anyone have experience with late 80's campy athena?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
anyone have experience with late 80's campy athena?
I've seen a couple of vintage bikes advertised with late 80's Athena that I would have to buy sight unseen, and I'm wondering whether anyone has a bike with it, and whether it's markedly worse than Record/Chorus. It certainly looks nice enough.
#2
NFL Owner
Other than recurring nightmares of trying to get Synchro II to index properly, not really.
Likes For monogodo:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have no experience trying Athena. Shopping for a bike in 1992 the seller told be that a marked difference could be noticed between the Athena and Chorus moreso than between Record and Chorus. I went for DuraAce. for what that's worth.
If I came upon a bike that I liked, its having Athena would not disway me. The slightly less sharp performance as noted , more in the rear der. than any other single place could be addressed by an '88 or so Record which are easy to find and not high priced. Those I've used on other things. The cranks, brakes as far as wt. and stiffness were not viewed as being significantly inferior, regarding Athena back then. At the time, most had a fairly good impression of it, priced ever so slightly less than Ultegra and were often viewed to be more appealing on Italian bikes.
If I came upon a bike that I liked, its having Athena would not disway me. The slightly less sharp performance as noted , more in the rear der. than any other single place could be addressed by an '88 or so Record which are easy to find and not high priced. Those I've used on other things. The cranks, brakes as far as wt. and stiffness were not viewed as being significantly inferior, regarding Athena back then. At the time, most had a fairly good impression of it, priced ever so slightly less than Ultegra and were often viewed to be more appealing on Italian bikes.
#4
Too many hobbies!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 304
Bikes: Maserati MT-2 (reviewed in Road and Track, 1974; Raleigh Competion GS Carlton; Dawes Super Gallexy; Hollands; Raleigh Professional
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have two Athena cranksets with the specified Athena Pedals. Interestingly enough, Campy required the pedal threaded shaft be a minimum of 15mm. Longer than other Campy pedals.
They are top notch pieces. The cranksets are very beautiful and the pedals are incredibly SMOOTH!! I'd go with them any time I needed a crankset. Right up there with Record.
BTW, they take a 111mm bb. Veloce AC-H or others fit the bill. There are even servicable Campy BBs in the 111mm variety.
Steve
They are top notch pieces. The cranksets are very beautiful and the pedals are incredibly SMOOTH!! I'd go with them any time I needed a crankset. Right up there with Record.
BTW, they take a 111mm bb. Veloce AC-H or others fit the bill. There are even servicable Campy BBs in the 111mm variety.
Steve
Last edited by steve-d; 10-03-09 at 06:30 AM.
#5
Too many hobbies!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 304
Bikes: Maserati MT-2 (reviewed in Road and Track, 1974; Raleigh Competion GS Carlton; Dawes Super Gallexy; Hollands; Raleigh Professional
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here are some pics of my Athena crankset (53-39) on my Raleigh Comp GS. Also, a pic of the Athena pedals. I used the Veloce AC-H (alloy cups, hollow spindle) version of the 111mm bb.
Steve
Steve
#6
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,845
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2925 Post(s)
Liked 2,921 Times
in
1,489 Posts
I never owned Athena but sold and service several bikes with it. as the other responders said other then the Synchro it was fabulous stuff. the brakes were pretty massive for sidepulls and stopped well. I always prefered the look and more moderate power of the Chorus brakes though. run the Synchro in friction or look for the retro friction shifters from simplex or Campi and you will be very happy with Athena
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
cool thanks for the advice. just out of curiosity, where would Shimano 600 of that era fit into the mix (ie better or worse than Athena/Chorus)? I've heard it's reasonably good, but have never tried it.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Record, Croce d'une, Chorus, Athena in that oder, late 80's early 90's
#9
Waiting for Summer !
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sthlm , Sweden
Posts: 753
Bikes: E.Merckx Corsa extra PK Banken,E.Merckx Corsa extra TT,E.Merckx Strada,De Visini,Olmo Gentleman,Peugeot PA-10,E.Merckx Corsa extra Team Issue,Nishiki Olympic Royale,Nishiki Olympic
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#10
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,601
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3869 Post(s)
Liked 6,454 Times
in
3,192 Posts
How do you tell the difference between 41 date code (1988) Chorus and Athena cranks if the arms are 170mm (a size shared by the two groups)?
Not a joke. Really. I know it sounds like a setup to a dedicated, maybe horrible c&v joke, but I really don't know.
Not a joke. Really. I know it sounds like a setup to a dedicated, maybe horrible c&v joke, but I really don't know.
#11
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
856 Posts
My experience as well!
With Synchro, using modern chain (perhaps even 9s chain on the 7s freewheels) is one thing that can make everything work better than it ever could back in the day.
The shifter internals must have some lube in there that isn't dried out. A shot of oil always works for me.
The big thing is that the indexing ring in the shifter actually match the freewheel cog spacing!
Athena is actually my favorite Syncho-II 7s variant, seems to handle a 13-26t freewheel no problem.
Athena is I believe also the very first Campagnolo rear derailer to feature any degree of slanted parallelogram, and they made a beautiful derailer in the process.
A lower-tier Xenon gruppo utilized the indexing geometry and derailer slant of the Athena, but all of their other gruppos had a visibly different derailer geometry.
I've run both of these gruppos with Sunrace 13-25t freewheels and Shimano 9s chain with very good results.
