Touring tire HEIGHT
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Touring tire HEIGHT
I'm currently running Conti Top Contact II 37mm tires on my +/- 10 year old 520 with planet bike fenders. The tires fit but the clearance between the tire and fender is extremely tight. Even on pavement if I get a pebble stuck in the tread it scrapes the fender and sounds like arcing electricity. Without realizing the potential problems, I rode a muddy trail and both wheels literally seized up making the ride a disaster.
I'm assuming that I need to drop to 35 or even 32 mm tires. Can anyone recommend a quality 32 or 35 mm tire that has a lower profile than most so I can add clearance? Yes, the fenders are at their highest adjustment. Also, since I'm a big guy, I tend to run my tires at or close to maximum recommended psi.
I have been looking at bicyclerollingresistance.com which lists heights of those tires tested. Even if I go to 32mm Schwalbe Marathon Green Guards, according to the site I'm only gaining 3mm which is only the height of two stacked pennies. I know that adding 3mm clearance is better than what I currently run, but is that significant enough to make a difference?
Any input is much appreciated.
Thank you.
I'm assuming that I need to drop to 35 or even 32 mm tires. Can anyone recommend a quality 32 or 35 mm tire that has a lower profile than most so I can add clearance? Yes, the fenders are at their highest adjustment. Also, since I'm a big guy, I tend to run my tires at or close to maximum recommended psi.
I have been looking at bicyclerollingresistance.com which lists heights of those tires tested. Even if I go to 32mm Schwalbe Marathon Green Guards, according to the site I'm only gaining 3mm which is only the height of two stacked pennies. I know that adding 3mm clearance is better than what I currently run, but is that significant enough to make a difference?
Any input is much appreciated.
Thank you.
#2
Banned
ETRTO Number 622.. A diameter .. +2x Width . simple Math.
Last edited by fietsbob; 11-10-16 at 08:40 AM.
#3
Ozark Hillbilly
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Show Me State
Posts: 680
Bikes: Long Haul Trucker
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm currently running Conti Top Contact II 37mm tires on my +/- 10 year old 520 with planet bike fenders. The tires fit but the clearance between the tire and fender is extremely tight. Even on pavement if I get a pebble stuck in the tread it scrapes the fender and sounds like arcing electricity. Without realizing the potential problems, I rode a muddy trail and both wheels literally seized up making the ride a disaster.
I'm assuming that I need to drop to 35 or even 32 mm tires. Can anyone recommend a quality 32 or 35 mm tire that has a lower profile than most so I can add clearance? Yes, the fenders are at their highest adjustment. Also, since I'm a big guy, I tend to run my tires at or close to maximum recommended psi.
I have been looking at bicyclerollingresistance.com which lists heights of those tires tested. Even if I go to 32mm Schwalbe Marathon Green Guards, according to the site I'm only gaining 3mm which is only the height of two stacked pennies. I know that adding 3mm clearance is better than what I currently run, but is that significant enough to make a difference?
Any input is much appreciated.
Thank you.
I'm assuming that I need to drop to 35 or even 32 mm tires. Can anyone recommend a quality 32 or 35 mm tire that has a lower profile than most so I can add clearance? Yes, the fenders are at their highest adjustment. Also, since I'm a big guy, I tend to run my tires at or close to maximum recommended psi.
I have been looking at bicyclerollingresistance.com which lists heights of those tires tested. Even if I go to 32mm Schwalbe Marathon Green Guards, according to the site I'm only gaining 3mm which is only the height of two stacked pennies. I know that adding 3mm clearance is better than what I currently run, but is that significant enough to make a difference?
Any input is much appreciated.
Thank you.
You may not be able to use longer stays if the fenders are maxed out against racks, etc.
#4
Senior Member
Custom fenders, alternative ones, plastic strips on the seat post or bottom of the rack. Pics might help us help you.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
JONK and LEEBO... The front fender is flush with the bottom of the fork and the back is flush against the crossbar behind the seat so both are as high as possible. Since I still have about a quarter inch left on the stays, I'm thinking of cutting grooves in the fenders, maxing out the stays and sealing with silicone if I don't change tires.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
I know what the 622 represents but the rest of the formula (if it is a formula) doesn't make sense to me. Also, if the width you're citing is the tire width, aren't most tires stated widths inflated and not accurately represented by the manufacturers?
I was hoping for information based on experience.
I was hoping for information based on experience.
#7
Ozark Hillbilly
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Show Me State
Posts: 680
Bikes: Long Haul Trucker
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Your wanting to go with bigger tires. The fenders are strong because of the way they are shaped; changing that shape by cutting them will weaken them. Have you thought about a different frame that can handle wider tires/fenders/racks?
I can insert a finger between my tires and fenders (Planet Bike), I never have problems with rocks. A few leaves get stuck and make noise.
I can insert a finger between my tires and fenders (Planet Bike), I never have problems with rocks. A few leaves get stuck and make noise.
Last edited by jonc123; 11-10-16 at 11:42 PM.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
US does test low in Math scores when compared internationally [I was a Product of the US Schools during the 50s & early 60's]
622 is ETRTO Bead seat Diameter (2 x r) standard it's where the tire meets the rim.. 2nd number is the width .
Round cross-section tire ... Width = Height in Radius , so 2x That.
622 is ETRTO Bead seat Diameter (2 x r) standard it's where the tire meets the rim.. 2nd number is the width .
Round cross-section tire ... Width = Height in Radius , so 2x That.
I am also a product of the same era. So you're saying Width (37mm)= Height in radius so 2x That. 2x 37mm = 74mm which is ridiculous.
