Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Newton-Rider reusable folding helmet

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Newton-Rider reusable folding helmet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-20, 07:01 PM
  #1  
freckles
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: socal
Posts: 157

Bikes: BF NWT, Tern Short Haul

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Newton-Rider reusable folding helmet

I saw this listed on a local biking blog I follow. Its thin, soft/squishy, foldable, lighweight and can be reused after impact. The material is soft and squishy and absorbs impact and unlike traditional helmets its reusable after an impact. What I don't like- no visor to provide some shade.

Last edited by LAJ; 10-22-20 at 07:34 AM.
freckles is offline  
Old 10-22-20, 03:33 PM
  #2  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,516

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4350 Post(s)
Liked 3,989 Times in 2,663 Posts
That sounds hilarious. I don't wear my helmet to crash and reuse it, it is a piece of safety equipment when it has done its job I would not want to rely upon it again. That is my brain I am more than happy to buy a new helmet when needed. Plus my brain is soft and squishy I don't know I want my helmet in that as well.

I also don't really see a need for a folding helmet unless I was doing L'Erocia so I could look like I was wearing the old "hair net" style helmets which I wouldn't want to do as they provided little to no protection.

Ehh but I guess they need some ideas on kickstarter.
veganbikes is offline  
Likes For veganbikes:
Old 10-23-20, 08:52 PM
  #3  
frogman
Senior Member
 
frogman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 908

Bikes: Wife says I have too many :-)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 250 Times in 158 Posts
It depends on how much you value protecting your brain in a crash.
frogman is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 06:57 AM
  #4  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
If the helmet passes all the standard certifications for one crash, great. if it truly can pass the same tests repeatedly, fine.

Is it certified to the same minimum safety standards as standard helmets?

I have seen pictures and was not impressed ... but I cannot claim to be an expert. if the experts certify it ....

As for it folding up, I'd say commuters who might have trouble storing a helmet (they are bulky) might see some benefit. Other than that .... why? And if they really can provide the same protection as a "normal" helmet over and over ... why aren't they everywhere? Hard to imagine that folding helmets haven't caught on of they really can last for years and survive multiple crashes. I'd think that the World Tour peloton would be all over this helmet if it really was better, because it would be lighter and more convenient to transport.

If you come back with answers to the certification question, the discussion can continue. If it doesn't meet the minimum requirements ... meh.
Maelochs is online now  
Old 10-24-20, 07:12 AM
  #5  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/n...ike-no-other#/

I watched the video which said that the helmet is only 16mm thick. I don't care what kind of "advanced non-Newtonian polymers" and "sophisticated internal structures" they use, that seems awfully thin to protect anyone's brain. For the rest of us non-metric folks, that's just over 1/2 inch thick.

Last edited by Milton Keynes; 10-24-20 at 07:18 AM.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Likes For Milton Keynes:
Old 10-24-20, 07:46 AM
  #6  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
"A polystyrene helmet is completely hard and works because, in the event of a serious and life threatening crash, it compresses and cracks open instead of your skull. This is good.

"However when you experience a medium hard crash, the impact force is not big enough to compress the very hard polystyrene and instead your head will take all the impact force leaving you with a concussion."

What complete BS. All the polystyrene shell does is keep the foam from tearing. The foam is what compresses. When I see this kind of slef-congratulatory ad copy, filled with outright lies, I steer clear of that product.
Maelochs is online now  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 10-24-20, 07:54 AM
  #7  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
Whole the very term "Non-Newtonian" is complete nonsense, the basic tech seems to come from the body-armor industry---fluid-impregnated cloth which stiffens on impact---so that might be legit.

I hadn't heard that armor-makers had had that much success .... but the newton-Rider ---on other sites---claims to use this sort of tech.

I have to admit this might actually be a "breakthrough"--or is "disruption" the modern term?---in helmet design.

The important question is ... can I mount my Take-a-Look mirror on the Newton-Rider?
Maelochs is online now  
Old 10-24-20, 08:04 AM
  #8  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
One issue I see---if the shell hardens on impact, it transmits, rather than absorbs, impact.

This site (https://newatlas.com/bicycles/newton-rider-bike-helmet/) says "And yes, the Newton-Rider reportedly does meet EN 1078 (Europe) and CPSC (US) safety standards." "Reportedly?" Not documented? Another site (https://www.autoevolution.com/news/n...le-150327.html) says "The Newton-Rider is compliant with EN 1078 (Europe) and CPSC (U.S.) safety standards, but is not yet certified because certification can only be obtained after mass-production."

