What weekly mileage (IYO) almost guarantees weight loss?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
What weekly mileage (IYO) almost guarantees weight loss?
I'm a marginal Clyde. In my distant youth, running 50-70 miles/week I could eat a house without gaining weight; I was an extremely fit 185-190 lbs. Now I'm a senior citizen cyclist and I believe that the equivalent cycling weekly mileage is north of 100 miles, but not far north. I do ride hard and I know that my base metabolism is definitely up, but I think once I get up to 125 miles/week I should be able to inch my way down to 185 lbs without paying much attention to what I consume. Anyone else have a similar experience.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: PNW - USA
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was/am 290lbs and last summer was riding 75-80 miles per week for 6 months.I was eating normally and not counting calories. I lost 5lb. Its all about diet, diet and diet. Unfortunately.
#3
SuperGimp
It's hard to slack off while running but it's incredibly easy while cycling, so your question is a little misleading. Are you hammering for 100 miles a week? Cruising? You get the point. I can ride 100 miles a week and not lose a drop of weight (dammit)
Btw, I would call 50 miles a week a ton! If you want to pick an equivalent for cycling, maybe 200 a week. I figure a marathon is vaguely equivalent to a century so that's where my math comes from. Marathons are harder and centuries probably take longer but I figure they're roughly equivalent.
Btw, I would call 50 miles a week a ton! If you want to pick an equivalent for cycling, maybe 200 a week. I figure a marathon is vaguely equivalent to a century so that's where my math comes from. Marathons are harder and centuries probably take longer but I figure they're roughly equivalent.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 2,844
Bikes: '13 Spech Roubaix SL4 Expert
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^ I would have to say about 200 a week which is doable but it is a lot. I average 160-180 and with some diet I am able to stay very lean for now. Be sure to put down the hammer too because intensity does help ALOT!
__________________
Cat 6 going on PRO....
Cat 6 going on PRO....
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I probably ride hard twice a week; at least 1/2 my mileage would be hard, some of it as a result of climbing. For me anything greater than 50-60'/mile I can't escape working hard. Cruising would be limited to those occasions when I do an easy 14 mile round trip for a cup of coffee. Of course, it's all about perspective. My running pace on steep climbs in my late 30's was faster than my riding ace in my late 60's! Getting old is a real bummer, but the alternative ain't so hot.
#6
got the climbing bug
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,204
Bikes: one for everything
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Liked 908 Times
in
273 Posts
9-10hrs/ week using any bike in my harem, once a month get a 12+hr week in there, once every 6wks, have recovery week w/ less then 5. I worry about getting faster, no matter what I weigh..... What works for me most likely won't work for you.
__________________
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
#7
Uber Goober
You can gain weight while riding a 1,000 miles a month. I know, I've done it.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#8
Senior Member
You can't outride a bad diet.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Just south of the Northern Border
Posts: 178
Bikes: 1996 Trek 820 Mountain Bike, 2010 Gary Fisher Tarpon, 2013 Trek Domane 4.5C, 2013 Orbea H20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are no guarantees in life. Like others posted, I can gain weight while riding as well. One must watch what one eats.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,617
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I see some gains at ~100 miles a week, but it depends on the miles. HRM has helped with the training. When I commute in, my heart rate averages 130 bpm, when I'm riding with some intensity, it's 160+. Do the commute miles burn some calories, sure, but not the same level as a harder ride. 30 mile commute = 800 calories, 20 mile road ride, 900+ calories.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,059
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 15,299 Times
in
7,231 Posts
+1. I did it while crossing the country fully loaded. We were averaging probably 60 miles/day with a rest day every 7th day or so. Once we got out of the mountains I kept eating like I was eating while riding in the mountains. 60 miles in flat eastern Montana is not 60 miles in the mountains of Washington State. I put on some poundage through the plains/midwest.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,689
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 413 Times
in
246 Posts
BB (former Clyde)
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,689
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 413 Times
in
246 Posts
FWIW, I generally figure 1 mile walking = 3-4 miles biking, given the same level of effort. Apparently most of the exercise/tracker apps I use do as well, as they generally credit me with 20-40 calories per mile biking and 70-100 calories per mile walking.
BB (former Clyde)
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#15
Lance Legweak
Everybody is different. As you age your metabolism slows, as you gain weight your metabolism slows, then there's your diet and weather conditions that can affect metabolism. The best thing to do is make sure you are on a good diet (keeping a food diary can open up your eyes as to how many calories you are actually consuming) and trying different distances to see where you are at. If I don't do at least 40 miles three times a week I don't seem to lose any weight, and at 35 miles I basically just maintain. If I push it to the 50 mile range, then I seem to lose much more, but if it's windy or I do hills, then obviously I burn more calories, so try and find a good distance for you. Once you feel comfortable, then add no more than 10% increase in distance and do that for at least a couple of weeks to allow your body to adapt. You should find a point where you start losing nicely. They say 2 LBS per week is good, but sometimes I'm lucky to get 1/2 to 1 LBS no matter what. As long as the weight is going in the right direction, then it's working.
#16
Senior Member
And you sir, beat me to it as well.
I keep track of what I burn both running and biking and plug that and my meals into Training Peaks. These are what Garmin and Powertap tells me, of course your data would be different
On average I burn 100 calories a mile running so a 10K in an hour I burn ~600 calories.
I also burn ~600 calories/hr on the bike on a flat 47'/mi ride at 18 mph.
I can, and have easily out eat those figures
Using our esteemed colleague TrojanHorse math...
