Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Bicycle weight vs your weight?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Bicycle weight vs your weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-11, 07:43 AM
  #1  
sam12
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bicycle weight vs your weight?

I assume every one wants well built low weight bike to gain better performance.

Lets say if you loose 10% of your weight (assume weight loss is pure fat and no muscle loss), would you gain performance (like climbing, speed etc) from the same bike as overall weight is less?

Last edited by sam12; 07-08-11 at 07:55 AM.
sam12 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 07:46 AM
  #2  
ErichM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Weight is weight, the amount of energy required to move that weight doesn't care where the weight is.
ErichM is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 07:55 AM
  #3  
Da Sherm
Gaming Guru
 
Da Sherm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Overpelt, Belgium
Posts: 121

Bikes: 2011 Ridley Orion Ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You wouldn't gain performance necessarily. Someone could go get liposuction and lose 20+ pounds, doesn't make them any more fit than before.

It's also much easier on the wallet to buy a 20-25lb titaniam/aluminum bike than some carbon-fiber 15 lb road bike if you have more than 10 pounds to lose. Let's face it, most of us could afford to lose some weight
Da Sherm is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 07:56 AM
  #4  
sam12
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why every one try to go for most expensive (better bike, light weight) than losing weight and get may be little less expensive bike to have similar performance?
sam12 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 07:59 AM
  #5  
z90
Senior Member
 
z90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Path to Fredvana
Posts: 909

Bikes: Long Haul Trucker 2010 , Felt Z90 2008, Rans Rocket 2001, Specialized Hardrock 1989

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sam12
Why every one try to go for most expensive (better bike, light weight) than losing weight and get may be little less expensive bike to have similar performance?
Why you talk like Tarzan?
z90 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:04 AM
  #6  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by z90
Why you talk like Tarzan?
+1
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:05 AM
  #7  
sam12
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by z90
Why you talk like Tarzan?

Did I shoot myself on my foot?
sam12 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:06 AM
  #8  
Gorden Gekko
White Bags + Red eggs
 
Gorden Gekko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by z90
Why you talk like Tarzan?
Gorden Gekko is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:06 AM
  #9  
pallen
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 4,034

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
When you buy a lighter bike you lose weight and you dont have to worry about your bike having too many cheeseburgers and gaining it back.
pallen is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:11 AM
  #10  
joe_5700
CAT4
 
joe_5700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 1,681

Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sam12
I assume every one wants well built low weight bike to gain better performance.

Lets say if you loose 10% of your weight (assume weight loss is pure fat and no muscle loss), would you gain performance (like climbing, speed etc) from the same bike as overall weight is less?
Yes and yes, but losing weight is not going to improve your speed on a flat road.
joe_5700 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:12 AM
  #11  
markrj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pallen
When you buy a lighter bike you lose weight and you dont have to worry about your bike having too many cheeseburgers and gaining it back.
Quote of the day!
markrj is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:16 AM
  #12  
SBRDude
Godfather of Soul
 
SBRDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,517

Bikes: 2002 Litespeed Vortex, 2010 Specialized Tricross Expert,2008 Gary Fischer Hi Fi Carbon, 2002 Specialized S-Works hard tail, 1990 Kestrel KM 40

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joe_5700
Yes and yes, but losing weight is not going to improve your speed on a flat road.
Perhaps not, but if you're lighter, you're going to be able to sprint and climb faster and therefore be able to ride more aggressively and that helps you get into even better shape. Also, weight DOES matter on flat roads, so let's be clear about that. I get that a few pounds aren't going to be noticeable, but a rider IS moving all the weight and it takes more work to move more weight.
SBRDude is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:17 AM
  #13  
Beaker
moth -----> flame
 
Beaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,916

Bikes: 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Yes. I lost an extra 5-6lbs from my usual riding weight over the last two months by ramping up my riding ahead of the death ride tomorrow, and climbing hills has become noticeably easier. Speed on the flats is no different.
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
Beaker is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:20 AM
  #14  
Mike F
Senior Member
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,181

Bikes: 2017 Specilized Roubaix, 2012 Scott CR1 Team, Felt Z85

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I can lose the weight difference between my bike and a really cool carbon fiber bike during one "sit" in thw AM
Mike F is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:21 AM
  #15  
hao
Senior Member
 
hao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sam12
Why every one try to go for most expensive (better bike, light weight) than losing weight and get may be little less expensive bike to have similar performance?
I know it's hard to believe, but there are people on this planet that are NOT fat. In fact, they are slim and they can't afford to lose body weight.
hao is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:26 AM
  #16  
z90
Senior Member
 
z90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Path to Fredvana
Posts: 909

Bikes: Long Haul Trucker 2010 , Felt Z90 2008, Rans Rocket 2001, Specialized Hardrock 1989

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike F
I can lose the weight difference between my bike and a really cool carbon fiber bike during one "sit" in thw AM
Does something about owning a carbon fiber bike cause constipation?
z90 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:27 AM
  #17  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times in 1,470 Posts
Originally Posted by z90
Why you talk like Tarzan?
Seriously people all over the world access this forum and they may not be proficient in English.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:28 AM
  #18  
DC_United_Fan
Senior Member
 
DC_United_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 444

Bikes: IRO SS / Trek 2.1 / Trek 5.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm far too fat for this thread...
DC_United_Fan is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:45 AM
  #19  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times in 373 Posts
Originally Posted by sam12
I assume every one wants well built low weight bike to gain better performance.

