"Strange" worn-out spoke holes: safe to reuse (relace) hub?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"Strange" worn-out spoke holes: safe to reuse (relace) hub?
I picked up this hub on e*ay recently. The pictures were bad and I didn't realize how badly worn were spoke holes on flanges. I am not quite sure what happened here: was spoke tension too high? or front wheel got stressed too much somehow? Moreover, it appears that the hub was relaced in the same pattern at least 4 times, as *each* hole is "elongated" both inside and outside.
Anyway, would you say this hub is safe to reuse / relace? I have never seen hub fail due to spokes "ripping" holes, but I haven't seen a hub like that either. What would collective wisdom of BikeForums say?
2
1
Anyway, would you say this hub is safe to reuse / relace? I have never seen hub fail due to spokes "ripping" holes, but I haven't seen a hub like that either. What would collective wisdom of BikeForums say?
2
1
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,703
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6063 Post(s)
Liked 4,694 Times
in
3,238 Posts
If I already had it, I'd use it if the lacing pattern was to be the same. My caveats are: I wouldn't put it on a bike I intended to immediately sell. And if I didn't already have it, I would have bought a new one instead.
#3
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,102
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 935 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
363 Posts
It's fine. The holes themselves are still round. The wear is where the spoke elbows seated into the countersink.However, your observation that they have been built up more than once is correct I believe given that all the holes have grooves that radiate the same way. Still not something I would be concerned about as long as it's laced 3 cross.
Last edited by Dan Burkhart; 06-10-19 at 01:31 PM.
Likes For Dan Burkhart:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: West Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,112
Bikes: '84 Peugeot PH10LE
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
39 Posts
Get a 1/4" x 90* chamfer tool from a tool supply house, or a machinst friend. Spin the tool by hand and re-cut the chamfers. I just did that to a 35 yo Helicomatic hub and then laced/trued the wheel. Worked like a champ. I'm lucky in that I work in a machine shop and have access to that kind of tooling. I'd use those hubs in a heart beat and never look back. You DO know that the spoke bend goes in the chamfer and not the spoke head, right?
Jon
Jon
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks, Iride01 Dan and Jon, for informative replies. I also chatted quickly wiht DT Swiss tech support person. He is guessing that wheel was "repeatedly" (?) built with insufficient tension. That is why, spoke had too much "freedom" with two ill effects: firstly, it worn out the holes, and secondly, spokes were failing prematurely. His advice was to get a new hub
Actually, Jon, I might have an access to machinist to do the chamfering you advice. Let me check with my friend, if so I will probably reaching out to you with more details on how to do it!
Thanks again.
Actually, Jon, I might have an access to machinist to do the chamfering you advice. Let me check with my friend, if so I will probably reaching out to you with more details on how to do it!
Thanks again.
#6
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 340 Times
in
250 Posts
Did anyone notice* that all of the grooves, supposedly worn by spoke wear, GO IN THE SAME DIRECTION, with NO ALTERNATION? I kind of would have expected every other hole to be in the same direction by spoke wear, with the holes in-between having no directional groove because they had the spoke head, with a similar pattern on the opposite face of each flange. These flanges show directional wear at every hole indicating that they've been relaced. And the relacing was indeed done with inadequate tension as the wear is seen around the entire circumference of each spoke hole, indicating loose spokes.
While the DT Swiss people are pretty much constrained to telling you to get a new hub (telling you that the hub is ok leaves them open to liability), I'd agree with the DT Swiss recommendation. I would not use that hub. Too much material loss. No idea of the fatigue effects of the obvious stress/strain reversal from loose spokes. Its the front hub, and you're applying the torque of braking through the spoke holes on the hub. Not for me.
If you want to ignore this advise, I would NOT chamfer, as this removes material from the entire hole and not just the portion raised by the spoke and weakens the hub and is unnecessary. Heck, the loose spokes have already chamfered those holes for you: why duplicate the job? If you want to smooth the hole and reduce stress risers, there's a technique that hole-drillers use in race cars and such. Also good for drilled holes in chainrings etc. Put a bar of steel in a vise, firmly. should be about 1/2 inch or 1cm wide. Must protrude, so that you can put the hub rim on it. Take two ball bearings about 2 times the size of the hole. Put the one bearing under the hole and set a hole in the hub on top of it. Put another bearing on top of the hole. Tap the top bearing with a hammer so that you knock down the ridge. Easy does it! If you don't have confidence in your sense of touch, don't do this. Repeat for each hole on both sides of both the outside and (more difficult) the inside of each hole.
