Ultegra Di2 or Dura Ace mechanical
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Ultegra Di2 or Dura Ace mechanical
I'm looking at a setup that offers these two component sets for the same price... I've not used electronic shifting. Any opinions and reasoning behind them? I get the electronic vs mech pros and cons, but does it matter when comparing across models?
Likes For eduskator:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,915
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3270 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Di2 hands down.
- DA will be lighter.
- Di2 will probably shift as well if not better and means you will not likely need to ever change your shift cables.
- You'll be changing bar tape only when the old gets chewed up.
- If the frame is all internal cabling, you won't be dealing with a yearly swap of shift cables, which are a bit more effort for internal.
- DA will be lighter.
- Di2 will probably shift as well if not better and means you will not likely need to ever change your shift cables.
- You'll be changing bar tape only when the old gets chewed up.
- If the frame is all internal cabling, you won't be dealing with a yearly swap of shift cables, which are a bit more effort for internal.
Likes For Steve B.:
#4
Senior Member
Not really. Ultegra vs Dura-Ace is largely an issue of weight, there's not really any functional difference between them. And really, there's not much room for there to be functional difference between them: even Claris works pretty much perfectly when it's in good adjustment.
Likes For HTupolev:
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Hey eduskator, thanks for the snarky response. See that word under my name... it says newbie. That means I'm not only new to the forum but you could also guess cycling(only a few years). I'm having trouble understanding the nuances of components. I've read enough to hear people always say they would get DA if they can afford it... and others that say Ultegra is great if you don't mind the little bit of weight, which I shouldn't really care since I'm not a competitive rider.
I'm more concerned about smooth shifting since I'm heavier and have a lot of hills(can be rough shifting under load). I also don't care about cost so I'd like something I'm not going to out grow.
I'm more concerned about smooth shifting since I'm heavier and have a lot of hills(can be rough shifting under load). I also don't care about cost so I'd like something I'm not going to out grow.
Last edited by cb400bill; 03-26-20 at 04:48 PM. Reason: No name calling
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,115
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 451 Post(s)
Liked 364 Times
in
227 Posts
I've never ridden any electronic groupset, so, I am of no use to you on that--sorry.
That said, I have ridden mechanical Ultegra and 105 extensively. I've only ridden the 9100 version of Dura Ace once and pretty briefly. Amazing. Now, I am not some kind of cycling genius, just a guy who rides a lot. What I would say about these three mechanical groupsets is that, were I riding blind, I don't believe there is any way I could distinguish between the shifting performance of 105 R7000 and the current DA. Perhaps on some psychotic hill and a sudden need for immediate, total stoppage, maybe those Dura Ace brakes are a bit better? Dunno about that, but as far as shifting goes, to me, they are the same. Obviously, DA has some technology the other two lack and is, of course, much lighter.
Not really sure where Shimano is going with this, business-wise. 105 is currently such an insane value, I don't know what their value proposition for customers buying new Ultegra is (mech., that is). I have owned and do currently own some Ultegra. But were I buying a bike with mechanical now, I would almost certainly get the 105 R7000 and put that extra money in wheels/other gear. Another nice power meter. etc. Shimano are going to have to do something to better differentiate the two in the next round of updgrades, or Ultegra will become irrelevant for many buyers, IMO. Just my own personal business take and others' mileage may, of course, vary.
Some people really like SRAM. I have owned it and really liked that unique shifting setup. I have found Shimano to be a bit more reliable, though. It might be also worth considering. Don't know anything about Campagnolo.
That said, I have ridden mechanical Ultegra and 105 extensively. I've only ridden the 9100 version of Dura Ace once and pretty briefly. Amazing. Now, I am not some kind of cycling genius, just a guy who rides a lot. What I would say about these three mechanical groupsets is that, were I riding blind, I don't believe there is any way I could distinguish between the shifting performance of 105 R7000 and the current DA. Perhaps on some psychotic hill and a sudden need for immediate, total stoppage, maybe those Dura Ace brakes are a bit better? Dunno about that, but as far as shifting goes, to me, they are the same. Obviously, DA has some technology the other two lack and is, of course, much lighter.
Not really sure where Shimano is going with this, business-wise. 105 is currently such an insane value, I don't know what their value proposition for customers buying new Ultegra is (mech., that is). I have owned and do currently own some Ultegra. But were I buying a bike with mechanical now, I would almost certainly get the 105 R7000 and put that extra money in wheels/other gear. Another nice power meter. etc. Shimano are going to have to do something to better differentiate the two in the next round of updgrades, or Ultegra will become irrelevant for many buyers, IMO. Just my own personal business take and others' mileage may, of course, vary.
Some people really like SRAM. I have owned it and really liked that unique shifting setup. I have found Shimano to be a bit more reliable, though. It might be also worth considering. Don't know anything about Campagnolo.