That site also says the helmet weight about 460 grams--heavy for a bike helmet--- and will cost about $100, which is pretty reasonable for bike helmet.

Pretty sure MIPS technology is not compatible.

Apparently the helmet has no vents at all---and a one-size-fits-all plastic liner which makes one helmet fit any head (between 57 and 60 cm in diameter.) The ventilation question worries me---but the manufacturers play up how the helmet is actually designed for "Modern Urban Youth" who might ride an electric scooter from the subway to the job, or who might use a rent-a-bike--not so much for the guy riding three hours at a time ... who knows?
Maelochs is online now  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 10-24-20, 08:16 AM
  #9  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
One issue I see---if the shell hardens on impact, it transmits, rather than absorbs, impact.
Sounds logical to me. But I'm still very skeptical that a 16mm thin helmet can offer much protection. Hardening without any sort of cushion doesn't sound like a good idea.


Apparently the helmet has no vents at all---and a one-size-fits-all plastic liner which makes one helmet fit any head (between 57 and 60 cm in diameter.) The ventilation question worries me---but the manufacturers play up how the helmet is actually designed for "Modern Urban Youth" who might ride an electric scooter from the subway to the job, or who might use a rent-a-bike--not so much for the guy riding three hours at a time ... who knows?
I didn't notice that, but yeah, wearing one on a 3 hour ride in the heat of summer doesn't sound pleasant. I sweat a lot even with my regular, vented helmet.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 08:28 AM
  #10  
Trevtassie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936

Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times in 640 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
"A polystyrene helmet is completely hard and works because, in the event of a serious and life threatening crash, it compresses and cracks open instead of your skull. This is good.

"However when you experience a medium hard crash, the impact force is not big enough to compress the very hard polystyrene and instead your head will take all the impact force leaving you with a concussion."

What complete BS. All the polystyrene shell does is keep the foam from tearing. The foam is what compresses. When I see this kind of slef-congratulatory ad copy, filled with outright lies, I steer clear of that product.
The foam in bicycle helmets is expanded polystyrene or EPS.... having gone over the bars and landed on my head I can assure you a: it hurt and b: the foam cracked. The shell can be almost anything, it's only there to aid durability and to help the helmet slide on road surfaces. There are kids helmets that have fabric shells or even just stenciled polystryrene.
Trevtassie is offline  
Old 10-24-20, 08:57 AM
  #11  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevtassie
The foam in bicycle helmets is expanded polystyrene or EPS.... having gone over the bars and landed on my head I can assure you a: it hurt and b: the foam cracked. The shell can be almost anything, it's only there to aid durability and to help the helmet slide on road surfaces. There are kids helmets that have fabric shells or even just stenciled polystryrene.
The foam will crack ... or crush ... it is the crushing of the foam which absorbs the shock---Not the hard shell.

As i said, the shell just holds the foam together. The Newtonian ad claimed that the polystyrene absorbed the shock---which is totally incorrect, and which you know from experience,.

The question with the Newtonian helmet is how fast the material hardens. For bullet-proof cloth it needs to harden extremely quickly, because it has to prevent penetration of a rifle round traveling at 2300 fps. A bullet-proof vest doesn't have to absorb all the shock---vests do have padding, but by and large, the vest needs to stop the projectile. Broken ribs are preferable to puctured lungs, and a big bruise on your chest is better than having your spine blown out through the flesh of your back .... at least, in my opinion.

A bike helmet is dealing with impact speeds between 20-90 fps (maybe 14-62 mph.) And a bike helmet is not designed to prevent penetration, which is generally not the issue, but rather to absorb impact---if the cloth hardens too fast, it will no t absorb the impact.

Anyway, the helmet is still in the prototype stage. How the final version will or will not work is still a mystery.
Maelochs is online now  
Old 10-24-20, 09:05 AM
  #12  
GlennR
On Your Left
 
GlennR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times in 1,187 Posts
GlennR is offline  
Likes For GlennR:
Old 10-24-20, 05:00 PM
  #13  
Trevtassie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936

Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times in 640 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
The foam will crack ... or crush ... it is the crushing of the foam which absorbs the shock---Not the hard shell.

