Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Topstone 105 Carbon Wheelset Weight? - how to drop weight without blowing budget

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Topstone 105 Carbon Wheelset Weight? - how to drop weight without blowing budget

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-20, 06:15 AM
  #1  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Topstone 105 Carbon Wheelset Weight? - how to drop weight without blowing budget

I am struggling to figure out the weight for the full wheelset on the bike. Components are listed below. Is it fair to compare wheelset weight based on hub, rim, spoke, with no tire? Trying to figure out how much weight I can drop on the bike by swapping this configuration with a new wheelset with some road tires. Any thoughts on this specifically along with recommendations and rough prices would be really helpful.

What are other simple and not crazy expensive ways to drop some weight?

Thanks!

Rear Hub

  • Formula RXC-400

Rims

  • WTB ST i23 TCS, 28h, tubeless ready

Spokes

  • Stainless Steel, 14g (Ai Offset Dish - rear)

Tire Size

  • 37

Tires

  • WTB Riddler TCS Light, 700 x 37c, tubeless ready

Wheel Size

  • 700c
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-21-20, 11:13 AM
  #2  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
Thats a bulleted list of your current stock wheelset?
Just remove the tires, tape, disc, and thruaxle. Weigh the wheels.

Then compare those weights to whatever you want online.
Wheel weights will be rim plus hub plus nipples and spokes.

A place to drop weight for sure is butted spokes. They are lighter and 'stronger' than plain gauge spokes.
The rim is another place as that rim is probably 100-150g heavier than some common alternatives. 605g for the stock rim vs 455g for h plus son hydra rim, for example.

A new wheelset is probably best, vs replacing parts of the stock wheelset.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 01:07 PM
  #3  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,844
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times in 4,674 Posts
What's your price limit for new wheels? And are they going to be used exclusively with skinny tires on pavement, or on other surfaces?
Koyote is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 04:04 PM
  #4  
msu2001la
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,873
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times in 867 Posts
You can get something in the 1500g range from Hunt for around $600. You could build a custom set on Prowheelbuilder.com for similar price/weight. You can definitely get 1500g Chinese carbon wheels for less than $500.

I have no idea how much your stock wheelset weighs, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was north of 1800g. I'll leave it up to you if spending $600 to drop 300g is worth it or not, but lighter wheels do spin up faster and feel awesome. The carbon wheels might give you some aero advantages, and Hunt makes some aero claims on some of their alloy wheels.
msu2001la is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 04:09 PM
  #5  
msu2001la
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,873
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times in 867 Posts
Also worth noting that I'm pretty sure the carbon Topstone has Cannondale's "AI Offset Geometry", so any wheelset you buy will need to be re-dished to fit the offset geometry.

This is a job that most any LBS can do, and suppliers like Hunt or PWB might be able to do it for you as well, but be aware that a new wheelset won't fit out-of-the-box unless it's got this specific dish offset.
msu2001la is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 04:42 PM
  #6  
GrainBrain
Senior Member
 
GrainBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,672

Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times in 471 Posts
Not being a naysayer but if it was me I'd just keep the stock wheelset with a different set of road tires and spend that $600 on a set of 650b wheels and tires. Better bang for buck imo. If you're thinking of going lightweight ya shoulda spent the extra $1,000 and gone for the RX version, would've gotten you a ton of lightweight upgrade components in the form of carbon post, bars, wheelset plus ultegra.
GrainBrain is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 06:23 PM
  #7  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
What's your price limit for new wheels? And are they going to be used exclusively with skinny tires on pavement, or on other surfaces?
Probably keeping it around 500-600 if I can. Looking to use the new wheels exclusively for road tires so I can swap on and off. Not super concerned with overall weight. I could drop 2lbs on the bike by going with the RX version, but that’s jumping from $2750 to $4200. For my purposes, I don’t think Ultegra is a huge deal and the nearly $1500 difference allows for a lot of upgrades/second set of wheels which will be very useful for me.