Likes For teutoned:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
I have ridden both and currently have Ultegra DI2 on my bike. Same price? It is DI2 all day. When I first got the Ultegra a couple of years ago, people asked about it. At the time I said that it was fantastic but wasn't necessarily worth the extra money unless you had it to spend or were a racer or whatever. It shifts faster and better than mechanical - picture going up hill and having to grab a lower gear under heavy load. No pause or scraping or whatever. It just happens! Do it, do it now
Likes For t595:
#10
Senior Member
Hey eduskator, thanks for the snarky response. See that word under my name... it says newbie. That means I'm not only new to the forum but you could also guess cycling(only a few years). I'm having trouble understanding the nuances of components. I've read enough to hear people always say they would get DA if they can afford it... and others that say Ultegra is great if you don't mind the little bit of weight, which I shouldn't really care since I'm not a competitive rider.
I'm more concerned about smooth shifting since I'm heavier and have a lot of hills(can be rough shifting under load). I also don't care about cost so I'd like something I'm not going to out grow. It's too bad my first encounter is with a snobbish dick than someone willing to mentor and educate. You do the sport proud.
I'm more concerned about smooth shifting since I'm heavier and have a lot of hills(can be rough shifting under load). I also don't care about cost so I'd like something I'm not going to out grow. It's too bad my first encounter is with a snobbish dick than someone willing to mentor and educate. You do the sport proud.
#11
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,667
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3100 Post(s)
Liked 6,633 Times
in
3,799 Posts
grizzle54, a couple years ago I faced a similar decision. I chose the Ultegra Di2 and haven't once regretted that decision. It is very reliable and shifts very smooth and quick. It doesn't complain when I shift it under load. It has been everything that I hoped it would be.
Likes For grizzle54:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
+1 for Ultegra di2, I have about 1200 miles on my new di2 bike and it's fantastic, I won't ever go back. In fact, I'll be switching the gravel bike to di2 when the budget allows. I went through four rear shift cables last year, and now I never have to worry about cables again.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
For the record, the two setups are on the Trek project one site. The SLR 8 is the DA mech and the SLR7 is the U Di2. Both start at the same price.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
Hey eduskator, thanks for the snarky response. See that word under my name... it says newbie. That means I'm not only new to the forum but you could also guess cycling(only a few years). I'm having trouble understanding the nuances of components. I've read enough to hear people always say they would get DA if they can afford it... and others that say Ultegra is great if you don't mind the little bit of weight, which I shouldn't really care since I'm not a competitive rider.
I'm more concerned about smooth shifting since I'm heavier and have a lot of hills(can be rough shifting under load). I also don't care about cost so I'd like something I'm not going to out grow.
I'm more concerned about smooth shifting since I'm heavier and have a lot of hills(can be rough shifting under load). I also don't care about cost so I'd like something I'm not going to out grow.
As you've seen from the responses here, that's not much of a question. Di2 is simply better than mechanical shifting, and the real difference between Ultegra and Dura-Ace is weight.
Last edited by noodle soup; 03-26-20 at 08:14 PM.
Likes For noodle soup:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 468
Bikes: Domane SLR7 Project One
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times
in
105 Posts
For me, Di2 hands down without question any day of the week. I have a P-One SLR 7 and absolutely love it and Di2. First bike I've ever owned with electronic shifting and have zero regrets with the purchase. Honestly, DA would a total waste for me since I'm a recreational/enthusiast rider and would never realize any real benefit from DA. In fact if I had to choose between Ultegra & DA I'd pick Ultegra & pocket the difference or buy a power meter or something else I would enjoy. But that's just me and my non-racing riding style.
Likes For August West:
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yes exactly, answers from people who have politely explained that distinction. Is that an unreasonable thing to ask for? I joined to tap a knowledge base, not be dismissed. Btw, thanks for telling me how I should react to jackasses.
Likes For noodle soup:
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I have looked... and you know what you find? DA, Ultegra, 105 and Tiagra all weigh and cost differently. Is the DA derailleur engineered differently to provide smoother shifting than ultegra... and ultegra better than 105... is that even a thing.. is weight the only factor between the models? That's something a novice wouldn't know. You also find Di2 vs mech. Obviously(based on said internet message boards) Di is smoother when comaparing U di2 vs U mech... but if there is a difference in shifting between models, does that mean DA mech is as smooth as U di2? Show me that comparison.
I find it funny that in a time where I literally can't go to a bike shop(thanks covid) and have to turn to what appears to be a knowledgeable online community, I find a couple of guys who would rather sit in a circle jerk and ridicule honest questions than to be decent and help("oh you should know that moron.. hiccup burp"). Numbers don't tell the whole story so personal experience and input from veterans is invaluable. I am thankful the majority of people here are open to bringing new cyclists up to speed and building a larger community. There are people like you in every industry... I get it... the world is less for it unfortunately.
#20
Senior Member
I find it funny that in a time where I literally can't go to a bike shop(thanks covid) and have to turn to what appears to be a knowledgeable online community, I find a couple of guys who would rather sit in a circle jerk and ridicule honest questions than to be decent and help("oh you should know that moron.. hiccup burp"). Numbers don't tell the whole story so personal experience and input from veterans is invaluable. I am thankful the majority of people here are open to bringing new cyclists up to speed and building a larger community. There are people like you in every industry... I get it... the world is less for it unfortunately.