I note that you have 21,566 posts in 75 months. That's 287.56 posts a month and almost 10 a day. (Simple math) When do you have time to ride your bike?
Let's do each other a favor. Please don't respond should I post anything in the future. I find most of your comments on BF condescending and not very helpful.
I'm ending it here before the mods get involved and I won't respond should you choose to make me 21,567. Have a great Thanksgiving.
#9
(622mm + (37mm * 2)) = actual your outside diameter (assuming your tire is round shaped and the tire width is accurate)
Obviously FB skipped a few English classes
#10
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,565
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3683 Post(s)
Liked 5,448 Times
in
2,769 Posts
If you can get a caliper and measure your inflated tires and also measure the inside width of your rims it would be a good start. The height as well as the measured width will vary with the width of the rim.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
It looks like your choices are:
1. Go to narrower tires, which will also mean higher pressures and a less comfy ride with increased rolling resistance
2. Modify the fenders to give more clearance. There's a real risk to modifying a front fender. If it folds up and locks the wheel, bad things tend to happen. This is also why you don't want to roll with inadequate clearance between the front fender and the tire.
3. Give up on the fenders. You're going to get wetter/muddier, but at least the wheels will go 'round.
4. Change to 650B wheels and make the necessary brake/frame modifications. This is a snap for disk brake bikes, but isn't really that big a deal for others. (I changed my wife's 1984 Trek 720 over from 700C to 650B last year, but she was already interested in new brakes that were going to require new posts, so the wheel size change wasn't forcing that issue.)
5. Buy a new bike that has adequate clearance for wide tires and fenders. The current trend is for much wider tires than just a few years ago, so you might consider making sure any new steed can handle things up in the 55mm range.
1. Go to narrower tires, which will also mean higher pressures and a less comfy ride with increased rolling resistance
2. Modify the fenders to give more clearance. There's a real risk to modifying a front fender. If it folds up and locks the wheel, bad things tend to happen. This is also why you don't want to roll with inadequate clearance between the front fender and the tire.
3. Give up on the fenders. You're going to get wetter/muddier, but at least the wheels will go 'round.
4. Change to 650B wheels and make the necessary brake/frame modifications. This is a snap for disk brake bikes, but isn't really that big a deal for others. (I changed my wife's 1984 Trek 720 over from 700C to 650B last year, but she was already interested in new brakes that were going to require new posts, so the wheel size change wasn't forcing that issue.)
5. Buy a new bike that has adequate clearance for wide tires and fenders. The current trend is for much wider tires than just a few years ago, so you might consider making sure any new steed can handle things up in the 55mm range.
#12
Senior Member
I don't have any suggestions, but re tire height, I may be wrong but I thought that I have read that the rim width and how a tire sits on a rim can make a slight diff in how the tire shape is. Maybe look into this to see if this would make a slight diff with a given tire/rim combo.
To be honest, while I have looked at tire widths in rreal life vs what it is claimed to be, I have never looked at the height aspect.
ulitimately thats too bad that the frame limits you to probably 32s to have a reasonable tire/fender clearance, but it is what it is.
I guess you'll have to decide if using 32s is ok for you or not. If not, as mentioned, a diff frame seems to be the only real option as I don't see how you could fudge the fenders higher if they are already up against the limit of the fork etc.
To be honest, while I have looked at tire widths in rreal life vs what it is claimed to be, I have never looked at the height aspect.
ulitimately thats too bad that the frame limits you to probably 32s to have a reasonable tire/fender clearance, but it is what it is.
I guess you'll have to decide if using 32s is ok for you or not. If not, as mentioned, a diff frame seems to be the only real option as I don't see how you could fudge the fenders higher if they are already up against the limit of the fork etc.
#13
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,565
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3683 Post(s)
Liked 5,448 Times
in
2,769 Posts
Someone posted this awhile back. Shows that a given tire becomes taller as well as wider with a wider rim. Was news to me!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Vancouver Wa.
Posts: 289
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, '92 Trek 520, Novara Randonee, '89 Allez, Schwinn Sierra beater
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I note that you have 21,566 posts in 75 months. That's 287.56 posts a month and almost 10 a day. (Simple math) When do you have time to ride your bike?
Let's do each other a favor. Please don't respond should I post anything in the future. I find most of your comments on BF condescending and not very helpful.
I'm ending it here before the mods get involved and I won't respond should you choose to make me 21,567. Have a great Thanksgiving.[/QUOTE]
Boom, nailed it. And, I concur
Let's do each other a favor. Please don't respond should I post anything in the future. I find most of your comments on BF condescending and not very helpful.
I'm ending it here before the mods get involved and I won't respond should you choose to make me 21,567. Have a great Thanksgiving.[/QUOTE]
Boom, nailed it. And, I concur
#15
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,224
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,246 Times
in
624 Posts
I note that you have 21,566 posts in 75 months. That's 287.56 posts a month and almost 10 a day. (Simple math) When do you have time to ride your bike?
Let's do each other a favor. Please don't respond should I post anything in the future. I find most of your comments on BF condescending and not very helpful.
I'm ending it here before the mods get involved and I won't respond should you choose to make me 21,567. Have a great Thanksgiving.
Let's do each other a favor. Please don't respond should I post anything in the future. I find most of your comments on BF condescending and not very helpful.
I'm ending it here before the mods get involved and I won't respond should you choose to make me 21,567. Have a great Thanksgiving.
I have in 60,000 miles with my high post count. 29,918 posts
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"