cycling in groups
#51
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Having a lifted pickup and a lifted Land Cruiser, I often have to ride into the ditch with oncoming cars. Riding 2 and 3 abreast on such roads is not only inconsiderate and dangerous but against the law. When I do pass cyclists I often need to drive into the ditch and they still do not move over
whether I have waited 30 seconds or 30 minutes is irrelevant.
#52
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
With respect to the wait time. You took part of my quote out of context, which is also unreasonable.
If cyclists are riding illegally, the amount of my time that they steal is irrelevant to the discussion. The law does not allow groups of cyclists to ride three abreast under any circumstances.
Riding 2 and 3 abreast on such roads is not only inconsiderate and dangerous but against the law. When I do pass cyclists I often need to drive into the ditch and they still do not move over and yes I get it that the center of the road is smoother but when a car comes, it should be single file as far right as is safe.....not two or three abreast down the center of the lane whether I have waited 30 seconds or 30 minutes is irrelevant.
#53
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
It is the responsibility of the person doing the overtaking to do so in a safe manner. If a driver attempting a pass has to drive into the ditch (or forces oncoming traffic into it) they are breaking the law, and creating a dangerous situation. That those they are overtaking may be breaking the law is immaterial.
Cool thing is, the OP understands this.
Cool thing is, the OP understands this.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
uh
"deal with it"
"deal with it"
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
a 20sec google taught me its not legal to pass a cyclists on a solid in your state
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
and whenever people will take their car on the road, there should be a event or something blabla
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351
Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
1. Where I live, It is not uncommon to get stuck behind a slow moving tractor or farm machine on a narrow road. In ALMOST EVERY CASE...it doesn't last more than a mile or two, because after being tailed for a few minutes, the tractor will be considerate and pull over when there is an opporunity to do so, letting the faster traffic pass. Common sense, courtesy, cars have to drive slower for a short time, but not very long.
2. In my group bike rides in these same areas, we often ride 2 or even 3 sided by side when there is no traffic, but when cars come from either direction, we stretch out into single-file to make passing as easy as possible. (The solid line is not an issue, because most of the roads have no lines or paint whatsoever...Yeah, farmland.... :-) I chalk our default response to traffic as common sense and courtesy. (Our groups are usually nomore than 8-12 riders...)
3. On a recent ride, there was a large truck that got stuck behind us as we were climbing a 1 mile, 6-7% grade that curved back and forth sharply. we were climbing single-file, stretched out due to differing climbing speeds, as far right as possible...but the truck did not attempt to pass until the road straightened out...probably because of some kind of common sense and courtesy, or something... :-)
2. In my group bike rides in these same areas, we often ride 2 or even 3 sided by side when there is no traffic, but when cars come from either direction, we stretch out into single-file to make passing as easy as possible. (The solid line is not an issue, because most of the roads have no lines or paint whatsoever...Yeah, farmland.... :-) I chalk our default response to traffic as common sense and courtesy. (Our groups are usually nomore than 8-12 riders...)
3. On a recent ride, there was a large truck that got stuck behind us as we were climbing a 1 mile, 6-7% grade that curved back and forth sharply. we were climbing single-file, stretched out due to differing climbing speeds, as far right as possible...but the truck did not attempt to pass until the road straightened out...probably because of some kind of common sense and courtesy, or something... :-)
#59
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It is the responsibility of the person doing the overtaking to do so in a safe manner. If a driver attempting a pass has to drive into the ditch (or forces oncoming traffic into it) they are breaking the law, and creating a dangerous situation. That those they are overtaking may be breaking the law is immaterial.
Cool thing is, the OP understands this.
Cool thing is, the OP understands this.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
The OP is not the typical driver.
My point is rather simple. Cyclists are their own worst enemy by blocking the roadway when they have not legal or logical reason to do so.
#60
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Italktocats,
20 seconds of internet research is usually pretty reliable, but it turns out (according to the County Sheriff's Office) that it's actually legal in Va.
Bravo on originality though!
Oh, wait..
20 seconds of internet research is usually pretty reliable, but it turns out (according to the County Sheriff's Office) that it's actually legal in Va.
Bravo on originality though!
Oh, wait..
#61
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
If there is such a law and there isn't in my state but more to the point, then why are many roads too narrow for two motor vehicles to pass without one going off the shoulder and into the "Ditch". The standard approach to these situations is the car stops as far right as possible and the pickup going the other way rides off the road to scrape by.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
The OP is not the typical driver.
My point is rather simple. Cyclists are their own worst enemy by blocking the roadway when they have not legal or logical reason to do so.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
The OP is not the typical driver.
My point is rather simple. Cyclists are their own worst enemy by blocking the roadway when they have not legal or logical reason to do so.
This is why I really tire of hearing the “The cyclist’s (scofflaw or not) forced me to pass when it wasn’t safe” excuse. Every operator is ALWAYS responsible for safe operation of their vehicle.
I don’t know why your state doesn’t make roads wide enough for lifted monster trucks, but maybe they need to require their owners pass a special test proving they can safely operate them around others.
I’m very doubtful that cyclists are “their own worst enemy”, but I agree they shouldn’t block other road users when it isn’t necessary.
Last edited by AlmostTrick; 05-21-15 at 12:41 PM.
#62
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
Oh, I figured when you called me a liar and asked what area that you were actually willing to do some homework to back up your bull****. Guess disparaging someone's character is fine, so long as it's not too much work or have to follow up, or anything.
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
In the context of the thread, those who choose to use the road for group activities have an obligation to accommodate other road users ahead of their desire to maintain group integrity.
#64
Cycle Year Round
If there is such a law and there isn't in my state but more to the point, then why are many roads too narrow for two motor vehicles to pass without one going off the shoulder and into the "Ditch". The standard approach to these situations is the car stops as far right as possible and the pickup going the other way rides off the road to scrape by.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#65
Cycle Year Round
As a cyclist and commercial vehicle operator, I know I'm often disrupting the flow of traffic, I also know a few will deal with it poorly. As road users we are all obligated to be as safe as possible without being compelled to endanger ourselves. Its our obligation to minimize our negative impact on others when we can regardless of our mode. The rules and laws of the road are not intended to be used as an excuse to relieve us of our obligations and responsibilities.
In the context of the thread, those who choose to use the road for group activities have an obligation to accommodate other road users ahead of their desire to maintain group integrity.
In the context of the thread, those who choose to use the road for group activities have an obligation to accommodate other road users ahead of their desire to maintain group integrity.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#66
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 33
Bikes: 2012 specialized hard rock, 2014 trek 7.3,2015 trek 1.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The group I ride with on Monday nights usually brings 1500+ every Monday, when it's warm out its not uncommon to hit 2000. Cars where/are pretty understanding when they wait though 4-5 light changes till the group makes it through the intersection. This year there is a police escort to cork the intersections. I ride with 3 groups on different days of the week, around here a group of 20 is small
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Based on your claims of obligation, your company and the other UPS, Fed-Ex, etc. companies should switch to mini-station wagons to lower their impact on the rest of us. Why do you feel you have a special right to drive an oversized vehicle and stop in places blocking much of the traffic?
In the real world most folks in all user groups understand, and do what's reasonable. Those with mental, or emotional defects who can't define what is, or act in a reasonable manner on their own are a lost cause as it should be self evident. Unfortunately we're stuck putting up with their caustic martyrdom, and selfish oblivion.
Another problem with groups is the "group mentality", which often leads to behavior that people as individuals otherwise wouldn't engage in.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
The group I ride with on Monday nights usually brings 1500+ every Monday, when it's warm out its not uncommon to hit 2000. Cars where/are pretty understanding when they wait though 4-5 light changes till the group makes it through the intersection. This year there is a police escort to cork the intersections. I ride with 3 groups on different days of the week, around here a group of 20 is small
#69
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
As a cyclist and commercial vehicle operator, I know I'm often disrupting the flow of traffic, I also know a few will deal with it poorly. As road users we are all obligated to be as safe as possible without being compelled to endanger ourselves. Its our obligation to minimize our negative impact on others when we can regardless of our mode. The rules and laws of the road are not intended to be used as an excuse to relieve us of our obligations and responsibilities.
