Why put such nice finish and fittings on a pipe frame? 1980s Japan.
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why put such nice finish and fittings on a pipe frame? 1980s Japan.
I bought this for the shimano 600 arabesque group set. I thought I might have scored a decent frame too, when I saw the forged drop outs, nice lugs and fully chromed forks and rear triangle. But when I pulled it apart, the frame is made of pipe! What have I got here? Is that a standard 1980s mid level set up or is it cheap pipes dressed up to trick the customer into paying too much?
Any Ideas? I’m posting from Australia so it could have been a local brand built up from imported parts.
Frame
serial number on left seat post - SOK5515
BB width - 68mm
rear drop space - 125mm
Front drop spacing - 100mm
Pipe lengths
seat - 56cm
top - 56cm
head - 12.5cm
chainstay - 45cm
Seat post
SR LAPRADE diameter - 26.2mm
Shimano Date codes
BB - EC
cranks - EA
chain ring - EE
brake lever - EB
(rear drop outs - marked Shimano SF is this a date code?)
Forks
drop outs - TANGE TF
steerer - TANGE OF
Wheels
Rims - ARAYA 27x1/4 w/o HP. JAPAN
Hubs – Shimano, 5 speed uniglide on rear
Spokes – Double butted 4 cross pattern
Rear wheel is not dished but has spacers on left side.
Any Ideas? I’m posting from Australia so it could have been a local brand built up from imported parts.
Frame
serial number on left seat post - SOK5515
BB width - 68mm
rear drop space - 125mm
Front drop spacing - 100mm
Pipe lengths
seat - 56cm
top - 56cm
head - 12.5cm
chainstay - 45cm
Seat post
SR LAPRADE diameter - 26.2mm
Shimano Date codes
BB - EC
cranks - EA
chain ring - EE
brake lever - EB
(rear drop outs - marked Shimano SF is this a date code?)
Forks
drop outs - TANGE TF
steerer - TANGE OF
Wheels
Rims - ARAYA 27x1/4 w/o HP. JAPAN
Hubs – Shimano, 5 speed uniglide on rear
Spokes – Double butted 4 cross pattern
Rear wheel is not dished but has spacers on left side.
#2
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 963 Times
in
628 Posts
Arabesque came on a lot of low end bikes. Even Sears sold a bike with it.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3463 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times
in
1,994 Posts
Not too surprising, a few brands emphasized components instead of the frame, many customers would appreciate better parts instead of better tubing.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
Ummmmm, it's called "tubing".
#7
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,346
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Liked 127 Times
in
82 Posts
I am not sure I understand the OP's point. Is the fact that the seat and down tubes aren't mitered on their ends inside the BB shell the reason for the disparagement? how much does the frame weigh? that will clue you into how pipe-like the frame tubing is.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Sunny South
Posts: 1,906
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Maybe someone "upgraded" a cheap frame. It may have been sentimental to them; their first bike or something. There are countless threads about folks wanting to restore and improve entry level (and worse) bicycles.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
I should do a photo essay on this one, as it's really a bit of an anomaly, compared to what you usually see with state-of-the-art Japanese componentry.
Actually, pics of the OPs frame looks like a lot nicer build than mine. "OOOH, forged dropouts... ain't we fancy, luv? Stamped not good enough for you?"
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 04-18-14 at 12:14 AM.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks guys.I'm certainly no expert, just beginning to play around with older bikes and wanting to learn.
I say "pipe" not tubing because there are obvious seams visible in the seat tube and head tube. Am I right in thinking that "pipes" and "tubes" are made by completely different processes and pipes are always heavier for the same strength or weaker for the same weight? I also thought the fatter the seat post, thinner the seat tube wall, the better the tubing. Does that mean the 26.2mm seat post goes with a better grade of pipe? Are there different grades of pipe like there are different grades of tubing?
I guess I'm asking about the manufacturing processes and where this bike would have been placed in the market at the time?
I'm guessing it was made in a fairly large factory with good process and quality control but using lower grade tubing for cost. The pipes look like the have been worked with some sort of press to fit them in the bottom bracket lug and also at the bottom of the head tube. Then brazed in an oven maybe? I was 13 in 1980 and had a TOYOSHA 10 speed with a sticker that said it was made by the Toyota Auto Body co. How many plants would have been making bicycle frames in Japan at the time and how many different brands would they end up wearing? The forks are stamped TANGE so I guess the frame was made in a different plant.
