What is your opinion?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,658
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1608 Post(s)
Liked 2,589 Times
in
1,224 Posts
If you don't ride hills around here you don't get very far. Many times you have the choice of either. Then there is Mt Diablo, where you get a sustained up hill and then a steep grade at the end of that. Prefer? The downhill side, lol.
#27
Road Runner
I ride in mostly flat areas by necessity and find that riding like that at a steady speed & cadence can be quite tiring over the long run. I much prefer rollers where my cadence and force on the pedals varies along the way, sort of like doing interval training with short breaks on the downhills. It's also fun to hammer the downhills and see how far up the next hill your momentum will carry you. I'm also not a strong climber and do better at long shallower climbs than short steep ones.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 564
Bikes: 1976 Raleigh,2015 Bianchi Intenso, 2012 Specialized Secteur.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I ride in mostly flat areas by necessity and find that riding like that at a steady speed & cadence can be quite tiring over the long run. I much prefer rollers where my cadence and force on the pedals varies along the way, sort of like doing interval training with short breaks on the downhills. It's also fun to hammer the downhills and see how far up the next hill your momentum will carry you. I'm also not a strong climber and do better at long shallower climbs than short steep ones.