tire direction
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
and a skid is just a reverse burnout... both melt rubber into little tiny balls.. AKA: "the marbles". created by heat as a result of FRICTION... you know... the same thing that makes brakes work.
enjoy eating your straw.
oh, and sliding tires across oily pavement is really... are ya sittin' down?.... petro-planing.
now... what makes wet pavement slippery when compared to dry pavement?
a thin layer of water... we know that as HYDROPLANING.... the amount of hydroplaning occurring is all that stands between you and that guardrail on the outside of any corner when the road surface is wet... speed reduces the time that the water has to get out from in between your tires and the pavement's surface.. tread helps speed the removal... directional treads actually create a pumping action as well as channels to facilitate the evacuation of the offending liquid.
Last edited by maddog34; 06-18-23 at 03:16 PM.
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 705
Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
107 Posts
You may be interested in the new thread, where that is discussed in more detail -- specifically the fact that NASA's equation proves bicycles can hydroplane.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,551
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
399 Posts
Well, it's a lot more than that. Science is the best way we have to understand the natural world. It's not perfect, being a human endeavor, but it's self-correcting and, given enough time, leads to better understanding.
In science, the word "theory" means a concept that is so well-supported by evidence that it's generally accepted as "truth"... at least in the scientific community. A theory starts as a "hypothesis", which may be not much more than an observation or educated guess. Then the hypothesis is tested, attempting to show that it's wrong; in other words to "falsify" it. If this happens, the scientist goes back to the drawing board and generates another hypothesis. When the hypothesis has been tested enough by multiple investigators, and becomes useful for making predictions, it attains the status of a theory.
Examples of theories include Germ Theory of Disease, Evolution, Continental Drift. These have stood the test of time and many challenges, but they *could* be falsified... whoever did this would instantly win the Nobel Prize!
In science, the word "theory" means a concept that is so well-supported by evidence that it's generally accepted as "truth"... at least in the scientific community. A theory starts as a "hypothesis", which may be not much more than an observation or educated guess. Then the hypothesis is tested, attempting to show that it's wrong; in other words to "falsify" it. If this happens, the scientist goes back to the drawing board and generates another hypothesis. When the hypothesis has been tested enough by multiple investigators, and becomes useful for making predictions, it attains the status of a theory.
Examples of theories include Germ Theory of Disease, Evolution, Continental Drift. These have stood the test of time and many challenges, but they *could* be falsified... whoever did this would instantly win the Nobel Prize!
Likes For sweeks:
#79
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,547
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,437 Times
in
2,763 Posts
L134, that does sound frightening regardless of the cause! How did you correct it?
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,543 Posts
you can lose traction without causing a skid mark
and losing traction is not hydroplaning in all cases, much less hydroplaning on liquefied rubber
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Likes For squirtdad:
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 705
Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
107 Posts
Long time ago, 1982. What I do recall is that I was terrified, I sensed that I had pretty much no control of the bike (probably not true as we did not crash) and I NEVER told my now ex-wife. I think I probably just managed to gradually slow down, stop, and take a deep breath. BTW, it was not a shimmy. It was more like a floating sensation. This topic has always fascinated me because of the experience and I simply don't buy the argument/theory that it is impossible to hydroplane on a bike, regardless of what any scientist might tell me.. I will also contend that the cited NASA study actually does NOT prove it impossible and therefore I am NOT dissing the scientists and am NOT denying the science.
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,376
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2485 Post(s)
Liked 2,956 Times
in
1,679 Posts
Long time ago, 1982. What I do recall is that I was terrified, I sensed that I had pretty much no control of the bike (probably not true as we did not crash) and I NEVER told my now ex-wife. I think I probably just managed to gradually slow down, stop, and take a deep breath. BTW, it was not a shimmy. It was more like a floating sensation. This topic has always fascinated me because of the experience and I simply don't buy the argument/theory that it is impossible to hydroplane on a bike, regardless of what any scientist might tell me.. I will also contend that the cited NASA study actually does NOT prove it impossible and therefore I am NOT dissing the scientists and am NOT denying the science.
#83
Junior Member
Well all I know is that there should be a law standardizing the location of the arrow on the sidewalk. Forget all this hydroplaning stuff, let's talk about all the time wasted worldwide looking for the gosh darn arrow (especially for those of us needing reading glasses).
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
For now, I'll stick to Vittoria tires.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
And my other wisecrack comment - I make it a point of seeing to it my tires always rotate so that the tread on top goes forward. I find the bike very difficult to balance when they rotate backwards and even when I can do the balancing act, I go not arrive where I intended to go.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,663
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1610 Post(s)
Liked 2,593 Times
in
1,225 Posts
You guys talking about losing your grip? The only time I've had issues on asphalt being wet is when it was painted and on tarred cracks.
#88
Newbie
yes I laughed out loud at that, just ride and see for yourself
#89
Senior Member
Amusing
All this chatter and I didnt see much about tire direction.
If you look directly at the tread and see a caret ^ or arrow head in the tread it is directional. When looking at the tire from the back or front the "point" should be facing up. If there is a directional arrow, that will match what I just wrote. It will be the opposite for the front.
HOWEVER many of the better quality tires will have a two sided arrow on the sidewall which will have front and back marked on either side of the arrow. This DOES match what I have described. Another conventional marking is POWER with an arrow that will also match.
The power scenario matches why the tire is mounted rotating one way for the rear and the opposite for the front. Rear has forces transmitted from the chain. Front has the most force from braking.
Got it figured out now?
-SP
If you look directly at the tread and see a caret ^ or arrow head in the tread it is directional. When looking at the tire from the back or front the "point" should be facing up. If there is a directional arrow, that will match what I just wrote. It will be the opposite for the front.
HOWEVER many of the better quality tires will have a two sided arrow on the sidewall which will have front and back marked on either side of the arrow. This DOES match what I have described. Another conventional marking is POWER with an arrow that will also match.
The power scenario matches why the tire is mounted rotating one way for the rear and the opposite for the front. Rear has forces transmitted from the chain. Front has the most force from braking.
Got it figured out now?
-SP