Who would have been the original owner? An amateur club racer? A budget conscious tourer? A teenager with generous parents?
I suppose I want to know if this is a "Nice Bike" but I guess I'll find out when I clean it up rebuild it and try riding it.
I say "pipe" not tubing because there are obvious seams visible in the seat tube and head tube. Am I right in thinking that "pipes" and "tubes" are made by completely different processes and pipes are always heavier for the same strength or weaker for the same weight? I also thought the fatter the seat post, thinner the seat tube wall, the better the tubing. Does that mean the 26.2mm seat post goes with a better grade of pipe? Are there different grades of pipe like there are different grades of tubing?
I guess I'm asking about the manufacturing processes and where this bike would have been placed in the market at the time?
I'm guessing it was made in a fairly large factory with good process and quality control but using lower grade tubing for cost. The pipes look like the have been worked with some sort of press to fit them in the bottom bracket lug and also at the bottom of the head tube. Then brazed in an oven maybe? I was 13 in 1980 and had a TOYOSHA 10 speed with a sticker that said it was made by the Toyota Auto Body co. How many plants would have been making bicycle frames in Japan at the time and how many different brands would they end up wearing? The forks are stamped TANGE so I guess the frame was made in a different plant.
Who would have been the original owner? An amateur club racer? A budget conscious tourer? A teenager with generous parents?
I suppose I want to know if this is a "Nice Bike" but I guess I'll find out when I clean it up rebuild it and try riding it.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,513
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3233 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
The fork/steerer has some letters/numbers stamped on it. That might help with identification.
#14
spondylitis.org
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Posts: 1,002
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times
in
63 Posts
The lugs, joinery, drop-outs, etc. don't look bad. Appears to be late-70s/early-80s MIJ construction; probably machine brazed/lugged.
Tange did make some pretty good seamed/double-butted Chrome-Molybdenum steel tubing in those days (ex. Infinity). Ishiwata has some good seamed Cr-Mo as well. Might be hi-ten steel, often referred to as "Gaspipe" (...not that there's anything WRONG with that...). The weight of the frame and fork should tell you something about what it was made from.
Do you plan to strip and media-blast, or are you just going to go with the natural patina?
Tange did make some pretty good seamed/double-butted Chrome-Molybdenum steel tubing in those days (ex. Infinity). Ishiwata has some good seamed Cr-Mo as well. Might be hi-ten steel, often referred to as "Gaspipe" (...not that there's anything WRONG with that...). The weight of the frame and fork should tell you something about what it was made from.
Do you plan to strip and media-blast, or are you just going to go with the natural patina?
#15
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,841
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2295 Post(s)
Liked 2,041 Times
in
1,250 Posts
Damn fine single speed conversion candidate. I too would like to know the weight of frame and fork. It looks like an early Fuji low end offering.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,648
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times
in
336 Posts
So its not a Colnago - it still looks pretty decent to me. You'd have to judge it after building it back up and riding it, but it doesn't appear low end - more like mid-tier.
Hope you have a large tub of elbow grease though....lots of muscle needed to clean it up!
Hope you have a large tub of elbow grease though....lots of muscle needed to clean it up!
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tewksbury, MA
Posts: 76
Bikes: Giant TCR, 03 Haro V3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I know exactly what he's talking about (or should be) since I am the proud owner of a 1979ish Ross Grand Tour Professional, a heavy, sloppily welded (at least partly, there are places where it was definitely spot welded, other places which look more brazed) poorly painted, plastic-stickered hunk o' junk all very prettily bedecked with 600 Arabesque components; even the early Hi-Flange hubs. But not the seat post, because 25mm Hi-Ten seat tube. Also the stem is made to fit an odd hi-ten tubing size.
I should do a photo essay on this one, as it's really a bit of an anomaly, compared to what you usually see with state-of-the-art Japanese componentry.
Actually, pics of the OPs frame looks like a lot nicer build than mine. "OOOH, forged dropouts... ain't we fancy, luv? Stamped not good enough for you?"
I should do a photo essay on this one, as it's really a bit of an anomaly, compared to what you usually see with state-of-the-art Japanese componentry.
Actually, pics of the OPs frame looks like a lot nicer build than mine. "OOOH, forged dropouts... ain't we fancy, luv? Stamped not good enough for you?"
