Help with mismatched Campy BB identification?
#1
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Help with mismatched Campy BB identification?
I've spent some time trying to identify a cheap find from the bike swap: a mismatched Campy bottom bracket. If anyone would like to weigh in, I'd be really grateful.
Last edited by MrEss; 01-14-12 at 10:40 PM.
#2
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
From the "BREV. INTER" and "rifling," I think the cups are Nuovo Record thick cups. I'm sure that can be confirmed or corrected at a glance.
The spindle is a mystery to me. Note the 14 ball bearings per side. The cones are too large in diameter to fit 11 1/4" balls like a normal bottom bracket; you can't fit them in there at all. (I haven't measured yet whether they're 3/16 or 7/32.) It's obviously not the correct spindle, since it's marked for a 68mm bottom bracket width.
The small bearings and lack of a rear-end OLD marking make me think that this might be the Record spindle from 1990 as mentioned in Sutherland's. Can anybody confirm that?
The spindle is a mystery to me. Note the 14 ball bearings per side. The cones are too large in diameter to fit 11 1/4" balls like a normal bottom bracket; you can't fit them in there at all. (I haven't measured yet whether they're 3/16 or 7/32.) It's obviously not the correct spindle, since it's marked for a 68mm bottom bracket width.
The small bearings and lack of a rear-end OLD marking make me think that this might be the Record spindle from 1990 as mentioned in Sutherland's. Can anybody confirm that?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
I'm sure someone will add pertinent information and your answer. FWIW, I always thought the "thick" cups were recessed on the face surfaces, at least on the fixed cup. Not sure though. Didn't Campy change the number of balls, and size, on the Super Record BB's some time in the 80's? Sorry...more questions than answers.
#4
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This spindle is obviously not Ti (and there's no seam between the cone and the spindle), so there goes the super record idea.
Last edited by MrEss; 01-15-12 at 11:31 AM.
#5
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,860
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,928 Times
in
1,493 Posts
Just what is mismatched? it is a 68SS spindle yes? Italian cups? how long is the spindle? is it asymetrical or symetrical? I can't really tell from the pics.
I can't find my 18 bis catalog but according to my '91ish parts catalog you have a Record BB.
The Record BB shows 14 balls but the CdA only has 11.
I can't find my 18 bis catalog but according to my '91ish parts catalog you have a Record BB.
The Record BB shows 14 balls but the CdA only has 11.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
Corsa Record, or C Record as it is often known by. Alloy cups 3/16" ball bearings, steel spindle.
#7
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,860
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,928 Times
in
1,493 Posts
OK I found the 18bis. according to the pic the Corse Record (C-Record) only has 11 balls in the BB.
OH I think I got this too a Italian BB is the 70SS spindle not 68? is that what is mismatched?
OH I think I got this too a Italian BB is the 70SS spindle not 68? is that what is mismatched?
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#8
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If the cranks fit I won't be too worried -- it just means the NDS crankarm will have migrated 2mm to the right.
If 1990/91 Record BB cups said "BREV INTER" and had "rifling" then that would take a lot of the mystery away -- it would simply be a 90/91 Record BB with the wrong size spindle.
I can post more / closer pictures of each cup and the spindle, if it'll help any.
Last edited by MrEss; 01-15-12 at 11:40 AM.
#9
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,860
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,928 Times
in
1,493 Posts
accord to the pics in the '90ish parts book for Record (not C-Rec) they say Made it Italy.
do the bearings fit the cups?
do the bearings fit the cups?
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#10
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The bearings do seem to fit the cups pretty well. It rolls very smoothly and the balls roll on the middle of the cups.
I'd read online that in the C-record era Record and Athena shared spindles marked "SSB" even though Record used 7/32" bearings and Athena used 1/4". So, it seems possible that the cups were designed for a 1/4" bearing but fit these smaller ones anyway.
I'd read online that in the C-record era Record and Athena shared spindles marked "SSB" even though Record used 7/32" bearings and Athena used 1/4". So, it seems possible that the cups were designed for a 1/4" bearing but fit these smaller ones anyway.
#11
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,790
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3590 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,935 Posts
From the "BREV. INTER" and "rifling," I think the cups are Nuovo Record thick cups. I'm sure that can be confirmed or corrected at a glance.
The spindle is a mystery to me. Note the 14 ball bearings per side. The cones are too large in diameter to fit 11 1/4" balls like a normal bottom bracket; you can't fit them in there at all. (I haven't measured yet whether they're 3/16 or 7/32.) It's obviously not the correct spindle, since it's marked for a 68mm bottom bracket width.
The small bearings and lack of a rear-end OLD marking make me think that this might be the Record spindle from 1990 as mentioned in Sutherland's. Can anybody confirm that?
