Joggers with IPOD's - anyone else have problems with them?
#51
L T X B O M P F A N S R
I do not intend to sound like that.
I can remember one specific incident on the Minuteman Bike path north of Boston last summer. It was a beautiful day so the bikepath was mobbed with all sorts of users. There were two joggers, no iPods or anything like that, running two abreast. I was third cyclist in line behind them, and there were other cyclists behind me as well (don't know how many). There was no opportunity to pass for literally about a half mile because of the traffic in the oncoming lane, and although the cyclist at the front of the queue was madly ringing his bell, the joggers did not make room and just chatted as they ran. They could have ran single file for all of 30 seconds while the queue passed... or better yet stay in single file rather than hog the whole lane when there were so many other people wanting to use the path.
If I'm on the road on a bike, I don't stay in the middle of the lane while while motor traffic piles up behind me if I don't have to. I think it's common sense to let faster traffic pass if it's safe to do so, don't you? That's all I'm saying.
I can remember one specific incident on the Minuteman Bike path north of Boston last summer. It was a beautiful day so the bikepath was mobbed with all sorts of users. There were two joggers, no iPods or anything like that, running two abreast. I was third cyclist in line behind them, and there were other cyclists behind me as well (don't know how many). There was no opportunity to pass for literally about a half mile because of the traffic in the oncoming lane, and although the cyclist at the front of the queue was madly ringing his bell, the joggers did not make room and just chatted as they ran. They could have ran single file for all of 30 seconds while the queue passed... or better yet stay in single file rather than hog the whole lane when there were so many other people wanting to use the path.
If I'm on the road on a bike, I don't stay in the middle of the lane while while motor traffic piles up behind me if I don't have to. I think it's common sense to let faster traffic pass if it's safe to do so, don't you? That's all I'm saying.
#52
P7 Fanboy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Crippled Burrick Inn
Posts: 338
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's the owner's fault for letting the jogger run wild without a leash. Whether or not pepper spray is mean or necessary, I'll save for another thread.
#53
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times
in
1,042 Posts
I do not intend to sound like that.
[SNIP]
If I'm on the road on a bike, I don't stay in the middle of the lane while while motor traffic piles up behind me if I don't have to. I think it's common sense to let faster traffic pass if it's safe to do so, don't you? That's all I'm saying.
[SNIP]
If I'm on the road on a bike, I don't stay in the middle of the lane while while motor traffic piles up behind me if I don't have to. I think it's common sense to let faster traffic pass if it's safe to do so, don't you? That's all I'm saying.
#54
L T X B O M P F A N S R
But you DO sound like that. And plenty of motorists sound just like you when they justify blowing their horns at a bicyclist anywhere on the road because common sense tells them that a bicyclist shouldn't be there. MAybe you should read back to yourself what you type before getting all snippy at other posters who respond to what you wrote not what you think you meant.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
In answer to the OP's question, yes, I get annoyed by joggers with iPods. I also get annoyed by cyclists with iPods, car drivers putting on makeup, and just about everyone else who positions themselves in a dynamic and potentially hazardous environment and then intentionally tunes out.
There is, of course, no terribly good answer to the problem. Sad to note how strongly it is defended, though, even by people on a cycling bulletin board. Oh well...
There is, of course, no terribly good answer to the problem. Sad to note how strongly it is defended, though, even by people on a cycling bulletin board. Oh well...
#56
Devilmaycare Cycling Fool
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wynnum, Australia
Posts: 3,819
Bikes: 1998 Cannondale F700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#57
member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 346
Bikes: Lemond Tourmalet, Giant mountain bike and a Cannondale Adventure 400 hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They're called ROAD bikes for a reason....
#58
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,513
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1431 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times
in
218 Posts
Like I said, this happened in a park where traffic should be slow, but dang. Not even a glance up the street before lurching off the curb while wearing buds?
#59
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#60
L T X B O M P F A N S R
#62
Custom User Title
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Unfortunately, VA
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think way too many people took the airzound thing the wrong way. Why does everyone always take **** so seriously?
This is something that was recommended in a humorous way, but is also a legitimate solution. We all know that there are *******s who probably would roll up from behind and get really close before using it, and most of us know that it is not a good idea to do so.
That does not mean that it is a bad thing to use as a safety device as long as it is used the right way.
Way too many people assume the most extreme bull**** just so they can make an argument.
This is something that was recommended in a humorous way, but is also a legitimate solution. We all know that there are *******s who probably would roll up from behind and get really close before using it, and most of us know that it is not a good idea to do so.
That does not mean that it is a bad thing to use as a safety device as long as it is used the right way.
Way too many people assume the most extreme bull**** just so they can make an argument.
#63
"Per Ardua ad Surly"
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 1,416
Bikes: Bianchi Specialissima, Mongoose Hilltopper ATB, Surly Cross-Check, Norco City Glide
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Honestly, I run with headphones on because I'm usually out for a 10+ mile run.
If a rider came up on me and blew an airzone at me, I wouldn't be lying in saying I'd probably strike them. I'm not a violent guy - but you'd put me into fight or flight mode...and I'm already running.
Good way to maybe get some mace in the face, or (as I already said) find a 200 lb. 6 foot former linebacker standing over you as you're pulling grass out of your face.
I'd suggest putting the vehicle on the road, and avoiding the multipurpose path.
My wife, she'd probably scream in your face and cause a scene, because people tend to get pissed when you scare them like that. Try it with a woman and you might even find you're facing something worse -
Think they might be terrified you were an attacker?
If a rider came up on me and blew an airzone at me, I wouldn't be lying in saying I'd probably strike them. I'm not a violent guy - but you'd put me into fight or flight mode...and I'm already running.
Good way to maybe get some mace in the face, or (as I already said) find a 200 lb. 6 foot former linebacker standing over you as you're pulling grass out of your face.
I'd suggest putting the vehicle on the road, and avoiding the multipurpose path.
My wife, she'd probably scream in your face and cause a scene, because people tend to get pissed when you scare them like that. Try it with a woman and you might even find you're facing something worse -
Think they might be terrified you were an attacker?
None of this would be an issue if people would just stay to the right and be reasonable. MUPs are just that.... multi-use.