Would others agree that a set of road tires will make a reasonable difference compared to stock for road riding? Pretty much makes this bike the Synapse at this point...
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 06:59 PM
  #8  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by GrainBrain
Not being a naysayer but if it was me I'd just keep the stock wheelset with a different set of road tires and spend that $600 on a set of 650b wheels and tires. Better bang for buck imo. If you're thinking of going lightweight ya shoulda spent the extra $1,000 and gone for the RX version, would've gotten you a ton of lightweight upgrade components in the form of carbon post, bars, wheelset plus ultegra.
Any idea what the weight differences are for each component between the 105 and RX Topstone? Best I can figure these are the difference components. Price difference is close to $1500. Figuring since I’ve read the weight difference between Ultegra and 105 component is around half a pound and the bike weights are roughly 2.5 pounds different, there is another 2lbs in these combined. Wondering if I can spend less than the $1500 and make a dent in the weight while getting a second wheel set for straight road riding as well. Thoughts? Thanks!

Wheel set
Bottom bracket
chain
crank
saddle
seat post
stem
ultegra vs. 105
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 07:15 PM
  #9  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,844
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times in 4,674 Posts
Just buy the better bike. It’ll be easier, and Ultegra has some additional advantages (beyond weight) compared to 105.
Koyote is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 11:02 AM
  #10  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Just buy the better bike. It’ll be easier, and Ultegra has some additional advantages (beyond weight) compared to 105.
So I took your advice and also went in a slightly different direction. I was finally able to get on the Topstone and Revolt Advanced 2 side by side. Amazingly, the difference was night and day. Not only was the geometry a bit better for me on the Giant, but it was much quicker. The kingpin suspension was nice, but also felt out of whack with no suspension on the front. At the end of the day I went with the Giant and upgraded to the Revolt Advanced 0. For the extra 1k looked like a ton of value. Carbon wheels that retail for 1500 alone, Ultegra vs. 105, carbon crank, seat post etc. Probably shaves a few pounds and adds quite a bit of performance. Pick it up later this week.
kosmo886 is offline  
Likes For kosmo886:
Old 06-23-20, 12:47 PM
  #11  
msu2001la
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,873
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 1,477 Times in 867 Posts
Originally Posted by kosmo886

Would others agree that a set of road tires will make a reasonable difference compared to stock for road riding? Pretty much makes this bike the Synapse at this point...
Looking at the specs on the Giant Revolt Advanced 0, they come with 40mm Maxxis Velocita, which looks like a high-volume road tire. A narrower road tire (like a 28mm) might be a tad faster, but I wouldn't think the difference is dramatic.

For anyone reading this thread and comparing the Carbon Topstone 105 tires, they are WTB Riddler, which look to have a more aggressive off-road tread. In that case I'd think switching to road tires might make a bigger difference.

I notice a pretty big difference on pavement when switching between 33mm CX knobbies and 28mm road tires on my CX bike. Most of these gravel tires are somewhere in-between.
msu2001la is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 12:48 PM
  #12  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,844
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times in 4,674 Posts
That Revolt Advanced 0 has a fantastic parts spec for the price...If you also prefer the geometry, that's a real win. And if I recall the price, you might still be able to justify that second wheelset.
Koyote is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 01:29 PM
  #13  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
That Revolt Advanced 0 has a fantastic parts spec for the price...If you also prefer the geometry, that's a real win. And if I recall the price, you might still be able to justify that second wheelset.
I suppose anything can be justified! Just wondering how big the difference will be with what would end up being a heavier wheel given I am not spending 1k+ on a second wheelset but with a road tire, versus the stock carbon wheelset and tires. Hmm...
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 01:32 PM
  #14  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by msu2001la
Looking at the specs on the Giant Revolt Advanced 0, they come with 40mm Maxxis Velocita, which looks like a high-volume road tire. A narrower road tire (like a 28mm) might be a tad faster, but I wouldn't think the difference is dramatic.

For anyone reading this thread and comparing the Carbon Topstone 105 tires, they are WTB Riddler, which look to have a more aggressive off-road tread. In that case I'd think switching to road tires might make a bigger difference.