As i said, the shell just holds the foam together. The Newtonian ad claimed that the polystyrene absorbed the shock---which is totally incorrect, and which you know from experience,.

The question with the Newtonian helmet is how fast the material hardens. For bullet-proof cloth it needs to harden extremely quickly, because it has to prevent penetration of a rifle round traveling at 2300 fps. A bullet-proof vest doesn't have to absorb all the shock---vests do have padding, but by and large, the vest needs to stop the projectile. Broken ribs are preferable to puctured lungs, and a big bruise on your chest is better than having your spine blown out through the flesh of your back .... at least, in my opinion.

A bike helmet is dealing with impact speeds between 20-90 fps (maybe 14-62 mph.) And a bike helmet is not designed to prevent penetration, which is generally not the issue, but rather to absorb impact---if the cloth hardens too fast, it will no t absorb the impact.

Anyway, the helmet is still in the prototype stage. How the final version will or will not work is still a mystery.
Dude, the foam is expanded polystyrene. When they talk about polystyrene, they are talking about the foam. It's hard and when you have an accident it dissipates energy by compressing and deforming. So the Newtownian blurb is entirely correct about how a conventional helmet functions. It's an expanded polystyrene tub your head goes in. It's hard and only deforms under heavy impact, which is not surprising given the test bike helmets have to undergo. It may have an outer cover made of higher density polytyrene, but equally it could be ABS or any other material that can be bonded to polystyrene.

As for how their effective their helmet is, who knows. I'm just pointing out that sledging them for their explanation of how a conventional helmet works is wrong.
Trevtassie is offline  
Likes For Trevtassie:
Old 10-24-20, 06:38 PM
  #14  
Ogsarg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,737

Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times in 551 Posts
Most crashes involve some amount of sliding. I'd hate to see what happens to your nose when you go down with that foam cap. No thanks. I'll stick with the mushroom that is going to help keep my nose, ears, etc. off the pavement.
Ogsarg is offline  
Likes For Ogsarg:
Old 10-26-20, 06:32 AM
  #15  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
"A polystyrene helmet is completely hard and works because, in the event of a serious and life threatening crash, it compresses and cracks open instead of your skull. This is good.

"However when you experience a medium hard crash, the impact force is not big enough to compress the very hard polystyrene and instead your head will take all the impact force leaving you with a concussion."

What complete BS. All the polystyrene shell does is keep the foam from tearing. The foam is what compresses. When I see this kind of slef-congratulatory ad copy, filled with outright lies, I steer clear of that product.
Originally Posted by Trevtassie
The foam in bicycle helmets is expanded polystyrene or EPS.... having gone over the bars and landed on my head I can assure you a: it hurt and b: the foam cracked. The shell can be almost anything, it's only there to aid durability and to help the helmet slide on road surfaces. There are kids helmets that have fabric shells or even just stenciled polystryrene.
Originally Posted by Trevtassie
Dude, the foam is expanded polystyrene. When they talk about polystyrene, they are talking about the foam. It's hard and when you have an accident it dissipates energy by compressing and deforming. So the Newtownian blurb is entirely correct about how a conventional helmet functions. It's an expanded polystyrene tub your head goes in. It's hard and only deforms under heavy impact, which is not surprising given the test bike helmets have to undergo. It may have an outer cover made of higher density polytyrene, but equally it could be ABS or any other material that can be bonded to polystyrene.

As for how their effective their helmet is, who knows. I'm just pointing out that sledging them for their explanation of how a conventional helmet works is wrong.
Well ... of course I was not Wrong in my misinterpretation of the ad text .... That would never happen ... but thanks to the two posters who offered a different interpretation.
Maelochs is online now  
Old 10-26-20, 12:41 PM
  #16  
Wanderer
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Posts: 8,234

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
The armor in my motorcycle clothes is the same technology, and it works very well.. My riding buddy had a hydroplane get off at 60 MPH and suffered zero consequences.

That material really does get harder, the harder it is hit, while still cushioning on the opposite side.

It's magic, I tell ya!
Wanderer is offline  
Old 10-26-20, 12:48 PM
  #17  
Germany_chris
I’m a little Surly
 
Germany_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422

Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times in 647 Posts
I like it and I’ll probably get one once it’s off indigogo
Germany_chris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.