Looking for the longest battery life & inexpensive bike computer. Not fancy...
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Looking for the longest battery life & inexpensive bike computer. Not fancy...
Any suggestions for a simple bike computer to measure distance and speed? Prefer GPS so I don't need a sensor on the wheel, etc. Can be simple LCD, don't need fancy. But MUST have very long battery life.
Thanks,
Pete
Thanks,
Pete
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Bikes: nothing to brag about
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 206 Times
in
116 Posts
I bought a couple on Ebay for 6 bucks each and they're fine. The type with what looks like a red domed jewel between the buttons below the screen.
Likes For mdarnton:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,976
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6186 Post(s)
Liked 4,803 Times
in
3,313 Posts
What does very long battery life mean to you? I don't do multi-day rides where I don't have a chance to charge in between them, so even an 8 hour capacity will be "long" to me.
The "simple" want for only distance and speed probably won't get you as good a device. A device that will be very inexpensive and have just speed, distance and a few other features will be made on the cheap with respect that they are probably made with little mean time between failure concerns.
Stick to Garmin, Wahoo or Lezyne if you want a decent GPS device that gives you speed and distance along with a good smattering of other features. Maps and navigation do add complication, but Garmin has Edge devices with no maps. They'll still give you a lot even without maps.
The "simple" want for only distance and speed probably won't get you as good a device. A device that will be very inexpensive and have just speed, distance and a few other features will be made on the cheap with respect that they are probably made with little mean time between failure concerns.
Stick to Garmin, Wahoo or Lezyne if you want a decent GPS device that gives you speed and distance along with a good smattering of other features. Maps and navigation do add complication, but Garmin has Edge devices with no maps. They'll still give you a lot even without maps.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
A decent wired-sensor LCD odometer (I'm running a Bell 150 at the moment, but have had cheaper ecommerce ones too) should get you thousands of miles on its coin cell. (My reason for replacing them is that particular frame/handlebar details meant I break the wire or mount a few times, and it's near impossible to solder that tiny enamled stuff)
Wanting GPS is where you start to run into battery issues; GPS takes quite a bit of power, especially if run continuously enough to even try to capture cycling movement. Do that and you're into something that needs to be recharged for every distance ride.
GPS is also less accurate; I have my simple sensor intentionally tuned to where it reads a century at about a .8 mile below the map distance, so I know anything it says, I actually did. GPS will overestimate the same ride by around 3%; at one point last spring Strava was bouncing all over the place and adding 20-30%, so I finally gave up and switched to ridewithgps - that's nice for keeping track of where I've been, but the wheel sensor is what I fully believe.
Wanting GPS is where you start to run into battery issues; GPS takes quite a bit of power, especially if run continuously enough to even try to capture cycling movement. Do that and you're into something that needs to be recharged for every distance ride.
GPS is also less accurate; I have my simple sensor intentionally tuned to where it reads a century at about a .8 mile below the map distance, so I know anything it says, I actually did. GPS will overestimate the same ride by around 3%; at one point last spring Strava was bouncing all over the place and adding 20-30%, so I finally gave up and switched to ridewithgps - that's nice for keeping track of where I've been, but the wheel sensor is what I fully believe.
Likes For UniChris:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,885
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 228 Times
in
180 Posts
You are way out of the "simple computer" category when it is based on GPS readings instead of using a wheel magnet. The description given by mdarnton is for the Sunding wired computer which is available for under $10 from numerous sellers. I've given away several of these as gifts. They are accurate as long as you correctly enter the wheel circumference and will go for at least a year without changing batteries even with daily riding. It would be a minor miracle to find anything that cheap that does not use a magnetic sensor.
Here's the red dot mentioned above.
Here's the red dot mentioned above.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
[QUOTE=VegasTriker;21939324]You are way out of the "simple computer" category when it is based on GPS readings instead of using a wheel magnet. The description given by mdarnton is for the Sunding wired computer which is available for under $10 from numerous sellers. I've given away several of these as gifts. They are accurate as long as you correctly enter the wheel circumference and will go for at least a year without changing batteries even with daily riding. It would be a minor miracle to find anything that cheap that does not use a magnetic sensor.
Here's the red dot mentioned above.
Thanks guys... Since I don't want yet another thing to charge, etc. on the Mickelson, I'm going to go with this unit. Between the phone and the trail cam... I am way above where I want to be on crap mounted on my bike. This will fit the bill nicely.
Pete
Here's the red dot mentioned above.
Thanks guys... Since I don't want yet another thing to charge, etc. on the Mickelson, I'm going to go with this unit. Between the phone and the trail cam... I am way above where I want to be on crap mounted on my bike. This will fit the bill nicely.
Pete
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
Have you ridden the Mickelson Trail before? Unless things have changed since I rode it in '15, other than for photos, you won't need your phone in a good number of places. It's a great ride, but be prepared for slower going than you might imagine due to grade and surface condition. Also be prepared for changing weather conditions, especially during thunderstorm season.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Have you ridden the Mickelson Trail before? Unless things have changed since I rode it in '15, other than for photos, you won't need your phone in a good number of places. It's a great ride, but be prepared for slower going than you might imagine due to grade and surface condition. Also be prepared for changing weather conditions, especially during thunderstorm season.
