Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

anyone have experience with late 80's campy athena?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

anyone have experience with late 80's campy athena?

Old 10-02-09, 10:01 PM
  #1  
bitt3n
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
anyone have experience with late 80's campy athena?

I've seen a couple of vintage bikes advertised with late 80's Athena that I would have to buy sight unseen, and I'm wondering whether anyone has a bike with it, and whether it's markedly worse than Record/Chorus. It certainly looks nice enough.
bitt3n is offline  
Old 10-02-09, 10:46 PM
  #2  
monogodo
NFL Owner
 
monogodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving Heritage District
Posts: 1,495

Bikes: 7-Eleven Eddy Merckx, Vitus Futural, Catamount FRS, Colnago SL, SS MTB

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Other than recurring nightmares of trying to get Synchro II to index properly, not really.
monogodo is offline  
Likes For monogodo:
Old 10-02-09, 11:39 PM
  #3  
old and new
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have no experience trying Athena. Shopping for a bike in 1992 the seller told be that a marked difference could be noticed between the Athena and Chorus moreso than between Record and Chorus. I went for DuraAce. for what that's worth.

If I came upon a bike that I liked, its having Athena would not disway me. The slightly less sharp performance as noted , more in the rear der. than any other single place could be addressed by an '88 or so Record which are easy to find and not high priced. Those I've used on other things. The cranks, brakes as far as wt. and stiffness were not viewed as being significantly inferior, regarding Athena back then. At the time, most had a fairly good impression of it, priced ever so slightly less than Ultegra and were often viewed to be more appealing on Italian bikes.
old and new is offline  
Old 10-03-09, 06:22 AM
  #4  
steve-d
Too many hobbies!
 
steve-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 304

Bikes: Maserati MT-2 (reviewed in Road and Track, 1974; Raleigh Competion GS Carlton; Dawes Super Gallexy; Hollands; Raleigh Professional

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have two Athena cranksets with the specified Athena Pedals. Interestingly enough, Campy required the pedal threaded shaft be a minimum of 15mm. Longer than other Campy pedals.

They are top notch pieces. The cranksets are very beautiful and the pedals are incredibly SMOOTH!! I'd go with them any time I needed a crankset. Right up there with Record.

BTW, they take a 111mm bb. Veloce AC-H or others fit the bill. There are even servicable Campy BBs in the 111mm variety.

Steve

Last edited by steve-d; 10-03-09 at 06:30 AM.
steve-d is offline  
Old 10-03-09, 06:27 AM
  #5  
steve-d
Too many hobbies!
 
steve-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 304

Bikes: Maserati MT-2 (reviewed in Road and Track, 1974; Raleigh Competion GS Carlton; Dawes Super Gallexy; Hollands; Raleigh Professional

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here are some pics of my Athena crankset (53-39) on my Raleigh Comp GS. Also, a pic of the Athena pedals. I used the Veloce AC-H (alloy cups, hollow spindle) version of the 111mm bb.

Steve
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
6.jpg (111.2 KB, 195 views)
File Type: jpg
13.jpg (104.2 KB, 198 views)
File Type: jpg
26.jpg (113.5 KB, 203 views)
steve-d is offline  
Old 10-03-09, 06:50 AM
  #6  
Bianchigirll 
Bianchi Goddess
 
Bianchigirll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 29,725

Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.

Mentioned: 191 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2912 Post(s)
Liked 2,836 Times in 1,460 Posts
I never owned Athena but sold and service several bikes with it. as the other responders said other then the Synchro it was fabulous stuff. the brakes were pretty massive for sidepulls and stopped well. I always prefered the look and more moderate power of the Chorus brakes though. run the Synchro in friction or look for the retro friction shifters from simplex or Campi and you will be very happy with Athena
__________________
One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"

Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Bianchigirll is offline  
Old 10-03-09, 10:08 AM
  #7  
bitt3n
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cool thanks for the advice. just out of curiosity, where would Shimano 600 of that era fit into the mix (ie better or worse than Athena/Chorus)? I've heard it's reasonably good, but have never tried it.
bitt3n is offline  
Old 10-03-09, 10:17 AM
  #8  
old and new
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bitt3n
cool thanks for the advice. just out of curiosity, where would Shimano 600 of that era fit into the mix (ie better or worse than Athena/Chorus)? I've heard it's reasonably good, but have never tried it.
As I indicated earlier ... 600 = Ultegra, it "works" as good as Chorus, better than Athena by most accounts. Ultegra was the second most pricey Shimano, almost nothing "beats" Ultegra in that time frame .. almost. I reckon that you should have the idea by now.
Record, Croce d'une, Chorus, Athena in that oder, late 80's early 90's
old and new is offline  
Old 10-03-09, 10:57 AM
  #9  
soderbiker
Waiting for Summer !
 
soderbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sthlm , Sweden
Posts: 753

Bikes: E.Merckx Corsa extra PK Banken,E.Merckx Corsa extra TT,E.Merckx Strada,De Visini,Olmo Gentleman,Peugeot PA-10,E.Merckx Corsa extra Team Issue,Nishiki Olympic Royale,Nishiki Olympic

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by monogodo
Other than recurring nightmares of trying to get Synchro II to index properly, not really.
Synchro II is no problem at all on this end , works perfectly here .


