Revolutionary 622mm disc brake rotor design
Likes For ctak:
#2
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
"Opponents of the design, however, criticize it for unsafely linking the braking surface to tire retention. As well, the oversized rotors are more susceptible to dirt, water, and oil from the riding surface causing contamination, early wear, and reduced braking performance."
#3
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
They literally might as well have taken that from a three-year-old thread on Slowtwitch.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Yawn. Let the bike speak for itself without having to resort to rabble-rousing for attention.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
The extreme amount of leverage that system provides seems dangerous. I'll wait for more real world testing.
Likes For tyrion:
Likes For rafazx10:
#7
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
And I mean, I’m not really pro-disc as a general thing (universally, anyway) but this is the opposite of a fresh hot take on the topic. And super lame as a publicity stunt. Before I read it I thought it was a slow news day and someone at CyclingTips wrote a lame column; now I’m losing respect for Rob English.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#8
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,522
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3660 Post(s)
Liked 5,406 Times
in
2,745 Posts
Not actually part of the bike but the way those ergo bars are jacked down and the placement of the levers looks like something out of the 80s. Goofy.... I assume it's custom so maybe the customer specified that and can't blame the builder. Even so, he should have corrected it for the glamour shots.
Likes For RedBullFiXX:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Not actually part of the bike but the way those ergo bars are jacked down and the placement of the levers looks like something out of the 80s. Goofy.... I assume it's custom so maybe the customer specified that and can't blame the builder. Even so, he should have corrected it for the glamour shots.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Not actually part of the bike but the way those ergo bars are jacked down and the placement of the levers looks like something out of the 80s. Goofy.... I assume it's custom so maybe the customer specified that and can't blame the builder. Even so, he should have corrected it for the glamour shots.
#12
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,522
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3660 Post(s)
Liked 5,406 Times
in
2,745 Posts
^^ If it was C&V stuff you'd be correct. Current bars are designed for the flats to extend horizontally and current brifters are designed for the hoods to initiate and continue from that plane, not be placed half way down the curve. You can look at any manufacturer's website and see examples. Of course people can put stuff anywhere they like but it may compromise the ergonomics the mfg worked so hard to achieve.
#13
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
Valve stems at appropriate place, cranks set correctly, gold chain, (cha-Ching!) but it’s not in Biggy Smalls. Sad!
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,982
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6190 Post(s)
Liked 4,806 Times
in
3,315 Posts
I can't afford a custom built bike. I'll ride what I can buy from the store. If it's this new version indicated by the OP or old style hydraulic disc brakes, that is of little importance.
As long as it's stopping performance meets the CPSC requirements for sale and my states legal requirements to be on public roads, I'll be interested more in things that make it go.
As long as it's stopping performance meets the CPSC requirements for sale and my states legal requirements to be on public roads, I'll be interested more in things that make it go.
Likes For rubiksoval:
#17
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
My next bike will almost certainly be disc brake, but I will also likely always have a rim brake bike to soak up a lot of the morning training miles in dry, flat Texas.
#18
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 393
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 264 Times
in
146 Posts
And I mean, I’m not really pro-disc as a general thing (universally, anyway) but this is the opposite of a fresh hot take on the topic. And super lame as a publicity stunt. Before I read it I thought it was a slow news day and someone at CyclingTips wrote a lame column; now I’m losing respect for Rob English.
#19
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
#20
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,889
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
138 Posts
What are the differences between disc and rim brake performance?
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 4,125
Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Grand Jubile, 2020 Holdsworth Competition, 2022 Giant Trance 29 3
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3357 Post(s)
Liked 3,636 Times
in
1,242 Posts
And I mean, I’m not really pro-disc as a general thing (universally, anyway) but this is the opposite of a fresh hot take on the topic. And super lame as a publicity stunt. Before I read it I thought it was a slow news day and someone at CyclingTips wrote a lame column; now I’m losing respect for Rob English.
If he really wanted to maximize the "rotor" size, he would have gone with 630mm wheels, anyways
I've never understood that either, but it doesn't offend me nearly as much as that crank
#23
Senior Member
I don't entirely understand rim brake diehards. Aside from a few grams and negligible aero gains, I don't understand why anyone would prefer a rim brake given the choice. I suppose the wheels are more compact and thru-axles are a but more fidgety? Seems like a low cost to pay for not tearing up the brake track on your $3000 carbon rims.
Maybe I just don't understand. Would anyone care to convince me otherwise?
Maybe I just don't understand. Would anyone care to convince me otherwise?
#24
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I don't entirely understand rim brake diehards. Aside from a few grams and negligible aero gains, I don't understand why anyone would prefer a rim brake given the choice. I suppose the wheels are more compact and thru-axles are a but more fidgety? Seems like a low cost to pay for not tearing up the brake track on your $3000 carbon rims.
Maybe I just don't understand. Would anyone care to convince me otherwise?
Maybe I just don't understand. Would anyone care to convince me otherwise?
They have advantages, but those of us in the above situations are not thrilled about the “get on board, chump” attitude expressed by many.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#25
Senior Member
Convince? You won’t be convinced, and I don’t care to try, but I can explain. Some of us tend to ride in dry flat environments, and good calipers are plenty for us. That means I can do things like flip the bike while swapping tires without making the brakes squishy, I can put the wheels in my car without worrying about the rotor getting damaged, and generally they’re just a lot more convenient. Oh and cheaper - much is made of the lack of much price difference between, say, an R5 disc and rim, but there’s no R2 disc (or at least wasn’t when I got it). Many of us also already had a bunch of nice rim brake wheels we aren’t eager to replace.
They have advantages, but those of us in the above situations are not thrilled about the “get on board, chump” attitude expressed by many.
They have advantages, but those of us in the above situations are not thrilled about the “get on board, chump” attitude expressed by many.
Likes For mattscq: