Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Topstone Sora vs 105 - $1000 difference worth it?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Topstone Sora vs 105 - $1000 difference worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-20, 08:22 AM
  #1  
simonsez
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Topstone Sora vs 105 - $1000 difference worth it?

My LBS currently has both of these bikes in my size and in stock. I can afford the 105 but in Canada the price difference between the two (after taxes) is $1,017 (about $775 USD).

Below are the major differences between the 2:

Sora Model: Promax Decoder R Mechanical brakes; Front & Rear Sora derailleur - 2x9; Sunrace Cassette; FSA Adventure Bottom Bracket; Tempo Adventure Crank; RD 2.0 rims

105 Model: 105 Hydro Disc brakes; Front & Rear 105 derailleur - 2x11; Shimano 105 Cassette; FSA Omega Bottom Bracket and Crank; WTB ST i23 Tubeless-Ready rims.

So my question, I don't know enough about parts and upgrading labour costs but would I be able to make the Sora better than the 105 by spending $1000 in upgrades?

Thank you for replying!
simonsez is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 10:01 AM
  #2  
Elvo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 369 Times in 206 Posts
No that is not worth $1000. I would buy the sora one and replace the brakes with $100 TRP Hy-Rds asap
Elvo is offline  
Likes For Elvo:
Old 06-08-20, 10:37 AM
  #3  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,084 Times in 1,180 Posts
105 has better wheels, hydro brakes, better crank, 11 spd.

Would it cost you $700 to get the Sora up to the 105 level ?, easily. Wheels alone are about $450. Best price I see for a 105 upgrade - shifters/calipers/F&R derailers/cassette & chain is $627. Then another $130 for the FSA crank.

You could sell the Sora parts as new on e-bay, hard to say what kind of money you'd make back.

The 105 is the better deal unless you choose to stay with some of the Sora parts like the wheels, even then it's close.

Last edited by Steve B.; 06-08-20 at 10:40 AM.
Steve B. is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 11:49 AM
  #4  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,613

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10959 Post(s)
Liked 7,487 Times in 4,188 Posts
If it isnt a financial issue to pay more, then yes I would say $775 for a 105 drivetrain, better brakes, and better wheels is worth it.

The brakes are going to be much better. TRP hyrd brake are...meh. The cable hydraulic brakes I have, juintech, are also...meh. They stop me fine, but i cant say its any better than trp spyre or other properly set up cable actuated disc brakes. Ive putzed around on 105 hydraulic brakes and they are very nice.
2 more cogs means tighter spacing shifts with 105, which is great to have. A higher quality wheelset that is tubeless ready is nice to have. The crank for the 105 is lighter too.

All that is worth $775 to me.

But the Sora bike will work great and is a solid value from a major brand.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 12:31 PM
  #5  
msu2001la
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,481 Times in 870 Posts
"Worth it" is a very subjective statement.
From my perspective, $775 seems like a reasonable cost to get a 105 hydro groupset and nicer wheels. Sora works fine, it's just a bit heavier and 9sp vs 11sp, the shifting is a little more clunky, etc. I'm also not a fan of mechanical disc brakes. It will feel entry level, but if your goal is to just get out and ride, it'll definitely work. If you're on a budget and just starting out, that $775 would go a long ways towards buying shoes, pedals, kit, helmet, etc.

Unless you're willing to spend like $10k+ on a bike, there's always going to be a version that's lighter, faster, has a higher end groupset, has more features, etc. Only you can decide where the line is. Personally, if I were buying a Topstone, I'd go for the Carbon Ultegra model ($3300 USD) mostly because I don't think I'd want an aluminum gravel bike, and the Ultegra model is "only" $550 more than the Carbon 105 model.
msu2001la is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 12:38 PM
  #6  
simonsez
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys, it sounds like paying the extra 1k for the 105 is probably worth it now and down the road. I need to make a decision soon before they sell out!
simonsez is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 01:00 PM
  #7  
thehammerdog
Senior Member
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704

Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by simonsez
My LBS currently has both of these bikes in my size and in stock. I can afford the 105 but in Canada the price difference between the two (after taxes) is $1,017 (about $775 USD).

Below are the major differences between the 2:

Sora Model: Promax Decoder R Mechanical brakes; Front & Rear Sora derailleur - 2x9; Sunrace Cassette; FSA Adventure Bottom Bracket; Tempo Adventure Crank; RD 2.0 rims

105 Model: 105 Hydro Disc brakes; Front & Rear 105 derailleur - 2x11; Shimano 105 Cassette; FSA Omega Bottom Bracket and Crank; WTB ST i23 Tubeless-Ready rims.

So my question, I don't know enough about parts and upgrading labour costs but would I be able to make the Sora better than the 105 by spending $1000 in upgrades?

Thank you for replying!
honestly the fun value will be improve slightly as the liggter better stuff.
so no.
thehammerdog is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 01:45 PM
  #8  
Fuzzy_Dunlop
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 15

Bikes: Trek Checkpoint SL5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
If it isnt a financial issue to pay more, then yes I would say $775 for a 105 drivetrain, better brakes, and better wheels is worth it.
If you're planning to keep your bike a long time, I would definitely spend the extra cash and buy the 105-equipped bike. It's a bombproof, tangibly better drivetrain than Sora - as are hydro brakes over mechanical ones - to say nothing of the wheels. 5 years from now, you're not likely to regret or even remember spending an extra grand on an already expensive bike. $1,000 over 5 years is $200/year - less than $20/month. Buy the best bike you can afford now, and go from there.
Fuzzy_Dunlop is offline  
Old 06-08-20, 05:55 PM
  #9  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,084 Times in 1,180 Posts
And as note that I had a hard time finding a website for a shop in the US that listed a price, as all these bikes are seemingly sold out everywhere. Grab the 105 as quickly as you can before the shop owner is offered a higher price !
Steve B. is offline  
Old 06-09-20, 08:57 AM
  #10  
sdmc530
Heft On Wheels
 
sdmc530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123

Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times in 346 Posts
If you got the cash to splash they hard YES its worth it. The sora bike is fine, don't get me wrong its a good bike. I have a bike with Sora on it, no issues. But after my second bike is 105, I wouldn't ever not have 105. its just better.

Neither will likely cause you any trouble and both will be fine bikes, but I do value the 105 over the sora and the price would be worth it to me!
sdmc530 is offline  
Old 06-10-20, 02:47 PM
  #11  
Longfellow02
Newbie
 
Longfellow02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 58

Bikes: Diamondback Cross Campus (1993), Trek Domane 2.3 (2016), Cannondale Topstone 105 AL (2020)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I faced the same decision point as you. Although I already had a Trek Domane with Shimano 105, so was 'spoiled' in that way.

I went to the LBS and test rode the Topstone Sora. I did not like the way it shifted, and I also wanted full hydraulic brakes.

So I ordered a Topstone 105 AL in size L It took several weeks to get it delivered to the shop. I've had it now about a week and love it.

As mentioned, act soon. I was told I got one of the last Topstone 105's in size L.
Longfellow02 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.