As you know, if you do use this hub, its' obvious that you can't use radial spoking (you've a disc brake). I wouldn't use 2 cross spoking either. I'd prefer to sue 4 cross (tangential) but might settle for 3 cross. 4 cross will give you less likelihood of spokes ripping out the hub flange. And use a spoke tension meter when relacing.
I wouldn't risk it. But I've had the pleasure of going over the bars and breaking my jaw and cracking 13 teeth. Conserving a hub is not worth risking my neck, jaw, or teeth.
*On edit, Dan Burkhart noticed.
While the DT Swiss people are pretty much constrained to telling you to get a new hub (telling you that the hub is ok leaves them open to liability), I'd agree with the DT Swiss recommendation. I would not use that hub. Too much material loss. No idea of the fatigue effects of the obvious stress/strain reversal from loose spokes. Its the front hub, and you're applying the torque of braking through the spoke holes on the hub. Not for me.
If you want to ignore this advise, I would NOT chamfer, as this removes material from the entire hole and not just the portion raised by the spoke and weakens the hub and is unnecessary. Heck, the loose spokes have already chamfered those holes for you: why duplicate the job? If you want to smooth the hole and reduce stress risers, there's a technique that hole-drillers use in race cars and such. Also good for drilled holes in chainrings etc. Put a bar of steel in a vise, firmly. should be about 1/2 inch or 1cm wide. Must protrude, so that you can put the hub rim on it. Take two ball bearings about 2 times the size of the hole. Put the one bearing under the hole and set a hole in the hub on top of it. Put another bearing on top of the hole. Tap the top bearing with a hammer so that you knock down the ridge. Easy does it! If you don't have confidence in your sense of touch, don't do this. Repeat for each hole on both sides of both the outside and (more difficult) the inside of each hole.
As you know, if you do use this hub, its' obvious that you can't use radial spoking (you've a disc brake). I wouldn't use 2 cross spoking either. I'd prefer to sue 4 cross (tangential) but might settle for 3 cross. 4 cross will give you less likelihood of spokes ripping out the hub flange. And use a spoke tension meter when relacing.
I wouldn't risk it. But I've had the pleasure of going over the bars and breaking my jaw and cracking 13 teeth. Conserving a hub is not worth risking my neck, jaw, or teeth.
*On edit, Dan Burkhart noticed.
Last edited by WizardOfBoz; 06-11-19 at 12:22 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,919
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,094 Posts
Ryoanji,
Here is what over-tension can do for a hub. The aluminium in a small hub sometimes is just not strong enough for the abuse some riders create. Note the elongation of the spoke holes in the direction of the tension, and the way the hub is distorted into a squared pattern. Smiles, MH
#8
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 340 Times
in
250 Posts
Criminal abuse of a Campy short-flange hub, Honk. Interesting.
#9
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,102
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 935 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
363 Posts
Did anyone notice* that all of the grooves, supposedly worn by spoke wear, GO IN THE SAME DIRECTION, with NO ALTERNATION? I kind of would have expected every other hole to be in the same direction by spoke wear, with the holes in-between having no directional groove because they had the spoke head, with a similar pattern on the opposite face of each flange. These flanges show directional wear at every hole indicating that they've been relaced. And the relacing was indeed done with inadequate tension as the wear is seen around the entire circumference of each spoke hole, indicating loose spokes.
While the DT Swiss people are pretty much constrained to telling you to get a new hub (telling you that the hub is ok leaves them open to liability), I'd agree with the DT Swiss recommendation. I would not use that hub. Too much material loss. No idea of the fatigue effects of the obvious stress/strain reversal from loose spokes. Its the front hub, and you're applying the torque of braking through the spoke holes on the hub. Not for me.
