Chainring Wear: Help me Evaluate
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 54
Bikes: Wilier Triestina GTR SL '16; Basso Gap '93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
8 Posts
Chainring Wear: Help me Evaluate
Hi All,
My Ultegra 6800 Chainrings have about 8000 miles on them. I'm going to replace the chain soon and wondering if the chainring teeth are worn enough to warrant replacement at the same time. A closeup pic is below.
The shifting is still OK. Looks like just the R6800 outer chainring is about $150 to replace, but a new Ultegra R8000 crankset is $279, so maybe it makes the most sense to upgrade the whole thing given the bonding issues of the R6800 cranks? I've got the R6800 FD, but the Shimano compatibility chart seems to show they work together.
Not wanting to spend money when it's not needed, but willing to invest if it makes sense to maximize the life of the drivetrain as a whole.
My Ultegra 6800 Chainrings have about 8000 miles on them. I'm going to replace the chain soon and wondering if the chainring teeth are worn enough to warrant replacement at the same time. A closeup pic is below.
The shifting is still OK. Looks like just the R6800 outer chainring is about $150 to replace, but a new Ultegra R8000 crankset is $279, so maybe it makes the most sense to upgrade the whole thing given the bonding issues of the R6800 cranks? I've got the R6800 FD, but the Shimano compatibility chart seems to show they work together.
Not wanting to spend money when it's not needed, but willing to invest if it makes sense to maximize the life of the drivetrain as a whole.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,066
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4197 Post(s)
Liked 3,849 Times
in
2,300 Posts
Chain ring wear won't add to chain wear much (assuming alloy rings). So replacement is usually driven by chain skip, chain drop and chain suck issues. But rough chain/ring teeth engagement can motivate replacement too.
I would replace the chain (and cassette?) then evaluate how things are.
One thing I will add is that the teeth imaged do look like the chain was well worn. The sides of their valleys seem rather eroded. Andy
I would replace the chain (and cassette?) then evaluate how things are.
One thing I will add is that the teeth imaged do look like the chain was well worn. The sides of their valleys seem rather eroded. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#4
Non omnino gravis
Easiest in a stand: while the chain is on the big ring, grab it at around the 2 o'clock position and pull forward. If the chainring is a little worn, you'll be able to lift it a little, and see some light between the chain and the ring. If it's really worn, you might be able to pull the chain off of the ring entirely. You can also put a short piece of new chain (like the part broken off when fitting a new chain) on a selection of teeth and see if the chain can rock back and forth.
You can't really judge wear by cosmetic appearances-- modern tooth profiles look half-worn when they're new, and common anodization is between 0.0002" and 0.0012" thick.
You can't really judge wear by cosmetic appearances-- modern tooth profiles look half-worn when they're new, and common anodization is between 0.0002" and 0.0012" thick.
#5
Blamester
Chain ring wear won't add to chain wear much (assuming alloy rings). So replacement is usually driven by chain skip, chain drop and chain suck issues. But rough chain/ring teeth engagement can motivate replacement too.
I would replace the chain (and cassette?) then evaluate how things are.
One thing I will add is that the teeth imaged do look like the chain was well worn. The sides of their valleys seem rather eroded. Andy
I would replace the chain (and cassette?) then evaluate how things are.
One thing I will add is that the teeth imaged do look like the chain was well worn. The sides of their valleys seem rather eroded. Andy
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 54
Bikes: Wilier Triestina GTR SL '16; Basso Gap '93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
8 Posts
I replace the chain when indicated by the Park chain wear tool at 0.5%, usually twice a year, and the cassette was just changed this spring. Tried pulling on the chain at the 2 o'clock position and there was a little give give, but I could not pull it up much, so I guess for now I'll keep using it. Thanks all.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Chainrings are pretty tolerant of wear as the chain is "applied" to them under tension so they are much less likely to skip than equally worn cogs. Typically, they are also larger and with more teeth to share the wear than cogs.
It takes a lot to wear chainrings to the point that they skip or spill the chain.
It takes a lot to wear chainrings to the point that they skip or spill the chain.
Likes For HillRider:
#9
Junior Member
Maybe it’s a lot, but I managed to get the middle chainring skipping, despite cleaning and lubing the drivetrain often and also alternating between 2 chains. In fact, I guess it’s not that uncommon, as I’ve seen other cyclists have this problem too, particularly on the middle chainring.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,869
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6955 Post(s)
Liked 10,959 Times
in
4,686 Posts
Chainrings are pretty tolerant of wear as the chain is "applied" to them under tension so they are much less likely to skip than equally worn cogs. Typically, they are also larger and with more teeth to share the wear than cogs.
It takes a lot to wear chainrings to the point that they skip or spill the chain.
It takes a lot to wear chainrings to the point that they skip or spill the chain.
#11
Non omnino gravis
I got right around 9k miles out of a Praxis Works 50T. When replaced, it was worn to the point that the bike made a creaky groan sort of noise every time I took off from a stop, as the chain slid up the worn teeth. I got almost double that out of a Praxis 48T previously, so this time around I figure I bear at least some of the responsibility-- I recall letting one pair of chains stay in use a bit too long.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,836
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 675 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
I'm also in the 20K+ mile school for chainring wear. I've only had one bike long enough to wear out a chainring. At that point it's just an annoying chain noise that doesn't improve with lubrication.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I’ve got about 20,000 and 30,000 miles, respectively, on my two oldest cranksets – and I’ve never even thought to check for wear. Now, if I were running a 1X, especially on a mountain or gravel bike in dirty conditions, I might expect to replace a chainring a bit earlier - but with a road double? No.