Bike Computer (Wahoo Elemnt Roam)
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20802 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times
in
4,666 Posts
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,254
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4242 Post(s)
Liked 1,343 Times
in
932 Posts
Wahoo Elmnt -> Original model. Monochrome. No longer made.
Wahoo Elmnt Bolt -> Smaller than original. Monochrome. $380.
Wahoo Elmnt Roam -> Same size as original. Color screen. $230.
Wahoo Elmnt Bolt -> Smaller than original. Monochrome. $380.
Wahoo Elmnt Roam -> Same size as original. Color screen. $230.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 579 Times
in
437 Posts
Seriously considering purchasing a new bike computer. I have always used my smartphone, so I am completely new to this.
After quite some research, I have developed a strong preference towards the Wahoo Elemnt Roam. Mainly it is going to be used for navigating. A device that is userfriendly and quick in use is a must.
The only thing I am unsure about, is that it seems like an old device. It was almost launched two years ago. I cannot seem to find out how frequent new bike computers get launched (like, the iPhone gets a new model every year). And also, if I were to purchase the Roam, for how long it will approximately receive software updates from Wahoo.
Can you guys help me out with some advice?
After quite some research, I have developed a strong preference towards the Wahoo Elemnt Roam. Mainly it is going to be used for navigating. A device that is userfriendly and quick in use is a must.
The only thing I am unsure about, is that it seems like an old device. It was almost launched two years ago. I cannot seem to find out how frequent new bike computers get launched (like, the iPhone gets a new model every year). And also, if I were to purchase the Roam, for how long it will approximately receive software updates from Wahoo.
Can you guys help me out with some advice?
I have a Bolt that's 3 years old and I had no issues whatsoever with it. I'll get a Roam when/if it dies. So far, it's as good as new.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,864
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times
in
1,003 Posts
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2019/06/...stability.html
That sums up, as someone who's bought three Garmin's and is real hard pressed to buy another, how I feel about the subject.
I'm also an Apple Watch user, and so use the Fitness app as my "hub," and the Garmin Connect app, which is responsible for sending data to Fitness/Health, is the reason I have automatic app updates turned off Garmin actually released an update over the summer, touted as a fix for a previous update that completely broke the integration, that deleted *all* of the data out of Apple Health and replaced it with the most recent 30 days of Garmin data. Just spectacularly, horrifyingly bad.
That sums up, as someone who's bought three Garmin's and is real hard pressed to buy another, how I feel about the subject.
I'm also an Apple Watch user, and so use the Fitness app as my "hub," and the Garmin Connect app, which is responsible for sending data to Fitness/Health, is the reason I have automatic app updates turned off Garmin actually released an update over the summer, touted as a fix for a previous update that completely broke the integration, that deleted *all* of the data out of Apple Health and replaced it with the most recent 30 days of Garmin data. Just spectacularly, horrifyingly bad.
I bought a Wahoo Elemnt which has worked flawless for 4 years. The only real issue I personally have had is the Wahoo insistance to revert to metric from Imperial even though I set it to imperial...Come on Wahoo, time to fix this, sad that it continued into the Roam.
#30
Blast from the Past
Anyone else have experience to share with the Roam? I'm considering replacing a Bolt with it, side buttons no longer working and some Bluetooth issues. Anyone pairing a Roam with SRM power meters in particular? Seems like every other Bolt firmware update caused problems with SRM.
#31
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,641
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1939 Post(s)
Liked 1,461 Times
in
1,012 Posts
Likes For eduskator:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 579 Times
in
437 Posts
Anyone else have experience to share with the Roam? I'm considering replacing a Bolt with it, side buttons no longer working and some Bluetooth issues. Anyone pairing a Roam with SRM power meters in particular? Seems like every other Bolt firmware update caused problems with SRM.
It's connected to my speed & cadence sensor, wahoo HR monitor & dual sided PM.
#34
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Much of the reason to get a newer model, at least to me, would be the battery life. Battery tech has gotten a lot better in the last 5 years. For that matter, the batteries, while in theory can be replaced in these units if you buy some 3rd party kits and follow some uTube videos, is not at all easy. So for many the older models just reach end of life because they can no longer hold a charge for even a 4-5hr ride. Now we're at a point where many of these new models claim can last over 12 hours -- which pretty much covers 98% of most users needs.
