Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

New Drivetrain/Bad Chainline Problem

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

New Drivetrain/Bad Chainline Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-18, 08:57 PM
  #1  
bike-izle
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
New Drivetrain/Bad Chainline Problem

Hi,

I'm currently installing a new SRAM Apex 2X10 drivetrain. All was well until I realized that the rear spacing/hub is 135 mm (Shimano XT hub) and that the chainline is different. The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).

I guess I need a different crankset, right? Are there "road" double cranks (50-53 chainring, maybe a little smaller) out there with a wider chainline?

Thanks
bike-izle is offline  
Old 05-11-18, 09:17 PM
  #2  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times in 1,579 Posts
Or don't use the small-small.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 05-11-18, 09:21 PM
  #3  
bike-izle
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Or don't use the small-small.
Yeah I know, but it still seems unsafe, and it'd be nice to have the "legit" chainline anyway....
bike-izle is offline  
Old 05-11-18, 09:37 PM
  #4  
Troul 
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,438

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,005 Times in 1,932 Posts
A wider bb might help enough?
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Old 05-11-18, 10:03 PM
  #5  
Eggman84
Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 489

Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 35 Posts
Using modern 2 piece cranks pretty much dictates the front chainline. You could use a crankset and square taper BB to reduce the chainline, assuming the there was space between the chain stay and chain . Other alternative is to use a larger small in ring, or smaller large ring, so that the chain does not "catch" the large chainring when you are in the small small combination.
Eggman84 is offline  
Old 05-11-18, 11:28 PM
  #6  
70sSanO
Senior Member
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,826

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 2,181 Times in 1,329 Posts
Is the chain catching on the large chainring ramps/pins or the actual teeth? If the ramps/pins are causing it, you might want to try a non-ramped chainring. I know it sounds sacrilegious, but you can still shift without them.

John
70sSanO is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 12:36 AM
  #7  
cpach
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mt Shasta, CA, USA
Posts: 2,144

Bikes: Too many. Giant Trance X 29, Surly Midnight Special get the most time.

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 313 Times in 237 Posts
This is how pretty much all disc brake road bikes are, particularly if they have short chainstays. Some crank manufacturers have made some steps to try to improve performance when used with the chainline 2.5mm out on disc frames by altering the shaping and spacing of charings among other things. I would recommend running it.
cpach is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 03:41 AM
  #8  
dsaul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,270
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 716 Post(s)
Liked 804 Times in 478 Posts
SRAM has started making some of the Rival and S-series cranksets in a wide axle version for 135 rear axle use. The problem of the chain climbing the shift pins on the large chainring has been going on ever since chainstays got really short. I can't use the two smallest cogs(in the small chainring) on my road bike with a 130 axle, due to the 407mm chainstay length.
dsaul is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 06:42 AM
  #9  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,812

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3597 Post(s)
Liked 3,421 Times in 1,946 Posts
Originally Posted by bike-izle
The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).
This is not unusual, and as @ThermionicScott notes, a reason to avoid that particular gear combination. The problem is exacerbated by short chainstays and a large difference between inner and outer rings on the crank.

While you can do various things with spacers to make that gear combination usable, doing so will often make other gear combinations unusable, so it's best to just avoid that gear combination.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 08:09 AM
  #10  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,076

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6245 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times in 3,342 Posts
I think the sum of all posts here is the answer. Chain line is not something that can be adjusted on many new cranks. Some have a little you can do with spacers, like the Race Face Cadence crank I bought five or six years ago. I've also seen DIYer's post adding spacers between the chainwheels and spider. Other ways to alter chainline are on the back wheel. Spacers on the axle if you have the clearance. Some don't, some do. Might have to change wheel dish wheel if it takes a lot to get back into where you need to be.

It's an experiment though. Once you leave the realm of what the mfr put on your bike, then it's up to you to see what fits and doesn't.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 09:37 AM
  #11  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,213

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2763 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Since I spend a lot more time in my big ring and 3 biggest cogs (common in rolling terrain) than my small ring and 3 smallest cogs (never), I actually prefer the chain-line I get with a road crank-set and 135mm rear hub.

I would just avoid the bad combos, but that's just me. Seems like a better solution than buying a new crankset, changing ring-size (unless you already wanted to do that), or moving the existing crank-set over just to accommodate a combo you don't even need.

Interested to know what you decide to do and how it works.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 10:42 AM
  #12  
leob1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle of the road, NJ
Posts: 3,137
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 293 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times in 69 Posts
Originally Posted by bike-izle
Hi,

I'm currently installing a new SRAM Apex 2X10 drivetrain. All was well until I realized that the rear spacing/hub is 135 mm (Shimano XT hub) and that the chainline is different. The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).

I guess I need a different crankset, right? Are there "road" double cranks (50-53 chainring, maybe a little smaller) out there with a wider chainline?

Thanks
A new crank, maybe. Better technique, definitely. I have a bike with Sram Apex, the front derailer is really bottom of the barrel, you should upgrade that. The front shifter are tuneable, you can move it a half shift so you can use that to reduce the chain rub, practice doing that. And don't cross chain, there is no reason to do that. Practice double shifting, shifting both the front and back at the same time so you can get to the gear you want. There is no reason to cross chain.
leob1 is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 11:28 AM
  #13  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Have you measured what the rear component of the chain line is..

to compare it with the front.. ?
fietsbob is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 02:31 PM
  #14  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,213

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2763 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by leob1
The front shifter are tuneable, you can move it a half shift so you can use that to reduce the chain rub, practice doing that.
I think what he means is that the chain is rubbing the big ring (and therefore wanting to climb on to it), not the derailleur.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 04:07 PM
  #15  
bike-izle
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Have you measured what the rear component of the chain line is..

to compare it with the front.. ?
Shimano XT rear hub, which I believe has ~47.5 mm chainline.
SRAM Apex crank, which is around 46 mm chainline. It's got a 53 big ring, so that definitely plays a role.

Not a big difference in chainline if the numbers are correct, but it still rubs.
bike-izle is offline  
Old 05-12-18, 04:50 PM
  #16  
mcours2006
Senior Member
 
mcours2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,207

Bikes: ...a few.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 410 Times in 236 Posts
I experience the same problem putting a modern groupset on a 126mm dropout and shorter chainstay. While most of the gears work okay, I can't dial it in perfect. The same groupset on a modern frame with 130 mm spacing works flawless and crisp.

I think mine has more to do with the shorter chainstay than the shorter dropout.

I think this is something you'll just have to learn to live with.
mcours2006 is offline  
Old 05-14-18, 12:34 AM
  #17  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,163
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4469 Post(s)
Liked 1,606 Times in 1,055 Posts
Originally Posted by mcours2006
I experience the same problem putting a modern groupset on a 126mm dropout and shorter chainstay. While most of the gears work okay, I can't dial it in perfect. The same groupset on a modern frame with 130 mm spacing works flawless and crisp.

I think mine has more to do with the shorter chainstay than the shorter dropout.

I think this is something you'll just have to learn to live with.
126 and 130 are the same chainline. 130 adds cogs on both inside and outside keeping the same cassette centerline.
Kontact is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Presser
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
27
12-11-18 05:37 AM
Josh784
Bicycle Mechanics
5
03-03-16 11:54 AM
chagzuki
Folding Bikes
14
10-10-10 05:26 AM
Brian_T
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
11
09-04-10 11:19 PM
Roll-Monroe-Co
Bicycle Mechanics
3
04-23-10 12:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.