If you want to ignore this advise, I would NOT chamfer, as this removes material from the entire hole and not just the portion raised by the spoke and weakens the hub and is unnecessary. Heck, the loose spokes have already chamfered those holes for you: why duplicate the job? If you want to smooth the hole and reduce stress risers, there's a technique that hole-drillers use in race cars and such. Also good for drilled holes in chainrings etc. Put a bar of steel in a vise, firmly. should be about 1/2 inch or 1cm wide. Must protrude, so that you can put the hub rim on it. Take two ball bearings about 2 times the size of the hole. Put the one bearing under the hole and set a hole in the hub on top of it. Put another bearing on top of the hole. Tap the top bearing with a hammer so that you knock down the ridge. Easy does it! If you don't have confidence in your sense of touch, don't do this. Repeat for each hole on both sides of both the outside and (more difficult) the inside of each hole.
As you know, if you do use this hub, its' obvious that you can't use radial spoking (you've a disc brake). I wouldn't use 2 cross spoking either. I'd prefer to sue 4 cross (tangential) but might settle for 3 cross. 4 cross will give you less likelihood of spokes ripping out the hub flange. And use a spoke tension meter when relacing.
I wouldn't risk it. But I've had the pleasure of going over the bars and breaking my jaw and cracking 13 teeth. Conserving a hub is not worth risking my neck, jaw, or teeth.
*On edit, Dan Burkhart noticed.
While the DT Swiss people are pretty much constrained to telling you to get a new hub (telling you that the hub is ok leaves them open to liability), I'd agree with the DT Swiss recommendation. I would not use that hub. Too much material loss. No idea of the fatigue effects of the obvious stress/strain reversal from loose spokes. Its the front hub, and you're applying the torque of braking through the spoke holes on the hub. Not for me.
If you want to ignore this advise, I would NOT chamfer, as this removes material from the entire hole and not just the portion raised by the spoke and weakens the hub and is unnecessary. Heck, the loose spokes have already chamfered those holes for you: why duplicate the job? If you want to smooth the hole and reduce stress risers, there's a technique that hole-drillers use in race cars and such. Also good for drilled holes in chainrings etc. Put a bar of steel in a vise, firmly. should be about 1/2 inch or 1cm wide. Must protrude, so that you can put the hub rim on it. Take two ball bearings about 2 times the size of the hole. Put the one bearing under the hole and set a hole in the hub on top of it. Put another bearing on top of the hole. Tap the top bearing with a hammer so that you knock down the ridge. Easy does it! If you don't have confidence in your sense of touch, don't do this. Repeat for each hole on both sides of both the outside and (more difficult) the inside of each hole.
As you know, if you do use this hub, its' obvious that you can't use radial spoking (you've a disc brake). I wouldn't use 2 cross spoking either. I'd prefer to sue 4 cross (tangential) but might settle for 3 cross. 4 cross will give you less likelihood of spokes ripping out the hub flange. And use a spoke tension meter when relacing.
I wouldn't risk it. But I've had the pleasure of going over the bars and breaking my jaw and cracking 13 teeth. Conserving a hub is not worth risking my neck, jaw, or teeth.
*On edit, Dan Burkhart noticed.
#10
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 340 Times
in
250 Posts
Got it. And they used used the same loose "chamfer as you ride" spoke tension. I just wonder how they got the wear so even between the two different lacings.
Last edited by WizardOfBoz; 06-18-19 at 09:05 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,919
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,094 Posts
Wiz,
I suspect that was a hub on a BMX racing bike. Ride about thirty race laps and put a flat spot in the rim, re-lace with a new rim. Then repeat the process four or five times and that is what the spoke holes will look like. It is likely a useable hub, but I wouldn't be racing on it. For a beater bike it will work fine and that is my advice to Ryoanji.
That Campy hub has been laying around for a few years. I just threw a tippo hub out two weeks ago that suffered the same fate. A stiff build, and some rough riding and all the hubs can fail like that. Smiles, MH
I suspect that was a hub on a BMX racing bike. Ride about thirty race laps and put a flat spot in the rim, re-lace with a new rim. Then repeat the process four or five times and that is what the spoke holes will look like. It is likely a useable hub, but I wouldn't be racing on it. For a beater bike it will work fine and that is my advice to Ryoanji.
That Campy hub has been laying around for a few years. I just threw a tippo hub out two weeks ago that suffered the same fate. A stiff build, and some rough riding and all the hubs can fail like that. Smiles, MH
#12
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,620
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,559 Times
in
1,574 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks!
