Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Why the rear brake?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Why the rear brake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-12, 04:17 AM
  #1  
powbob
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why the rear brake?

I know this is a stupid question, but I currently only have a track bike to which I have added a front brake. This stops me very well from speeds up to about the low 30's MPH. So why do I need a rear brake on the geared bike I'm building? I'm sure there are real world reasons. Just curious.
powbob is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 04:21 AM
  #2  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,067

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22610 Post(s)
Liked 8,934 Times in 4,164 Posts
Even better stopping and better modulation.

The front break is clearly better than the rear, but the combo is better.

It's like asking why have a front derailleur, just a 1x10 is adequate.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 04:44 AM
  #3  
powbob
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Makes sense. Thank you.
powbob is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 05:01 AM
  #4  
MrTuner1970
Underwhelming
 
MrTuner1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Mississippi
Posts: 1,263

Bikes: Lynskey R330 Ti, Dean El Vado Ti, Trek 4300

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What datlas said. And I don't know about you, but if my front brake cable broke during a ride, having the rear brake would kinda be nice.
MrTuner1970 is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 05:30 AM
  #5  
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,844

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 929 Times in 614 Posts
Originally Posted by powbob
I know this is a stupid question, but I currently only have a track bike to which I have added a front brake. This stops me very well from speeds up to about the low 30's MPH. So why do I need a rear brake on the geared bike I'm building? I'm sure there are real world reasons. Just curious.
How about the mid 50s, when a car pulls out in front of you ?
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 05:36 AM
  #6  
AdelaaR
Senior Member
 
AdelaaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vlaamse Ardennen, Belgium
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
If you are ever going down a steep, winding, wet road ... and you pull your front brake, inevitably falling down and breaking about every bone in and around your neck ... THEN will you know why bikes have rear brakes ... if you're not dead, at least.
AdelaaR is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 05:42 AM
  #7  
ahsposo 
Artificial Member
 
ahsposo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,158

Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6768 Post(s)
Liked 5,485 Times in 3,226 Posts
Originally Posted by MrTuner1970
What datlas said. And I don't know about you, but if my front brake cable broke during a ride, having the rear brake would kinda be nice.
Bingo.

And of course with a fixed gear you can stop the bike by stopping the pedals from turning.
__________________
ahsposo is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 05:44 AM
  #8  
ahsposo 
Artificial Member
 
ahsposo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,158

Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6768 Post(s)
Liked 5,485 Times in 3,226 Posts
Originally Posted by AdelaaR
If you are ever going down a steep, winding, wet road ... and you pull your front brake, inevitably falling down and breaking about every bone in and around your neck ... THEN will you know why bikes have rear brakes ... if you're not dead, at least.
Your world is a very dangerous place...
__________________
ahsposo is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 05:53 AM
  #9  
thump55
I got 99 problems....
 
thump55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?
Posts: 2,087
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
You also can use your rear brakes only when slowing to a stop or in most "non-critical" braking situations. This'll help spread out your brake wear on rims/pads so you are not destroying only the front rim/pads.
thump55 is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 06:24 AM
  #10  
thinktubes 
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,347

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,380 Times in 893 Posts
You need a rear brake so you can lay down some "awesome patches".
thinktubes is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 06:38 AM
  #11  
andrewclaus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837

Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 430 Posts
Braking with the rear brake is more stable, I think. I was taught to start braking with the rear, then add the front for a quicker "panic" stop if needed. The front wheel has less weight on it on a typical road bike, and is therefore easier to brake which is not always a good thing. In an extreme front-only stop, you could pitch over the front wheel. I picture it as throwing an anchor behind you rather than a block in front of you.
andrewclaus is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 06:59 AM
  #12  
Altbark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Trenton On
Posts: 245

