Crankset upgrade needs shorter BB?
#1
King of the molehills
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit 'burbs, east side.
Posts: 1,197
Bikes: '04 Giant OCR2, DIY light tourer built on on Scattante cross frame, '87 Schwinn World Sport F/G conversion, '85 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Crankset upgrade needs shorter BB?
Working on my "frigid rigid" MTB (see sig) I just installed a nice lightly used Shimano LX Biopace crankset of roughly the same vintage to replace the original, worn out low end (Acera?) unit, also Biopace. Same ring sizes.
But now I can't get the front der to shift quite as smoothly. Got it working but...ehhh. Yep, played around with cage alignment, height, cable tension, etc, etc. Rear shifts great.
I really didn't measure the chainline with the old unit but a crude straightedge check seems to show the chainline is a bit to the outside. Is it likely that a simple upgrade -- same brand, same vintage -- would require a different BB spindle length?
Or maybe a gen-u-wine Hyperglide chain instead of the generic KMC "for all derailleurs" I have on now would help? Chain is new but cheap.
Derailleurs are original. Low end but in good working order w/no play.
But now I can't get the front der to shift quite as smoothly. Got it working but...ehhh. Yep, played around with cage alignment, height, cable tension, etc, etc. Rear shifts great.
I really didn't measure the chainline with the old unit but a crude straightedge check seems to show the chainline is a bit to the outside. Is it likely that a simple upgrade -- same brand, same vintage -- would require a different BB spindle length?
Or maybe a gen-u-wine Hyperglide chain instead of the generic KMC "for all derailleurs" I have on now would help? Chain is new but cheap.
Derailleurs are original. Low end but in good working order w/no play.
Last edited by bcoppola; 01-31-08 at 09:04 AM.
#3
King of the molehills
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit 'burbs, east side.
Posts: 1,197
Bikes: '04 Giant OCR2, DIY light tourer built on on Scattante cross frame, '87 Schwinn World Sport F/G conversion, '85 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
select the middle chainring and the middle ring on the cassette, now see if the chain line is strait? you can use the rear wheel/tyre as a guide. if the chain is strait you don't need a new bottom bracket
#6
King of the molehills
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit 'burbs, east side.
Posts: 1,197
Bikes: '04 Giant OCR2, DIY light tourer built on on Scattante cross frame, '87 Schwinn World Sport F/G conversion, '85 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks! I checked the chainline w/UVs method & it looks OK. Plus a little more fiddling with the FD improved it a bit. Trainer workout revealed no further problems. Triple FDs, I have heard, tend to be fussy anyway.
There's a couple of 1mm spacers I can move around on the rear hub to tweak the chainline further & see if it'll improve things a bit more or not.
There's a couple of 1mm spacers I can move around on the rear hub to tweak the chainline further & see if it'll improve things a bit more or not.
#7
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301
Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Working on my "frigid rigid" MTB (see sig) I just installed a nice lightly used Shimano LX Biopace crankset of roughly the same vintage to replace the original, worn out low end (Acera?) unit, also Biopace. Same ring sizes.
But now I can't get the front der to shift quite as smoothly. Got it working but...ehhh. Yep, played around with cage alignment, height, cable tension, etc, etc. Rear shifts great.
I really didn't measure the chainline with the old unit but a crude straightedge check seems to show the chainline is a bit to the outside. Is it likely that a simple upgrade -- same brand, same vintage -- would require a different BB spindle length?
Or maybe a gen-u-wine Hyperglide chain instead of the generic KMC "for all derailleurs" I have on now would help? Chain is new but cheap.
But now I can't get the front der to shift quite as smoothly. Got it working but...ehhh. Yep, played around with cage alignment, height, cable tension, etc, etc. Rear shifts great.
I really didn't measure the chainline with the old unit but a crude straightedge check seems to show the chainline is a bit to the outside. Is it likely that a simple upgrade -- same brand, same vintage -- would require a different BB spindle length?
Or maybe a gen-u-wine Hyperglide chain instead of the generic KMC "for all derailleurs" I have on now would help? Chain is new but cheap.
