Non-drive side 4mm further from chainstays
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Non-drive side 4mm further from chainstays
So it seems the 68x110 BB I got is asymmetric with the non-drive side being longer. I have a 2.1mm spacer I could put between the fixed cup and frame on the drive side to help even things out, but I'm wondering does it matter? Will 4mm cause any issues?
#2
Really Old Senior Member
Are you sure the DS chain stay isn't "pinched in" to make clearance for the rings?
How many rings & cogs?
IF both an odd number to can easily eyeball to see if the RINGS are where they are supposed to be.
Put on the center ring & cog.
Stand behind the bike and see if the chain runs parallel.
Then- check on EACH adjacent cog and see if the misalignment between those cogs is equal.
How many rings & cogs?
IF both an odd number to can easily eyeball to see if the RINGS are where they are supposed to be.
Put on the center ring & cog.
Stand behind the bike and see if the chain runs parallel.
Then- check on EACH adjacent cog and see if the misalignment between those cogs is equal.
Likes For Bill Kapaun:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,891
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4790 Post(s)
Liked 3,917 Times
in
2,548 Posts
What are you measuring to and from? What kind of frame, crankset and BB?
Likes For 79pmooney:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Comparing to same measurement on the other side (not shown). I'm measuring about 12mm on the drive side and 16mm on the non-drive.
FMFXTR square taper single speed crank (it's a cheap China-special crank if you've never heard of it)
Shimano UN55 68x110 BB (it looked suspiciously asymmetric when I pulled it out of the box)
K2 Zed Sport (el-cheapo frame from Craigslist)
I replaced a UN55 68x118 as I'm trying to get the chainline correct and the chainring was sitting too far out. The chainline is actually good now with the 110, and if I use a spacer to try to fix the mismatched spacing between crank arms, then it's going to put the chainline out a bit again (although not as much as before).
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,056
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4195 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times
in
2,295 Posts
Back in the day having crank arm ends that were of different distances from the stays was the norm (although usually with the DS being further away from the stay). I never heard discussion of fit or body problems due to this slight offset.
Some BBs won't allow much offsetting to the drive side because the NDS cup has a lip that will dig into the shell's threads. (Shimano as a common example) Andy
Some BBs won't allow much offsetting to the drive side because the NDS cup has a lip that will dig into the shell's threads. (Shimano as a common example) Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
Likes For nomadmax:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Back in the day having crank arm ends that were of different distances from the stays was the norm (although usually with the DS being further away from the stay). I never heard discussion of fit or body problems due to this slight offset.
Some BBs won't allow much offsetting to the drive side because the NDS cup has a lip that will dig into the shell's threads. (Shimano as a common example) Andy
Some BBs won't allow much offsetting to the drive side because the NDS cup has a lip that will dig into the shell's threads. (Shimano as a common example) Andy
Well, if one crank arm was a foot further away from the chainstay than the other, it would definitely matter. So that asymmetry can definitely matter. It's just a question of whether 4mm will matter.
I'm posting because this is the second bike I've used this particular brand/model crankset on, and both show the non-drive side a little further out (the other bike is only about 2mm difference, though, and it's using a UN55 68x113). And after a bunch of measurements trying to get the chainlines perfect (which it seems I have), I have this other variable of unequal crank arm spacing, and I fear if I try to address it, then I'm going to mess up my chainlines again, and I'll be in this oubliette of dependent variables that will swarm and encompass me in a desolate pit of darkness and despair.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,891
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4790 Post(s)
Liked 3,917 Times
in
2,548 Posts
Shimano BBs are usually symmetric. Poor tolerances on the crank might make for a couple of mms difference in fit on the spindle. Maybe the right is a touch big and the left a touch small? (I replaced a Phil Wood that was a touch too close with a Phil spindle 3mm longer and gained 5mm. That's with very high quality stuff.
Symmetry makes very little difference to our perception of fit. My knees need the lowest Q-factor I can get but care zero which side that comes from.
Edit: While I am on Phil Wood, know that they will make any length and asymmetry you want. Shimano makes very high quality BBs so you can decide how much you want to alter each side, adjust the 110 symmetrical Shimano accordingly and order that from Phil Wood. Phil's BBs are adjustable so you can play with the symmetry to dial in the chainline. Expensive and not overnight, but fun. Good company and their stuff is beautiful!
Ben
Symmetry makes very little difference to our perception of fit. My knees need the lowest Q-factor I can get but care zero which side that comes from.
