Best dyno lights for a front rack mount?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Best dyno lights for a front rack mount?
Planning on mounting a dyno (Shutter Precision)-powered light on the bottom of my front rack. Will be riding in total darkness quite a bit (brevets and Seattle winter commutes), so lighting the ground is as important is being seen.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Cormac
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Cormac
#2
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,697 Times
in
2,518 Posts
For randonneuring, I would go with an Edelux II or an IQ-X.
#3
Callipygian Connoisseur
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,373
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times
in
190 Posts
Tough to beat the performance and value of the B&M lights. My 80 lux Cyo Senso Premium with its shaped beam is a total game changer. The shaped beam allows control over where the light is cast. Follow the instructions and you'll enjoy riding with an amazing field of view without blinding oncoming traffic. B&M has a 100 lux (IQ-X?) which, considering how nice the 80 lux performs, must be insanely great. I also recommend B&M taillights.
-Kedosto
-Kedosto
#4
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
There isn't nearly the room you think there is under your front rack. Adjacent to the rack might work but leaves the light either ripe for getting hit or one side of the bike blind. Mounting at the axle leaves the bike susceptible to splashes and throws the light too horizontal. B&M specifically say not to mount the light at the axle. Also they say that a dynamo light mounted mounted upside down won't have good optics & is likely to fill with water. Between the fork crown and the handlebars is best.
I am pleased with the B&M Lumotec IQ-X it's 100 lumens, but has a narrower throw & weaker plastic mount than the Luxos U. I think the driven led's are likely the same but The Luxos U IQ-2 is nominally 70 lumen, largely on account of the wider light distribution, thus lower light "density". The Luxos U IQ-2 will do 100 lumens for short periods of time until the internal cache battery depleats. The Luxos U IQ-2 also has a remote switch I don't like because the housing broke after 50 miles, & the switch seems susceptable to water intrusion & has to be mounted somewhere. So yet another wire.
The problem. with dynamo lights rests purely on the number of electrons you have in supply. Bright & focused or less bright & distributed. Either light I mention is plenty bright enough to ride by, but my preference is the IQ-X due to it's simplicity.
I am pleased with the B&M Lumotec IQ-X it's 100 lumens, but has a narrower throw & weaker plastic mount than the Luxos U. I think the driven led's are likely the same but The Luxos U IQ-2 is nominally 70 lumen, largely on account of the wider light distribution, thus lower light "density". The Luxos U IQ-2 will do 100 lumens for short periods of time until the internal cache battery depleats. The Luxos U IQ-2 also has a remote switch I don't like because the housing broke after 50 miles, & the switch seems susceptable to water intrusion & has to be mounted somewhere. So yet another wire.
The problem. with dynamo lights rests purely on the number of electrons you have in supply. Bright & focused or less bright & distributed. Either light I mention is plenty bright enough to ride by, but my preference is the IQ-X due to it's simplicity.
Last edited by base2; 01-22-19 at 03:24 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
Agreed.
I've seen a "mount" that'll hole one of these on a rack, though I can't find a link now. It's basically just an arc of sheet metal, presumably fairly stout, with a hole in either end. One bolt holds it to the rack, and the other holds the light to the mount offset from the rack so you get clearance. IIRC you could buy it for $10-15, although an afternoon in the garage with a Dremel and some aluminum sheet stock might be cheaper. It looked fairly elegant, though I never got a round tuit to mount my troubled light like that. Anyone remember where that was?
I've seen a "mount" that'll hole one of these on a rack, though I can't find a link now. It's basically just an arc of sheet metal, presumably fairly stout, with a hole in either end. One bolt holds it to the rack, and the other holds the light to the mount offset from the rack so you get clearance. IIRC you could buy it for $10-15, although an afternoon in the garage with a Dremel and some aluminum sheet stock might be cheaper. It looked fairly elegant, though I never got a round tuit to mount my troubled light like that. Anyone remember where that was?
#6
Banned
E Delux body & mount is Aluminum, lens Glass; B&M, plastic .. Tab, most of body* and Lens
I have the B&M Eyc Senso T on my Brompton, Fork Crown Closer to the ground so seems brighter..
* top of body is aluminum for LED heat sink dissipation..
In LBS, had more than 1 B&M Luxos U* arrive at tour's end, broken off , mounted on the front rack of tour bikes.. getting to the coast..
getting a rack fabricated with a light guard?
* that one includes a USB output..
...
I have the B&M Eyc Senso T on my Brompton, Fork Crown Closer to the ground so seems brighter..
* top of body is aluminum for LED heat sink dissipation..
In LBS, had more than 1 B&M Luxos U* arrive at tour's end, broken off , mounted on the front rack of tour bikes.. getting to the coast..
getting a rack fabricated with a light guard?
* that one includes a USB output..
...
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-22-19 at 04:11 PM.
#7
Callipygian Connoisseur
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,373
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 564 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times
in
190 Posts
There isn't nearly the room you think there is under your front rack. Adjacent to the rack might work but leaves the light either ripe for getting hit or one side of the bike blind. Mounting at the axle leaves the bike susceptible to splashes and throws the light too horizontal. B&M specifically say not to mount the light at the axle. Also they say that a dynamo light mounted mounted upside down won't have good optics & is likely to fill with water. Between the fork crown and the handlebars is best.
I am pleased with the B&M Lumotec IQ-X it's 100 lumens, but has a narrower throw & weaker plastic mount than the Luxos U. I think the driven led's are likely the same but The Luxos U IQ-2 is nominally 70 lumen, largely on account of the wider light distribution, thus lower light "density". The Luxos U IQ-2 will do 100 lumens for short periods of time until the internal cache battery depleats. The Luxos U IQ-2 also has a remote switch I don't like because the housing broke after 50 miles, & the switch seems susceptable to water intrusion & has to be mounted somewhere. So yet another wire.
The problem. with dynamo lights rests purely on the number of electrons you have in supply. Bright & focused or less bright & distributed. Either light I mention is plenty bright enough to ride by, but my preference is the IQ-X due to it's simplicity.
I am pleased with the B&M Lumotec IQ-X it's 100 lumens, but has a narrower throw & weaker plastic mount than the Luxos U. I think the driven led's are likely the same but The Luxos U IQ-2 is nominally 70 lumen, largely on account of the wider light distribution, thus lower light "density". The Luxos U IQ-2 will do 100 lumens for short periods of time until the internal cache battery depleats. The Luxos U IQ-2 also has a remote switch I don't like because the housing broke after 50 miles, & the switch seems susceptable to water intrusion & has to be mounted somewhere. So yet another wire.
The problem. with dynamo lights rests purely on the number of electrons you have in supply. Bright & focused or less bright & distributed. Either light I mention is plenty bright enough to ride by, but my preference is the IQ-X due to it's simplicity.
The mounting arms on my B&M headlights are stainless steel and are very stout. It would be a shame if they cheaped out with plastic mounts on the new models.
-Kedosto
#8
Banned
With my Koga WTR (short travel) Suspension fork, I used a B&M Nylon Mount on my Schmidt e6 and kept it, for the E deluxe ... its been fine for 10+ years..
so Best , for clarity, if you specify Which Plastic ...
The casing of the B&M headlight is not ductile like Nylons.. its more prone to crack , and have things like the mounting tab break off when hit..
My Eyc is well protected, under my Brompton front bag, use a stamped from Stainless steel sheet metal mount on it (Schmidt made)
....
so Best , for clarity, if you specify Which Plastic ...
The casing of the B&M headlight is not ductile like Nylons.. its more prone to crack , and have things like the mounting tab break off when hit..
My Eyc is well protected, under my Brompton front bag, use a stamped from Stainless steel sheet metal mount on it (Schmidt made)
....
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-23-19 at 01:39 PM.
#9
Senior Member
I am using an IQ-X and love it. I have several trail sections through the forest which are in the pitch black and this little headlight provides a lot of light. I however did not use the standard plastic bracket but used a more sturdy metal bracket.
#10
On Holiday
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,014
Bikes: A bunch of old steel bikes
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
12 Posts
Another happy IQ-X user. Great bright lighting pattern and flexibility in mounting (i.e. the mounting strap can be rotated around the light body for any orientation). Yes the mounting strap (sleeve?) is nylon but seems to be pretty robust. If it worries you, you could fabricate a metal one with not much trouble.
#11
Senior Member
Tough to beat the performance and value of the B&M lights. My 80 lux Cyo Senso Premium with its shaped beam is a total game changer. The shaped beam allows control over where the light is cast. Follow the instructions and you'll enjoy riding with an amazing field of view without blinding oncoming traffic. B&M has a 100 lux (IQ-X?) which, considering how nice the 80 lux performs, must be insanely great. I also recommend B&M taillights.
-Kedosto
-Kedosto
#12
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I also vote for the 80 lux Cyo Premium.
What rack are you using? Do you have fenders? If so, what fenders? Here are a couple ways I have that light mounted:
What rack are you using? Do you have fenders? If so, what fenders? Here are a couple ways I have that light mounted:
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#13
Jedi Master
I'd get an upside-down Edelux ii, but I got a great price on a right-side up one so I have it mounted with the Nitto lamp holder #6. I also looked at the soma wingman, but it seemed like a bit too much.
#15
Senior Member
bumm.de/en/products/dynamo-scheinwerfer/parent/164/produkt/164rtsndi-01-schwarz-164rtsndi-silber.html?
Taillight:
bumm.de/en/products/akku-batterie-rucklichter/parent/323.html?
spanninga.com/en/product/pimento/
Mounting options:
bumm.de/en/products/mehr/gruppe/Mounting%20brackets.html
bikeforums.net/electronics-lighting-gadgets/1126857-minoura-spacer-light-gadget-mount-di-light-fender-hole-mount.html
#16
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Moved from Commuting
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#17
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
You can mount the IQ-X upside down too.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,206
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3460 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times
in
1,144 Posts
I assume you already know this, but just in case you don't, most lights have a vent hole in the bottom and that is one reason (besides light beam) that other posters are saying do not mount it upside down, as rain water can get into the light if it is upside down. But not yet mentioned is the potential for tire spray if you do not run fenders. So, think about where your tire spray is when you decide where to mount the light so that the tire spray does not get into the light casing.