Bikes: 2010 Cannondale T1, 1998 Specialized FSR

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewclaus
Braking with the rear brake is more stable, I think. I was taught to start braking with the rear, then add the front for a quicker "panic" stop if needed. The front wheel has less weight on it on a typical road bike, and is therefore easier to brake which is not always a good thing. In an extreme front-only stop, you could pitch over the front wheel. I picture it as throwing an anchor behind you rather than a block in front of you.
There is absolutely nothing correct in this reply. Nothing!!! Andrewclaus does not know how weight transfers when braking and clearly does not know how to apply the brakes on a two wheeled vehicle when doing an emergency stop. How sad.
Altbark is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:13 AM
  #13  
Ooompa Loompa
Powered by pie
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewclaus
Braking with the rear brake is more stable, I think. I was taught to start braking with the rear, then add the front for a quicker "panic" stop if needed. The front wheel has less weight on it on a typical road bike, and is therefore easier to brake which is not always a good thing. In an extreme front-only stop, you could pitch over the front wheel. I picture it as throwing an anchor behind you rather than a block in front of you.
I suggest reading Sheldon Brown's page on braking. https://sheldonbrown.com/brakturn.html When I first started coming to bikeforums I was one of those who used thier rear brake 90% of the time. I've since trained myself to instead use the front brake 90% of the time and I can feel a massive difference. It's so much safer, and it works better.
Ooompa Loompa is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:16 AM
  #14  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 352 Posts
From Sheldon Brown:
Maximum Deceleration--Emergency Stops
The fastest that you can stop any bike of normal wheelbase is to apply the front brake so hard that the rear wheel is just about to lift off the ground. In this situation, the rear wheel cannot contribute to stopping power, since it has no traction.

...snip..

Using both brakes together can cause "fishtailing." If the rear wheel skids while braking force is also being applied to the front, the rear of the bike will tend to swing past the front, since the front is applying a greater decelerating force than the rear. Once the rear tire starts to skid, it can move sideways as easily as forward.

Before I knew better, I locked up the rear in an emergency stop and started the fishtailing. Letting off the back brake stopped it. But I was lucky I didn't crash.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Back brakes are good for alternating wheels on long downhills, so the rims don't get too hot, and are fine for normal easy braking. And I use the back brake in slippery conditions.

Last edited by rm -rf; 05-16-12 at 07:21 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:21 AM
  #15  
pallen
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 4,034

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
From Sheldon Brown:
Maximum Deceleration--Emergency Stops
The fastest that you can stop any bike of normal wheelbase is to apply the front brake so hard that the rear wheel is just about to lift off the ground. In this situation, the rear wheel cannot contribute to stopping power, since it has no traction.
and if you think you can yank the front brake and hold it at exactly that point, on the edge of tipping over the front wheel, for the duration of a stop, I would like to see that. A little light use of the rear brake helps fill in with extra stopping power where you don't quite have the guts to push that envelope on the front. Yes, you have to use it carefully to avoid locking up the rear. The rear is also good for other reasons mentioned here - backup, alternating for heat management, slower stops, and most importantly for laying down "awesome patches"
pallen is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:36 AM
  #16  
AdelaaR
Senior Member
 
AdelaaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vlaamse Ardennen, Belgium
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ahsposo
Your world is a very dangerous place...
I don't know how you ride, but I tend to "hang" while going fast in turns.
If I were to come across anything unexpected while "hanging" on wet or muddy roads ... and if I would apply my front brake ... I would surely go down.
Rear brakes can be very handy in these situations. A bit of skidding may occur but at least I could brake without my front wheel drifting.
I have never crashed and I have never had any accident with my bike yet, so I might know what I'm talking about or I might just get lucky.
AdelaaR is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:45 AM
  #17  
andrewclaus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837

Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by Ooompa Loompa
I suggest reading Sheldon Brown's page on braking. https://sheldonbrown.com/brakturn.html When I first started coming to bikeforums I was one of those who used thier rear brake 90% of the time. I've since trained myself to instead use the front brake 90% of the time and I can feel a massive difference. It's so much safer, and it works better.
Thank you for the link and constructive reply. I've just learned something which is why I'm on this forum!

Originally Posted by Altbark
There is absolutely nothing correct in this reply. Nothing!!! Andrewclaus does not know how weight transfers when braking and clearly does not know how to apply the brakes on a two wheeled vehicle when doing an emergency stop. How sad.
After reading the above Sheldon Brown link, I would delete the second sentence but otherwise I stand by my reply. I do agree, now, that learning to brake correctly with the front brake is an excellent skill to have. I accept your criticism about not knowing how to apply the brakes. Yes, it's sad, but it's why we continue to learn things from good teachers.

But there's apparently nothing wrong with my basic understanding of the physics. The Sheldon Brown article states that when braking with the front, the rear wheel can leave the ground, not exactly a stable position to be in, and exactly what I said.
andrewclaus is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:49 AM
  #18  
pallen
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 4,034

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewclaus
But there's apparently nothing wrong with my basic understanding of the physics. The Sheldon Brown article states that when braking with the front, the rear wheel can leave the ground, not exactly a stable position to be in, and exactly what I said.
In my experience, that fear is generally unfounded. Yes, you can can brake with the front hard enough to go over the bars, but that is a LOT harder to do than most people who avoid the front brake think.
pallen is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 07:58 AM
  #19  
Mike F
Senior Member
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,181

Bikes: 2017 Specilized Roubaix, 2012 Scott CR1 Team, Felt Z85

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I find the back brake for me is better at feathering my speed on a decent.
Mike F is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 09:25 AM
  #20  
EdIsMe
Senior Member
 
EdIsMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 663

Bikes: 2011 Neuvation FC100, 2013 Mercier Kilo TT Pro, 1984 Peugeot SV-L

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A hammer is not the best tool for all jobs and a front brake is not the best tool for all braking. Having both is just better.
EdIsMe is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 09:37 AM
  #21  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
like a motorcycle, if you're in dirt or gravel (which I cross on certain rides) you don't want to use your front brake, you want to use your rear, if you don't chances are you're going down.
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 09:39 AM
  #22  
Juan Foote
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
 
Juan Foote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299

Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 686 Posts
I am not even sure I agree with the article written by Mr Brown. I do not doubt his experience or knowledge, but would never tell ANYONE to brake only with the front wheel in any situation.
I fall back to what I learned from motorcycle instruction, as it applies to bicycles just as well.

Front brake is 80% of your braking power, back is 20%. In most situations the front brake will do most of the stopping, and the back brake is much like an indicator. If it skids during stopping you should modulate slightly on both in order to eliminate the skid from the back end. In any situation where you are making a low speed turn, or in wet conditions, the back brake should be applied a bit more than the front. Your stopping power will be lessened, but so will the possibility of loosing traction on the front wheel and going down.
Really has a lot to do with feel and experience. Over application of the front brakes pushes your center of gravity too far forward and makes you unstable on the bike. Aside from that, the mention above about a back up brake in case of failure is golden.
Juan Foote is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 09:44 AM
  #23  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by punkncat
I am not even sure I agree with the article written by Mr Brown. I do not doubt his experience or knowledge, but would never tell ANYONE to brake only with the front wheel in any situation.
I fall back to what I learned from motorcycle instruction, as it applies to bicycles just as well.

Front brake is 80% of your braking power, back is 20%. In most situations the front brake will do most of the stopping, and the back brake is much like an indicator. If it skids during stopping you should modulate slightly on both in order to eliminate the skid from the back end. In any situation where you are making a low speed turn, or in wet conditions, the back brake should be applied a bit more than the front. Your stopping power will be lessened, but so will the possibility of loosing traction on the front wheel and going down.
Really has a lot to do with feel and experience. Over application of the front brakes pushes your center of gravity too far forward and makes you unstable on the bike. Aside from that, the mention above about a back up brake in case of failure is golden.
seems like shifting your weight back will help avoid the "lifting" of the rear wheel.
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 09:44 AM
  #24  
Ricanfred
Senior Member
 
Ricanfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 496

Bikes: Yes, I ride an aluminum Trek!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Back brakes only in slippery conditions and both brakes with a lot more lever pressure on the front brake for me works the best.
Ricanfred is offline  
Old 05-16-12, 09:54 AM
  #25  
RollCNY
Speechless
 
RollCNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842

Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewclaus
In an extreme front-only stop, you could pitch over the front wheel. I picture it as throwing an anchor behind you rather than a block in front of you.
There are many youtube videos of folks going over the front of their bars when braking hard. And if you pay attention, you can see that every one of them had their arms loose and elbows bent. If one uses their arms and skeletal system, there is very little chance of doing an "endo" when using your front brake.

This is not an original concept, and has been the basis of some previous fairly educational threads. And the video evidence is always entertaining.
RollCNY is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.