I notice a pretty big difference on pavement when switching between 33mm CX knobbies and 28mm road tires on my CX bike. Most of these gravel tires are somewhere in-between.
Interesting point. I hadn’t noticed that this tire is described as a “smooth riding, high volume slick tire for mixed surfaces” Any idea the rolling difference for a 40mm slick versus 28? My guess is not a ton, but love to know if someone has tried.
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 01:38 PM
  #15  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,844
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times in 4,674 Posts
Originally Posted by kosmo886
I suppose anything can be justified! Just wondering how big the difference will be with what would end up being a heavier wheel given I am not spending 1k+ on a second wheelset but with a road tire, versus the stock carbon wheelset and tires. Hmm...
Personally, I'd just use the stock wheels with a do-everything tire. But if you wanted a second wheelset, make it alloy with high spoke count, mount up some gnarly wide tires for rough riding. Then use the stock cf wheels with some slimmer (maybe 32mm) road tires for speedy pavement riding.
Koyote is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 01:49 PM
  #16  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Personally, I'd just use the stock wheels with a do-everything tire. But if you wanted a second wheelset, make it alloy with high spoke count, mount up some gnarly wide tires for rough riding. Then use the stock cf wheels with some slimmer (maybe 32mm) road tires for speedy pavement riding.
Per the prior post, it actually looks like the stock tire is fairly versatile. I was and am a little concerned about road performance given it’s 40mm wide, but I know skinny isn’t necessarily better. Given it’s a slick versus knobby it could be a good performer. Or could always swap to a 34 or 35 slick or something that can be very good everywhere except on real off-road stuff I guess.
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 01:58 PM
  #17  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,844
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times in 4,674 Posts
Originally Posted by kosmo886
Per the prior post, it actually looks like the stock tire is fairly versatile. I was and am a little concerned about road performance given it’s 40mm wide, but I know skinny isn’t necessarily better. Given it’s a slick versus knobby it could be a good performer. Or could always swap to a 34 or 35 slick or something that can be very good everywhere except on real off-road stuff I guess.
You could probably work out a tire switch with the shop, if you wanted something different. Might cost you a little money, but perhaps they would work something out.
Koyote is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 01:59 PM
  #18  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by kosmo886
Interesting point. I hadn’t noticed that this tire is described as a “smooth riding, high volume slick tire for mixed surfaces” Any idea the rolling difference for a 40mm slick versus 28? My guess is not a ton, but love to know if someone has tried.
Its a ton. I've posted here a lot.
Putzing around solo, it doesn't make much difference
Commuting, its about 10%, or 1-2mph.

Aggressive club rides, its a ton. The difference from being at the front of the pack to being dropped. Lowers my heart rate about 5bpm at the limit. We are probably talking 30-40 watts at race like speeds, but then again I cant increase my Threshold Power by 30 watts so easily.

I'm specifically referring to the Conti GP5000. Before that I was using the 4-season - and there wasn't much of a difference between them and a good gravel tire. But the gp5000 has less than 1/2 the rolling resistance of my other tires. Drafting at 30mph, rolling resistance is a pretty big deal.
chas58 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 02:09 PM
  #19  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
Its a ton. I've posted here a lot.
Putzing around solo, it doesn't make much difference
Commuting, its about 10%, or 1-2mph.

Aggressive club rides, its a ton. The difference from being at the front of the pack to being dropped. Lowers my heart rate about 5bpm at the limit. We are probably talking 30-40 watts at race like speeds, but then again I cant increase my Threshold Power by 30 watts so easily.

I'm specifically referring to the Conti GP5000. Before that I was using the 4-season - and there wasn't much of a difference between them and a good gravel tire. But the gp5000 has less than 1/2 the rolling resistance of my other tires. Drafting at 30mph, rolling resistance is a pretty big deal.
Any thoughts on a tire that would be great on the road and still capable of moderate off road? That is assuming such a thing exists?
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 03:24 PM
  #20  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by kosmo886
Any thoughts on a tire that would be great on the road and still capable of moderate off road? That is assuming such a thing exists?
I have what the German's say is the fastest (and best all around) gravel tire (Conti Terra Speed), and I can't say I can tell much difference between it, or my Ramblers, or my G-One's. The GP5000 is different, and I use it 32mm tubless for our summer/fall gravel which tends to be dry hard packed (and often better than our asphalt). If I"m not sprinting, racing, KOM'ing, it doesn't make a huge difference. I did get a ton of PRs on Strava last year when I switched to the GP5000.
chas58 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 03:26 PM
  #21  
BluFalconActual
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 33 Posts
Here’s the problem, a gravel bike is awesome because it can do 90 percent of what a road bike can plus a lot that it cant, but they are still not as fast as a dedicated road race bike on the road. Now, if you dont care about that last 10 percent and don’t see yourself doing the roadie thing of really fast group rides or going for local KOMs, then a gravel bike with a road set of wheels or even a 35mm slick tire will be just fine. If you do care about those things, then you are going to want more than one bike.
I know this because I went through the same problem. I was all about going fast on the road but then bought a gravel bike. The gravel bike did so well at 90 percent of what I did on my road bike that I ended up selling the road bike. After like a month, I realized that I still REALLY liked going on fast rides with my friends and the gravel bike was just a hinderance. It made me like it a whole lot less. I finally broke down and bought a road bike again and made the gravel bike a dedicated gravel rig. Unsurprisingly, I love the gravel bike a whole lot more again because I use it in the way that it was engineered to be ridden. Flying down gravel roads or just putting around mixed terrain. When I want to go fast on group rides or snag a KOM, my road bike is my go to.
We all try to beat the system but in the end, N+1 is a thing.
BluFalconActual is offline  
Likes For BluFalconActual:
Old 06-23-20, 03:35 PM
  #22  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
I have what the German's say is the fastest (and best all around) gravel tire (Conti Terra Speed), and I can't say I can tell much difference between it, or my Ramblers, or my G-One's. The GP5000 is different, and I use it 32mm tubless for our summer/fall gravel which tends to be dry hard packed (and often better than our asphalt). If I"m not sprinting, racing, KOM'ing, it doesn't make a huge difference. I did get a ton of PRs on Strava last year when I switched to the GP5000.
what size are the terra speeds? Just worried my 40mm are a shade too large for keeping up with a pack on the roads...

