Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Lightest bike is disc brakes

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Lightest bike is disc brakes

Old 10-09-20, 12:12 AM
  #1  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Lightest bike is disc brakes

https://bikerumor.com/2020/10/08/585...k-catching-it/

It's 75% of the cost of a base model Honda Civic. Frameset is less than 600 grams. 13 pounds off the shelf, probably 11 if you threw lots of money at it.

So now there's a weight penalty for using rim brakes.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 10-09-20, 12:37 AM
  #2  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
So now there's a weight penalty for using rim brakes.
Not if we're allowing comparisons to previous model years. The lightest production road bikes from the lightweight push half a decade ago were under 11 pounds, like the Fuji SL 1.1 or Trek Emonda SLR 10.

Getting below 14 pounds is hardly all that interesting for a top-end carbon lightweight-oriented climbing bike. Not in and of itself, anyway. I could head down into Seattle tomorrow and order a sub-14lb off-the-peg road bike from R&E with a steel frame, if I were so inclined.

And if we're allowing custom builds, this 6lb road bike had rim brakes.

Last edited by HTupolev; 10-09-20 at 12:42 AM.
HTupolev is online now  
Likes For HTupolev:
Old 10-09-20, 12:58 AM
  #3  
Branko D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times in 252 Posts
Depends on build, but since a hydraulic disc groupset is heavier by about 300-ish grams and disc brake wheels are also a tad heavier, you can get a rim brake bike weighting the same for many thousands less...

So, no. I ride discs but have no illusions which is lighter and (marginally) faster. Better brakes are worth a very small penalty for me.
​​​​​​
Branko D is offline  
Old 10-09-20, 02:36 AM
  #4  
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
I guess they spent all their money on the bike and didn't have any left to buy a spirit level to adjust the seat.

znomit is offline  
Likes For znomit:
Old 10-09-20, 05:34 AM
  #5  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
I guess they spent all their money on the bike and didn't have any left to buy a spirit level to adjust the seat.
Level seats are old school and uncomfortable (and a result of archaic UCI regulations that have thankfully changed). If you want to get low and fast, a tilted seat is likely to be way more comfortable and sustainable for most people.
rubiksoval is offline  
Likes For rubiksoval:
Old 10-09-20, 07:27 AM
  #6  
Ferrouscious 
Some Weirdo
 
Ferrouscious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Rexburg, ID
Posts: 502

Bikes: '86 Schwinn Prelude, '91 Scott Sawtooth, '73 Raleigh "Grand 3"

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Level seats are old school and uncomfortable (and a result of archaic UCI regulations that have thankfully changed). If you want to get low and fast, a tilted seat is likely to be way more comfortable and sustainable for most people.
nah
Ferrouscious is offline  
Likes For Ferrouscious:
Old 10-09-20, 07:40 AM
  #7  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by Ferrouscious
nah
Nah, yeah
Kimmo is offline  
Likes For Kimmo:
Old 10-09-20, 08:10 AM
  #8  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,907

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10397 Post(s)
Liked 11,849 Times in 6,066 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Level seats are old school and uncomfortable (and a result of archaic UCI regulations that have thankfully changed). If you want to get low and fast, a tilted seat is likely to be way more comfortable and sustainable for most people.
I've seen that numerous places, but whenever my saddle is even a hair off of level with the nose down, I feel like I'm sliding toward the bars and spend the whole ride pushing back on the seat. Is there some adjustment or such that I'm missing? Is it the shape of the saddle?
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Likes For genejockey:
Old 10-09-20, 08:14 AM
  #9  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20801 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times in 4,666 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
https://bikerumor.com/2020/10/08/585...k-catching-it/

It's 75% of the cost of a base model Honda Civic. Frameset is less than 600 grams. 13 pounds off the shelf, probably 11 if you threw lots of money at it.

So now there's a weight penalty for using rim brakes.
You rabble rouser, you.

WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 10-09-20, 09:21 AM
  #10  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
I've seen that numerous places, but whenever my saddle is even a hair off of level with the nose down, I feel like I'm sliding toward the bars and spend the whole ride pushing back on the seat. Is there some adjustment or such that I'm missing? Is it the shape of the saddle?
Im already working hard as it is- I dont want to spend 2-4 hours pushing my body away from the cockpit as it continually slides forward.

I honestly doubt most recreational or even most enthusiast cyclists can hold a 'low and fast' position for long enough to make a downward tilting saddle beneficial. So the rest of the time riding, they are adjusting over and over again as they slide.
This seems like a race setup decision so cool for that situation.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 10-09-20, 09:45 AM
  #11  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
I've seen that numerous places, but whenever my saddle is even a hair off of level with the nose down, I feel like I'm sliding toward the bars and spend the whole ride pushing back on the seat. Is there some adjustment or such that I'm missing? Is it the shape of the saddle?
Maybe you ride much further back? I used to feel similarly and had to make constant adjustments when I was much further behind the bottom bracket.

Once I moved my seat substantially forward to open up my hip angle and allow for a lower front end, I simply couldn't have the bike seat level and found I'm totally planted in the seat. In that position, though, hands are on the hoods, elbows are about 90 degrees, and I'm pretty far forward. There's not much room to move forward at that point.
rubiksoval is offline  
Likes For rubiksoval:
Old 10-09-20, 09:48 AM
  #12  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by Ferrouscious
nah
What is "nah"? Nah, I ride my bike bolt upright and don't need to have a lower front end and a saddle position to allow that? Or nah, I never noticed how many performance-oriented people are now tilting their saddle down? Or nah, I'm just going to say nah because I'm going to pretend that the way I do it is the de facto way that everyone else is doing it (aside from the photo that prompted the comment in the first place)?
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 10-09-20, 09:55 AM
  #13  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
I've seen that numerous places, but whenever my saddle is even a hair off of level with the nose down, I feel like I'm sliding toward the bars and spend the whole ride pushing back on the seat. Is there some adjustment or such that I'm missing? Is it the shape of the saddle?
Depends on the posture you're trying to achieve, and on the saddle. There's no one angle that's always correct in all situations for everybody, but, the point is that "always make it perfectly level" isn't a good practice. Nor is it even always well-defined, since not all saddles are flat.
HTupolev is online now  
Likes For HTupolev:
Old 10-09-20, 10:26 AM
  #14  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,907

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10397 Post(s)
Liked 11,849 Times in 6,066 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Maybe you ride much further back? I used to feel similarly and had to make constant adjustments when I was much further behind the bottom bracket.

Once I moved my seat substantially forward to open up my hip angle and allow for a lower front end, I simply couldn't have the bike seat level and found I'm totally planted in the seat. In that position, though, hands are on the hoods, elbows are about 90 degrees, and I'm pretty far forward. There's not much room to move forward at that point.
As it happens, I have short femurs for my inseam length and height, so I'm actually pretty far forward as it is. My saddles are close to as far forward as they can get. Currently my bikes have about 8-9 cm of drop from saddle top to bars, and that works for me, especially since I swapped in new bars with shallower drop. Now I can easily do a couple miles into the wind in the drops. But I have one bike for which I think might be fun to experiment with more drop. I've got 1.5 cm of spacers to play with.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Old 10-09-20, 01:36 PM
  #15  
surak
Senior Member
 
surak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times in 436 Posts
Some of the Aethos lineup comes with the Power saddle, which my Retul fitter/LBS owner told me is usually more comfortable tilted down, based on Retul data. I've found that to be the case personally as well. Usually a level Power saddle would be accompanied by little if any bar drop.
surak is offline  
Likes For surak:
Old 10-11-20, 03:37 PM
  #16  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Lol, ten years ago I posted my ride in Hot or Not, and copped all this flak for a three degree tilt.