My flat century would take 6 hrs = 6 *600 = 3600
The Mountains of Misery century (10,000' gain) took me 6 1/2 hrs and 4,300 calories.
The marathon (MCM in DC) I ran last year took me 4:49; round to 5 and I get 5 * 600 = 3000 however my Garmin reported 2,060
End of the day it's calories in vs calories out. Its not Rocket Surgery...
I keep track of what I burn both running and biking and plug that and my meals into Training Peaks. These are what Garmin and Powertap tells me, of course your data would be different
On average I burn 100 calories a mile running so a 10K in an hour I burn ~600 calories.
I also burn ~600 calories/hr on the bike on a flat 47'/mi ride at 18 mph.
I can, and have easily out eat those figures
Using our esteemed colleague TrojanHorse math...
My flat century would take 6 hrs = 6 *600 = 3600
The Mountains of Misery century (10,000' gain) took me 6 1/2 hrs and 4,300 calories.
The marathon (MCM in DC) I ran last year took me 4:49; round to 5 and I get 5 * 600 = 3000 however my Garmin reported 2,060
End of the day it's calories in vs calories out. Its not Rocket Surgery...
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,079
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I didn't lose any weight until I started riding over 100 miles a week. At 150-175 miles a week I don't really have to watch what I eat. Which means I can have soda, beer and some cookies but I don't generally eat a lot of junk.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From my experience, assuming you show some semblance of control and moderately good choices in your diet, the key to get out and do long rides. I have found I can do 5 1 hour rides a week and lose/maintain weight OK. BUT, in a week where I do a 3 hour and 2 1 hour rides, I'll drop more that week.
Just my personal experience.
Just my personal experience.
#20
Senior Member
I'm a marginal Clyde. In my distant youth, running 50-70 miles/week I could eat a house without gaining weight; I was an extremely fit 185-190 lbs. Now I'm a senior citizen cyclist and I believe that the equivalent cycling weekly mileage is north of 100 miles, but not far north. I do ride hard and I know that my base metabolism is definitely up, but I think once I get up to 125 miles/week I should be able to inch my way down to 185 lbs without paying much attention to what I consume. Anyone else have a similar experience.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Here is the only thing that guarantees weight loss:
Expending more calories than you ingest every day.
Remember that the more you ride, the more fuel that the engine needs. The longer the individual ride, the more important it is to re-fuel mid-ride. We often don't eat the right things on long rides. Most energy bars have a crap load of calories and carbs.
Also, having been both a serious runner and a serious cyclist in my life (at different times), running 70 miles a week expends way more calories than cycling 100 miles a week. You may only burn 200-300 extra calories during a 15 mile ride, depending on body weight and effort. You'll burn a lot more than that running 10 miles.
Expending more calories than you ingest every day.
Remember that the more you ride, the more fuel that the engine needs. The longer the individual ride, the more important it is to re-fuel mid-ride. We often don't eat the right things on long rides. Most energy bars have a crap load of calories and carbs.
Also, having been both a serious runner and a serious cyclist in my life (at different times), running 70 miles a week expends way more calories than cycling 100 miles a week. You may only burn 200-300 extra calories during a 15 mile ride, depending on body weight and effort. You'll burn a lot more than that running 10 miles.
Last edited by mprelaw; 01-30-14 at 03:56 PM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: the wall
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm 44, 6'1". february 2013 I was down to 225. Averaged 125 mi/wk for the whole year, and weighed 245 at the end of the year. I ate most anything I wanted. Didn't work at all.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ellensburg,WA
Posts: 3,175
Bikes: Schwinn Broadway, Specialized Secteur Sport(crashed) Spec. Roubaix Sport, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times
in
80 Posts
Lots of miles at a moderate pace works best. To many hard miles and you will likely hunger more than you need causing you to out eat your riding. 1 mile running ~= 4-5 miles on the bike. I had the best weight loss when I was riding every day, several times a day. Some days a morning commute 3.25 miles at the time, short lunch time ride and then a longer after work commute, often 12+ miles. Then on weekends longer rides 30-70 miles. All the while paying attention to what I was eating. Salads for lunches during the work week. Weekend rides were done through lunch time so if I ate it was about 200 calories per hour on the bike nutrition. Eggs nearly every morning for breakfast. Meat for dinners with veggies but not lots of carbs. Once or twice a week we did eat spaghetti. Other exception to that was tortillas when we had tacos or fajitas. Stayed away from bread at lunch and dinner and limited potatoes.
What will work for you might be a far cry from what worked for me. How much time are you willing to commit to riding in an effort to lose weight? 125 miles a week along with eating to lose weight should get you there.
What will work for you might be a far cry from what worked for me. How much time are you willing to commit to riding in an effort to lose weight? 125 miles a week along with eating to lose weight should get you there.
__________________
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
Sir Mark, Knight of Sufferlandria
#25
Senior Member
If all you wanted to eat was vegetables, then all you wanted was low calories. If you state that you ate dinner and then ate cake and all you wanted was a piece of cake every night and your total calorie intake was less than you used, then that still plugs right into the formula in<out=loss.
If what you wanted was to eat nothing but 3 large high calorie pieces of cake every day for every meal and for snacks between meals and for snacks in the evening and rode your bike 2 miles after work every day, when you plugged those numbers into the formula, it wouldn't work. It would end up reversing and being in>out=gain.
Thus, just saying you ate whatever you want is still a variable and is not a factual statement because what you want can and would be different to what someone else wants.