OP, build the bike and give it a whirl!
#19
Really Old Senior Member
Thanks guys.I'm certainly no expert, just beginning to play around with older bikes and wanting to learn.
I say "pipe" not tubing because there are obvious seams visible in the seat tube and head tube. Am I right in thinking that "pipes" and "tubes" are made by completely different processes and pipes are always heavier for the same strength or weaker for the same weight? ..................
I say "pipe" not tubing because there are obvious seams visible in the seat tube and head tube. Am I right in thinking that "pipes" and "tubes" are made by completely different processes and pipes are always heavier for the same strength or weaker for the same weight? ..................
Pipe is measured by a somewhat more obscure sizing standard, with varying wall thickness, such as schedule 40, schedule 80 etc. and sizes that don't exactly match the actual size. I think that way back when, it was "supposed" to be a nominal ID.
Pipe or tubing can be seamless or seamed.
Back in my Boilermaker days, I used both types of tubing.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frame is 2500g, 5.5lb. Fork is 600g, 1.75lb.
I like the idea of Tange or Ishiwata seamed/double-butted Chrome-Molybdenum steel tubing. That's definitely what I'm going to tell people it is!
As you can see it's all in pretty poor condition. It think the original finish might have been orange painted over the chrome then the bad bright yellow was a later home job. I'm probably going to have it blasted and base coated then get my daughter to paint it as an art project and finish it up with the arabesque group.
Should I put the small parts in the dishwasher? Should I tell my wife?
I'm not sure about this one braze on cable stop which is pretty rusted but feels solid. Will it survive blasting? I don't have the welding skills to fix it first.
I like the idea of Tange or Ishiwata seamed/double-butted Chrome-Molybdenum steel tubing. That's definitely what I'm going to tell people it is!
As you can see it's all in pretty poor condition. It think the original finish might have been orange painted over the chrome then the bad bright yellow was a later home job. I'm probably going to have it blasted and base coated then get my daughter to paint it as an art project and finish it up with the arabesque group.
Should I put the small parts in the dishwasher? Should I tell my wife?
I'm not sure about this one braze on cable stop which is pretty rusted but feels solid. Will it survive blasting? I don't have the welding skills to fix it first.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3463 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times
in
1,994 Posts
duct tape it off and go at that area by hand.
#22
spondylitis.org
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Posts: 1,002
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times
in
63 Posts
Should hold up to soda blasting. Not sure about sand or media blasting, though. If it dies, you can always grind it down and use one of these:
https://www.google.com/search?q=chai...en-US:official
https://www.google.com/search?q=chai...en-US:official
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all that good advice, the clamp on cable stop in particular.
I also got PMd a link to an old thread on 1980s road bikes https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/vi...p?f=23&t=33573 but I'm too much of a newbie to PM back to say thank you. Follow that thread long enough and you'l find this link 1986 Tange catalog4 to a tubing guide (I guess the stuff not described as "seamless" has seams?) and this Frame & Tubing Rigidity highly detailed piece by Crispin Miller.
I also got PMd a link to an old thread on 1980s road bikes https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/vi...p?f=23&t=33573 but I'm too much of a newbie to PM back to say thank you. Follow that thread long enough and you'l find this link 1986 Tange catalog4 to a tubing guide (I guess the stuff not described as "seamless" has seams?) and this Frame & Tubing Rigidity highly detailed piece by Crispin Miller.
#24
Spin Forest! Spin!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Posts: 5,956
Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
I don't think that frame is a low end model, given the workmanship and dropouts. 26.2mm is usually straight gauge tubing of 4130 Cro-moly. It can still be Hi tensile 1020, but your weights have me suspect it to be cro-moly steel. Comparing it to the weight of my all cro-moly TIGed hybrid frameset of similar size and also 26.2mm seat post.
Probably Tange seamed tubing. The Japanese made seamed tubesets so well, it rode and was as strong as seamless versions.
Give that thing an oxalic acid bath, and restore it.
I think it's really cool that you have a rare high flanged version of the early freehub.
Probably Tange seamed tubing. The Japanese made seamed tubesets so well, it rode and was as strong as seamless versions.
Give that thing an oxalic acid bath, and restore it.
I think it's really cool that you have a rare high flanged version of the early freehub.