Likes For dddd:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,777
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1676 Post(s)
Liked 3,084 Times
in
911 Posts
I had an ‘89 Bianchi Giro with 7 speed Athena. Shifting was great. I’m not sure about a weight difference but I think functionally comparable to C Record and IMO biggest different is aesthetics, where the C Record stands out. My experience with Syncro has generally been very good. On that bike I used a KMC 8 speed chain and a Sachs Aris freewheel.
I’ve seen some Athena Syncro shifters on eBay which have a black plastic part and they look cheap, up the ones on my bike were all metal and my guess is same for all groups in that era.
I’ve seen some Athena Syncro shifters on eBay which have a black plastic part and they look cheap, up the ones on my bike were all metal and my guess is same for all groups in that era.
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#13
Banned.
I believe Athena had self extracting crank bolts, Chorus did not. Going by memory, so I could be wrong.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,467
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1077 Post(s)
Liked 1,893 Times
in
929 Posts
Last edited by P!N20; 07-30-20 at 05:54 PM.
Likes For P!N20:
#15
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,601
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3869 Post(s)
Liked 6,454 Times
in
3,192 Posts
Thanks for the replies.
Correct. I'm looking at 1988, so, first gen.
Ahh. That's interesting. Velobase pics for Athena look the same as Chorus -- shiny and beautiful:
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...8d23f&Enum=115
.
edit: I may have figured it out if the dust caps give an indication. Mine have a 5mm hole for an allen key like the Velobase pics for Chorus:
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...0c73b&Enum=115
... not the two pin hole caps in the Velobase Athena pics.
1st gen Chorus cranks did not have self extracting crank bolts.
the finish on the Athena was dull compared with the nice silver of the Chorus.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...8d23f&Enum=115
.
edit: I may have figured it out if the dust caps give an indication. Mine have a 5mm hole for an allen key like the Velobase pics for Chorus:
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...0c73b&Enum=115
... not the two pin hole caps in the Velobase Athena pics.
Last edited by SurferRosa; 07-30-20 at 06:12 PM.
Likes For SurferRosa:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,467
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1077 Post(s)
Liked 1,893 Times
in
929 Posts
That's easy then, the Chorus cranks had a raised profile around the crank bolt hole.
Actually that's not right, I'm thinking of Veloce, sorry.
Ahh. That's interesting. Velobase pics for Athena look the same as Chorus -- shiny and beautiful.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...8d23f&Enum=115
.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...8d23f&Enum=115
.
Likes For P!N20:
#17
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,601
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3869 Post(s)
Liked 6,454 Times
in
3,192 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
Likes For P!N20:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: London, UK
Posts: 723
Bikes: Yes, probably too many but still have a roving eye...
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 2,782 Times
in
531 Posts
Very timely post as I have a pair of these cranks. They are to be fitted to a frame that has not arrived yet, so I don't know if the bottom bracket will be English or Italian threaded, but once I know that I'm trying to find what axle length I need.
Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?
Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
Here's a pic next to a later gen Chorus for comparison of the arms.
Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?
Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
Here's a pic next to a later gen Chorus for comparison of the arms.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,467
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1077 Post(s)
Liked 1,893 Times
in
929 Posts
I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need.
#22
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,845
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2925 Post(s)
Liked 2,921 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Very timely post as I have a pair of these cranks. They are to be fitted to a frame that has not arrived yet, so I don't know if the bottom bracket will be English or Italian threaded, but once I know that I'm trying to find what axle length I need.
Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?
Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
Here's a pic next to a later gen Chorus for comparison of the arms.
Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?
Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
Here's a pic next to a later gen Chorus for comparison of the arms.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Likes For Bianchigirll:
#23
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,889
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
138 Posts
[QUOTE=Bianchigirll;21616613 IMHO the Chorus group and Sheriff Star hubs were the most beautiful parts ever made by Campi[/QUOTE]
I think so too.
I think so too.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times
in
162 Posts
I have an original Athena equipped bike that I bought new in 1988? That was a long time ago.
Athena is very well made, jewel quality finish and it has wonderful asthmatics.
lt was the entry level group so it is heavier than Chorus, C-record.
Athena functions as well as any Campy from that era. It would probably last forever but will never shift as well as Shimano 105 from that same period.
I personally would not trade it for 600 or 105 because I am just a fan of that era of Campy parts.
Athena is very well made, jewel quality finish and it has wonderful asthmatics.
lt was the entry level group so it is heavier than Chorus, C-record.
Athena functions as well as any Campy from that era. It would probably last forever but will never shift as well as Shimano 105 from that same period.
I personally would not trade it for 600 or 105 because I am just a fan of that era of Campy parts.
#25
Disciple of St. Tullio
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 743
Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times
in
140 Posts
When I first built up my Ciöcc in 1992 I used Athena, though with index DT shifters. Over time I replaced the derailleurs with Record and put Ergos on it, but that wasn't because the Athena didn't work well. I had zero complaints about the function of Athena and I felt that it looked good as well. I don't really think that the Record stuff worked any better but it had the cachet.
111mm is correct.
Very timely post as I have a pair of these cranks. They are to be fitted to a frame that has not arrived yet, so I don't know if the bottom bracket will be English or Italian threaded, but once I know that I'm trying to find what axle length I need.
Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?
Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?
Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
Likes For Choke: