A little invention that makes climbing easy
#76
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Your concept is fundamentally flawed. When climbing, you want your center of mass vertically over the bottom bracket.
The problem is that the grade of the hill causes the bike to rotate raising the front wheel. That's why standing on steep grades works, your center of mass moves forward so that it remains over the bottom bracket.
By going more upright, you're moving your center of mass backwards. You keep your seat, but your center of mass is in the wrong place.
The problem is that the grade of the hill causes the bike to rotate raising the front wheel. That's why standing on steep grades works, your center of mass moves forward so that it remains over the bottom bracket.
By going more upright, you're moving your center of mass backwards. You keep your seat, but your center of mass is in the wrong place.
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That is correct, but when you climb out of the seat, your hips rise and fall 5 or 6 inches TWICE per crank revolution. You are lifting your upper body 1 foot per crank revolution, while being seated means you don't lift your upper body at all. That is why you might last 30 seconds, or 4 minutes, but it's a huge waste of energy that forces you back into the seat.
#80
Non omnino gravis
That is correct, but when you climb out of the seat, your hips rise and fall 5 or 6 inches TWICE per crank revolution. You are lifting your upper body 1 foot per crank revolution, while being seated means you don't lift your upper body at all. That is why you might last 30 seconds, or 4 minutes, but it's a huge waste of energy that forces you back into the seat.
And I can stand and pedal for miles, not minutes.
#81
Senior Member
You are still doing the same work and the position confers no mechanical advantage I can see. Plus the additional weight of the stem must eliminate any advantage if there were one. Plus the bulkiness of the device would increase drag and additionally the Fred factor that would only lean towards embarrassment and reduced effort from the humiliation of being caught with such a dorky device.
#82
Senior Member
Or just get proper gearing...
If you have appropriate hearing you don't need to push against anything more than a fraction of your body weight. Froome can climb at 400+W, and weighs about 160lbs. He doesn't need extra weight on the pedals. Of course he also isn't trying to mash 30rpm uphill...
If you have appropriate hearing you don't need to push against anything more than a fraction of your body weight. Froome can climb at 400+W, and weighs about 160lbs. He doesn't need extra weight on the pedals. Of course he also isn't trying to mash 30rpm uphill...
Seems Datlas is right, eat less and ride faster.
#83
Senior Member
The number one thing slowing you down on the flat is air resistance. Fat people are even less aero than the rest of us, because the air has so far to go to get around them. But aerodynamics aren't really an issue at climbing speeds, so fat people just fly up the hills like there's pizza at the top.
#85
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
This is like the original Schwinn Stingray. I could climb all day out of the saddle on those, because my back was straight up and down, had to zig-zag of course.
Last edited by roadrecumbent; 11-19-16 at 11:42 PM. Reason: spelling
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
Rats. I was expecting a thread on Bio-Pace chainrings.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
On sprints to the finish, its always off the saddle. Even at steep finish lines.
Comparing two riders of different weight only shows that difference. But the bar thing is about the one same rider using different positions.
Comparing two riders of different weight only shows that difference. But the bar thing is about the one same rider using different positions.
Last edited by Garfield Cat; 11-20-16 at 08:50 AM.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
That is correct, but when you climb out of the seat, your hips rise and fall 5 or 6 inches TWICE per crank revolution. You are lifting your upper body 1 foot per crank revolution, while being seated means you don't lift your upper body at all. That is why you might last 30 seconds, or 4 minutes, but it's a huge waste of energy that forces you back into the seat.
As for the OP. The raised clip on handlebars are a stupid idea, at least as far as being a performance aid to climbing.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I don't agree with OP's reasoning at all but ... there are times when climbing, standing out of the saddle, when I wish that my handlebars were higher because I'm bending over with the low bars or else having to crouch somewhat.
Moving back on the seat, sitting up more - on climbs I only do that when I'm trying to rest by going really slow. Maybe this invention facilitates that and would be useful for that purpose for some people. But for going up "4% faster" I'm out of the saddle over the pedals, and if I'm going faster still I may be forward of the pedals and pulling up on the bars, which is opposite what OP claims. I'd probably leave that part out of the sales pitch.
Moving back on the seat, sitting up more - on climbs I only do that when I'm trying to rest by going really slow. Maybe this invention facilitates that and would be useful for that purpose for some people. But for going up "4% faster" I'm out of the saddle over the pedals, and if I'm going faster still I may be forward of the pedals and pulling up on the bars, which is opposite what OP claims. I'd probably leave that part out of the sales pitch.
#93
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,760
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
Thank you for the opportunity to post this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bucVwI0RfEg
Hopefully someone will mention Montana soon.
-Tim-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bucVwI0RfEg
Hopefully someone will mention Montana soon.
-Tim-
__________________
#98
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,518
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3658 Post(s)
Liked 5,403 Times
in
2,744 Posts
This silliness has now popped up in Touring, in case you need more.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: ATL ,GA. NE corridor
Posts: 192
Bikes: 17 Cannondale Synapse C; 17 DB Podium; 15 Trek Marlin 5
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can't see how that would help. It looks like a hinderance to me standing up and leaning forward.
#100
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,464 Posts
A new thread on this got started in Touring. Check it out for the lasted posts.
https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/11...ng-easier.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/11...ng-easier.html