Edit: While I am on Phil Wood, know that they will make any length and asymmetry you want. Shimano makes very high quality BBs so you can decide how much you want to alter each side, adjust the 110 symmetrical Shimano accordingly and order that from Phil Wood. Phil's BBs are adjustable so you can play with the symmetry to dial in the chainline. Expensive and not overnight, but fun. Good company and their stuff is beautiful!
Ben
Last edited by 79pmooney; 09-11-20 at 07:20 PM.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,824 Times
in
878 Posts
4mm doesn't matter if the chainline is correct. Your time would be better spent riding and enjoying the bike.
Likes For nomadmax:
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Shimano BBs are usually symmetric. Poor tolerances on the crank might make for a couple of mms difference in fit on the spindle. Maybe the right is a touch big and the left a touch small? (I replaced a Phil Wood that was a touch too close with a Phil spindle 3mm longer and gained 5mm. That's with very high quality stuff.
Symmetry makes very little difference to our perception of fit. My knees need the lowest Q-factor I can get but care zero which side that comes from.
Edit: While I am on Phil Wood, know that they will make any length and asymmetry you want. Shimano makes very high quality BBs so you can decide how much you want to alter each side, adjust the 110 symmetrical Shimano accordingly and order that from Phil Wood. Phil's BBs are adjustable so you can play with the symmetry to dial in the chainline. Expensive and not overnight, but fun. Good company and their stuff is beautiful!
Ben
Symmetry makes very little difference to our perception of fit. My knees need the lowest Q-factor I can get but care zero which side that comes from.
Edit: While I am on Phil Wood, know that they will make any length and asymmetry you want. Shimano makes very high quality BBs so you can decide how much you want to alter each side, adjust the 110 symmetrical Shimano accordingly and order that from Phil Wood. Phil's BBs are adjustable so you can play with the symmetry to dial in the chainline. Expensive and not overnight, but fun. Good company and their stuff is beautiful!
Ben
Will do. Gonna take it out tomorrow, I think.
#12
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 400
Bikes: Schwinn, Nishiki, Santana, Trek, Rodriguez
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 106 Times
in
69 Posts
OMG, thank you, someone still uses UN55 and the world is again ok. And, just perhaps, I need not yet hoard UN55's.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,056
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4195 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times
in
2,295 Posts
[QUOTE=crankholio;21689748]I did have a Phil Wood BB a long time ago. I got it because it was the only thing I could find with Raleigh threaded cups for an old Raleigh frame. It was a very nice BB, but probably the cost of 6-7 UN55's. I still have my Phil Wood BB tools as well, but I haven't used them since. Maybe one day once again
Will do. Gonna take it out tomorrow, I think.[/QUOTEcrankholio-
I do this stuff 5 days a week, not including my personal stable of rides. During the riding (and thus work) season the last thing i want to do is to HAVE TO service my personal stuff. Thus (that word again) I have chosen to go Phil for most all my bearing needs. I can get (or could prior to the C-19 pandemic) UN-55s for very little and I have a number of 52s, 54s, 72s on my shelf nearly 5 feet below my desk top. I now use them to size what I need and then get a Phil.
O, too, like a narrow Q but I need low gears and thus (bingo) run a triple on all my frequently used bikes. The Phil BBs let me get the narrowest Q and also the best chainlines. Andy
Will do. Gonna take it out tomorrow, I think.[/QUOTEcrankholio-
I do this stuff 5 days a week, not including my personal stable of rides. During the riding (and thus work) season the last thing i want to do is to HAVE TO service my personal stuff. Thus (that word again) I have chosen to go Phil for most all my bearing needs. I can get (or could prior to the C-19 pandemic) UN-55s for very little and I have a number of 52s, 54s, 72s on my shelf nearly 5 feet below my desk top. I now use them to size what I need and then get a Phil.
O, too, like a narrow Q but I need low gears and thus (bingo) run a triple on all my frequently used bikes. The Phil BBs let me get the narrowest Q and also the best chainlines. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#14
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,107
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 852 Post(s)
Liked 1,433 Times
in
815 Posts
I have a couple of bikes with the UN55, including one that is brand new and just installed. Chance are good that I will never have to buy another one. Wonderful, durable BBs.
#15
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,777
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3582 Post(s)
Liked 3,394 Times
in
1,928 Posts
Functionally, only the drive side offset makes any real difference. It has to be long enough for the chainrings to clear the frame, but short enough for the front derailleur to manage. The non-drive side only has to clear the frame. In most cases a few millimeters more or less is no issue. Some people may have idiosyncratic sensitivity to "Q-factor" (the distance between the right and left pedals) where non-drive side clearance may be a concern, but this is not common in my experience.