In the context of the thread, those who choose to use the road for group activities have an obligation to accommodate other road users ahead of their desire to maintain group integrity.
In the context of the thread, those who choose to use the road for group activities have an obligation to accommodate other road users ahead of their desire to maintain group integrity.
Oh, and in keeping with the "Most polite thread ever on A&S" Thank you, sir!
#71
Cycle Year Round
Everybody is obligated to do what they can, when they can within reason, nobody gets a free pass to do as they please without consideration for others.
In the real world most folks in all user groups understand, and do what's reasonable. Those with mental, or emotional defects who can't define what is, or act in a reasonable manner on their own are a lost cause as it should be self evident. Unfortunately we're stuck putting up with their caustic martyrdom, and selfish oblivion.
Another problem with groups is the "group mentality", which often leads to behavior that people as individuals otherwise wouldn't engage in.
In the real world most folks in all user groups understand, and do what's reasonable. Those with mental, or emotional defects who can't define what is, or act in a reasonable manner on their own are a lost cause as it should be self evident. Unfortunately we're stuck putting up with their caustic martyrdom, and selfish oblivion.
Another problem with groups is the "group mentality", which often leads to behavior that people as individuals otherwise wouldn't engage in.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#72
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
It took three whole pages to gather that you shouldn't pass at all on a solid line, and the OP says there is a legal way to do it in Virginia.
Ipso facto, they need to ask their authorities. Case closed?
Ipso facto, they need to ask their authorities. Case closed?
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#73
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If there is such a law and there isn't in my state but more to the point, then why are many roads too narrow for two motor vehicles to pass without one going off the shoulder and into the "Ditch". The standard approach to these situations is the car stops as far right as possible and the pickup going the other way rides off the road to scrape by.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
If cyclists would ride single file as required by law, I could pass without going off the road. Pretty damned simple.
#74
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FliesOnly1,
Roads like this are rampant in rural America. Narrow country roads often have areas that are impassable by two cars at one time. Usually there's a warning sign. Sometimes there's not.
Roads like this are rampant in rural America. Narrow country roads often have areas that are impassable by two cars at one time. Usually there's a warning sign. Sometimes there's not.
#75
Cycle Year Round
CB HI,
And if they were only going 17mph for a portion of the trip (remember, it's hilly!) and my commute was actually 12.25 miles instead of 11.25, which means it would've taken me 16.3 minutes instead of 15, then it would've taken me about 27 extra minutes.
I can do the math and I concede that I probably should have made more of an effort to do that to make my original post more accurate. I've also conceded that cyclists are low on the list of motorist "inconveniences."
Whether my trip took 12 minutes, 22 minutes, 27 minutes, or 45 minutes longer wasn't what I was trying to highlight.
I acknowledge and understand your exasperation and the part I played in it, but I hope that my (fairly long) original post isn't boiled down to that one line.
And if they were only going 17mph for a portion of the trip (remember, it's hilly!) and my commute was actually 12.25 miles instead of 11.25, which means it would've taken me 16.3 minutes instead of 15, then it would've taken me about 27 extra minutes.
I can do the math and I concede that I probably should have made more of an effort to do that to make my original post more accurate. I've also conceded that cyclists are low on the list of motorist "inconveniences."
Whether my trip took 12 minutes, 22 minutes, 27 minutes, or 45 minutes longer wasn't what I was trying to highlight.
I acknowledge and understand your exasperation and the part I played in it, but I hope that my (fairly long) original post isn't boiled down to that one line.
Makes it look like you are exaggerating again or hiding something.
How about actually posting the road your driving on, where you get on and approximate point you get off the roadway. What is the actual average number of cyclist in the group you ride behind?
I was being nice by using the low end of the speed range of 18 mph rather than a middle range of 21 mph. Then you want to drop the speed down to 17 mph for the cyclist for your hypothetical.
Maybe the real solution for everyone on this road, is to install an extra lane at a couple of the uphill sections that would allow easy passing at those points. That solution even works for slow busses/trucks on the road.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.