What's the latest and greatest cycling computer?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
What's the latest and greatest cycling computer?
I have owned a Garmin Edge 800 since its inception many years ago. It sill works fine on most outings but will die after about 6 hours of runtime. Looking for something connected that will last longer and does all the great things my 800 does and more.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,969
Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 844 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
106 Posts
Garmin watches are (IMHO) excellent alternatives. They'll capture all the metrics of computer heads and provide an easy 20h+ with GPS, and twice that in ultratrac mode. I've recently purchased a refurbished F5 ($300) and rely on the watch for metrics (speed/cadence/power, etc.) and most navigation, sometimes assisted by a smartphone because the F5 doesn't have mapping capability. If money is no object (lucky you) F6 has even better autonomy.
Watches can be mounted on the handlebars (I have an out-front mount from raceware). Some keep them on their wrist -- not clear to me how they switch screens, though. Newer watches have a reasonably large display. No need to upgrade your glasses.
And you can run with them, or keep track of your heart rate all day.
And know what time it is .
Watches can be mounted on the handlebars (I have an out-front mount from raceware). Some keep them on their wrist -- not clear to me how they switch screens, though. Newer watches have a reasonably large display. No need to upgrade your glasses.
And you can run with them, or keep track of your heart rate all day.
And know what time it is .
Likes For gauvins:
#3
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
#4
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,463 Times
in
1,433 Posts
You could keep your 800 and put an external battery in your tool bag. Run a USB cable to the computer. I'm assuming the computer will run while being charged. The Anker E1 Astro works well. I've owned a few.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Garmin Fenix 6. The non-solar one gets something like 60 hours of GPS time per charge. And is vastly more useful.
I used to have an 800 too. 🙂
I used to have an 800 too. 🙂
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,878
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 2,080 Times
in
1,178 Posts
If you don’t need a Di2 connection, or have a need for multiple activity profiles, the Garmin Edge Explore is a very reliable unit, big enough to have a decent display of the maps. It’s bigger than the 830 at the same price ($250), runs about 15 hrs. for basic tracking, 12 or so if navigating a few hours.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 1,221
Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times
in
260 Posts
The touch screen on my 800 stopped working after a few years, I'm guessing from riding below in some wet winter conditions, that dropped below freezing during the ride, causing the water/ice to expand and crack the seals on the display. I replaced it with a 520 and never had an issue in the same conditions. Plus, in the winter with insulated gloves on, I like the tactile buttons much better than the touch screen.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,878
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 2,080 Times
in
1,178 Posts
The Garmin 830 is the newest unit available. I'm very happy with mine.
@Steve B. I don't think the Garmin Edge Explore and Edge 830 are the same price.
@Steve B. I don't think the Garmin Edge Explore and Edge 830 are the same price.
520 is $249
Edge Explore is $249
530 is $299
830 is $385
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,878
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 2,080 Times
in
1,178 Posts
And a bit of research shows that the basic Explore (as opposed to the Edge Explore 820 and 1000) does not support the RWGPS iQ app. That sucks.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4248 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
IQ 3 gives you a better menu to use in apps.
The Explore is newer than the 1000 and the 1000 Explore.
It doesn't make sense that the RWGPS app doesn't support the Explore. I suspect it's something RWGPS overlooked.
If the older 1000 and the 1000 Explore can use an app, the newer Explore should be able to run the same app.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,878
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 2,080 Times
in
1,178 Posts
All of the newer units support some form of IQ (2 or better) starting with the 520.
IQ 3 gives you a better menu to use in apps.
The Explore is newer than the 1000 and the 1000 Explore.
It doesn't make sense that the RWGPS app doesn't support the Explore. I suspect it's something RWGPS overlooked.
If the older 1000 and the 1000 Explore can use an app, the newer Explore should be able to run the same app.
IQ 3 gives you a better menu to use in apps.
The Explore is newer than the 1000 and the 1000 Explore.
It doesn't make sense that the RWGPS app doesn't support the Explore. I suspect it's something RWGPS overlooked.
If the older 1000 and the 1000 Explore can use an app, the newer Explore should be able to run the same app.
https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/apps/7...7-e13ffd064d54
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
That doesn't necessarily mean it won't work, it could just mean they haven't tested it.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4248 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
Anyway...
It’s almost a certainty that most (by a large majority) app developers don’t have all the physical devices their app support.
Garmin realizes that wouldn’t be practical and set things up so that wouldn’t be required.
The IQ development environment has a simulator. It’s not perfect but it lets you try any of the devices.
The developer picks the devices to support but Garmin can even automatically migrate your app to new devices that are similar. That lets users buy an upgraded device and use an app without waiting for the developer to compile a new version.
The RWGPS app isn’t so complicated that they couldn’t do that too.
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-04-19 at 04:16 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4248 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
When I was recommending the Explore, I went to the Garmin site for iQ apps and was surprised that the list of devices for which RWGPS is available does not include the Explore. Seems like an error , but who knows.
https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/apps/7...7-e13ffd064d54
https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/apps/7...7-e13ffd064d54
RWGPS replied 9/10/2019 saying they were looking into adding more device compatibility in future releases.
In another RWGPS reply, they indicate they buy actual devices to test on.
The Explore is old enough that it’s odd they haven’t done that already.
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-04-19 at 04:32 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
It's also old enough that they might not find it relevant anymore. It might have been supported previously, but new code may not have been tested on it. I've spent my entire career writing code commercially, mostly for small companies. This is entirely plausible. I can see several of the PMs I've worked with making the decision to pull it off the list without much thought. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm saying if you have the device and want to use the software, it's worth trying. I've run CIQ stuff on my Garmin watch that it wasn't specifically listed as compatible with.
@njkayaker - For what it's worth, I've seen a number of complaints that people tested a watch face in the simulator tool and it looked and worked fine, but not on the device. Garmin made the simulator and, rightly or wrongly, their software isn't held in high regard among their user base.
This is one of those "a good test is worth a thousand expert opinions" situations.
@njkayaker - For what it's worth, I've seen a number of complaints that people tested a watch face in the simulator tool and it looked and worked fine, but not on the device. Garmin made the simulator and, rightly or wrongly, their software isn't held in high regard among their user base.
This is one of those "a good test is worth a thousand expert opinions" situations.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4248 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
It's also old enough that they might not find it relevant anymore. It might have been supported previously, but new code may not have been tested on it. I've spent my entire career writing code commercially, mostly for small companies. This is entirely plausible. I can see several of the PMs I've worked with making the decision to pull it off the list without much thought. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm saying if you have the device and want to use the software, it's worth trying. I've run CIQ stuff on my Garmin watch that it wasn't specifically listed as compatible with.
@njkayaker - For what it's worth, I've seen a number of complaints that people tested a watch face in the simulator tool and it looked and worked fine, but not on the device. Garmin made the simulator and, rightly or wrongly, their software isn't held in high regard among their user base.
This is one of those "a good test is worth a thousand expert opinions" situations.
@njkayaker - For what it's worth, I've seen a number of complaints that people tested a watch face in the simulator tool and it looked and worked fine, but not on the device. Garmin made the simulator and, rightly or wrongly, their software isn't held in high regard among their user base.
This is one of those "a good test is worth a thousand expert opinions" situations.
The RWGPS app runs on the older 520. It supports the older Explore 1000.
The UI and display for watches can be much more fussy, especially for something complicated. And many of them are different in small but important ways.
The RWGPS app has a very minimal UI.
Supporting the Explore is no more work than supporting the older 1000.
Based on actual experience writing IQ apps.
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-04-19 at 03:39 PM.
#19
Senior Member
I use this system and only upgraded to an Edge 1030 due to my ageing eyesight needing a bigger screen.
Likes For njkayaker:
#21
Senior Member
One would assume OP has an external charger for his Edge 800 so I'm unclear as to your point.
Considering there can be days in between towns whilst on tour, I'm unsure what good an external charger would be, hence my investing in my dynohub charging system which not only keeps my Edge charged but also my lights, camera etc.
Liked my system so much, I also ended up buying the same system for my bike trailer.
OP's was considering buying a newer Garmin Edge due to his 800 unit only holding a charge in use for 6 hours.
I was offering a potential solution enhancing his bikes utility for less investment.
Considering there can be days in between towns whilst on tour, I'm unsure what good an external charger would be, hence my investing in my dynohub charging system which not only keeps my Edge charged but also my lights, camera etc.
Liked my system so much, I also ended up buying the same system for my bike trailer.
OP's was considering buying a newer Garmin Edge due to his 800 unit only holding a charge in use for 6 hours.
I was offering a potential solution enhancing his bikes utility for less investment.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4248 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
One would assume OP has an external charger for his Edge 800 so I'm unclear as to your point.
Considering there can be days in between towns whilst on tour, I'm unsure what good an external charger would be, hence my investing in my dynohub charging system which not only keeps my Edge charged but also my lights, camera etc.
Liked my system so much, I also ended up buying the same system for my bike trailer.
OP's was considering buying a newer Garmin Edge due to his 800 unit only holding a charge in use for 6 hours.
I was offering a potential solution enhancing his bikes utility for less investment.
Considering there can be days in between towns whilst on tour, I'm unsure what good an external charger would be, hence my investing in my dynohub charging system which not only keeps my Edge charged but also my lights, camera etc.
Liked my system so much, I also ended up buying the same system for my bike trailer.
OP's was considering buying a newer Garmin Edge due to his 800 unit only holding a charge in use for 6 hours.
I was offering a potential solution enhancing his bikes utility for less investment.
He talked about 6 hours being too short. We don’t really know anything else.
He can also replace the battery for $30 (or less).
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-08-19 at 09:58 AM.