EDIT: Actually an addendum question. Related to above, my current older 520 is getting pretty bad at holding a charge (I suspect in part is also due to using the Varia with it for some reason). As pertains battery life, do the batteries in these things age and hold lesser charges if they've sat on the shelf for while (eg. is 2yr old NOS going to have any worse battery performance than a brand new stocked item)? Reason I ask is that I see the 520plus is still sold at the likes of Nashbar etc at good discounts. Is there a downside to NOS as far as battery life goes? Garmin still sells these directly, but not sure if they're actually still making them (and I wouldn't buy a 520+ from them since they're only pricing $20 less than the 530).
EDIT: Actually an addendum question. Related to above, my current older 520 is getting pretty bad at holding a charge (I suspect in part is also due to using the Varia with it for some reason). As pertains battery life, do the batteries in these things age and hold lesser charges if they've sat on the shelf for while (eg. is 2yr old NOS going to have any worse battery performance than a brand new stocked item)? Reason I ask is that I see the 520plus is still sold at the likes of Nashbar etc at good discounts. Is there a downside to NOS as far as battery life goes? Garmin still sells these directly, but not sure if they're actually still making them (and I wouldn't buy a 520+ from them since they're only pricing $20 less than the 530).
Last edited by Sy Reene; 05-18-21 at 07:50 AM.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20802 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times
in
4,666 Posts
If you're just tracking your ride from your pocket, phones are fine. Once you start adding functionality, phones start lagging. If you want an always-on display, to see live metrics or mapping, integration with various sensors, etc, phones are a compromise, specially if you're in to longer rides - large, clunky mounts (relative to a dedicated computer), poor battery life, may or may not have weather sealing, etc.
Likes For WhyFi:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
This is a controversial issue and there are good reasons to use a phone and good reasons not to. Passions run hot and the last time we had a phone vs bike computer thread four people were decapitated.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Now we're at a point where many of these new models claim can last over 12 hours -- which pretty much covers 98% of most users needs.
EDIT: Actually an addendum question. Related to above, my current older 520 is getting pretty bad at holding a charge (I suspect in part is also due to using the Varia with it for some reason). As pertains battery life, do the batteries in these things age and hold lesser charges if they've sat on the shelf for while (eg. is 2yr old NOS going to have any worse battery performance than a brand new stocked item)? Reason I ask is that I see the 520plus is still sold at the likes of Nashbar etc at good discounts. Is there a downside to NOS as far as battery life goes? Garmin still sells these directly, but not sure if they're actually still making them (and I wouldn't buy a 520+ from them since they're only pricing $20 less than the 530).
EDIT: Actually an addendum question. Related to above, my current older 520 is getting pretty bad at holding a charge (I suspect in part is also due to using the Varia with it for some reason). As pertains battery life, do the batteries in these things age and hold lesser charges if they've sat on the shelf for while (eg. is 2yr old NOS going to have any worse battery performance than a brand new stocked item)? Reason I ask is that I see the 520plus is still sold at the likes of Nashbar etc at good discounts. Is there a downside to NOS as far as battery life goes? Garmin still sells these directly, but not sure if they're actually still making them (and I wouldn't buy a 520+ from them since they're only pricing $20 less than the 530).
My 2 year old Garmin watch gets 56 hours of every second GPS.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,657
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1245 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times
in
673 Posts
Much of the reason to get a newer model, at least to me, would be the battery life. Battery tech has gotten a lot better in the last 5 years. For that matter, the batteries, while in theory can be replaced in these units if you buy some 3rd party kits and follow some uTube videos, is not at all easy. So for many the older models just reach end of life because they can no longer hold a charge for even a 4-5hr ride. Now we're at a point where many of these new models claim can last over 12 hours -- which pretty much covers 98% of most users needs.
EDIT: Actually an addendum question. Related to above, my current older 520 is getting pretty bad at holding a charge (I suspect in part is also due to using the Varia with it for some reason). As pertains battery life, do the batteries in these things age and hold lesser charges if they've sat on the shelf for while (eg. is 2yr old NOS going to have any worse battery performance than a brand new stocked item)? Reason I ask is that I see the 520plus is still sold at the likes of Nashbar etc at good discounts. Is there a downside to NOS as far as battery life goes? Garmin still sells these directly, but not sure if they're actually still making them (and I wouldn't buy a 520+ from them since they're only pricing $20 less than the 530).
EDIT: Actually an addendum question. Related to above, my current older 520 is getting pretty bad at holding a charge (I suspect in part is also due to using the Varia with it for some reason). As pertains battery life, do the batteries in these things age and hold lesser charges if they've sat on the shelf for while (eg. is 2yr old NOS going to have any worse battery performance than a brand new stocked item)? Reason I ask is that I see the 520plus is still sold at the likes of Nashbar etc at good discounts. Is there a downside to NOS as far as battery life goes? Garmin still sells these directly, but not sure if they're actually still making them (and I wouldn't buy a 520+ from them since they're only pricing $20 less than the 530).
