those are tremendous increases. I am also now wondering what else was different about the ride besides the bike..
- your effort; casual vs. going really hard (say 70% effort compared to 90%)
- any stops included in one trip and not the other?
- different method of recording time and speed?
- hybrid not optimized for speed-- fat knobby tires, panniers, rear rack, fenders, etc
Etc. I am not disagreeing with your basic premise that the road bike was significantly faster. I'm just joining Talldog in being surprised at how much better.
Those are tremendous increases. I am also now wondering what else was different about the ride besides the bike..
- your effort; casual vs. going really hard (say 70% effort compared to 90%)
- any stops included in one trip and not the other?
- different method of recording time and speed?
- hybrid not optimized for speed-- fat knobby tires, panniers, rear rack, fenders, etc
Etc. I am not disagreeing with your basic premise that the road bike was significantly faster. I'm just joining Talldog in being surprised at how much better.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
...but not exactly what you said...
No-one was more surprised than me when I got back home.
In response to Colin (who was actually able to articulate his point):
-effort may have been a little higher due to excitement
-no stops on either trip
-same method of recording time...in fact, because my Wiggle order hadn't arrived yet I took the computer off my hybrid and put it on the road bike so it was exactly the same computer..
-the hybrid has knobby tyres...but they're racing ralphs which are supposed to deliver pretty low rolling resistance
No-one was more surprised than me when I got back home.
In response to Colin (who was actually able to articulate his point):
-effort may have been a little higher due to excitement
-no stops on either trip
-same method of recording time...in fact, because my Wiggle order hadn't arrived yet I took the computer off my hybrid and put it on the road bike so it was exactly the same computer..
-the hybrid has knobby tyres...but they're racing ralphs which are supposed to deliver pretty low rolling resistance
Last edited by Lexi01; 08-31-11 at 05:37 PM.
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, California
Posts: 160
Bikes: 2011 Look 566 Ultegra, 2010 Specialized Sirrus Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
...but not exactly what you said...
No-one was more surprised than me when I got back home.
In response to Colin (who was actually able to articulate his point):
-effort may have been a little higher due to excitement
-no stops on either trip
-same method of recording time...in fact, because my Wiggle order hadn't arrived yet I took the computer off my hybrid and put it on the road bike so it was exactly the same computer..
-the hybrid has knobby tyres...but they're racing ralphs which are supposed to deliver pretty low rolling resistance
No-one was more surprised than me when I got back home.
In response to Colin (who was actually able to articulate his point):
-effort may have been a little higher due to excitement
-no stops on either trip
-same method of recording time...in fact, because my Wiggle order hadn't arrived yet I took the computer off my hybrid and put it on the road bike so it was exactly the same computer..
-the hybrid has knobby tyres...but they're racing ralphs which are supposed to deliver pretty low rolling resistance
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I.e. this is based on wheel size...not tyre size. Both bikes have 700c wheels...one has 23mm tyres, the other 35mm.
Last edited by Lexi01; 08-31-11 at 06:26 PM.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, California
Posts: 160
Bikes: 2011 Look 566 Ultegra, 2010 Specialized Sirrus Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not sure that's entirely correct...I think the computers calculate speed based on the number of revolutions the spoke magnet makes past the sensor on the fork...
I.e. this is based on wheel size...not tyre size. Both bikes have 700c wheels...one has 23mm tyres, the other 35mm.
I.e. this is based on wheel size...not tyre size. Both bikes have 700c wheels...one has 23mm tyres, the other 35mm.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If your hybrid tires have a taller profile, they are rolling a bit further with each revolution than a road tire with a shorter profile. This is the case even if the rim size is the same. So on the road bike each revolution you're not moving quite as far, and you'll have more revolutions to cover the same distance. You should be able to figure out the differential by looking at the odometer, assuming you did the exact same route on both.
Point A to Point B was 80ish kms...I did the same route on both bikes...the computer has an allowance to change rim size but not tyre profile...the road bike took considerably less time to complete the same route...my top speed was considerably higher on the road bike.
Please tell me if I'm missing something...cos if I need to change the computer setup for different tyre thickness to get an accurate reading I'd like to do it sooner rather than later.
#40
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155
Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
If the total distance over 80km agrees, you don't need to recalibrate. If on the other hand the same ride measures 80 km on your hybrid and 79km on your road bike, you should adjust your computer.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 463
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, California
Posts: 160
Bikes: 2011 Look 566 Ultegra, 2010 Specialized Sirrus Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This. It's very weird that your cyclometer only accounts for rim size; I'd check the manual to validate that.
#43
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
Best way to get average speed is distance over time, and not what the bike computer spits out. Your times are the accurate speed increase, and if the mph is from computer, that would be off.
Your big number jump is probably accurate, but there is a lot at play. I apologize for the non-metric, imperial numbers, but at the 14.6 mph average, you are primarily battling rolling resistance vs. air resistance, so things like tires and weight have greater impact. At the 18.1 mph average, you are overwhelmingly dealing with air resistance vs. rolling, like to the tune of 80%/20%. It doesn't change the numbers, but improved aerodynamics of drop bars becomes the most significant at speeds over 18 mph. Now of course you ride over those speeds in order to get the 18.1 average, so it absolutely helps. But probably isn't the sole cause.
I ride a flat bar hybrid, and have struggled to break the 20 mph average speed barrier. I can hit 19.9 over 12 mile course, 19.6 on 25 mile course, and 19.2 on 50 mile course. This is where aerodynamics is crushing me. I often wonder if drops would help me, but it is impossible to quantify.
Keep hammering though. Your speed will continue to grow.
Your big number jump is probably accurate, but there is a lot at play. I apologize for the non-metric, imperial numbers, but at the 14.6 mph average, you are primarily battling rolling resistance vs. air resistance, so things like tires and weight have greater impact. At the 18.1 mph average, you are overwhelmingly dealing with air resistance vs. rolling, like to the tune of 80%/20%. It doesn't change the numbers, but improved aerodynamics of drop bars becomes the most significant at speeds over 18 mph. Now of course you ride over those speeds in order to get the 18.1 average, so it absolutely helps. But probably isn't the sole cause.
I ride a flat bar hybrid, and have struggled to break the 20 mph average speed barrier. I can hit 19.9 over 12 mile course, 19.6 on 25 mile course, and 19.2 on 50 mile course. This is where aerodynamics is crushing me. I often wonder if drops would help me, but it is impossible to quantify.
Keep hammering though. Your speed will continue to grow.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 463
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride a flat bar hybrid, and have struggled to break the 20 mph average speed barrier. I can hit 19.9 over 12 mile course, 19.6 on 25 mile course, and 19.2 on 50 mile course. This is where aerodynamics is crushing me. I often wonder if drops would help me, but it is impossible to quantify.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#46
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
It's not impossibble at all. If you ride the same bike but equip it with drop bars and ride in those drops, and using a 19mph starting reference, you will gain about 2mph solely from riding in the drops as opposed to the flatbar. Not significant in my opinion unless you are racing. That is a big jump and drop bars will not cover that gap on their own, not by a long shot. It takes an exceptionally strong rider to maintain 23mph + with no help from a paceline or group. Not many can do it for long, regardless of the type of bike or bars used.
The 50 mile group ride course that I ride 1-2 times per weekend has 2300 ft of hill climbing. If 30% of my time is spent climbing, drops will have no impact on that time. If 5-10% is spent descending, drops could have an impact, but since I descend at the exact same pace as the group already tucked in their drops, I doubt I will see improvement there (215 lbs of gristle makes for already fast descents). So the advantage would be on the flats and gentle grades, maybe 60-65% of the ride time. So to gain 2 mph average on the total ride, I would have to gain 3.6 to 3.8 ish mph on cruising speed, which I doubt. Since I already cruise, in general, between 22 and 25 mph, terrain dependent, that seems a leap too far.
Please take none of this as argumentative. I agree with all of your summary statements. I don't race against anything other than myself, and I would love to crush the 20 mph average as simply a personal goal. I just doubt that it would get me there.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 463
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I totally agree with your earlier post about it being insubstantial under a given speed, and all of the technical detail that I abridged originally. I struggle with the thought that even at a 20mph average speed drops will add 2mph to your average speed. Top speed, sure. Cruising speed, probably close to it. But average, I struggle with.
The 50 mile group ride course that I ride 1-2 times per weekend has 2300 ft of hill climbing. If 30% of my time is spent climbing, drops will have no impact on that time. If 5-10% is spent descending, drops could have an impact, but since I descend at the exact same pace as the group already tucked in their drops, I doubt I will see improvement there (215 lbs of gristle makes for already fast descents). So the advantage would be on the flats and gentle grades, maybe 60-65% of the ride time. So to gain 2 mph average on the total ride, I would have to gain 3.6 to 3.8 ish mph on cruising speed, which I doubt. Since I already cruise, in general, between 22 and 25 mph, terrain dependent, that seems a leap too far.
Please take none of this as argumentative. I agree with all of your summary statements. I don't race against anything other than myself, and I would love to crush the 20 mph average as simply a personal goal. I just doubt that it would get me there.
The 50 mile group ride course that I ride 1-2 times per weekend has 2300 ft of hill climbing. If 30% of my time is spent climbing, drops will have no impact on that time. If 5-10% is spent descending, drops could have an impact, but since I descend at the exact same pace as the group already tucked in their drops, I doubt I will see improvement there (215 lbs of gristle makes for already fast descents). So the advantage would be on the flats and gentle grades, maybe 60-65% of the ride time. So to gain 2 mph average on the total ride, I would have to gain 3.6 to 3.8 ish mph on cruising speed, which I doubt. Since I already cruise, in general, between 22 and 25 mph, terrain dependent, that seems a leap too far.
Please take none of this as argumentative. I agree with all of your summary statements. I don't race against anything other than myself, and I would love to crush the 20 mph average as simply a personal goal. I just doubt that it would get me there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dad 2 3
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
11
09-07-12 03:48 AM
armyguy
Hybrid Bicycles
29
08-18-11 09:04 PM