You should measure the chainline. This is explained at https://sheldonbrown.com/chainline.
See also: https://sheldonbrown.com/derailer-adjustment
MTB triples on steel frames are normally 47.5 mm or so. For "road" use, a 45 mm chainline is generally the way to go.
For chains, I like the SRAM PC 870 for this sort of application.
Sheldon "Measurements" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------------+ | I’ll be appearing in the chorus of the Sudbury Savoyards’ | | Production of Gilbert & Sullivan’s Yeomen of the Guard | | Sudbury, Massachusetts, February 22 through March 1 | | https://sudburysavoyards.org | +------------------------------------------------------------+
#9
King of the molehills
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit 'burbs, east side.
Posts: 1,197
Bikes: '04 Giant OCR2, DIY light tourer built on on Scattante cross frame, '87 Schwinn World Sport F/G conversion, '85 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you Sheldon! The old crankset (Shimano 200GS -- I was mistaken) have the rings riveted to the spider -- no easy way to remove/replace.
BTW, I was leery of Biopace and was going to replace them with a round set till I read your article. So I'm giving it a try. Hey, you were right about using the front brake only for fixed gear.
Yes, I really should measure the chainline properly before proceeding further. I plead sloth. Thanks for the SRAM recommendation.
Regrettably, I cannot make it to MA for your G&S performance. Break a leg (from a theatre major).
torque1st: As for spacers on the chainrings, only works if the rings need to be moved outwards. Used 'em on my FG conversion (from Harris of course). Mine will probably need to go in, if at all.
BTW, I was leery of Biopace and was going to replace them with a round set till I read your article. So I'm giving it a try. Hey, you were right about using the front brake only for fixed gear.
Yes, I really should measure the chainline properly before proceeding further. I plead sloth. Thanks for the SRAM recommendation.
Regrettably, I cannot make it to MA for your G&S performance. Break a leg (from a theatre major).
torque1st: As for spacers on the chainrings, only works if the rings need to be moved outwards. Used 'em on my FG conversion (from Harris of course). Mine will probably need to go in, if at all.
Last edited by bcoppola; 02-01-08 at 06:34 PM.
#10
Space Dust
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 261
Bikes: Old DF
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
bcoppola: Direction is only one way but it depends on your crankset setup. I worked on one the other day that would move the rings inward.
#11
King of the molehills
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit 'burbs, east side.
Posts: 1,197
Bikes: '04 Giant OCR2, DIY light tourer built on on Scattante cross frame, '87 Schwinn World Sport F/G conversion, '85 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
(This old 820 functions, in part, as a wrenching practice mule.)
#13
Really Old Senior Member
I just moved a GS200 crankset to my "main bike" from my "backup bike". Although it was a severe downgrade, "quality-wise", I needed the shorter 170MM cranks vs the 175MM I was using- See-
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=361045
I initially used the original BB cup & spindle set up, although the races were questionable. I then changed to a new cartridge BB and noticed these differences-
On the old spindles (I had 2 different ones) when I tightened down the arms, the bolts basically tightened down immediately and I had negligible rotation as I torqued them down. On the NEW cartridge, I could feel the arms tighten down pretty much all the way. I still had that feel when I reached what I felt was more than adequate torque. I didn't have to adjust the Fder (I have friction shifters, thus more "leeway"), but I felt the more I torqued it, the more tha chain line would decrease.
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=361045
I initially used the original BB cup & spindle set up, although the races were questionable. I then changed to a new cartridge BB and noticed these differences-
On the old spindles (I had 2 different ones) when I tightened down the arms, the bolts basically tightened down immediately and I had negligible rotation as I torqued them down. On the NEW cartridge, I could feel the arms tighten down pretty much all the way. I still had that feel when I reached what I felt was more than adequate torque. I didn't have to adjust the Fder (I have friction shifters, thus more "leeway"), but I felt the more I torqued it, the more tha chain line would decrease.
#14
Senior Member
Sheldon, what voice do you sing? I've been in choirs since around 6 years old -- Love it!
Road Fan
Road Fan