Do Specialized road bikes have proprietary parts?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
306 Posts
Do Specialized road bikes have proprietary parts?
I seem to recall hearing over coffee/beer/whatever that Specialized uses proprietary components on their bikes, forcing you to purchase Specialized gear/parts. Is this true? When I spec them out online, they are using what seems to be Shimano/SRAM components, so I'm unclear on where there proprietary bit comes in. And if Specialized is using proprietary parts/components, what are they exactly? How does it impact on your use of the bike?
Thank you.
Thank you.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
Future Shock is proprietary. It's the only non-trivial proprietary part on my 2019 Roubaix. Hasn't bothered me yet, though it's easy to find plenty of wailing and gnashing of teeth about it on BF.
More of their bikes are using proprietary D-shaped seat posts. My Giant has one too, while my 2019 Roubaix uses standard. I have yet to want to switch posts but prefer standard. D-shape supposedly makes saddle alignment a non-issue, but I've still managed to carelessly misalign my saddle on the Giant by a fair amount when I thought it couldn't happen.
More of their bikes are using proprietary D-shaped seat posts. My Giant has one too, while my 2019 Roubaix uses standard. I have yet to want to switch posts but prefer standard. D-shape supposedly makes saddle alignment a non-issue, but I've still managed to carelessly misalign my saddle on the Giant by a fair amount when I thought it couldn't happen.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,569
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times
in
429 Posts
A lot of manufacturers now use proprietary seatposts, particularly on aero frames. I wouldn't let that be a determining factor.
Several years ago, Specialized released its SCS road disc wheel system, which it thought would be copied by the rest of the industry. It wasn't.
That said, Specialized, like most manufacturers, uses its own branded bars, stems, saddles and wheels, but they can be swapped out with pretty much any other option.
Several years ago, Specialized released its SCS road disc wheel system, which it thought would be copied by the rest of the industry. It wasn't.
That said, Specialized, like most manufacturers, uses its own branded bars, stems, saddles and wheels, but they can be swapped out with pretty much any other option.
Likes For topflightpro:
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6191 Post(s)
Liked 4,806 Times
in
3,315 Posts
Probably the materials of the frame or some unique way they manufacture the frame or any other component they make. But as for the Shimano, SRAM, or any other groupset on them, they are standard in that respect.
But of course Shimano, SRAM and others have their proprietary stuff too.
Are you wanting to copy it and sell it? or just asking if you can put other components on it?
But of course Shimano, SRAM and others have their proprietary stuff too.
Are you wanting to copy it and sell it? or just asking if you can put other components on it?
#6
Junior Member
To better answer your original question, No, the drive trains are not proprietary neither is most of the bike except very specific limited examples as stated above.
#7
Senior Member
More of their bikes are using proprietary D-shaped seat posts. My Giant has one too, while my 2019 Roubaix uses standard. I have yet to want to switch posts but prefer standard. D-shape supposedly makes saddle alignment a non-issue, but I've still managed to carelessly misalign my saddle on the Giant by a fair amount when I thought it couldn't happen.
It being "for alignment" is silly. It's not difficult to adequately align a saddle, and a circular cross-section protects the bicycle by being able to twist in a crash, in addition to allowing the rails to be intentionally positioned non-straight if that's ever needed or desired for whatever reason.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
D-shape is primarily for aerodynamics and compliance.
It being "for alignment" is silly. It's not difficult to adequately align a saddle, and a circular cross-section protects the bicycle by being able to twist in a crash, in addition to allowing the rails to be intentionally positioned non-straight if that's ever needed or desired for whatever reason.
It being "for alignment" is silly. It's not difficult to adequately align a saddle, and a circular cross-section protects the bicycle by being able to twist in a crash, in addition to allowing the rails to be intentionally positioned non-straight if that's ever needed or desired for whatever reason.
I've never noticed any benefit to supposed increased compliance. I don't ride my road bikes like cruisers with all my weight on my butt. You won't see tandem owners wishing they had a D-shaped stoker seat post.
As for aero frame features for a rec cyclist, BF debates the value plenty. It's pretty low on the list of advantages.
What is an actual, tangible, and noticeable difference between D-shaped and standard seat posts is that if I wanted a different seat post, I'd be s.o.l. This is exactly the type of effect of being proprietary that the OP is asking about.
#9
Senior Member
Those were scare quotes, and I was ridiculing the idea. I don't think we disagree with each other.
#11
Senior Member
I didn't mean to imply whether or not you yourself were making the claim. I was disagreeing with the idea, regardless of who suggested it. By using the word "supposedly", it seemed like you were implying that someone was implying that it was one of the reasons for the D-shape.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
306 Posts
Just asking to know what I'm getting in to if I were to purchase a Specialized bike. Am I locked in to their system, for example.
Last edited by NoWhammies; 07-19-19 at 09:27 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
329 Posts
Somewhat depends on the bike you're talking about. Example: I have an older Tricross that uses some sort of proprietary headset--although plenty of people have retrofitted them with third-party headsets.
#15
Full Member
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
They sometimes use their own cranks but Shimano etc can be fitted with adapters.
The earlier model Diverge had an odd rear hub spacing and as has been mentioned there is the future shock on the Roubaix.
So you could say they don't use much odd ball stuff and it certainly is nothing compared to all the proprietary parts on many modern bikes, especially around the bar/stem area.
The earlier model Diverge had an odd rear hub spacing and as has been mentioned there is the future shock on the Roubaix.
So you could say they don't use much odd ball stuff and it certainly is nothing compared to all the proprietary parts on many modern bikes, especially around the bar/stem area.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
I didn't mean to imply whether or not you yourself were making the claim. I was disagreeing with the idea, regardless of who suggested it. By using the word "supposedly", it seemed like you were implying that someone was implying that it was one of the reasons for the D-shape.
#18
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
What are the chances of getting parts for the future shock in 15 years?
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Actually pretty good. They have 3 models with it and I have a feeling that it will be part of their production for the next 10 years at least. Epic XC ones on the other hand are going to be very hard to come bye.