Lets say if you loose 10% of your weight (assume weight loss is pure fat and no muscle loss), would you gain performance (like climbing, speed etc) from the same bike as overall weight is less?
You gain more performance loosing the weight from your body for several reasons: 1) your body doesn't have to support the extra body weight (that extra 10% of weight has to be oxygenated etc.) 2) you'll be more aerodynamic 10% lighter, with less frontal area, and it will also likely be easier to get in a more aero position.

So until you get to the point where you are too light and starting to lose power, cutting body weight will have a greater effect than cutting bike weight.

Originally Posted by joe_5700
Yes and yes, but losing weight is not going to improve your speed on a flat road.
Incorrect. Cutting any weight, bike or body, will make you faster on the flats. For one thing all that weight has to be accelerated, and no one rides at a perfectly constant pace. The difference is not as great as climbing, but there will be an effect.

More importantly, cutting body weight reduces aerodynamic drag as set forth above and will make you faster on the flats. Again, not as significant as in climbing, but 10% reduction in body weight will increase your speeds on the flat, even with no change in power.

Add in that unless your already at your ideal weight a decrease in weight will likely make you more fit, your ability to sustain putting out power will increase.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:52 AM
  #20  
Nachoman
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
I'm just not willing to substitute fruit or cottage cheese for fries.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 08:57 AM
  #21  
Dantebfd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hao
I know it's hard to believe, but there are people on this planet that are NOT fat. In fact, they are slim and they can't afford to lose body weight.
You wouldn't know it by walking around Disney World. Seriously, at what point will "scootering" surpass walking as the preferred means of getting around?
Dantebfd is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 09:00 AM
  #22  
joe_5700
CAT4
 
joe_5700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 1,681

Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
You gain more performance loosing the weight from your body for several reasons: 1) your body doesn't have to support the extra body weight (that extra 10% of weight has to be oxygenated etc.) 2) you'll be more aerodynamic 10% lighter, with less frontal area, and it will also likely be easier to get in a more aero position.

So until you get to the point where you are too light and starting to lose power, cutting body weight will have a greater effect than cutting bike weight.



Incorrect. Cutting any weight, bike or body, will make you faster on the flats. For one thing all that weight has to be accelerated, and no one rides at a perfectly constant pace. The difference is not as great as climbing, but there will be an effect.

More importantly, cutting body weight reduces aerodynamic drag as set forth above and will make you faster on the flats. Again, not as significant as in climbing, but 10% reduction in body weight will increase your speeds on the flat, even with no change in power.

Add in that unless your already at your ideal weight a decrease in weight will likely make you more fit, your ability to sustain putting out power will increase.
Interesting... All you hear on here (OVER AND OVER AGAIN) is that weight does not matter in the flats. I can tell you that I have not become more aero as a result of going from 185 to 155 lbs. Are you serious???!!! I can understand if you go from Mabel King or Nell Carter size down to a svelte road rider.
joe_5700 is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 09:05 AM
  #23  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times in 373 Posts
Originally Posted by joe_5700
Interesting... All you hear on here (OVER AND OVER AGAIN) is that weight does not matter in the flats. I can tell you that I have not become more aero as a result of going from 185 to 155 lbs. Are you serious???!!! I can understand if you go from Mabel King or Nell Carter size down to a svelte road rider.
Go to Kruezotter, and take your expample of going from 185 to 155. I assumed the default height of 5'10" and 20.9lbs for bike weight. Power of 300 watts, and riding in the drops.

The 185 lb rider does 23.7mph on flat ground. The 155 lb rider does 24.5mph on flat ground. Not an order of magnitude difference but measurable.

https://www.noping.net/english/


And as a matter of simple logic, aerodynamic drag is a function of frontal area, and the drag coefficient. If your height remains the same, and your weight decreases, your frontal area will decrease, without even considering the likelyhood that less gut will make it easier to hold a lower position.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.

Last edited by merlinextraligh; 07-08-11 at 09:10 AM.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 09:07 AM
  #24  
chadteck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joe_5700
Interesting... All you hear on here (OVER AND OVER AGAIN) is that weight does not matter in the flats. I can tell you that I have not become more aero as a result of going from 185 to 155 lbs. Are you serious???!!! I can understand if you go from Mabel King or Nell Carter size down to a svelte road rider.
Did you test in a wind tunnel?

I think Merlin put it pretty clearly: loosing fat (not muscle) will make you faster on the flats, but not nearly the difference it will make on hills.
chadteck is offline  
Old 07-08-11, 09:08 AM
  #25  
Groundhog1248
Senior Member
 
Groundhog1248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 82

Bikes: Fuji SL1, GT Team Carbon, Mrazek BOH FX Mountain bike and Giant TCR1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
+1

Originally Posted by pallen
When you buy a lighter bike you lose weight and you dont have to worry about your bike having too many cheeseburgers and gaining it back.
Groundhog1248 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.