The spindle is a mystery to me. Note the 14 ball bearings per side. The cones are too large in diameter to fit 11 1/4" balls like a normal bottom bracket; you can't fit them in there at all. (I haven't measured yet whether they're 3/16 or 7/32.) It's obviously not the correct spindle, since it's marked for a 68mm bottom bracket width.
The small bearings and lack of a rear-end OLD marking make me think that this might be the Record spindle from 1990 as mentioned in Sutherland's. Can anybody confirm that?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think the cups and bearings at least are original C-Record from the mid 80s. These used 3/16" balls, not 1/4" balls. If the spindle works smoothly with those cups and balls then it too is C-Record. If instead it works with standard cups and 1/4" balls, then the spindle is mismatched with the cups and bearings.
I agree that those look to be 1980s C-Record parts. The spindle is marked correctly for a C-Record one (there was no "68-SSc" spindle), and has the 1 mm 'step' where the bearing surface begins, so it calls for 3/16" bearings. '-SSa' was Croce d'Aune, '-SSb' was Chorus, '-SSg' was Athena, '-SSf' was Xenon....
At that time, only C-Record and Super Record BBs used the 3/16" bearings. All others still used 1/4" ones.
I've seen that combination of parts (that the OP has) on eBay sometimes. If you put the wrong bearings in there (i.e. 1/4") it will kinda-sorta partially make up for using the incorrect spindle with those cups, in an Italian-thread frame, but I don't recommend it at all, because of where the bearings will run (incorrectly) on the bearing surfaces.
Last edited by 753proguy; 01-15-12 at 02:05 PM. Reason: spellin' (naturellement).
#14
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Winner winner chicken dinner!
Thanks much, Miamijim, for the picture that puts the discussion and cross-referencing (of contradictory and incomplete documentation!) completely to rest.
Lessons learned:
(A) The presence or absence of a "C" on a C-record spindle (as reported here: long link) must be a manufacturing mark similar to the famous "Z".
(B) Campagnolo kept using the "BREV INTER" marking on cups well into the 1980s even after some other cups went to "Made in Italy"
(C) Working together over the internet to research something is awesome.
Thanks much, Miamijim, for the picture that puts the discussion and cross-referencing (of contradictory and incomplete documentation!) completely to rest.
Lessons learned:
(A) The presence or absence of a "C" on a C-record spindle (as reported here: long link) must be a manufacturing mark similar to the famous "Z".
(B) Campagnolo kept using the "BREV INTER" marking on cups well into the 1980s even after some other cups went to "Made in Italy"
(C) Working together over the internet to research something is awesome.
#15
Cat 6
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 7,482
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
118 Posts
And that would work just fine on a nice French frame, rethreaded to Italian (I have one)
__________________
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale), special CNC & Gitane Interclub / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 French / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII f&f (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 09 Giant TCX0 / 10 Vassago Fisticuff
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale), special CNC & Gitane Interclub / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 French / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII f&f (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 09 Giant TCX0 / 10 Vassago Fisticuff
#16
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,790
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3590 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,935 Posts
FWIW, Campy also used 3/16" balls in some early 60s Record bottom brackets, but at least those parts were clearly marked as such:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The "70mm = Italian" is not carved in stone -- merely a heuristic, but any spindle ground for 3/16" balls could be compatible with those cups.
FWIW, Campy also used 3/16" balls in some early 60s Record bottom brackets, but at least those parts were clearly marked as such:
FWIW, Campy also used 3/16" balls in some early 60s Record bottom brackets, but at least those parts were clearly marked as such:
I'll wait right here while you do that......
#18
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
FWIW, this bottom bracket worked fine in my Italian-threaded Atala.
There are barely enough threads to get the lockring on, but it's on. The crank doesn't seem to have noticed that the NDS migrated 2mm to the right -- there is still plenty of clearance.
Replacing an Ultegra 6500 triple (running as a 74/130 double with only the small and middle rings) I lost approximately 2/3 of a pound on the bike by going to this bottom bracket and a Victory crankset!
There are barely enough threads to get the lockring on, but it's on. The crank doesn't seem to have noticed that the NDS migrated 2mm to the right -- there is still plenty of clearance.
Replacing an Ultegra 6500 triple (running as a 74/130 double with only the small and middle rings) I lost approximately 2/3 of a pound on the bike by going to this bottom bracket and a Victory crankset!
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768
Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I'd think the 68 spindle in an Italian frame would put the adjustable cup almost 2mm inside the shell!
#20
likes to ride an old bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Nope! A proper spindle would put the adjustable cup far enough out to have the lockring plus an extra mm or so... so with the smaller spindle the lockring is about 0.5mm proud of the adjustable cup. l might look for a thinner lockring some time, but it doesn't bother me much.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
With the correct bearings, the chainline will be off 1 mm to the right, but that's not much at all, and adds chainstay clearance anyways.