Cheers
soderbiker is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 03:41 PM
  #10  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,237

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
How do you tell the difference between 41 date code (1988) Chorus and Athena cranks if the arms are 170mm (a size shared by the two groups)?

​​​​​​Not a joke. Really. I know it sounds like a setup to a dedicated, maybe horrible c&v joke, but I really don't know.
SurferRosa is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 04:37 PM
  #11  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,171

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1554 Post(s)
Liked 1,274 Times in 846 Posts
Originally Posted by soderbiker
Synchro II is no problem at all on this end , works perfectly here .


Cheers

My experience as well!

With Synchro, using modern chain (perhaps even 9s chain on the 7s freewheels) is one thing that can make everything work better than it ever could back in the day.

The shifter internals must have some lube in there that isn't dried out. A shot of oil always works for me.

The big thing is that the indexing ring in the shifter actually match the freewheel cog spacing!

Athena is actually my favorite Syncho-II 7s variant, seems to handle a 13-26t freewheel no problem.

Athena is I believe also the very first Campagnolo rear derailer to feature any degree of slanted parallelogram, and they made a beautiful derailer in the process.
A lower-tier Xenon gruppo utilized the indexing geometry and derailer slant of the Athena, but all of their other gruppos had a visibly different derailer geometry.
I've run both of these gruppos with Sunrace 13-25t freewheels and Shimano 9s chain with very good results.
dddd is offline  
Likes For dddd:
Old 07-30-20, 05:13 PM
  #12  
Spaghetti Legs 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 5,085

Bikes: Numerous

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1672 Post(s)
Liked 3,034 Times in 904 Posts
I had an ‘89 Bianchi Giro with 7 speed Athena. Shifting was great. I’m not sure about a weight difference but I think functionally comparable to C Record and IMO biggest different is aesthetics, where the C Record stands out. My experience with Syncro has generally been very good. On that bike I used a KMC 8 speed chain and a Sachs Aris freewheel.

I’ve seen some Athena Syncro shifters on eBay which have a black plastic part and they look cheap, up the ones on my bike were all metal and my guess is same for all groups in that era.
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur

Spaghetti Legs is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 05:23 PM
  #13  
jiangshi
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,958
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times in 172 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
How do you tell the difference between 41 date code (1988) Chorus and Athena cranks if the arms are 170mm (a size shared by the two groups)?

​​​​​​Not a joke. Really. I know it sounds like a setup to a dedicated, maybe horrible c&v joke, but I really don't know.
I believe Athena had self extracting crank bolts, Chorus did not. Going by memory, so I could be wrong.
jiangshi is offline  
Old 07-30-20, 05:36 PM
  #14  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,452
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 924 Posts
Originally Posted by jiangshi
I believe Athena had self extracting crank bolts, Chorus did not. Going by memory, so I could be wrong.
Other way around - Chorus had the self extracting crank bolts, Athena did not. BUT, 1st gen Chorus cranks did not have self extracting crank bolts as far as I'm aware.

If that doesn't help, the finish on the Athena was dull compared with the nice silver of the Chorus. This is wrong, sorry.

Last edited by P!N20; 07-30-20 at 05:54 PM.
P!N20 is offline  
Likes For P!N20:
Old 07-30-20, 05:47 PM
  #15  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,237

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
Thanks for the replies.

Originally Posted by P!N20
1st gen Chorus cranks did not have self extracting crank bolts.
Correct. I'm looking at 1988, so, first gen.

the finish on the Athena was dull compared with the nice silver of the Chorus.
Ahh. That's interesting. Velobase pics for Athena look the same as Chorus -- shiny and beautiful:

https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...8d23f&Enum=115

.

edit: I may have figured it out if the dust caps give an indication. Mine have a 5mm hole for an allen key like the Velobase pics for Chorus:

https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...0c73b&Enum=115

... not the two pin hole caps in the Velobase Athena pics.

Last edited by SurferRosa; 07-30-20 at 06:12 PM.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 07-30-20, 05:51 PM
  #16  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,452
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 924 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
Correct. I'm looking at 1988, so, first gen.
That's easy then, the Chorus cranks had a raised profile around the crank bolt hole.