do you find the 32mm gp5000s wide enough for light gravel? Thought of that as more of a road only width. Was wondering if there is anything in the 34-35 range that is a good compromise.
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 04:56 PM
  #23  
kosmo886
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 192 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by BluFalconActual
Here’s the problem, a gravel bike is awesome because it can do 90 percent of what a road bike can plus a lot that it cant, but they are still not as fast as a dedicated road race bike on the road. Now, if you dont care about that last 10 percent and don’t see yourself doing the roadie thing of really fast group rides or going for local KOMs, then a gravel bike with a road set of wheels or even a 35mm slick tire will be just fine. If you do care about those things, then you are going to want more than one bike.
I know this because I went through the same problem. I was all about going fast on the road but then bought a gravel bike. The gravel bike did so well at 90 percent of what I did on my road bike that I ended up selling the road bike. After like a month, I realized that I still REALLY liked going on fast rides with my friends and the gravel bike was just a hinderance. It made me like it a whole lot less. I finally broke down and bought a road bike again and made the gravel bike a dedicated gravel rig. Unsurprisingly, I love the gravel bike a whole lot more again because I use it in the way that it was engineered to be ridden. Flying down gravel roads or just putting around mixed terrain. When I want to go fast on group rides or snag a KOM, my road bike is my go to.
We all try to beat the system but in the end, N+1 is a thing.
In your view, what is preventing a gravel bike with road tires from the final 10% comparison with a road bike? Most of the gravel bikes are something close to an endurance road bike from +/-. Assuming equal specs...I suppose you could have a tiny amount of extra weight on a gravel bike, but with equal components and wheels/tires, I am not sure where the difference comes from. Just interested in your view.
kosmo886 is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 05:12 PM
  #24  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,844
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times in 4,674 Posts
Originally Posted by kosmo886
In your view, what is preventing a gravel bike with road tires from the final 10% comparison with a road bike? Most of the gravel bikes are something close to an endurance road bike from +/-. Assuming equal specs...I suppose you could have a tiny amount of extra weight on a gravel bike, but with equal components and wheels/tires, I am not sure where the difference comes from. Just interested in your view.
Weight (heavier), aerodynamics (more tire clearance = more drag), and gravel bike gearing tends to differ from road bike gearing.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 06-23-20, 05:23 PM
  #25  
GrainBrain
Senior Member
 
GrainBrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,672

Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times in 471 Posts
Have you stated your location or maybe post some pictures of the gravel your thinking of riding? What's the aggregate size? Around here it's about 1" and under with about 35% less then 3/8". So when they lay new stuff, it's kinda tough with my 37mm tires. Usually it tames down after a week and you could ride 32 ok - often, after some light soaking rains and not a lot of heavy use that could cause washboard it becomes very smooth and I've ridden 25mm GP4ks on it.

A rough surface is annoying, but you could have problems with larger aggregate either slashing sidewalls or just throwing you around.
GrainBrain is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.