How low is your gearing?
#1
2k miles from the midwest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: ~'75 Colin Laing, '80s Schwinn SuperSport 650b, ex-Backroads ti project...
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 931 Times
in
446 Posts
How low is your gearing?
I live in a fairly hilly city and have started using an old Burley Cub trailer for errands. Right now, I've been using the same bike for light-to-medium trips with front and rear racks and then the trailer for multiple cat litter purchases. My gearing is 45/30 and a 12/32 cassette. I'm thinking of dropping my granny to make using the trailler easier, but not having it be so low that I'm crossover gearing backwards when I drop into it.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I'm in Helena Montana again.
Posts: 1,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My gearing isn't low enough sometimes. I've got a triple in the front. I've seen many mountain bikes with a small chain ring with just twenty-two teeth. Maybe a triple crank set would be better for you. A Megarange cassette has a low gear with thirty-four teeth. I don't know which would be cheaper for you to get.
#3
No longer here
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yep,LOTS of mtn bikes run a 22t front granny,and 32-34t rear,and it's getting more and more popular on 29er's to run a 36t granny out back. I run 32x24 (pretty low by mtn SS standards) on my mtn 29er SS,but my former local trails were pretty hilly,and a 22/32 double front with a 11-34t rear 9 speed on my geared mtn bike.
On my CX bike (my goto in town),I run a touring triple (26/36/46) up front,but a mtn 9 speed cassette out back with 11-34t. So far(just moved here a few months ago,and due to spinal injuries,I don't get to ride everyday...just not up to it some days),my granny gear combo being 26t front/34t rear has been plenty low enough for the moderate hills we have,but I haven't hauled much weight yet,let alone a trailer.
But yeah,you have lots of options depending on your frame
On my CX bike (my goto in town),I run a touring triple (26/36/46) up front,but a mtn 9 speed cassette out back with 11-34t. So far(just moved here a few months ago,and due to spinal injuries,I don't get to ride everyday...just not up to it some days),my granny gear combo being 26t front/34t rear has been plenty low enough for the moderate hills we have,but I haven't hauled much weight yet,let alone a trailer.
But yeah,you have lots of options depending on your frame
#4
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
I have many bikes that range from ss/fg to 27 speeds but the main commuter and tow vehicle has a 28/38/48 triple and a 13-30 6 speed with a 3/3 split in that the bottom 3 and top 3 have a slightly wider gap between them to give closer steps at both ends of the cassette range. The 28/30 gives me a 24 gear inch low.
The extrabike has a 28/34 to give a 21 gear inch low.
The touring bike has a 28/34 and the mountain bikes have 24/34 and 24/30 which gives me some truly stump pulling gearing although these uber low > 2 gear inches are for climbing on the trails and are not anything I would need for utilitarian purposes.
For geared bikes that do not carry or tow a 40-100 range is more than sufficient.
The extrabike has a 28/34 to give a 21 gear inch low.
The touring bike has a 28/34 and the mountain bikes have 24/34 and 24/30 which gives me some truly stump pulling gearing although these uber low > 2 gear inches are for climbing on the trails and are not anything I would need for utilitarian purposes.
For geared bikes that do not carry or tow a 40-100 range is more than sufficient.
#5
In the right lane
I use my trailer with a 44-33-22 MTB crankset. Cassette is a 7 speed. I think 28 is the big cog. Really great for making the hill back home from the grocery store.
#6
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I ride a number of bikes. The FG is a 42/16, roughly a 70-inch gear. The road bikes use compact 50/34 chainrings and 12/25 and 12/27 cassettes. The tourer uses a Rohloff hub, again with a 42/16 ratio. It has 26" wheels, so that gves it roughly a 19" to 100" range.
#7
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
My gear ranges are from 21" low on my expedition bike to a 40" or so on my 3 speeds. I have one single speed that is geared to around 64". For heavy hauling anything under 30" works for me. The terrain around here is gently rolling hills with only a couple of short steep ones.
Aaron
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,522
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My low is around 33", my high is around 85". I don't mind walking up hills tho. If I routinely hit one of the (very rare) 5% grades in Madison, I'd probably have more like a 20" low.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a standard 27-speed mountain bike configuration. I have an Xtracycle mounted on it, and commute with my wife and our lunches on the back for a total weight of about 350 pounds all together (myself, the wife, the lunches, and the bike). There are two hills on the mile and a half to work, both averaging around an 8% grade with one peaking out at a 10% grade. The total distance is 1.5 miles and the total climbing is 80-100'.
I have found that the second chain ring is best in a 2-4 configuration, and dropping down to 2-2 on the 10% grade, while maintaining a high cadence. The thing I've learned about hills on bicycles (and this is especially true with heavy loads) is that if you go too low of a gear, things just get harder, because you're exerting for such a longer period of time with no recovery. Therefore, I found it is best to use the gear where you're at peak exertion, but still maintaining a good cadence (don't start lagging or you'll hurt your knees).
Another thing to consider if you're having a hard time hauling loads would be an electric system. We have a BionX system that we use in the winter to assist in riding through snow and it works great. Since it has a torque sensor, the motor is completely hands free - if you need more power from the motor, just pedal harder. The regen braking is also very nice in winter, as it is basically anti-lock braking, and worked well enough such that I never actually had to use the actual brakes.
Shameful product placing, I know, but this is the configuration we've been using for around three years now and it works great.
I have found that the second chain ring is best in a 2-4 configuration, and dropping down to 2-2 on the 10% grade, while maintaining a high cadence. The thing I've learned about hills on bicycles (and this is especially true with heavy loads) is that if you go too low of a gear, things just get harder, because you're exerting for such a longer period of time with no recovery. Therefore, I found it is best to use the gear where you're at peak exertion, but still maintaining a good cadence (don't start lagging or you'll hurt your knees).
Another thing to consider if you're having a hard time hauling loads would be an electric system. We have a BionX system that we use in the winter to assist in riding through snow and it works great. Since it has a torque sensor, the motor is completely hands free - if you need more power from the motor, just pedal harder. The regen braking is also very nice in winter, as it is basically anti-lock braking, and worked well enough such that I never actually had to use the actual brakes.
Shameful product placing, I know, but this is the configuration we've been using for around three years now and it works great.
#11
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
18.6"
I swapped the granny chainring out for a 20-tooth, so with a 28 in the rear & 26" tires my low end is 18.6". On the next bike I'll be dropping that a bit further for touring and general load hauling and mountain climbing. Nothing's flat here and there are a few (avoidable) 20 degree hills where it's hard to keep the front wheel on the ground climbing in the saddle and no shortage of 10+ degree climbs on my regular routes. I like to keep spinning up hills and my knees don't need the abuse of a taller gear.
#12
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 2
Bikes: Gunnar Crosshairs, K2 Zed Team, Eighth Inch Scrambler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
71" My main bike is a singlespeed set up with a 42x16 and 38mm knobbies. Most of the hills that I go up on a regular basis aren't too steep so it works out alright. I am thinking that I will drop down to a 66/67" once I have to start riding on snow covered roads.
#13
In the right lane
I think 42 by 16 is a very common gear for most riders... at least on the flats. That where I ride my bike most of the time. On windy days I might move to the next sprocket up on the rear cassette though.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central Quebec
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm running a 1x7 set-up on my commuter right now that consists of a 38t chainring and a 11-30 casette. 38-30 does feel tall sometimes when riding trails but is fine for commuting. Also, whenever 38-11 is too small, I just coast.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WNCGoater
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
51
11-23-17 10:19 AM
Nanaterry
Touring
26
02-02-13 10:19 AM