This is worth a share - interesting fold!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,463
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
This is worth a share - interesting fold!
Cyclopic Spokeless eFolder
Well here is something new, a spokeless electric folding bike that looks like a futuristic penny farthing!
The Cyclopic folds into the front wheel to create a very compact design for transport and storage. Low maintenance and cleanliness is another highlight with a full enclosed drivetrain and puncture proof tires from Tannus.
#2
Widely Despised
Setting aside efficiency issues of hubless wheels,
the seat sits almost directly over the rear wheel's center.
That's some pretty awkward riding geometry.
the seat sits almost directly over the rear wheel's center.
That's some pretty awkward riding geometry.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,463
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
I know - it's almost like a penny farthing in a lean back sort of way. The fold is pretty clever, though. And it's electric so maybe the user wouldn't be pedaling very hard.
#4
Banned
Does it Exist. or just in CGI Until patent is granted..
Hubless wheels can Be the electric motor..
....
Hubless wheels can Be the electric motor..
....
Last edited by fietsbob; 04-05-19 at 12:47 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,708
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times
in
252 Posts
Rather than getting sprayed onto you, the mud gets packed into those tubes for tires ane then the bike stops, so you do not need to deal with any maintenance - trying to transcribe these claims onto some actual practical experience.
#6
55+ Club,...
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in New York, NY
Posts: 4,343
Bikes: 9+,...
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1127 Post(s)
Liked 854 Times
in
598 Posts
This bike scares me,...LOL!!! I'd be deathly afraid to even sit on it. Us chubby guys tip over quite easily!
__________________
If it wasn't for you meddling kids,...
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,223
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3465 Post(s)
Liked 1,470 Times
in
1,147 Posts
I think it would handle like driving an articulated front end loader, but a front end loader has four wheels so you do not have to balance it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 522
Bikes: Downtube IX NS&FS, Dahon Speed8Pro/Matrix/Curve, Brom S2L,Montague Para, ICE-XL w/Rollie/Schlumpf, Trident Spike, ebikes, BFSatRDay
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times
in
81 Posts
They laughed at Wilbur and Orville , too.
But then ,they laughed at Bob Hope, as well.
But then ,they laughed at Bob Hope, as well.
#11
Senior Member
I'm sure we've all see a score of "bikes" imagineered by designers over the years. They're pretty much all as silly as this one.
Why do they all seem to hate spokes?
Why do they all seem to hate spokes?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
The proportions don't even remotely work. For it to work with no head tube and the seat so close to to the smaller wheel, that would have to be a 36" or so front wheel. I've got one here, it's a bit unwieldy and too big to carry it hanging from your arm the way pictured on their site. Even if you assume the pedals are just decoration, there's no reason to put them way up at the height of the axis of the rear wheel, look at a picture of an adult on a unicycle where the cranks actually need to be at axle height and it becomes obvious that would take a far taller seatpost than pictured. Essentially their pedals are too high to use, but if they're not going to be used then pedal strikes aren't an issue and they could just have low moped running boards.
Seems like this was sketched by an artist who's never ridden any sort of cycle device - notice no one on their "meet the team" lists any familiarity with any sort of cycling at all; you'd think a bike company would have at least someone who'd pose on or with a bike...
The whole concentricity idea is silly anyway; it forces a large diameter wheel which is an immediate portability issue, while yielding a very narrow package, which isn't all that much an asset, and then you actually sit over the small wheel leading to worse ride quality than wrangling that big one on and off trains and busses should earn you. If you dispense with or fold the pedaling mechanism, you could fold two 24" wheels beside each other and have decent ride quality in a still fairly narrow package but with a maximum dimension that will fit in a train/bus overhead luggage bin where this would not remotely.
If they want to argue that the idea actually has merit, the most obvious thing they need to do is build one up with their proposed proportions using ordinary off the shelf spoked wheels that let the bike function, but not fold (putting cranks inside a spoked wheel's circumference but not concentric with its axle is a problem that Huni-Rex for example solved using a chain on each side, or they could just make a purely electric prototype - though trying to put them there is one of their more obvious mistakes). Actually get on that and ride it, and they'll realize the proposed design is not going to work well.
