Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

You cant judge a tire widrh by its picture?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

You cant judge a tire widrh by its picture?

Old 01-17-20, 04:29 PM
  #1  
UsedToBeFaster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
You cant judge a tire widrh by its picture?


One of these ties is 40 mil the other 32 mil you tell me which one the one on the left or the one on the right
UsedToBeFaster is offline  
Old 01-17-20, 04:31 PM
  #2  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
It would be harder if you didn't leave one of the sizes clearly showing in the picture.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Likes For Bah Humbug:
Old 01-17-20, 05:09 PM
  #3  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,492
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3646 Post(s)
Liked 5,377 Times in 2,729 Posts
^^^^
shelbyfv is offline  
Old 01-17-20, 10:18 PM
  #4  
TheDudeIsHere
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 467
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 276 Times in 161 Posts
The closer one is the 32.

By the way the tire has 3 lanes of tread across it, the slightly narrower look of the tire to the eye, the way the tire has wore in the center vs the overall width, because a highly trained eye can tell the difference between tire widths, I chose the closer tire.

........AND, it says 32 on it!


Last edited by TheDudeIsHere; 01-17-20 at 10:22 PM.
TheDudeIsHere is offline  
Old 01-17-20, 11:03 PM
  #5  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18347 Post(s)
Liked 4,497 Times in 3,344 Posts
The corollary, of course, is that you can't judge a tire's width by the manufacture's markings.

The one in back does appear to have a deeper sidwall. And, they may also look different if you had a top-down view.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 01-18-20, 08:24 AM
  #6  
UsedToBeFaster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
And for my next trick. Pull my finger ...

That was a flop wasn't it.

But it's interesting that the 32mm tire actually blows up to be *taller* than the 40mm tire. This is significant to me, as tire height (for cushioning of road noise) is more important than width.

Do manufacturers assume that width is a surrogate for height? Unless your riding off road, then width is not that an interesting measure of a tire.
UsedToBeFaster is offline  
Old 01-18-20, 08:40 AM
  #7  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,601

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10943 Post(s)
Liked 7,469 Times in 4,179 Posts
Originally Posted by UsedToBeFaster
But it's interesting that the 32mm tire actually blows up to be *taller* than the 40mm tire. This is significant to me, as tire height (for cushioning of road noise) is more important than width
.
Tire depth 'cushions' road noise independent of width?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 01-18-20, 10:52 AM
  #8  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18347 Post(s)
Liked 4,497 Times in 3,344 Posts
Originally Posted by UsedToBeFaster
But it's interesting that the 32mm tire actually blows up to be *taller* than the 40mm tire. This is significant to me, as tire height (for cushioning of road noise) is more important than width.

Do manufacturers assume that width is a surrogate for height? Unless your riding off road, then width is not that an interesting measure of a tire.
Most bicycle tires have a generally round casing profile. Thus when you're turning it presents a fairly uniform surface to the road.

Cars tires get a flat profile by using fixed length circumferential belts around the tire. Thus, the tires are also marked with a width to height aspect ratio.

I hadn't realized those flat profile tires were being used on bikes. I'm trying to imagine the cost/benefit of that.
CliffordK is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.