Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Building a Gitane Tandem

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Building a Gitane Tandem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-19, 09:41 AM
  #26  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 163 Posts
Bravo for a lovely tandem restoration. And brava to your daughter-stoker.
Just make sure the cable housing from the stem shifter to the drum brake is that intended for brakes, like the classic tightly wound helical stuff we're all familiar with. SIS-style shifter housing may rupture under the high compression forces applied to it during braking. Even if the cable itself has to be shift cable (in order to fit the shifter lever), the housing must be brake-capable. So they say.

I've never had much luck using Sheldon Brown's technique for centering chainrings on their spiders. Don't be disappointed if you still have a tight spot and a slack spot after the operation. It's no big deal -- the frame will flex enough to accommodate the small variation. The mechanism won't actually bind up and seize.

Let us know how much you and your daughter enjoy it!
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Old 05-12-19, 11:02 AM
  #27  
Aubergine 
Bad example
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,072

Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 827 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 97 Posts
Originally Posted by conspiratemus1
Bravo for a lovely tandem restoration. And brava to your daughter-stoker.
No daughter involved. I bought this to rebuild for the fun of it, and will set up the stoker position for a friend who is interested in joining me.

Just make sure the cable housing from the stem shifter to the drum brake is that intended for brakes, like the classic tightly wound helical stuff we're all familiar with. SIS-style shifter housing may rupture under the high compression forces applied to it during braking. Even if the cable itself has to be shift cable (in order to fit the shifter lever), the housing must be brake-capable. So they say.
That makes perfect sense. I actually ran a brake cable (and housing) through the stem shifter. The shaft of the cable end fits into the hole in the shifter, so I was satisfied that it would work acceptably.

I've never had much luck using Sheldon Brown's technique for centering chainrings on their spiders. Don't be disappointed if you still have a tight spot and a slack spot after the operation. It's no big deal -- the frame will flex enough to accommodate the small variation. The mechanism won't actually bind up and seize.
I am obviously not quite at that point! But I will be keeping all the excellent info in mind. Thank you.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Aubergine is offline  
Old 05-12-19, 02:41 PM
  #28  
Aubergine 
Bad example
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,072

Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 827 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 97 Posts
Ok, I got the timing chain properly adjusted and aligned the cranks. I also put a spacer in the rear crank, drive side, so the granny might work now. Gonna button it up now and see how it functions.

edit: nuts. I need to put in another spacer. Should have just gone with a Phil BB so I would not need to put up with this.

second Edit: bb spindle is just not wide enough. Gonna need to get a Phil after all.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978

Last edited by Aubergine; 05-12-19 at 03:48 PM.
Aubergine is offline  
Old 05-12-19, 04:03 PM
  #29  
kc0yef 
Senior Member
 
kc0yef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: OZARKS
Posts: 1,396
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Anyone in Washington State looking to do this same project Have complete bike sans cranks needs paint..
__________________
riding
kc0yef is offline  
Old 05-12-19, 04:40 PM
  #30  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times in 1,997 Posts
Originally Posted by Aubergine
Ok, I got the timing chain properly adjusted and aligned the cranks. I also put a spacer in the rear crank, drive side, so the granny might work now. Gonna button it up now and see how it functions.

edit: nuts. I need to put in another spacer. Should have just gone with a Phil BB so I would not need to put up with this.

second Edit: bb spindle is just not wide enough. Gonna need to get a Phil after all.
before you spend the big dollars on a phil BB, double check the chainline. the middle chainring should align with the mid point of the rear cog set. There was a mention of the Campagnolo derailluer not being the best unit for your use, I won't go that fat yet, but at the time of its design, it was deemed acceptable by Campagnolo for a triple with the smallest ring of 42t. They went smaller later- yes; but would be inclined to use a front mech designed for a wide range triple crank set. Campagnolo even made triple specific front mechs later, much later. From my quick eyeball of the images, I think the aft part of the front mech cage is marginal in how far it descends at the cage closing bolt, beneficial cage shaping is non existent.
repechage is offline  
Old 05-12-19, 05:06 PM
  #31  
Aubergine 
Bad example
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,072

Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 827 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 97 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
before you spend the big dollars on a phil BB, double check the chainline. the middle chainring should align with the mid point of the rear cog set. There was a mention of the Campagnolo derailluer not being the best unit for your use, I won't go that fat yet, but at the time of its design, it was deemed acceptable by Campagnolo for a triple with the smallest ring of 42t. They went smaller later- yes; but would be inclined to use a front mech designed for a wide range triple crank set. Campagnolo even made triple specific front mechs later, much later. From my quick eyeball of the images, I think the aft part of the front mech cage is marginal in how far it descends at the cage closing bolt, beneficial cage shaping is non existent.
Ok, let me make this clear about Nuovo Record front derailleurs. I have been using them on triple cranks since 1979. I currently am using them on *all* of my vintage triples, with a granny of 26 teeth. They work just fine. Very smooth and dependable. I do not need a different derailleur for friction shifting. Now, I will agree that they don’t work well with indexed shifters (or even the older Campy Ergo semi-indexed shifters). I do use the modern Racing Triple derailleurs for that.

As for the bottom bracket, I did eyeball the chainline and it was off, pretty much centered on the second-largest cog (of five.) I was trying to use a Velo Orange 117.5 BB, which are nice but I have learned do not always play nicely with French Bottom bracket shells. When it tried to space the BB over I discovered that I could not move the adjustable cup in enough to tighten the bottom bracket properly. The reason is that the threading inside the shell is rather short and so the adjustable cup runs out of threading and binds up. (This has also happened on other French bikes I have had, so I should have known better.) The Phil BBs have narrower cups and so are much easier to adjust on old French bikes.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Aubergine is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 12:03 PM
  #32  
Aubergine 
Bad example
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,072

Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 827 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 97 Posts
I installed a 122 mm VO BB to replace the 117.5 I previously used. It shifts properly across all three chainrings now. I’ll button it up after I lop a few mm off the adjustable cup so it will screw fully into the shell.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Aubergine is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 12:50 PM
  #33  
ryansu
Senior Member
 
ryansu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841

Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times in 367 Posts
As others have said love that Green @Aubergine nice perseverance on getting the old Tandem back on the road, my only experience with Tandems was following them on the STP as they make a fantastic hole in the wind . Hope it all gets sorted so you can get out and enjoy it. I see an Orange Gitane tandem frame and bits on Seattle CL, I am not tempted.
ryansu is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 05:57 PM
  #34  
Aubergine 
Bad example
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,072

Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 827 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 97 Posts
All done! Although I need to get some single-ring chainring bolts for the timing rings so I can replace the ones on there now, which are too long. Everything is nice and tight, and works as it should.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Aubergine is offline  
Old 05-18-19, 12:38 PM
  #35  
RandolphCarter
PeopleCode delaminator
 
RandolphCarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Round Lake. NY
Posts: 377

Bikes: 1986 Trek 310 Elance, 1997 Schwinn HydraGlide, 1987 Trek Antelope 800, 2003 Haro F4, 198? Allsop Offroad Climber

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Liked 153 Times in 67 Posts
That came out looking fantastic!
RandolphCarter is offline  
Old 05-18-19, 02:19 PM
  #36  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,046

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,387 Times in 3,672 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian25
Hi, I was admiring your tandem. Do you mind sharing what that green is called or and number code? I have used an old Campy double front derailleur for triples before. They do not work very well for triples. I would recommend a front derailleur designed for triples.
You do know that Campy used the NR fd on their factory triple setups for years, sold 1000's, works great.

Even 40 years later, they work just fine.


merziac is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sintheah
Classic & Vintage
9
07-29-18 06:51 PM
mikebian
Tandem Cycling
2
09-29-17 05:20 AM
MrFizzle
Classic & Vintage
19
07-16-17 09:58 AM
drummerian
Tandem Cycling
10
01-13-14 01:49 PM
2frmMI
Tandem Cycling
12
05-31-10 05:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.