Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Shimano RM40 hubs vs Shimano RSX hubs

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Shimano RM40 hubs vs Shimano RSX hubs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-20, 10:22 AM
  #1  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Shimano RM40 hubs vs Shimano RSX hubs

OK, which hub is better and why would you choose one over the other. This conversation is irrespective of rim or bike attached.

I ask this, as my 98 Schwinn Searcher hybrid and my 98 Cannondale R200 both have the RM40 hubsets, as does my daughter's 98 Schwinn Passage. My recently acquired 97 Cannondale R300 was supposed to be so equipped as well. BUT, it has RSX A410 hubset instead...
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-07-20, 07:49 AM
  #2  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
Is the RM40 8s vs the A410 7s? I have the latter and it’s a solid hub set. Less chunky than the MTB. I would think the OLD’s are going to be different between mtb and road standards.

Neither is high end, but both should be very functional and I would think whichever fits the bike will work. Properly maintained, they’ll both last a very long time.
mountaindave is offline  
Old 02-07-20, 10:11 AM
  #3  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,466 Times in 1,434 Posts
Low end Shimano hubs are made of surprisingly good quality. Don't worry.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 02-07-20, 12:31 PM
  #4  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by mountaindave
Is the RM40 8s vs the A410 7s? I have the latter and it’s a solid hub set. Less chunky than the MTB. I would think the OLD’s are going to be different between mtb and road standards.

Neither is high end, but both should be very functional and I would think whichever fits the bike will work. Properly maintained, they’ll both last a very long time.
+1 to all this. I would use either one with confidence.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-08-20, 01:02 AM
  #5  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by mountaindave
Is the RM40 8s vs the A410 7s? I have the latter and it’s a solid hub set. Less chunky than the MTB. I would think the OLD’s are going to be different between mtb and road standards.

Neither is high end, but both should be very functional and I would think whichever fits the bike will work. Properly maintained, they’ll both last a very long time.
Both are 7 speed free hubs. Rephrasing. My daughter's RM40 is 7s, and both of mine are 7s. As is the RSX. Frankly, I didn't know they offered a RSX hubset, but shouldn't be surprised.

I have no doubt the RM40, and RSX hubs will last. Certainly Shimano made gazillions of RM40s... The RSX set with my new acquisition was a surprise, expected RM40s.

Along with all my other winter projects, I think lacing new rims to refurbished and polished RSX hubs is in order. And use them on the 98 R200, it wears much nicer examples of RSX components than the well used 97 R300 I snagged.

Thanks for the help!
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-08-20, 06:29 AM
  #6  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
In the 90’s the road groups directly under 105 were RSX and RX100. They roughly equate to Sora and Tiagra respectively. However, I find the RSX and RX100 groups to be more aesthetically pleasing as they were silver and less chunky than Sora and Tiagra.

I happen to have the ‘98 8s version C’dale R300 and it’s been a great road bike for my daughters. I converted it to 650b, but I digress...
mountaindave is offline  
Old 02-08-20, 07:33 PM
  #7  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by mountaindave
In the 90’s the road groups directly under 105 were RSX and RX100. They roughly equate to Sora and Tiagra respectively. However, I find the RSX and RX100 groups to be more aesthetically pleasing as they were silver and less chunky than Sora and Tiagra.

I happen to have the ‘98 8s version C’dale R300 and it’s been a great road bike for my daughters. I converted it to 650b, but I digress...
I can't say I've seen RX100 components. But I agree, the RSX hubs do look a LOT nicer than RM40.

Now you have me interested in your 650b swap on the 98 R300. I had contemplated a 650b swap on a Marin hybrid I picked up just before getting the R300. But, the chain stay spacing is narrow and I couldn't really gain any tire width with 650b.
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-08-20, 09:41 PM
  #8  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
Yeah, the indents on the OS chain stays is 700c specific and I can just barely fit 32’s in. Normally I can get 38’s on even with a late 80’s bike that barely fits 700x25. But it was a decent improvement over 28’s considering it’s the smallest frame they made (50 CM?) and my girls are pretty light weight.
mountaindave is offline  
Likes For mountaindave:
Old 02-08-20, 09:46 PM
  #9  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
Also, after riding the C’dale bike to school and back on gravel and around crappy pavement, my daughter came to like the feel of supple tires (Grand Bois Cypress). When I had her test ride a friend’s full 7400 DA Vitus 979 with 25’s that he would give me at a really good price she just said, “Too skinny,” and walked off.
mountaindave is offline  
Likes For mountaindave:
Old 02-09-20, 07:20 AM
  #10  
top506
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Posts: 5,325

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 280 Posts
Originally Posted by zjrog
I can't say I've seen RX100 components. But I agree, the RSX hubs do look a LOT nicer than RM40.

.
IIRC, RX100 was 7s DT shifters. RSX was a year or two later, 7 or 8s, brifters.

Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Likes For top506:
Old 02-09-20, 08:48 AM
  #11  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by mountaindave
Yeah, the indents on the OS chain stays is 700c specific and I can just barely fit 32’s in. Normally I can get 38’s on even with a late 80’s bike that barely fits 700x25. But it was a decent improvement over 28’s considering it’s the smallest frame they made (50 CM?) and my girls are pretty light weight.
I might look at 650b for the R300 then. Just out of curiosity. I'd fit 28s on the R200, and it was tight. So I stayed with 25s... I know I don't want to go back to 23s, the Clyde I still am, and the much heavier guy I used to be say no...
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-09-20, 12:43 PM
  #12  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by zjrog
I can't say I've seen RX100 components. But I agree, the RSX hubs do look a LOT nicer than RM40.
I have a road bike outfitted completely with RX100 parts. Works great, and from what I've heard, it's basically 105 with a different finish. (The hubs do have "piston-ring" type seals instead of rubber seals, but that has yet to be a problem.)
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 02-10-20, 04:37 PM
  #13  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by thermionicscott
i have a road bike outfitted completely with rx100 parts. Works great, and from what i've heard, it's basically 105 with a different finish. (the hubs do have "piston-ring" type seals instead of rubber seals, but that has yet to be a problem.)
cool!
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-10-20, 04:40 PM
  #14  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by mountaindave
Yeah, the indents on the OS chain stays is 700c specific and I can just barely fit 32’s in. Normally I can get 38’s on even with a late 80’s bike that barely fits 700x25. But it was a decent improvement over 28’s considering it’s the smallest frame they made (50 CM?) and my girls are pretty light weight.
Happened to run across your R300 post on the 650b conversion pics thread.... Cool beans!
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-10-20, 09:43 PM
  #15  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
Ha! I forgot all about that post - good sleuthing!

Here’s a shot of the chain stay clearance. Not great, but it works for road riding. You can see the indent on the stay doesn’t line up with 650b wheels. Cant really tell, but there’s about 2mm in each side... at most.


mountaindave is offline  
Old 02-10-20, 10:58 PM
  #16  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times in 865 Posts
The RSX freehub should be able to handle an 11t cog, whereas the HB-RM40 would normally need to have the splines cut back a couple of mm.

RX100 lasted a few years, went from 7s DT levers to 8s STI
RSX was lower-tier than RX100, and was still at the 7s level when the first STI version appeared. The first version had compact (26)-36-46t chainrings and often was paired with an 11-24t 7s cassette.
dddd is offline  
Old 02-10-20, 11:32 PM
  #17  
wrk101
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,525

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
My luck with Shimano hubs has been worse than others. As a percentage, I find a more worn out cones on Shimano hubs than any other brand. The opposite side of the spectrum are Campy hubs. I have had Campy hubs as far back as 1959 with still great cones and cups. Meanwhile, I have had to use a bunch of Shimano wheels as donors.
wrk101 is offline  
Likes For wrk101:
Old 02-10-20, 11:40 PM
  #18  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
I actually prefer the RX100 over similar vintage 105 for purely aesthetic reasons - I love shiny over dull gray.
mountaindave is offline  
Likes For mountaindave:
Old 02-11-20, 08:57 AM
  #19  
3speedslow
Senior Member
 
3speedslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 9,338

Bikes: A few

Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1942 Post(s)
Liked 1,073 Times in 637 Posts
Needs pics!




3speedslow is offline  
Old 02-11-20, 10:41 AM
  #20  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,466 Times in 1,434 Posts
Originally Posted by wrk101
My luck with Shimano hubs has been worse than others. As a percentage, I find a more worn out cones on Shimano hubs than any other brand. The opposite side of the spectrum are Campy hubs. I have had Campy hubs as far back as 1959 with still great cones and cups. Meanwhile, I have had to use a bunch of Shimano wheels as donors.
I wonder if they wear out because of maladjustment. Most bikes come with their hubs set too tight.

I agree about Campagnolo hubs, though. I've never seen anything better.

But wouldn't you agree that low-end Shimano beats those Normandy Sport hubs from the 70s? I was a bike mechanic from 1978 through 1984, and I overhauled hundreds of Normandy hubs. Ick!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Likes For noglider:
Old 02-12-20, 10:29 PM
  #21  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by 3speedslow
Needs pics!




Wow. That's awesome! I have a lot of work to do to match that shine with my RSX!
zjrog is offline  
Old 02-12-20, 10:34 PM
  #22  
zjrog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times in 207 Posts

RSX I got on my recent 97 Cannondale R300
RM-40 on my 98 Cannondale R200
105 5600 series
561 Wheelset, both this and the 105 wheelset were picked up used. The 561 wheels are too low spoke for my weight, but they are just fine on my indoor trainer (and shiny!)...
zjrog is offline  
Likes For zjrog:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.