Yeah, that's right. So ahead of the curve over here I'm on a tangent.
Kimmo is offline  
Likes For Kimmo:
Old 10-12-20, 06:49 AM
  #17  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
Use whatever saddle angle works for you. My SMP stratos is set nose down 2-3 degrees, with a 10cm saddle to bar drop. There is certainly no rule that saddles should be level.
DaveSSS is offline  
Likes For DaveSSS:
Old 10-12-20, 07:10 AM
  #18  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,279 Times in 739 Posts
Now I'm bummed. My CAAD 12 weighs 17.5 lbs and cost me $1350. For only another $12,000 or so, I could have a bike that's 3 lb lighter. What was I thinking?
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 10-12-20, 07:28 AM
  #19  
vespasianus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 700

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked 389 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
Now I'm bummed. My CAAD 12 weighs 17.5 lbs and cost me $1350. For only another $12,000 or so, I could have a bike that's 3 lb lighter. What was I thinking?

What a loser. You should immediately spend $4000 to get that bike down to 17 lbs. And make sure you tell the wife. She will fully understand and see the logic.
vespasianus is offline  
Likes For vespasianus:
Old 10-12-20, 01:24 PM
  #20  
Racing Dan
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,231
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1335 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
https://bikerumor.com/2020/10/08/585...k-catching-it/

It's 75% of the cost of a base model Honda Civic. Frameset is less than 600 grams. 13 pounds off the shelf, probably 11 if you threw lots of money at it.

So now there's a weight penalty for using rim brakes.
Its also the MOST expensive bike. This is how they move the goal posts to justify their other semi light bikes are now several grand. As if they turned back the clock a decade or more :-)

Note 13 lbs is about 5,9 kg or 5900 grams. The fame is only 11% of the total weight. Not saving the last 200-300 grams off of the frame would save a LOT of money to put into other components or in the pocket.
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 10-12-20, 04:39 PM
  #21  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,279 Times in 739 Posts
Originally Posted by vespasianus
What a loser. You should immediately spend $4000 to get that bike down to 17 lbs. And make sure you tell the wife. She will fully understand and see the logic.
You actually think someone would marry me?
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 10-12-20, 05:40 PM
  #22  
Kimmo 
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,537

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1523 Post(s)
Liked 716 Times in 508 Posts
Originally Posted by Racing Dan
Note 13 lbs is about 5,9 kg or 5900 grams. The fame is only 11% of the total weight. Not saving the last 200-300 grams off of the frame would save a LOT of money to put into other components or in the pocket.
IKR? I've got a bike weighs 6.4kg, owes me like AU$3.5k. Owed me half that before I threw the tubulars on it, and it was 6.7.

Talk about diminishing returns...
Kimmo is offline  
Old 10-12-20, 07:01 PM
  #23  
vespasianus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 700

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked 389 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
You actually think someone would marry me?
LOL. Well, If you get a $12,500 bike, I am sure you would get a wife, maybe two!
vespasianus is offline  
Old 10-12-20, 08:14 PM
  #24  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,938 Times in 4,673 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
https://bikerumor.com/2020/10/08/585...k-catching-it/

It's 75% of the cost of a base model Honda Civic. Frameset is less than 600 grams. 13 pounds off the shelf, probably 11 if you threw lots of money at it.

So now there's a weight penalty for using rim brakes.
Since I don't own a Honda Civic, I could totally afford that bike.

But for $14k, I would prefer custom lugged steel with a flashy paint job, weight be damned. If I had a 13 pound bike, I wouldn't have an excuse for being so slow.
Koyote is offline  
Old 10-12-20, 08:18 PM
  #25  
Wileyone 
Senior Member
 
Wileyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,537
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times in 403 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
Now I'm bummed. My CAAD 12 weighs 17.5 lbs and cost me $1350. For only another $12,000 or so, I could have a bike that's 3 lb lighter. What was I thinking?
Or you could just skip lunch.
Wileyone is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.