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#40
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Garmin has been very generous with myself regarding battery replacement policies. For a standard battery replacement fee, they upgraded me to the most current model. Replaced my 810 with a 1030. I know a lot of people like to beef on Garmin but have found their contribution to cycling has been amazing and software issues of old have largely diminished.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
They probably don't have any 810s left to replace it with, had to come up with something, and wanted to keep a happy customer. Too bad they might have some 520s still. Maybe you can run down the clock. 🙂
#42
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Yeah, I thought about just taking my time. I was pretty optimistic that I could end up with perhaps at least the 520+ refurbed. As it is, I have to figure out the timing as I don't want to be without a unit of some sort for too long and have to plan shipping two ways before I'd get the replacement.
#43
Blast from the Past
New Roam arrived today. Getting it set up for a ride tomorrow. It is definitely a much bigger screen than the Bolt, think my old eyes are going to appreciate that.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Yeah, I thought about just taking my time. I was pretty optimistic that I could end up with perhaps at least the 520+ refurbed. As it is, I have to figure out the timing as I don't want to be without a unit of some sort for too long and have to plan shipping two ways before I'd get the replacement.
I would try calling them, saying your unit is old and well used, the battery isn't working anymore, what can they do for you? Can't hurt to ask, I don't think a warehouse full of refurbs is valuable to them.
#45
Newbie
I have owned a Garmin 520, a bolt (still have it) and now the Roam.
The Roam is a great unit, very stable. Only had it do a weird reboot on me once on a long ride and didn't lose any data.
The App is good, The customizable screens and features are good, battery life is good. It's got auto backlight when it gets dark, which is nice. The display is a little easier to see than on the Bolt.
The bad parts:
The buttons are kind of ******, they are hard to press especially with gloves on. Get a good stiff mount made of aluminum like a k-edge so it doesn't flex when you try pushing them. The bolt doesn't suffer from this problem, especially the front facing buttons
The ability to route from the unit is there but in my opinion lacks functionality. Not really a big deal to me since I probably wouldn't use it anyway. You can always route from the app and then send it to unit.
The Roam is a great unit, very stable. Only had it do a weird reboot on me once on a long ride and didn't lose any data.
The App is good, The customizable screens and features are good, battery life is good. It's got auto backlight when it gets dark, which is nice. The display is a little easier to see than on the Bolt.
The bad parts:
The buttons are kind of ******, they are hard to press especially with gloves on. Get a good stiff mount made of aluminum like a k-edge so it doesn't flex when you try pushing them. The bolt doesn't suffer from this problem, especially the front facing buttons
The ability to route from the unit is there but in my opinion lacks functionality. Not really a big deal to me since I probably wouldn't use it anyway. You can always route from the app and then send it to unit.
#46
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,587
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1244 Post(s)
Liked 1,271 Times
in
702 Posts
Y'know what I had noticed? The Wahoo Elemnt Out Front Mount is under $20; a K-Edge equivalent is close to $50!!! I got the Out Front. In fact, I got three of them. No flexing on any of them.
#47
Senior Member
If I was looking for a new computer to be used primarily for navigation I think my top contender right now would be the Hammerhead Karoo 2.
#48
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So, I eventually bought myself a bike computer. I did make me understand the whole debate of 'bike computer vs smartphone' better, because boy, the hardware and software really does feel outdated if you compare it to a smartphone. Nevertheless, I'm still happy with my purchase since it did solve the phone issues stated here above.
At first I bought the Wahoo Element Roam. Loved the ease of use, but hated the ugly maps on it. I returned it for a Garmin Edge 530. The more detailed maps and the EUR 100 price difference convinced me to keep this one instead.
The only thing that really frustrates me is the return-to-route functionality, when you've gone off course. This is an issue on both the Wahoo and the Garmin. It often says I am off course even though I am clearly following the line. This becomes especially an issue if I've found a route on Komoot and I want to reverse the direction.
#49
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Garmin has greatly improved over the years, but Wahoo is absolutely the leader in terms of ease-of-use and user experience quality. It’s very much a situation akin to the Apple vs. Windows paradigm.
#50
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was really surprised by how much more detailed and colourful the Garmin maps are in comparison to the Wahoo. Which makes navigating so much easier. I also had both units in my hand and comparing the actual units to each other, I also found the Garmin to be so much better looking. This is especially the case when it is mounted onto the bike. The Roam feels and looks a lot more bulky while the screen sizes are pretty much the same.