New Drivetrain/Bad Chainline Problem
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
New Drivetrain/Bad Chainline Problem
Hi,
I'm currently installing a new SRAM Apex 2X10 drivetrain. All was well until I realized that the rear spacing/hub is 135 mm (Shimano XT hub) and that the chainline is different. The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).
I guess I need a different crankset, right? Are there "road" double cranks (50-53 chainring, maybe a little smaller) out there with a wider chainline?
Thanks
I'm currently installing a new SRAM Apex 2X10 drivetrain. All was well until I realized that the rear spacing/hub is 135 mm (Shimano XT hub) and that the chainline is different. The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).
I guess I need a different crankset, right? Are there "road" double cranks (50-53 chainring, maybe a little smaller) out there with a wider chainline?
Thanks
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Or don't use the small-small.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,438
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,005 Times
in
1,932 Posts
A wider bb might help enough?
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#5
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 489
Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times
in
35 Posts
Using modern 2 piece cranks pretty much dictates the front chainline. You could use a crankset and square taper BB to reduce the chainline, assuming the there was space between the chain stay and chain . Other alternative is to use a larger small in ring, or smaller large ring, so that the chain does not "catch" the large chainring when you are in the small small combination.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,826
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 2,181 Times
in
1,329 Posts
Is the chain catching on the large chainring ramps/pins or the actual teeth? If the ramps/pins are causing it, you might want to try a non-ramped chainring. I know it sounds sacrilegious, but you can still shift without them.
John
John
#7
Senior Member
This is how pretty much all disc brake road bikes are, particularly if they have short chainstays. Some crank manufacturers have made some steps to try to improve performance when used with the chainline 2.5mm out on disc frames by altering the shaping and spacing of charings among other things. I would recommend running it.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,270
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 716 Post(s)
Liked 804 Times
in
478 Posts
SRAM has started making some of the Rival and S-series cranksets in a wide axle version for 135 rear axle use. The problem of the chain climbing the shift pins on the large chainring has been going on ever since chainstays got really short. I can't use the two smallest cogs(in the small chainring) on my road bike with a 130 axle, due to the 407mm chainstay length.
#9
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,812
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3597 Post(s)
Liked 3,421 Times
in
1,946 Posts
While you can do various things with spacers to make that gear combination usable, doing so will often make other gear combinations unusable, so it's best to just avoid that gear combination.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,076
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6245 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times
in
3,342 Posts
I think the sum of all posts here is the answer. Chain line is not something that can be adjusted on many new cranks. Some have a little you can do with spacers, like the Race Face Cadence crank I bought five or six years ago. I've also seen DIYer's post adding spacers between the chainwheels and spider. Other ways to alter chainline are on the back wheel. Spacers on the axle if you have the clearance. Some don't, some do. Might have to change wheel dish wheel if it takes a lot to get back into where you need to be.
It's an experiment though. Once you leave the realm of what the mfr put on your bike, then it's up to you to see what fits and doesn't.
It's an experiment though. Once you leave the realm of what the mfr put on your bike, then it's up to you to see what fits and doesn't.
#11
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,213
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2763 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Since I spend a lot more time in my big ring and 3 biggest cogs (common in rolling terrain) than my small ring and 3 smallest cogs (never), I actually prefer the chain-line I get with a road crank-set and 135mm rear hub.
I would just avoid the bad combos, but that's just me. Seems like a better solution than buying a new crankset, changing ring-size (unless you already wanted to do that), or moving the existing crank-set over just to accommodate a combo you don't even need.
Interested to know what you decide to do and how it works.
I would just avoid the bad combos, but that's just me. Seems like a better solution than buying a new crankset, changing ring-size (unless you already wanted to do that), or moving the existing crank-set over just to accommodate a combo you don't even need.
Interested to know what you decide to do and how it works.
#12
Senior Member
Hi,
I'm currently installing a new SRAM Apex 2X10 drivetrain. All was well until I realized that the rear spacing/hub is 135 mm (Shimano XT hub) and that the chainline is different. The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).
I guess I need a different crankset, right? Are there "road" double cranks (50-53 chainring, maybe a little smaller) out there with a wider chainline?
Thanks
I'm currently installing a new SRAM Apex 2X10 drivetrain. All was well until I realized that the rear spacing/hub is 135 mm (Shimano XT hub) and that the chainline is different. The chain rubs and wants to climb up onto the big ring when cross chaining (small-small).
I guess I need a different crankset, right? Are there "road" double cranks (50-53 chainring, maybe a little smaller) out there with a wider chainline?
Thanks
#13
Banned
Have you measured what the rear component of the chain line is..
to compare it with the front.. ?
to compare it with the front.. ?
#14
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,213
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2763 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
SRAM Apex crank, which is around 46 mm chainline. It's got a 53 big ring, so that definitely plays a role.
Not a big difference in chainline if the numbers are correct, but it still rubs.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,207
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 410 Times
in
236 Posts
I experience the same problem putting a modern groupset on a 126mm dropout and shorter chainstay. While most of the gears work okay, I can't dial it in perfect. The same groupset on a modern frame with 130 mm spacing works flawless and crisp.
I think mine has more to do with the shorter chainstay than the shorter dropout.
I think this is something you'll just have to learn to live with.
I think mine has more to do with the shorter chainstay than the shorter dropout.
I think this is something you'll just have to learn to live with.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,163
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4469 Post(s)
Liked 1,606 Times
in
1,055 Posts
I experience the same problem putting a modern groupset on a 126mm dropout and shorter chainstay. While most of the gears work okay, I can't dial it in perfect. The same groupset on a modern frame with 130 mm spacing works flawless and crisp.
I think mine has more to do with the shorter chainstay than the shorter dropout.
I think this is something you'll just have to learn to live with.
I think mine has more to do with the shorter chainstay than the shorter dropout.
I think this is something you'll just have to learn to live with.