Square taper BB's
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 147
Bikes: 1974 PX-10E sold, 1977 Witcomb stolen, 1980 Roberts 1 speed, 1987 Cyclops 3 x 6 friction triple crank, 2010 Masi Commuter 1 speed, 2017 Ribble 525 2 x 10 with Ergos
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times
in
16 Posts
Square taper BB's
I realize this may be a hypothetical or even rhetorical question, but here goes:
If square taper bottom brackets are so heavy, flexible, and crude compared to modern hollow axle systems, why does square taper still seem to dominate the track and single speed worlds? I would have thought track and single speed riders would most want the claimed improvements, especially in stiffness, but uptake seems minimal to zero compared to road and MTB riders.
If square taper bottom brackets are so heavy, flexible, and crude compared to modern hollow axle systems, why does square taper still seem to dominate the track and single speed worlds? I would have thought track and single speed riders would most want the claimed improvements, especially in stiffness, but uptake seems minimal to zero compared to road and MTB riders.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18302 Post(s)
Liked 4,470 Times
in
3,326 Posts
I think, at least for Shimano, the Octalink is the bottom bracket of choice for track.
The Campagnolo Record square taper bottom brackets were fairly light, with hollow spindles.
Keep in mind that many of the Walmart bikes are made to look like track bikes, but really aren't close.
The Campagnolo Record square taper bottom brackets were fairly light, with hollow spindles.
Keep in mind that many of the Walmart bikes are made to look like track bikes, but really aren't close.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,091 Times
in
722 Posts
Newer does not always mean better. It might mean cheaper to make or faster to assemble, which saves the manufacturer money. Or it may cater to the "gotta have the latest" crowd,
There is something to be said for older technology which has stood the test of time. How many previous "modern" BB systems have gone extinct, while square taper soldiers on?
There is something to be said for older technology which has stood the test of time. How many previous "modern" BB systems have gone extinct, while square taper soldiers on?
#4
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
1,715 Posts
Likes For terrymorse:
#5
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,620
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,559 Times
in
1,574 Posts
I realize this may be a hypothetical or even rhetorical question, but here goes:
If square taper bottom brackets are so heavy, flexible, and crude compared to modern hollow axle systems, why does square taper still seem to dominate the track and single speed worlds? I would have thought track and single speed riders would most want the claimed improvements, especially in stiffness, but uptake seems minimal to zero compared to road and MTB riders.
If square taper bottom brackets are so heavy, flexible, and crude compared to modern hollow axle systems, why does square taper still seem to dominate the track and single speed worlds? I would have thought track and single speed riders would most want the claimed improvements, especially in stiffness, but uptake seems minimal to zero compared to road and MTB riders.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#6
Senior Member
They don't all use square taper.
But, where they do, it's a combination of cheapness, lack of track popularity limiting tech development, and the ability to tune q-factor.
Or, in the case of Japanese Keirin, it's because they have very strict fairness rules dictating that bicycles be built with very specific technologies. Those rules were established over half a century ago, and they've found little reason to change them, so the bikes are still made with the same sorts of old-school designs.
Small weight differences aren't very important in track because there aren't any climbs, and "stiffness" concerns with steel square taper spindles are silly marketing nonsense.
But, where they do, it's a combination of cheapness, lack of track popularity limiting tech development, and the ability to tune q-factor.
Or, in the case of Japanese Keirin, it's because they have very strict fairness rules dictating that bicycles be built with very specific technologies. Those rules were established over half a century ago, and they've found little reason to change them, so the bikes are still made with the same sorts of old-school designs.
Small weight differences aren't very important in track because there aren't any climbs, and "stiffness" concerns with steel square taper spindles are silly marketing nonsense.
Likes For HTupolev:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,091 Times
in
722 Posts
Another reason to use square taper would be on a long tour, where replacements are much more likely to be readily available than the latest-and-greatest BB du jour.
#8
Very Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,211
Bikes: Giant Quasar & Fuji Roubaix
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
244 Posts
I like square taper simply because it's what I'm familiar with, availability of parts, and most importantly, it's what I know how to work on.
#9
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
1,715 Posts
Just say "no" to square taper. It's junk technology that eats crank arms, and possibly injures the rider.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Likes For terrymorse:
#10
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Just say "no" to square taper. It's junk technology that eats crank arms, and possibly injures the rider.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
Post-sq-taper designs have had durability issues as well....HT2 arms coming apart, short-lived BB life due to poor sealing compared to sq-taper. etc.
Not at all saying spindle isn't better....but almost all the issues taper cranks have spindle cranks have had as well....exception being that 3-piece cranks can be adjusted for an out of spec BB shell--with 2-piece cranks the shell must be machined nearly perfectly. But, spindle cranks can be nearly a pound lighter while being much stiffer.