Originally Posted by SurferRosa
Ahh. That's interesting. Velobase pics for Athena look the same as Chorus -- shiny and beautiful.

https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.as...8d23f&Enum=115
.
Actually that's not right, I'm thinking of Veloce, sorry.
P!N20 is offline  
Likes For P!N20:
Old 07-30-20, 06:03 PM
  #17  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,237

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
Originally Posted by P!N20
That's easy then, the Chorus cranks had a raised profile around the crank bolt hole.
Hmmm... Can you tell by these two pics of my crank?





.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 07-30-20, 06:12 PM
  #18  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,452
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 924 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
Hmmm... Can you tell by these two pics of my crank?
Yeah that's 1st gen Chorus, baby!
P!N20 is offline  
Likes For P!N20:
Old 07-31-20, 01:08 AM
  #19  
botty kayer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: London, UK
Posts: 719

Bikes: Yes, probably too many but still have a roving eye...

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 311 Post(s)
Liked 2,734 Times in 526 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
Hmmm... Can you tell by these two pics of my crank?





.
Very timely post as I have a pair of these cranks. They are to be fitted to a frame that has not arrived yet, so I don't know if the bottom bracket will be English or Italian threaded, but once I know that I'm trying to find what axle length I need.

Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?

Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?

Here's a pic next to a later gen Chorus for comparison of the arms.

botty kayer is offline  
Old 07-31-20, 02:58 AM
  #20  
holly77
Junior Member
 
holly77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think my mum had used it
holly77 is offline  
Old 07-31-20, 02:59 AM
  #21  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,452
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 924 Posts
Originally Posted by botty kayer
I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need.
The ‘flare’ that the commenter was commenting on is seen from looking at the cranks directly at the face, not from the side, so it has no bearing on spindle length. Having said that, it’s a subtle difference, not really an identifier.
P!N20 is offline  
Old 07-31-20, 07:18 AM
  #22  
Bianchigirll 
Bianchi Goddess
 
Bianchigirll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 29,725

Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.

Mentioned: 191 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2912 Post(s)
Liked 2,836 Times in 1,460 Posts
Originally Posted by botty kayer
Very timely post as I have a pair of these cranks. They are to be fitted to a frame that has not arrived yet, so I don't know if the bottom bracket will be English or Italian threaded, but once I know that I'm trying to find what axle length I need.

Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?

Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?

Here's a pic next to a later gen Chorus for comparison of the arms.
Yes it is 111 or 112 symetrical. Chorus was huge departure from other CampI cranks with it's super low profile design. IMHO the Chorus group and Sheriff Star hubs were the most beautiful parts ever made by Campi
__________________
One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"

Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Bianchigirll is offline  
Likes For Bianchigirll:
Old 07-31-20, 07:39 AM
  #23  
sced
South Carolina Ed
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,887

Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 287 Times in 137 Posts
[QUOTE=Bianchigirll;21616613 IMHO the Chorus group and Sheriff Star hubs were the most beautiful parts ever made by Campi[/QUOTE]

I think so too.
sced is offline  
Old 07-31-20, 07:41 AM
  #24  
embankmentlb
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 160 Posts
I have an original Athena equipped bike that I bought new in 1988? That was a long time ago.
Athena is very well made, jewel quality finish and it has wonderful asthmatics.
lt was the entry level group so it is heavier than Chorus, C-record.
Athena functions as well as any Campy from that era. It would probably last forever but will never shift as well as Shimano 105 from that same period.
I personally would not trade it for 600 or 105 because I am just a fan of that era of Campy parts.
embankmentlb is offline  
Old 07-31-20, 10:42 AM
  #25  
Choke 
Disciple of St. Tullio
 
Choke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 740

Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times in 138 Posts
When I first built up my Ciöcc in 1992 I used Athena, though with index DT shifters. Over time I replaced the derailleurs with Record and put Ergos on it, but that wasn't because the Athena didn't work well. I had zero complaints about the function of Athena and I felt that it looked good as well. I don't really think that the Record stuff worked any better but it had the cachet.

Originally Posted by botty kayer
Very timely post as I have a pair of these cranks. They are to be fitted to a frame that has not arrived yet, so I don't know if the bottom bracket will be English or Italian threaded, but once I know that I'm trying to find what axle length I need.

Mine have the 51 code on the right side crank arm, so assume these are from a year later, 1989?. Out of interest what number is stamped in the box on your left side crank arm? Mine has 71, why the difference and does anyone know what that signifies?

Velobase says these cranks use a 111 mm BB axle instead of the 102mm for the later generation Chorus. I also note that in the comments on Velobase for these cranks someone says the earlier version had "distinctive curved arm with obvious flare at pedal end; other similar models do not seem to be as flared". I thought maybe this flare would explain the longer axle, but mine don't seem to be more flared than the later Chorus, so I'm still not 100% which axle length I need. SurferRosa have you fitted these to a bike yet? And if yes what BB did you need?
111mm is correct.
Choke is offline  
Likes For Choke:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.