Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Spokes: double-butted vs. thick elbow (single butted)

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Spokes: double-butted vs. thick elbow (single butted)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-19, 04:53 PM
  #1  
tyrion
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Spokes: double-butted vs. thick elbow (single butted)

Which one makes a more durable wheel? Sapim Race (double-butted 2.0mm, 1.8mm, 2.0mm) or Sapim Strong (single butted, 2.3mm elbow, 2.0mm rest)?

I've read enough from the the experts here to believe triple butted spokes makes the most durable wheel, but that's not available from the builder I'm looking at.

Sapim suggests it's Strong (single butted) spoke is their strongest ("The Strong is developed for specific and heavy usage such as tandem, e-bikes or heavy load use.")

Does this make sense to the wheel building experts here?
tyrion is offline  
Old 12-04-19, 08:54 PM
  #2  
tomtomtom123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,064
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 350 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 122 Times in 90 Posts
When I was building new wheels a few months ago I also considered the race and strong. I bought one of each and stuck them through the Shimano hub flange, and the strong needed some force to bend the spokes around the flange for the ones with heads in the inside of the flange. So I went with the race.

The thicker strong would stretch less than the thinner race, but I have very short spokes on my 20" wheels, so the amount of stretch with the short race on 20" would be less than a long strong on 26".

I assume that the double butted would reduce wear at the nipple compared to single butted. But the thicker elbow on the strong might be appropriate in some cases for heavy loads.
tomtomtom123 is offline  
Likes For tomtomtom123:
Old 12-04-19, 09:08 PM
  #3  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4792 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times in 2,548 Posts
What rims are you using? I find that I get more rim damage from potholes and the like with heavier spokes; ie the middle 80%. The Race is 1.8, the Strong 2.0. 2.0 is 23% larger, ie 23% stiffer and with 81% of the stretch, so that much harder on rims with hard hits. For lightish rims like Mavi Open Pros, I avoid 2.0s like the plague. (Well, I often pick up new wheels cheap laced with factory 2.0 and ride them until I'm in wheel-building mode, then they get ripped out and 2-1.6-2s laced in (2-1.8-2 on the right rear).

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 12-04-19, 09:36 PM
  #4  
tyrion
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
What rims are you using?
Looking at strong rims, Velocity Cliffhanger, Velocity Aileron, and WTB KOM Tough. I would get 36 hole versions of the Velocities but the WTB only comes in 32 hole. If I go with Cliffhangers (675 grams per rim!) I think it will be plenty strong with any spoke, but if I go with the WTB I think I need to maximize the strength I can get with 32 spokes.

I'm 240 lbs and am hard on wheels, so I want something rugged that I don't have to worry about.
tyrion is offline  
Old 12-04-19, 09:39 PM
  #5  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4792 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times in 2,548 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
Looking at strong rims, Velocity Cliffhanger, Velocity Aileron, and WTB KOM Tough. I would get 36 hole versions of the Velocities but the WTB only comes in 32 hole. If I go with Cliffhangers (675 grams per rim!) I think it will be plenty strong with any spoke, but if I go with the WTB I think I need to maximize the strength I can get with 32 spokes.

I'm 240 lbs and am hard on wheels, so I want something rugged that I don't have to worry about.
I weigh 150 and am not hard on rims. Your plan sounds solid.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.