To your other questions: the mechanical derailleur sets are so good these days you'd really have to be picking at nits to find the noticeable advantages of one over the next level up or down in terms of actual shifting. Shimano tries to impress upon us that the higher-end sets use some more expensive materials, or get some extra machine steps, or whatever, but in the end, the biggest advantage of them is weight and prestige. If you're not a pro, and you're also not vain, then there's no real reason to go with Dura Ace unless you just want to. Cycling is a hobby for most of us, and hobby money expenditures don't have to be justified by things like logic and cost/benefit analyses. Some people like having the best, and it really floats their boat to have it, so they buy it.
For whatever combination of personal vanity or just some indescribable and unjustifiable personal preference I'm an Ultegra guy. It's the best of all the non-Dura Ace sets, while still costing just half of what Dura Ace costs. The difference in cost from Ultegra on down is much smaller, so I personally consider Ultegra to be the "sweet spot" on a price per goodness basis. I'd be hard pressed to justify my preference for Ultegra over, say, 105, by pointing to actual benefits other than a couple hundred grams or something. For a 255-lb clydesdale that's not an argument I'm prepared to make, other than I just like Ultegra better, so there it is.
Anyhow, Di2 is awesome. It's more than just the smooth and quick shifts. It also takes almost no effort. You're literally just clicking a button. I'll just reach down with my middle finger (to shift up) or pointer finger (to shift down) and press it, and it's nearly instantly and smoothly done. Is it really worth the hundreds of dollars difference in price? I don't know. Thankfully I don't have to justify myself to anyone but my wife, and she was cool with it. I also like that I never have to swap brake cables, I can adjust my derailleur if I need to with a few clicks on the button, no screwdrivers, no looking up on the internet what the screws are for again because I forgot since the last time I adjusted them, no nothing. Oh, and I've only got something like 2300 miles on my new bike with Di2, and have only charged the battery I think twice, and the second time it wasn't even close to gone, I'd just gotten home from a military deployment and figured it would be a good idea to start with a fresh charge and not have to worry about it for another 5 or 6 months. Di2 is the shiznit my friend. Get it and you'll never go back.
Likes For SethAZ:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N. California
Posts: 158
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6, Santa Cruz Tallboy 27.5+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
Rear Cassette
I see you ride hills. Probably ought to consider cassette gearing available for each rear derailleur.
Another question to ask yourself is “Do I want a lower gear range cassette that requires a GS derailleur”?
105 & Ultegra are available in both SS short cage and GS. I don’t believe DA mech or elect are. Don’t know about Di2
Another question to ask yourself is “Do I want a lower gear range cassette that requires a GS derailleur”?
105 & Ultegra are available in both SS short cage and GS. I don’t believe DA mech or elect are. Don’t know about Di2
Last edited by BarryVee; 03-27-20 at 12:46 AM.
#22
Full Member
I see you ride hills. Probably ought to consider cassette gearing available for each rear derailleur.
Another question to ask yourself is “Do I want a lower gear range cassette that requires a GS derailleur”?
105 & Ultegra are available in both SS short cage and GS. I don’t believe DA mech or elect are. Don’t know about Di2
Another question to ask yourself is “Do I want a lower gear range cassette that requires a GS derailleur”?
105 & Ultegra are available in both SS short cage and GS. I don’t believe DA mech or elect are. Don’t know about Di2
I have several bikes with UDI2 including my latest Project One below. It is simply wonderful.
Likes For SkepticalOne:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
I stopped reading a few posts back, but I gather we've got some crossed wires here.
OP, your question is totally fair enough from a noob's perspective, but it's also exactly the sort of post that can go on for pages and pages, like disc vs rim brakes, hence eduskator's dismissive response; I'm pretty sure he took you for a sock puppet, which I don't think anybody's made clear.
OP, your question is totally fair enough from a noob's perspective, but it's also exactly the sort of post that can go on for pages and pages, like disc vs rim brakes, hence eduskator's dismissive response; I'm pretty sure he took you for a sock puppet, which I don't think anybody's made clear.
Likes For Kimmo:
#24
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 286
Bikes: Tcr advanced sl & Protos
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times
in
33 Posts
How about 9100 Di2? I have both and they perform exactly the same, but that Dura-Ace logo looks better. (Finish may look better too)
Get the Di2 and don’t look back. I have it now on all 3 bikes and it’s a no brainer.
Get the Di2 and don’t look back. I have it now on all 3 bikes and it’s a no brainer.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
I'd say the answer to this question depends whether you're a sensible person, or just a little bit nuts for bikes, and want to feel that state of the art drivetrain through the tactile nerve of a mechanical cable. And also, mechanical derailers look better.
I'd be torn. If we're talking disc though, the purism is broken; I'd go for the Ultegra Di2, but with the less ugly Dura-Ace rotors.
I'd be torn. If we're talking disc though, the purism is broken; I'd go for the Ultegra Di2, but with the less ugly Dura-Ace rotors.