Last edited by Marcus_Ti; 08-13-19 at 07:01 PM.
#11
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2144 Post(s)
Liked 3,373 Times
in
1,193 Posts
Just say "no" to square taper. It's junk technology that eats crank arms, and possibly injures the rider.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
Wonder why, over several decades & tens of thousands of miles, none of this has ever happened to me. Ever.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#12
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
1,715 Posts
Likes For terrymorse:
#13
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2144 Post(s)
Liked 3,373 Times
in
1,193 Posts
Likes For rccardr:
#14
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
1,715 Posts
Some people live charmed lives. Others, not so much.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/...ng-cranks.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/...ng-cranks.html
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#15
Senior Member
Excessive torque will move the starting point for that installation cycle slightly farther up the taper, which means that the crank will suffer more of that permanent wear than it should have. In today's cartridge-BB world of very infrequent re-installations, this almost never becomes a problem in the first place.
To cause a problematic amount of added walk-up on a single installation from overtorque, you'd have to go really nuts. Like "bust out a huge cheater bar for no reason" nuts. The kind of behavior that will wreck any kind of crank interface.
(What is a big problem for taper interface wear is when someone misinterprets the walk-up as loosening of the fixing bolt, and repeatedly re-tightens the bolt after every few rides. Each time this is done, it restarts the walk-up cycle and puts a re-installation worth of wear on the interface.)
Likes For HTupolev:
#16
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,546
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1070 Post(s)
Liked 837 Times
in
472 Posts
Terry, I think you're being a little dramatic.
To the OP, it's a little heavier and required multiple sizes to be made. The nee outboard ones are lighter and streamline the manufacturing process.
Square taper bearings almost always last longer.
Broken cranks or flex has nothing to do with it. Maybe marketing.
To the OP, it's a little heavier and required multiple sizes to be made. The nee outboard ones are lighter and streamline the manufacturing process.
Square taper bearings almost always last longer.
Broken cranks or flex has nothing to do with it. Maybe marketing.
Likes For rosefarts:
#17
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,898
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26212 Post(s)
Liked 10,180 Times
in
7,062 Posts
#18
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,620
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,559 Times
in
1,574 Posts
That's what I'm hoping for with all of my old bikes. After installing cartridge BBs, the cranks just stay on, year after year.
#19
Senior Member
Just say "no" to square taper. It's junk technology that eats crank arms, and possibly injures the rider.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
If the crank arm becomes loose, which happens when the fixing bolt gets loose or falls out, the crank arm is ruined.
If the fixing bolt is over tightened, which happens a lot, the crank arm "walks" up the taper. The crank arm develops a crack from being overstressed, then it breaks off without warning—usually when the rider is standing on the pedals—sending the rider to the ground.
Just. Say. No.
The reason for the newer BBs is strictly marketing to people who need the "new and improved model". Otherwise there wouldn't be so many.
Likes For davidad:
#20
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,620
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,559 Times
in
1,574 Posts
I,m sorry, but you don't have a clue. If a sq. taper crank is torqued properly it will not walk up the taper until it cracks un less someone keeps retorquing the bolt.
The reason for the newer BBs is strictly marketing to people who need the "new and improved model". Otherwise there wouldn't be so many.
The reason for the newer BBs is strictly marketing to people who need the "new and improved model". Otherwise there wouldn't be so many.
#21
Senior Member
The greats of pro cycling used square taper without issues. I have had square taper on every bike since the beginning of time, and have had zero issues. I know some seriously powerful riders that use square taper without issues. I even use, God forbid, Shimano UN52 square taper BB with Campagnolo Nuovo Record crank, and have had zero issues. Been using it for 20 years this way.
Marketing BS for sure.
Marketing BS for sure.
#22
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
1,715 Posts
As you state, re-tightening the fixing bolt will continue the crank arm's journey up the taper, increasing the possibility of a fracture.
And believe it or not, I do "have a clue". Would you like to compare CVs?
Two words: proprietary & patents.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#23
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,898
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26212 Post(s)
Liked 10,180 Times
in
7,062 Posts
...it's a wonder more people haven't been killed by square taper BB's.
Likes For 3alarmer:
#24
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,959
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
1,715 Posts
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Likes For terrymorse:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,919
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,094 Posts
I guess I'm a bit old skool on this one. 3 RAAMs, and a bunch of time at the Major Taylor in Indy, and countless hours in the saddle for commutes and daily cycling and no failures in my square taper bottom brackets. I volunteer at a local bike project and I see a lot of over tightened crank arms but none that have ever failed. Maybe wee need to re-think putting aluminium crank arms on steel spindles. For my 200 pound body though they work quite nicely. Smiles, MH
Last edited by Mad Honk; 08-15-19 at 08:43 AM. Reason: correction