My understanding is that cell service has improved a bit -- but again, don't care. I want to carry the least possible crap. LOL. It'll be 6-7 days... so carrying crap is my chief concern at the moment.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
I have not ridden the Mick before. My desire for the phone is for GPS/mapping/speed, etc. I don't need (or want) to talk to anyone. LOL. (Wife may want us to bring our inReach... not sure yet)
My understanding is that cell service has improved a bit -- but again, don't care. I want to carry the least possible crap. LOL. It'll be 6-7 days... so carrying crap is my chief concern at the moment.
My understanding is that cell service has improved a bit -- but again, don't care. I want to carry the least possible crap. LOL. It'll be 6-7 days... so carrying crap is my chief concern at the moment.
And 6-7 days? You must be going both directions, no?
Likes For indyfabz:
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Mapping & GPS? You worried about getting lost on a rail-trail? The simple computer pictured above will be sufficient (assuming you calibrate it correctly) and won't need charging or a new battery any time soon. Put the phone in the pocket so it doesn't fall off when you hit one of many potential bumps in the trail.
And 6-7 days? You must be going both directions, no?
And 6-7 days? You must be going both directions, no?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
I've been using a Planet Bike wireless for 7 or 8 years. It needs 2 batteries twice a year. Previously I had something else that was unsatisfactory. https://www.amazon.com/Planet-Bike-P...a-568872520249
#15
Full Member
The "simple" want for only distance and speed probably won't get you as good a device. A device that will be very inexpensive and have just speed, distance and a few other features will be made on the cheap with respect that they are probably made with little mean time between failure concerns.
The only reason I replaced mine was because I wanted to move to something that could also display cadence.
#16
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,976
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6186 Post(s)
Liked 4,803 Times
in
3,313 Posts
The OP was asking about GPS devices. I consider the very cheap devices with GPS as lower quality. I wasn't making any judgement of non-GPS devices.
Likes For Iride01:
#17
Full Member
No, you didn't say anything about the Cateye Velo 7. I'm sorry if you got the impression that I was lighting into you by quoting your post; that was not my intention.
What I was trying to get at was that the "wish for simple" could lead to something that felt like decent quality - but by completely departing the GPS world, and by not buying the absolutely cheapest computer on offer.
I agree with you 100% that, if one wants to go the GPS route, the safe bet is to go with something tried and true from one of the big players.
What I was trying to get at was that the "wish for simple" could lead to something that felt like decent quality - but by completely departing the GPS world, and by not buying the absolutely cheapest computer on offer.
I agree with you 100% that, if one wants to go the GPS route, the safe bet is to go with something tried and true from one of the big players.
Likes For John Valuk:
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Bikes: nothing to brag about
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 206 Times
in
116 Posts
The quest was for simple, time, speed, distance; GPS was an option, not an essential. For six bux you get simple.
My red dot model has proven to be accurate and reliable at what it is designed to do, which is basically count wheel revs and calculate them into other things. This isn't really a difficult problem to accomplish cheaply and reliably, just as $3 Casio watches used to be able to do with time. As far as GPS, well, my thousand dollar cell phones have not done this job as well as my $6 computer tracks my distance (I stopped messing with the calibration when I got it to better than 1%, but I could have kept going if I'd wished).
My red dot model has proven to be accurate and reliable at what it is designed to do, which is basically count wheel revs and calculate them into other things. This isn't really a difficult problem to accomplish cheaply and reliably, just as $3 Casio watches used to be able to do with time. As far as GPS, well, my thousand dollar cell phones have not done this job as well as my $6 computer tracks my distance (I stopped messing with the calibration when I got it to better than 1%, but I could have kept going if I'd wished).
Last edited by mdarnton; 02-24-21 at 03:35 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Likes For 70sSanO:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
But you didn’t note that your suggestion doesn’t satisfy the OP’s preference for something without a wheel sensor, so it was not clear what you were suggesting.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
In fact, my first computer from the 80s was a CatEye. You could see the unit from outer space.
#24
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Not the very cheapest, but both my bikes have a Sigma BC 7.16 wired computer. They claim 1000 riding hours (which is about three years for me) for a single battery so we will see.
I like the feature that both the sensor and computer unit are designed to be attached by O-ring rather than zip tie, so it’s easy to attach and remove if need be. Also that means it’s less destructively mounted if something causes a bit of pull on the connecting wire.
Otto
I like the feature that both the sensor and computer unit are designed to be attached by O-ring rather than zip tie, so it’s easy to attach and remove if need be. Also that means it’s less destructively mounted if something causes a bit of pull on the connecting wire.
Otto
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Yep. I’ve had the same CatEye wireless (makes it easier to box and ship) on my touring/commuter for years. I’ve changed the transmitter and unit batteries once or twice. I’ve done fully loaded touring with it over surfaces that nearly rattled out some fillings.
In fact, my first computer from the 80s was a CatEye. You could see the unit from outer space.
In fact, my first computer from the 80s was a CatEye. You could see the unit from outer space.
John
Likes For 70sSanO: