Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Hybrid Bicycles
Reload this Page >

Benefit of a better crankset?

Search
Notices
Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

Benefit of a better crankset?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-11, 07:37 PM
  #1  
Triaxtremec
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 202

Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Sport, Kona Kahuna 29er, Santa Cruz Nickel 650b, Cannondale CAAD 10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Benefit of a better crankset?

I have a Sirrus Sport 2010 and was curious of the benefits of upgrading the crankset as well as what crank to choose?
Triaxtremec is offline  
Old 05-17-11, 09:01 PM
  #2  
nfmisso
Nigel
 
nfmisso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991

Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Benefit: separates you from your money; enriching the supplier and manufacturer.

Why do you want to change it? Are the gear ratio not to your liking? The wrong color?
nfmisso is offline  
Old 05-17-11, 09:20 PM
  #3  
Triaxtremec
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 202

Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Sport, Kona Kahuna 29er, Santa Cruz Nickel 650b, Cannondale CAAD 10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I feel like I'm shifting constantly, kinda drive me nuts sometimes, other than that works great but doesn't look as cool as others. I'm not going to buy a new one just based on looks. I guess I just don't understand why some can be $40 and other $400 and the benefits of them.
Triaxtremec is offline  
Old 05-17-11, 10:49 PM
  #4  
NukeouT
Senior Member
 
NukeouT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 446

Bikes: 1996 LeMond Yellow Jersey, 2013 Soma Saga, 1980 Zebrakenko Wind, 1980 Nishiki Ultimate

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Sometimes teeth wear down, which can cause bad shifting. They should be flat instead of pointy.

You can also get damage on your square-taper cranks from putting them on too tight or riding on them when they are too loose. This often also warrants a replacement.

Aside from that sometimes you want to change amount of teeth or crank length. I moved from a 165mm crankset to a 170 standard and it made a positive difference for me.

Some cranks also come with an outer chain guard to protect your pants from getting eaten.

Others are newer so they are simply lighter in weight.

Some new high-end cranksets out there like SRAM can measure the torque you put into them.

Some may be needed for special drive-trains and chains, although I know little about this. I mainly stick to vintage parts.
NukeouT is offline  
Old 05-18-11, 02:42 AM
  #5  
nfmisso
Nigel
 
nfmisso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991

Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Triaxtremec
I feel like I'm shifting constantly, kinda drive me nuts sometimes, other than that works great but doesn't look as cool as others. I'm not going to buy a new one just based on looks. I guess I just don't understand why some can be $40 and other $400 and the benefits of them.
why are you shifting constantly? just can't find the right gear - what you really want is between two that you have?

you have not really defined the problem well, nor not adequately stated what you currently have to provide anyone enough information to suggest any solutions.

Information needed:
* number of teeth on every sprocket of your cassette/freewheel.
* number of teeth on each chain ring.
* tire size
* terrain the you ride.
* front and rear combinations that you are currently using, and under what conditions when riding.

For example; on my commuter:
14 - 16 - 18 - 20 - 22 - 24 - 34
40/52
32-630
mostly flat, one underpass and one over pass in 12 mile one way commute.
On the level I start off in 52/24, and shift up to cruise in 52/16; 52/18 if there is a mild head wind and 52/14 with a strong tail wind. For the over/under passes I get down to the 52/22 if I do not have to stop due to traffic. I do not use the 40T chain ring during my normal commute.

I am planning on changing to 13,15,17,19,21,24,28 in the near future, mainly for the smaller jump between 24-28 compared with 24-34 which is tough on the knees.
nfmisso is offline  
Old 05-18-11, 03:48 AM
  #6  
AdelaaR
Senior Member
 
AdelaaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vlaamse Ardennen, Belgium
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Glad to know I'm not the only hybrid rider staying on his 52 chainring nearly all the time

OP, as nfmisso said, you should clearly state your problem otherwise it is impossible to suggest anything.
AdelaaR is offline  
Old 05-18-11, 05:30 AM
  #7  
qmsdc15
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Triax, shifting a lot is good. If the shifting is working well, and the chain is running smoothly, don't change anything. I usually stay in my middle ring until I need something bigger or smaller.

My theory is if you change your chain often enough you should never need new chainrings, but in practice no one changes his chain that often and eventually rings wear out. Most bikes these days come with chainrings riveted together rather than bolted, so when you've worn out one of the rings, you need to replace the whole crankset.

I've purchased a crank with Hollowtech bottom bracket for when I need to replace the crank on my MTB. It's a lot lighter than the stock crank/BB. It was on sale and I figure I'll need it sooner or later.
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 05-18-11, 06:01 AM
  #8  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Triaxtremec
I guess I just don't understand why some can be $40 and other $400 and the benefits of them.
At the very low end, you tend to get stamped rings, riveted-together sets in which the rings cannot be changed, steel rings instead of aluminum, old-style bottom-bracket choices such as square-taper.

As you move up the price scale, you tend to see more CNC machining on the rings (improves shifting), stronger alloys, alloy rings instead of steel (less weight), bolts instead of rivets, so that you can replace individual rings, hollowed out crank arms (on many Shimano models), etc.

You do get to the point of diminishing returns. For my mountain bikes, I've been buying either the Shimano LX cranks from Jenson at $89, or SLX cranks when on sale for less than $150. A racer might benefit from spending more to shed a few grams, but I prefer to stay in the middle zone and focus on bang-for-the-buck.
JonathanGennick is offline  
Old 05-18-11, 06:12 AM
  #9  
qmsdc15
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The LX from Jensen USA is the one I bought for my MTB. The 44t big ring maybe too small for a hybrid but with 11t small cog, 108 gear inches, not bad. I need to get my BB shell faced before installing that, right?
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 05-18-11, 06:27 AM
  #10  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 37 Posts
Originally Posted by qmsdc15
I need to get my BB shell faced before installing that, right?
Getting the shell faced is the gold-standard, yes. I will confess that on my latest build, that I just slapped the chainset on without facing. But the "best practice" is to face the bottom-bracket to ensure that the two sides are square with each other.
JonathanGennick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tara1234
Bicycle Mechanics
26
06-28-17 07:15 PM
Santaria
Bicycle Mechanics
15
02-01-15 10:08 PM
Geoffmcc99
Bicycle Mechanics
12
08-02-14 05:12 PM
tommyt2010
Road Cycling
12
07-03-10 11:14 AM
AFoe
Bicycle Mechanics
6
05-27-10 01:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.