Thank you, again, everybody. Very useful discussion. I wish I wouldn't have bought this hub in the first place, but now I have it, I see I can still use it for backup wheelset maybe. It is a nice dt swiss hub, too bad it got mangled up so bad.
#14
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 340 Times
in
250 Posts
If its any comfort, Dan Burkhart knows a LOT more about hubs than I do, so you may have a pretty good hub for backup purposes. So you may want to weight what he says over what I say. But again, I would NOT chamfer. And make sure that your spoke alignment is the same as what the previous owner used. Good luck.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,919
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,094 Posts
The Campi hub I pictured was damaged more by over-tensioning than multiple re-lacings. It shows signs of a Jobst Brandt lacing and a lacing based on drive flex that I use often. But nothing more than possibly three total lacings. The chamfered sections of the flanges are only slightly deformed of the button side of the spokes in the pics it is pretty clear.
As for the DA hub pictured from the OP it is clear there were multiple re-lacings. Smiles, MH
#16
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,573
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 700 Times
in
384 Posts
I'd use it with proper spoke tension and laced cross 3 only (cross 4 isn't recommended on a 32 spoke wheel).
#17
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 340 Times
in
250 Posts
Ah, learn something every day. I'm doing two 36 holers in 4 cross to duplicate the OEM lacing. But my next project will be to lace up some short-flange campy hubs to modern 700c rims. Those, I'll be doing 3-cross.
#18
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,842
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 919 Times
in
606 Posts
I found that odd too.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,919
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,094 Posts
Wiz,
I am currently rebuilding all of my race bikes from the 1980's. They were all in storage when a fire occurred, suspicious at best, but about $11,000 in damages. All are in process of powder coating, and finding decal sets to restore them. All were race wheels: Campi high flange hubs and GP 4 rims and Vitoria tyres. The rims are all in need of replacement as well as spokes from the heat damage. But they were 3X patterns except for one special 3X by radial on a drive wheel for my Ochsner. If I was doing any touring, it would definitely be four cross patterns for those wheels. The 4X deals with loads better than the 3X (more appropriate for race type wheels). JMHO, MH
I am currently rebuilding all of my race bikes from the 1980's. They were all in storage when a fire occurred, suspicious at best, but about $11,000 in damages. All are in process of powder coating, and finding decal sets to restore them. All were race wheels: Campi high flange hubs and GP 4 rims and Vitoria tyres. The rims are all in need of replacement as well as spokes from the heat damage. But they were 3X patterns except for one special 3X by radial on a drive wheel for my Ochsner. If I was doing any touring, it would definitely be four cross patterns for those wheels. The 4X deals with loads better than the 3X (more appropriate for race type wheels). JMHO, MH
#20
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 285 Times
in
222 Posts
Wiz,
I am currently rebuilding all of my race bikes from the 1980's. They were all in storage when a fire occurred, suspicious at best, but about $11,000 in damages. All are in process of powder coating, and finding decal sets to restore them. All were race wheels: Campi high flange hubs and GP 4 rims and Vitoria tyres. The rims are all in need of replacement as well as spokes from the heat damage. But they were 3X patterns except for one special 3X by radial on a drive wheel for my Ochsner. If I was doing any touring, it would definitely be four cross patterns for those wheels. The 4X deals with loads better than the 3X (more appropriate for race type wheels). JMHO, MH
I am currently rebuilding all of my race bikes from the 1980's. They were all in storage when a fire occurred, suspicious at best, but about $11,000 in damages. All are in process of powder coating, and finding decal sets to restore them. All were race wheels: Campi high flange hubs and GP 4 rims and Vitoria tyres. The rims are all in need of replacement as well as spokes from the heat damage. But they were 3X patterns except for one special 3X by radial on a drive wheel for my Ochsner. If I was doing any touring, it would definitely be four cross patterns for those wheels. The 4X deals with loads better than the 3X (more appropriate for race type wheels). JMHO, MH
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,919
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,094 Posts
The four cross wheels deal with problems far better than any other pattern! Smiles, MH
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,059
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2156 Post(s)
Liked 416 Times
in
330 Posts
Don't you just hate it when ebay sellers post up crappy photos? In the case of this hub the bad photos were most likely to conceal the true condition of the hub. I'd send the thing back even if it cost me money to do so. Life's too short to waste time building a wheel with a POS worn out hub.