Here at least is a picture (I suspect render/photosohp - notice the valve stem that wouldn't survive a single rotation) that reveals the proportion problem:
https://www.standard.co.uk/tech/elec...-a4110151.html
Notice where the seat is compared to where it needs to be?
And of course articles just get generated from a press package without any actual *thought* put into considering what has been proposed.
Seems like this was sketched by an artist who's never ridden any sort of cycle device - notice no one on their "meet the team" lists any familiarity with any sort of cycling at all; you'd think a bike company would have at least someone who'd pose on or with a bike...
The whole concentricity idea is silly anyway; it forces a large diameter wheel which is an immediate portability issue, while yielding a very narrow package, which isn't all that much an asset, and then you actually sit over the small wheel leading to worse ride quality than wrangling that big one on and off trains and busses should earn you. If you dispense with or fold the pedaling mechanism, you could fold two 24" wheels beside each other and have decent ride quality in a still fairly narrow package but with a maximum dimension that will fit in a train/bus overhead luggage bin where this would not remotely.
If they want to argue that the idea actually has merit, the most obvious thing they need to do is build one up with their proposed proportions using ordinary off the shelf spoked wheels that let the bike function, but not fold (putting cranks inside a spoked wheel's circumference but not concentric with its axle is a problem that Huni-Rex for example solved using a chain on each side, or they could just make a purely electric prototype - though trying to put them there is one of their more obvious mistakes). Actually get on that and ride it, and they'll realize the proposed design is not going to work well.
Here at least is a picture (I suspect render/photosohp - notice the valve stem that wouldn't survive a single rotation) that reveals the proportion problem:
https://www.standard.co.uk/tech/elec...-a4110151.html
Notice where the seat is compared to where it needs to be?
And of course articles just get generated from a press package without any actual *thought* put into considering what has been proposed.
Last edited by UniChris; 06-26-19 at 09:08 AM.
#13
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Liked 1,833 Times
in
1,065 Posts
Pennys are front drive.
The 1879 Lawson Bicyclette, an actual rideable bicycle:
Folding joint also the steering axis? "Simsons already did it." US Patent 378253, 'Folding Velocipede', E. G. Latta, 1888:
131 years later and still a bad idea.
The 1879 Lawson Bicyclette, an actual rideable bicycle:
Folding joint also the steering axis? "Simsons already did it." US Patent 378253, 'Folding Velocipede', E. G. Latta, 1888:
131 years later and still a bad idea.
Last edited by tcs; 06-26-19 at 09:22 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 339
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times
in
20 Posts
Yet another clueless designer thinking hubless wheel is cool.
Hubless wheel is stupid idea in general, as you can see from this actual one made by Yale students.
Hubless wheel is stupid idea in general, as you can see from this actual one made by Yale students.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
So a 40 inch wheel - pretty much confirms my argument that this proposed one with a little more handlebar would need something close to the 36in range on front for the proportions to work. Maybe 34", though the next available size down for prototyping is 32.
Not exactly most people's idea of folding bike portability.
Last edited by UniChris; 06-27-19 at 09:08 AM.
#16
Banned
A folding , segmented wheel, penny farthing bike was pictured in the "Brompton Bicycle" book ...
You have to buy the book to see the picture ..
You have to buy the book to see the picture ..
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
Seems a little easier with a pneumatic tire than rubber retained by a twist and solder wire.
#18
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Liked 1,833 Times
in
1,065 Posts
#19
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Liked 1,833 Times
in
1,065 Posts
For a modern folding (and transforming dwarf) penny, check out the MC2.
https://www.mc2bike.com/index.html
https://www.mc2bike.com/index.html
#21
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 48
Bikes: Montague Swissbike X50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, the cool aesthetics of the hubless wheel were a big part of why I went with the Geoorbital wheel for my Montague --- the negative riding aspects (vibration/harsh ride, heavy due to the motor/battery) would make me leery of a non-powered implementation.
#22
Senior Member
Wow that's...something.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
op3studios
Utility Cycling
15
12-06-14 04:40 PM
Amuro Lee
Electric Bikes
2
11-07-10 11:54 PM